09-23-2020, 10:04 PM
(09-23-2020 12:15 PM)Statefan Wrote: [ -> ]Just because Navy can not compete in basketball why do people assume that the ACC would freeze out their other Olympic Athletes.
You can be FB only or all in.
(09-23-2020 12:15 PM)Statefan Wrote: [ -> ]Just because Navy can not compete in basketball why do people assume that the ACC would freeze out their other Olympic Athletes.
(09-23-2020 09:17 PM)RUScarlets Wrote: [ -> ](09-23-2020 09:52 AM)DFW HOYA Wrote: [ -> ]16 is too many, the ACC knows that. They've scuttled a powerful brand for taking ESPN's bait to split up the Big East to save them money.
A 12 team ACC (so long to BC, Pitt, and post-Boeheim Syracuse) would be a powerful combination.
Big East Football was greater than the sum of its parts because of the rivalries and the media focus. If you just kept the North East monopoly, you could have let Miami go and all the schools would have been better off collectively. Now, some schools are winners and others are losers. That's Darwinism I suppose, but even a football conference with:
South: Pitt, WVU, UC, UL, USF, UCF
North: RU, UConn, BC, Cuse, Navy (FB only), Temple
That conference would have never lost P6 status in football let alone BBall. Now half those schools are set years back while the others sold out to greed (and obscurity in most cases). ESPN sadly didn't want to shell out two separate contracts and tried to cut costs, diluting the product overall.
(09-23-2020 10:35 PM)Nerdlinger Wrote: [ -> ](09-23-2020 09:17 PM)RUScarlets Wrote: [ -> ](09-23-2020 09:52 AM)DFW HOYA Wrote: [ -> ]16 is too many, the ACC knows that. They've scuttled a powerful brand for taking ESPN's bait to split up the Big East to save them money.
A 12 team ACC (so long to BC, Pitt, and post-Boeheim Syracuse) would be a powerful combination.
Big East Football was greater than the sum of its parts because of the rivalries and the media focus. If you just kept the North East monopoly, you could have let Miami go and all the schools would have been better off collectively. Now, some schools are winners and others are losers. That's Darwinism I suppose, but even a football conference with:
South: Pitt, WVU, UC, UL, USF, UCF
North: RU, UConn, BC, Cuse, Navy (FB only), Temple
That conference would have never lost P6 status in football let alone BBall. Now half those schools are set years back while the others sold out to greed (and obscurity in most cases). ESPN sadly didn't want to shell out two separate contracts and tried to cut costs, diluting the product overall.
It's questionable that a conference like that would have maintained power status in football into the CFP era. And in any case, they lack a monopoly on the Northeast without the strongest school, Penn State.
(09-23-2020 11:40 AM)oliveandblue Wrote: [ -> ]Tulane has a near ideal ACC university profile, but needs more seasoning in the American before its athletic programs are ACC standard. The ACC should wait until Tulane is ready - and that will be around 8-10 years provided that Tulane continues to grow (and that may never happen).
(09-24-2020 04:17 AM)CliftonAve Wrote: [ -> ](09-23-2020 10:35 PM)Nerdlinger Wrote: [ -> ](09-23-2020 09:17 PM)RUScarlets Wrote: [ -> ](09-23-2020 09:52 AM)DFW HOYA Wrote: [ -> ]16 is too many, the ACC knows that. They've scuttled a powerful brand for taking ESPN's bait to split up the Big East to save them money.
A 12 team ACC (so long to BC, Pitt, and post-Boeheim Syracuse) would be a powerful combination.
Big East Football was greater than the sum of its parts because of the rivalries and the media focus. If you just kept the North East monopoly, you could have let Miami go and all the schools would have been better off collectively. Now, some schools are winners and others are losers. That's Darwinism I suppose, but even a football conference with:
South: Pitt, WVU, UC, UL, USF, UCF
North: RU, UConn, BC, Cuse, Navy (FB only), Temple
That conference would have never lost P6 status in football let alone BBall. Now half those schools are set years back while the others sold out to greed (and obscurity in most cases). ESPN sadly didn't want to shell out two separate contracts and tried to cut costs, diluting the product overall.
It's questionable that a conference like that would have maintained power status in football into the CFP era. And in any case, they lack a monopoly on the Northeast without the strongest school, Penn State.
