CSNbbs

Legal in Colorado, and now they are trying to change the law in their home state of Utah.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/first-cousi...d=64461811

Roll tide

When your sister is ragging, its always nice to get some strange from your cousin.

As long as they don't procreate...

(03-07-2019 03:11 PM)CliftonAve Wrote: [ -> ]Legal in Colorado, and now they are trying to change the law in their home state of Utah.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/first-cousi...d=64461811

Wonder if anyone will decline to make that wedding cake.....

Hate to point this out but 100 years ago it wasn't uncommon at all for first cousins to marry. I bet if you did a genealogical search of your own ancestors you'll see that your family trees have more crossed branches than you might have thought. The truth was the only women near your own age within a reasonable distance of where you lived probably were all related to you in some measure. You either courted a cousin or you did without.

You only share 7.31-13.8% DNA with your first cousins. The real danger of cousin marriage is when you marry your cousin but your common grandparents were also first cousins. This can result in multiplying the common DNA and thus risk more chances of birth defects and other recessive traits.

Oh, goody.

WTF is going on in what used to be the sensible midwest?

Is the dope that good? Sheeesh.

I thought Arkansas had an exclusive on those weddings.

I've got a few first cousins I'd tap . Growing up in a household with 4 boys who had a HUGE extended family of female cousins one couldn't help but fantasize at times.

Edit: VERY attractive Italian cousins at that...

Here for the comments, not disappointed. Keep it up folks!

(03-07-2019 03:47 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote: [ -> ]Hate to point this out but 100 years ago it wasn't uncommon at all for first cousins to marry. I bet if you did a genealogical search of your own ancestors you'll see that your family trees have more crossed branches than you might have thought. The truth was the only women near your own age within a reasonable distance of where you lived probably were all related to you in some measure. You either courted a cousin or you did without.

You only share 7.31-13.8% DNA with your first cousins. The real danger of cousin marriage is when you marry your cousin but your common grandparents were also first cousins. This can result in multiplying the common DNA and thus risk more chances of birth defects and other recessive traits.

True story, I signed up on ancestry.com after my daughter told me about a family tree she'd come across compiled by some distant cousin in Arkansas. She called the woman who told her in no uncertain terms that she wanted nothing to do with any of the people whose names were included and to not bother ever calling back, click.
My daughter sent me the link to the file this woman had created and it was titled "One Fu**ed Up Family Tree. LOL. It seems a lot of my distant relatives were from Arkansas and Missouri and the branches were few.

(03-07-2019 03:47 PM)49RFootballNow Wrote: [ -> ]Hate to point this out but 100 years ago it wasn't uncommon at all for first cousins to marry. I bet if you did a genealogical search of your own ancestors you'll see that your family trees have more crossed branches than you might have thought.

I have to say that 49r is right.. I've got two names in my family tree that come up 4 times within 3 generations. (and there was documentation enclosed to prove it was the same couple).

Executive order coming for the rights to marry your own daughter? LOL.

Oh! But West Virginian's are RUBES?!?

Don't care if you marry a boulder anymore.

And bakers should still be able to tell you to **** off if you want a cake to commemorate what is sure to be a rocky marriage.

(03-07-2019 04:06 PM)usmbacker Wrote: [ -> ]I thought Arkansas had an exclusive on those weddings.

Damn it.

(03-07-2019 05:24 PM)tigersroll Wrote: [ -> ]Executive order coming for the rights to marry your own daughter? LOL.

I was wondering who the first idiot to make this thread political was going to be.

(03-07-2019 09:14 PM)hawghiggs Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-07-2019 04:06 PM)usmbacker Wrote: [ -> ]I thought Arkansas had an exclusive on those weddings.

Damn it.

I remember watching an Arkansas game 2-3 years ago. Announcers were commenting about a couple of their offensive linemen. One of them said, "They got married last summer... but not to each other."

(03-07-2019 09:18 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-07-2019 09:14 PM)hawghiggs Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-07-2019 04:06 PM)usmbacker Wrote: [ -> ]I thought Arkansas had an exclusive on those weddings.

Damn it.

I remember watching an Arkansas game 2-3 years ago. Announcers were commenting about a couple of their offensive linemen. One of them said, "They got married last summer... but not to each other."

When I deployed to Florida in 98 for the wild fires the SC, MS, and Arkansas crews ended up together. One of the Arkansas crews had two guys who told us "We ended up marrying cousins. Not our cousins like usually happens in Arkansas, our wives are cousins. I'm from Texas and he's from Missouri so we aren't into that." LOL

ive heard weirder:
Why Women Are Choosing to Marry Themselves : https://www.vogue.com/article/women-marr...s-sologamy
Woman who married dog eight years ago says he's 'Perfect' for her : https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style...94626.html