06-07-2021, 11:05 AM
I think Assyrian's point is spot on, the strengths of JMU are obvious to us and plenty of fans of teams associated with us but are they obvious to the people that can be a part of getting us that conference invite? It's not hard to lay out why we can see JMU as a good fit that would benefit a conference, but it's hard to tell if the people that have a say in adding JMU to their conference will see it anywhere near the same way.
There are even some things I see as upside that likely have conferences looking at the exact same thing as a downside. Mostly being FCS. The way I see it, we're working with 63 scholarships and we're recruiting under the FCS/CAA label but putting together teams that can beat SMU, lead UNC through the first quarter, blow out ECU, and hang to the end with WVU/NC State. So imagine what we could do with 85 scholarships and recruiting under the FBS/AAC label. But is that how the people in the AAC that matter will look at it? I think 95% of fans that aren't JMU fans would say no. We don't know though, and hopefully the admin has a good feel for the real answer to those type questions and will do everything they can to improve on the things that are seen as a negative.
There are even some things I see as upside that likely have conferences looking at the exact same thing as a downside. Mostly being FCS. The way I see it, we're working with 63 scholarships and we're recruiting under the FCS/CAA label but putting together teams that can beat SMU, lead UNC through the first quarter, blow out ECU, and hang to the end with WVU/NC State. So imagine what we could do with 85 scholarships and recruiting under the FBS/AAC label. But is that how the people in the AAC that matter will look at it? I think 95% of fans that aren't JMU fans would say no. We don't know though, and hopefully the admin has a good feel for the real answer to those type questions and will do everything they can to improve on the things that are seen as a negative.