Under the metrics of the BCS system that conference would still be an automatic qualifier. Had that conference remained, I don’t think the schools would have the authority to blow up the BCS system.
RU is right though, there were some great rivalries there. Obviously you had WVU/Pitt, UC/UL, WVU/UL, UC/Pitt, SU/UConn, SU/Rutgers, UConn/Rutgers.. the first two were much more established that the later but I think those other series were starting to perculate over the years. For me as a UC fan, I thought the Ohio River quadrant of WVU, Pitt, Louisville and Cincinnati was just starting to gel and become established as an anchor of football in that conference. I witnessed a lot of people here in Ohio care about BE football that otherwise would not have been in the past... I am no speaking of Cincinnati here I am talking about other parts of the state that would time in for a UC/Pitt or WVU game. The TV ratings for the 2009 UC/Pitt game rivaled the ratings for Ohio State/Penn State game which had been played the week before.
(09-24-2020 04:17 AM)CliftonAve Wrote: [ -> ](09-23-2020 10:35 PM)Nerdlinger Wrote: [ -> ](09-23-2020 09:17 PM)RUScarlets Wrote: [ -> ](09-23-2020 09:52 AM)DFW HOYA Wrote: [ -> ]16 is too many, the ACC knows that. They've scuttled a powerful brand for taking ESPN's bait to split up the Big East to save them money.
A 12 team ACC (so long to BC, Pitt, and post-Boeheim Syracuse) would be a powerful combination.
Big East Football was greater than the sum of its parts because of the rivalries and the media focus. If you just kept the North East monopoly, you could have let Miami go and all the schools would have been better off collectively. Now, some schools are winners and others are losers. That's Darwinism I suppose, but even a football conference with:
South: Pitt, WVU, UC, UL, USF, UCF
North: RU, UConn, BC, Cuse, Navy (FB only), Temple
That conference would have never lost P6 status in football let alone BBall. Now half those schools are set years back while the others sold out to greed (and obscurity in most cases). ESPN sadly didn't want to shell out two separate contracts and tried to cut costs, diluting the product overall.
It's questionable that a conference like that would have maintained power status in football into the CFP era. And in any case, they lack a monopoly on the Northeast without the strongest school, Penn State.
Under the metrics of the BCS system that conference would still be an automatic qualifier. Had that conference remained, I don’t think the schools would have the authority to blow up the BCS system.
RU is right though, there were some great rivalries there. Obviously you had WVU/Pitt, UC/UL, WVU/UL, UC/Pitt, SU/UConn, SU/Rutgers, UConn/Rutgers.. the first two were much more established that the later but I think those other series were starting to perculate over the years.
(09-24-2020 08:57 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote: [ -> ]I don't see the scenario where any of the service academies ever join a Power 5 conference. Semi-pro sports simply are not what they are about. They don't need the money and in most of their sports they would be hampered by academic and size limitation standards.
(09-24-2020 06:57 AM)Fighting Muskie Wrote: [ -> ](09-24-2020 04:17 AM)CliftonAve Wrote: [ -> ](09-23-2020 10:35 PM)Nerdlinger Wrote: [ -> ](09-23-2020 09:17 PM)RUScarlets Wrote: [ -> ](09-23-2020 09:52 AM)DFW HOYA Wrote: [ -> ]16 is too many, the ACC knows that. They've scuttled a powerful brand for taking ESPN's bait to split up the Big East to save them money.
A 12 team ACC (so long to BC, Pitt, and post-Boeheim Syracuse) would be a powerful combination.
Big East Football was greater than the sum of its parts because of the rivalries and the media focus. If you just kept the North East monopoly, you could have let Miami go and all the schools would have been better off collectively. Now, some schools are winners and others are losers. That's Darwinism I suppose, but even a football conference with:
South: Pitt, WVU, UC, UL, USF, UCF
North: RU, UConn, BC, Cuse, Navy (FB only), Temple
That conference would have never lost P6 status in football let alone BBall. Now half those schools are set years back while the others sold out to greed (and obscurity in most cases). ESPN sadly didn't want to shell out two separate contracts and tried to cut costs, diluting the product overall.
It's questionable that a conference like that would have maintained power status in football into the CFP era. And in any case, they lack a monopoly on the Northeast without the strongest school, Penn State.
