(01-24-2022 09:29 AM)bricksnivy Wrote: [ -> ] (01-24-2022 09:06 AM)Seahawkhoops Wrote: [ -> ] (01-18-2022 10:44 AM)Seahawkhoops Wrote: [ -> ]Picks for the weekend:
Cinci, KC, GB, TB
Well, at least i got the AFC right.
Chiefs/Rams will be a good Super Bowl
I think everyone in the world thought when TB tied it that was it. How do you let the best WR in the league get free in do or die? Crazy finish
(01-24-2022 09:45 AM)Seahawkhoops Wrote: [ -> ] (01-24-2022 09:29 AM)bricksnivy Wrote: [ -> ] (01-24-2022 09:06 AM)Seahawkhoops Wrote: [ -> ] (01-18-2022 10:44 AM)Seahawkhoops Wrote: [ -> ]Picks for the weekend:
Cinci, KC, GB, TB
Well, at least i got the AFC right.
Chiefs/Rams will be a good Super Bowl
I think everyone in the world thought when TB tied it that was it. How do you let the best WR in the league get free in do or die? Crazy finish
Blitzing and leaving a safety to cover Kupp is risky. I don’t think LA will win, but they have a shot. Still, Id rather have a Bills/Chiefs rematch. They’re the best two teams.
The athlon pro football peview picked kc vs rams super bowl with kc as winner.
Sent from my SM-G981U using Tapatalk
The Rams Vs. the Bengals...................... Wow, who'd a thunk it.
I agreee and the last 6 games have been great to watch.
Sent from my SM-G981U using Tapatalk
(01-31-2022 09:06 AM)tke75hawk Wrote: [ -> ]I agreee and the last 6 games have been great to watch.
Sent from my SM-G981U using Tapatalk
After the a$$ kicking's that happened opening weekend, the rest of the playoffs have been absolutely phenomenal!
Darnell Mooney is a legit #2 WR in the NFL and the Bears aren't trying to sabotage Justin Fields.
I hope not. I have Fields in a dynasty league.
(05-10-2022 11:08 AM)B_Hawk06 Wrote: [ -> ]I hope not. I have Fields in a dynasty league.
I wouldn't count on him as a QB1 next season, but the coaches aren't toying with starting a guy like washed-Dalton, and the scheme can't be as bad as Nagy's. The Bears aren't going to be good next year, but I think we're using our top 5 pick to draft a WR rather than the next QB.
(05-10-2022 11:08 AM)B_Hawk06 Wrote: [ -> ]I hope not. I have Fields in a dynasty league.
Should have drafted Mac attack instead
(05-10-2022 01:18 PM)bricksnivy Wrote: [ -> ] (05-10-2022 11:08 AM)B_Hawk06 Wrote: [ -> ]I hope not. I have Fields in a dynasty league.
I wouldn't count on him as a QB1 next season, but the coaches aren't toying with starting a guy like washed-Dalton, and the scheme can't be as bad as Nagy's. The Bears aren't going to be good next year, but I think we're using our top 5 pick to draft a WR rather than the next QB.
You know the draft already happened right? Confused by your wording.
(05-10-2022 01:38 PM)B_Hawk06 Wrote: [ -> ] (05-10-2022 01:18 PM)bricksnivy Wrote: [ -> ] (05-10-2022 11:08 AM)B_Hawk06 Wrote: [ -> ]I hope not. I have Fields in a dynasty league.
I wouldn't count on him as a QB1 next season, but the coaches aren't toying with starting a guy like washed-Dalton, and the scheme can't be as bad as Nagy's. The Bears aren't going to be good next year, but I think we're using our top 5 pick to draft a WR rather than the next QB.
You know the draft already happened right? Confused by your wording.
They'll draft a WR in the 2023 draft. They're not going to be good this year, but I think they're committed to Fields. They didn't have a 1st round pick this year, but I think they draft a difference maker on offense in the 1st next year and it'll be a top 10 pick, possibly top 5. Would be higher if they didn't always beat Detroit.
(05-10-2022 01:59 PM)bricksnivy Wrote: [ -> ]They'll draft a WR in the 2023 draft. They're not going to be good this year, but I think they're committed to Fields. They didn't have a 1st round pick this year, but I think they draft a difference maker on offense in the 1st next year and it'll be a top 10 pick, possibly top 5. Would be higher if they didn't always beat Detroit.
So you're giving Fields 2022 AND 2023? I think that's overly optimistic. Even if the Bears don't draft a QB high in 2023, there's always a chance they bring in a legitimate veteran QB option at some point.
If the Bears do indeed wait beyond 2023: Keep in mind that Mitchell Trubisky is scheduled to be a free agent after the 2023 season.