Under the metrics of the BCS system that conference would still be an automatic qualifier. Had that conference remained, I don’t think the schools would have the authority to blow up the BCS system.
RU is right though, there were some great rivalries there. Obviously you had WVU/Pitt, UC/UL, WVU/UL, UC/Pitt, SU/UConn, SU/Rutgers, UConn/Rutgers.. the first two were much more established that the later but I think those other series were starting to perculate over the years. For me as a UC fan, I thought the Ohio River quadrant of WVU, Pitt, Louisville and Cincinnati was just starting to gel and become established as an anchor of football in that conference. I witnessed a lot of people here in Ohio care about BE football that otherwise would not have been in the past... I am no speaking of Cincinnati here I am talking about other parts of the state that would time in for a UC/Pitt or WVU game. The TV ratings for the 2009 UC/Pitt game rivaled the ratings for Ohio State/Penn State game which had been played the week before.
I really enjoyed the 2005-2011 Big East. I was in UG during part of that stretch and watched a lot of college football. I was one of those Ohioans who started following the Bearcats during that stretch. The teams were competitive and the games were exciting. Like you said, the new rivalries that were starting to emerge were fun to watch. They unfortunately lacked the big name programs that could demand big tv dollars which meant the grass was going to be greener on the other side for anyone who left so they couldn’t keep it together. ESPN ultimately decided to kill BE football.
I do wish they had the foresight to bring UCF in as a fb affiliate if not a full member. It would have given USF a true in conference rival and ensured everyone played in FL every single year.
(09-24-2020 12:23 PM)slhNavy91 Wrote: [ -> ](09-24-2020 08:57 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote: [ -> ]I don't see the scenario where any of the service academies ever join a Power 5 conference. Semi-pro sports simply are not what they are about. They don't need the money and in most of their sports they would be hampered by academic and size limitation standards.
Except that Navy DID join then-BCS-Auto-Qualifier Big East, signing paperwork on 24 Jan 2012.
And I hope that "they don't need the money" is not the ill-informed idea that your federal government dollars fund Navy sports.
The Naval Academy Athletic Association is a 501.c.3 organization independent of the U.S. Navy, with operating agreements in place with the U.S. Naval Academy. About 1% of the $40M+ budget is federal, appropriated dollars because some of the coaches and staff ARE also employees of USNA (P.E. department, active duty officers, athletic trainers) and that much of travel costs etc are just inextricable. If the NAAA could get that to zero, they would.
Otherwise, the NAAA supports 33 varsity intercollegiate sports and provides varying levels of support to club teams, from revenue sports - mainly football.
(09-24-2020 02:18 PM)MidknightWhiskey Wrote: [ -> ](09-24-2020 06:57 AM)Fighting Muskie Wrote: [ -> ](09-24-2020 04:17 AM)CliftonAve Wrote: [ -> ](09-23-2020 10:35 PM)Nerdlinger Wrote: [ -> ](09-23-2020 09:17 PM)RUScarlets Wrote: [ -> ]Big East Football was greater than the sum of its parts because of the rivalries and the media focus. If you just kept the North East monopoly, you could have let Miami go and all the schools would have been better off collectively. Now, some schools are winners and others are losers. That's Darwinism I suppose, but even a football conference with:
South: Pitt, WVU, UC, UL, USF, UCF
North: RU, UConn, BC, Cuse, Navy (FB only), Temple
That conference would have never lost P6 status in football let alone BBall. Now half those schools are set years back while the others sold out to greed (and obscurity in most cases). ESPN sadly didn't want to shell out two separate contracts and tried to cut costs, diluting the product overall.
It's questionable that a conference like that would have maintained power status in football into the CFP era. And in any case, they lack a monopoly on the Northeast without the strongest school, Penn State.
Under the metrics of the BCS system that conference would still be an automatic qualifier. Had that conference remained, I don’t think the schools would have the authority to blow up the BCS system.
RU is right though, there were some great rivalries there. Obviously you had WVU/Pitt, UC/UL, WVU/UL, UC/Pitt, SU/UConn, SU/Rutgers, UConn/Rutgers.. the first two were much more established that the later but I think those other series were starting to perculate over the years. For me as a UC fan, I thought the Ohio River quadrant of WVU, Pitt, Louisville and Cincinnati was just starting to gel and become established as an anchor of football in that conference. I witnessed a lot of people here in Ohio care about BE football that otherwise would not have been in the past... I am no speaking of Cincinnati here I am talking about other parts of the state that would time in for a UC/Pitt or WVU game. The TV ratings for the 2009 UC/Pitt game rivaled the ratings for Ohio State/Penn State game which had been played the week before.
I really enjoyed the 2005-2011 Big East. I was in UG during part of that stretch and watched a lot of college football. I was one of those Ohioans who started following the Bearcats during that stretch. The teams were competitive and the games were exciting. Like you said, the new rivalries that were starting to emerge were fun to watch. They unfortunately lacked the big name programs that could demand big tv dollars which meant the grass was going to be greener on the other side for anyone who left so they couldn’t keep it together. ESPN ultimately decided to kill BE football.
I do wish they had the foresight to bring UCF in as a fb affiliate if not a full member. It would have given USF a true in conference rival and ensured everyone played in FL every single year.
They did. I believe Pitt's chancellor was one of the biggest advocates for adding UCF. usf's president continuously sided with the basketball only schools against adding UCF. UCF was eventually invited to the Big East but between the invite and playing the first season the realignment chaos ensued.
(09-24-2020 02:40 PM)quo vadis Wrote: [ -> ](09-24-2020 12:23 PM)slhNavy91 Wrote: [ -> ](09-24-2020 08:57 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote: [ -> ]I don't see the scenario where any of the service academies ever join a Power 5 conference. Semi-pro sports simply are not what they are about. They don't need the money and in most of their sports they would be hampered by academic and size limitation standards.
Except that Navy DID join then-BCS-Auto-Qualifier Big East, signing paperwork on 24 Jan 2012.
And I hope that "they don't need the money" is not the ill-informed idea that your federal government dollars fund Navy sports.
The Naval Academy Athletic Association is a 501.c.3 organization independent of the U.S. Navy, with operating agreements in place with the U.S. Naval Academy. About 1% of the $40M+ budget is federal, appropriated dollars because some of the coaches and staff ARE also employees of USNA (P.E. department, active duty officers, athletic trainers) and that much of travel costs etc are just inextricable. If the NAAA could get that to zero, they would.
Otherwise, the NAAA supports 33 varsity intercollegiate sports and provides varying levels of support to club teams, from revenue sports - mainly football.
Well, it's not "independent of the US Navy". As the website says:
"All negotiations, plans, appointments and acts of the NAAA which directly affect the Naval Academy athletic program are subject to the review of the NAAA Board of Control (Chaired by the Commandant of the Naval Academy) and ultimately the approval of the Superintendent of the Naval Academy."
https://navysports.com/sports/2018/5/23/...-html.aspx
(09-24-2020 02:18 PM)MidknightWhiskey Wrote: [ -> ](09-24-2020 06:57 AM)Fighting Muskie Wrote: [ -> ](09-24-2020 04:17 AM)CliftonAve Wrote: [ -> ](09-23-2020 10:35 PM)Nerdlinger Wrote: [ -> ](09-23-2020 09:17 PM)RUScarlets Wrote: [ -> ]Big East Football was greater than the sum of its parts because of the rivalries and the media focus. If you just kept the North East monopoly, you could have let Miami go and all the schools would have been better off collectively. Now, some schools are winners and others are losers. That's Darwinism I suppose, but even a football conference with:
South: Pitt, WVU, UC, UL, USF, UCF
North: RU, UConn, BC, Cuse, Navy (FB only), Temple
That conference would have never lost P6 status in football let alone BBall. Now half those schools are set years back while the others sold out to greed (and obscurity in most cases). ESPN sadly didn't want to shell out two separate contracts and tried to cut costs, diluting the product overall.
It's questionable that a conference like that would have maintained power status in football into the CFP era. And in any case, they lack a monopoly on the Northeast without the strongest school, Penn State.
Under the metrics of the BCS system that conference would still be an automatic qualifier. Had that conference remained, I don’t think the schools would have the authority to blow up the BCS system.