(05-10-2022 02:07 PM)Seahawk Nation 08 Wrote: [ -> ] (05-10-2022 01:59 PM)bricksnivy Wrote: [ -> ]They'll draft a WR in the 2023 draft. They're not going to be good this year, but I think they're committed to Fields. They didn't have a 1st round pick this year, but I think they draft a difference maker on offense in the 1st next year and it'll be a top 10 pick, possibly top 5. Would be higher if they didn't always beat Detroit.
So you're giving Fields 2022 AND 2023? I think that's overly optimistic. Even if the Bears don't draft a QB high in 2023, there's always a chance they bring in a legitimate veteran QB option at some point.
If the Bears do indeed wait beyond 2023: Keep in mind that Mitchell Trubisky is scheduled to be a free agent after the 2023 season.
I think Fields gets two years with the new FO and staff. If he's bad next year, that can change, but I think he can improve significantly in year two and Chicago still be bad.
I'm really interested to see Tribusky next year. I don't think he is as bad as he looked in Chicago. I don't think he's capable of carrying a team either, but he's gotta be better than Big Ben the last two years.
(05-10-2022 03:18 PM)bricksnivy Wrote: [ -> ] (05-10-2022 02:07 PM)Seahawk Nation 08 Wrote: [ -> ] (05-10-2022 01:59 PM)bricksnivy Wrote: [ -> ]They'll draft a WR in the 2023 draft. They're not going to be good this year, but I think they're committed to Fields. They didn't have a 1st round pick this year, but I think they draft a difference maker on offense in the 1st next year and it'll be a top 10 pick, possibly top 5. Would be higher if they didn't always beat Detroit.
So you're giving Fields 2022 AND 2023? I think that's overly optimistic. Even if the Bears don't draft a QB high in 2023, there's always a chance they bring in a legitimate veteran QB option at some point.
If the Bears do indeed wait beyond 2023: Keep in mind that Mitchell Trubisky is scheduled to be a free agent after the 2023 season.
I think Fields gets two years with the new FO and staff. If he's bad next year, that can change, but I think he can improve significantly in year two and Chicago still be bad.
I'm really interested to see Tribusky next year. I don't think he is as bad as he looked in Chicago. I don't think he's capable of carrying a team either, but he's gotta be better than Big Ben the last two years.
Yep I think Trubisky will be the next Tannehill. Very solid but never great.
(05-10-2022 06:29 PM)Seahawk Nation 08 Wrote: [ -> ] (05-10-2022 03:18 PM)bricksnivy Wrote: [ -> ] (05-10-2022 02:07 PM)Seahawk Nation 08 Wrote: [ -> ] (05-10-2022 01:59 PM)bricksnivy Wrote: [ -> ]They'll draft a WR in the 2023 draft. They're not going to be good this year, but I think they're committed to Fields. They didn't have a 1st round pick this year, but I think they draft a difference maker on offense in the 1st next year and it'll be a top 10 pick, possibly top 5. Would be higher if they didn't always beat Detroit.
So you're giving Fields 2022 AND 2023? I think that's overly optimistic. Even if the Bears don't draft a QB high in 2023, there's always a chance they bring in a legitimate veteran QB option at some point.
If the Bears do indeed wait beyond 2023: Keep in mind that Mitchell Trubisky is scheduled to be a free agent after the 2023 season.
I think Fields gets two years with the new FO and staff. If he's bad next year, that can change, but I think he can improve significantly in year two and Chicago still be bad.
I'm really interested to see Tribusky next year. I don't think he is as bad as he looked in Chicago. I don't think he's capable of carrying a team either, but he's gotta be better than Big Ben the last two years.
Yep I think Trubisky will be the next Tannehill. Very solid but never great.
I think that’s a fair assessment of him.
What are y’all’s thoughts on Sam Howell?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
I think Howell is talented and faster than people think. He needs to be more selective in the NFL when he decides to take off and run. He sometimes forces the ball too but is a good prospect for sure.
2021-2022 Season is off to an entertaining start. Josh Allen and the Bills picked up where they left off, but even better.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
(09-08-2022 10:46 PM)B_Hawk06 Wrote: [ -> ]2021-2022 Season is off to an entertaining start. Josh Allen and the Bills picked up where they left off, but even better.
Stafford’s elbow, not so much. Running counter to Dr Rob’s pre-game diagnosis, too.
(09-08-2022 10:46 PM)B_Hawk06 Wrote: [ -> ]2021-2022 Season is off to an entertaining start. Josh Allen and the Bills picked up where they left off, but even better.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Someone's excited LOL
Attributing 1st game jitters to those 1st half turnovers?