RU is right though, there were some great rivalries there. Obviously you had WVU/Pitt, UC/UL, WVU/UL, UC/Pitt, SU/UConn, SU/Rutgers, UConn/Rutgers.. the first two were much more established that the later but I think those other series were starting to perculate over the years. For me as a UC fan, I thought the Ohio River quadrant of WVU, Pitt, Louisville and Cincinnati was just starting to gel and become established as an anchor of football in that conference. I witnessed a lot of people here in Ohio care about BE football that otherwise would not have been in the past... I am no speaking of Cincinnati here I am talking about other parts of the state that would time in for a UC/Pitt or WVU game. The TV ratings for the 2009 UC/Pitt game rivaled the ratings for Ohio State/Penn State game which had been played the week before.
I really enjoyed the 2005-2011 Big East. I was in UG during part of that stretch and watched a lot of college football. I was one of those Ohioans who started following the Bearcats during that stretch. The teams were competitive and the games were exciting. Like you said, the new rivalries that were starting to emerge were fun to watch. They unfortunately lacked the big name programs that could demand big tv dollars which meant the grass was going to be greener on the other side for anyone who left so they couldn’t keep it together. ESPN ultimately decided to kill BE football.
I do wish they had the foresight to bring UCF in as a fb affiliate if not a full member. It would have given USF a true in conference rival and ensured everyone played in FL every single year.
They did. I believe Pitt's chancellor was one of the biggest advocates for adding UCF. usf's president continuously sided with the basketball only schools against adding UCF. UCF was eventually invited to the Big East but between the invite and playing the first season the realignment chaos ensued.
(09-24-2020 06:51 PM)CrazyPaco Wrote: [ -> ]Pitt led the charge to add TCU, and then UCF. WVU and Rutgers were on board with UCF. Others, particularly Louisville and USF, were not, nor were the basketball schools, and tried to push Villanova and their "Duke plan" playing in an 18K seat stadium. That was actually the end of the Big East. The fissure caused by that was irreconcilable as the revenue gap growing between the Big East and the rest of the AQs was not going to slow by adding Villanova football.
(09-24-2020 07:36 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote: [ -> ]If the Big East hadn’t been assaulted on 3 fronts I wonder how things would have worked out for them. I wonder if USF would have eventually caved on the UCF issue and then, if their BCS status could be secured, BYU and Boise St as fb affiliates.
I suppose the fairest way to organize things would have been a zipper:
It was inevitable that the house was going to fall. The Big 12 needed a 10th; the ACC was nervous and needed new markets, and the Big Ten saw easy money from T3 sitting there for the taking.
(09-24-2020 07:19 PM)DFW HOYA Wrote: [ -> ](09-24-2020 06:51 PM)CrazyPaco Wrote: [ -> ]Pitt led the charge to add TCU, and then UCF. WVU and Rutgers were on board with UCF. Others, particularly Louisville and USF, were not, nor were the basketball schools, and tried to push Villanova and their "Duke plan" playing in an 18K seat stadium. That was actually the end of the Big East. The fissure caused by that was irreconcilable as the revenue gap growing between the Big East and the rest of the AQs was not going to slow by adding Villanova football.
Villanova was one week away from a trustees vote to add I-A football when Pitt submarined the deal by announcing its move to the ACC. The two schools have enjoyed a frosty relationship over the years and the timing was curious, if that.
That would have left Georgetown as the only non I-A football program in the Big East. While it was geographically the closest to the ACC, neither side had interest.
(09-24-2020 07:51 PM)quo vadis Wrote: [ -> ](09-24-2020 07:36 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote: [ -> ]If the Big East hadn’t been assaulted on 3 fronts I wonder how things would have worked out for them. I wonder if USF would have eventually caved on the UCF issue and then, if their BCS status could be secured, BYU and Boise St as fb affiliates.
I suppose the fairest way to organize things would have been a zipper:
It was inevitable that the house was going to fall. The Big 12 needed a 10th; the ACC was nervous and needed new markets, and the Big Ten saw easy money from T3 sitting there for the taking.
The Big East fell apart because it failed to recognize what the ACC understood - there was room for only one "power" football conference along the Atlantic seaboard.
That's why the ACC attacked the Big East in 2003. It thought that by swiping Miami, VT, and BC that it had mortally wounded the Big East football conference. But to their (and really everyone's) shock and amazement, the rump Big East of 2005+ managed to not only pull itself together, but to match the ACC in football performance and arguably best them in hoops performance.
The Big East should have struck first at the ACC circa 2010, but it foolishly thought that after the failed 2003 attack the ACC had agreed to peaceful coexistence.
It was a fatal error.