(03-20-2017 05:05 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: [ -> ]I don't really have a problem with Trump's playing golf, just as I didn't have a problem when Obama did it.
It wasn't the fact that he did it.. It was a question of WHEN he did it that was my issue.
Kind of like when anti-Bush people railed about Bush going to his ranch so often.
(03-20-2017 06:26 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote: [ -> ] (03-20-2017 04:04 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:“I’m going to be working for you. I’m not going to have time to go play golf,” he said in Virginia last August.
Quote:Trump has on 10 different occasions traveled to golf clubs that bear his name in Florida — one out of every six days he’s been in office.
But rest easy. Sean Spicer explains...
Quote:“One is I think you saw him utilize this as an opportunity with Prime Minister Abe to help foster deeper relationships in Southeast Asia — in Asia, rather, and have a growing relationship that’s going to help U.S. interests. How you use the game of golf is something that he’s talked about.”
Sean Spicer wants you to know that Trump’s golfing is strategic and/or not happening
Whats funny is that the left savaged Bush for playing golf...
Ummmm....no...not really. We savaged him for that video when he was acting all serious then bragged "Now watch me his this drive!"
And then when he said he gave up golf but hadn't really yet.
But you'll remember, we were in a pretty big war at that time...so it wasn't really good optics for him to be golfing anyway.
(03-20-2017 10:27 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-20-2017 07:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]The saddest thing I saw. The cost of the entire meals on wheels program is the same as Melania spending 6 days in NY. Live in the WH for a month and save home bound senior meals.
I don't know where this idea came from, but if you do the math you will realize very quickly that it cannot possibly be true. Either that, or Meals on Wheels is such a tiny program that its impact cannot possibly be significant.
It is a tiny program when it comes to what the government funds. That's why it's just so utterly stupid to cut it. It just make you look like an uncaring fool for no real fiscal benefit.
(03-21-2017 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ] (03-20-2017 10:27 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-20-2017 07:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]The saddest thing I saw. The cost of the entire meals on wheels program is the same as Melania spending 6 days in NY. Live in the WH for a month and save home bound senior meals.
I don't know where this idea came from, but if you do the math you will realize very quickly that it cannot possibly be true. Either that, or Meals on Wheels is such a tiny program that its impact cannot possibly be significant.
It is a tiny program when it comes to what the government funds. That's why it's just so utterly stupid to cut it. It just make you look like an uncaring fool for no real fiscal benefit.
b/c a penny saved is never a penny earned....
your math is solid like a limp one....
dippos have no clue that 'enabling policy' is vastly different than 'creation policy'......
#fuelinglazy
(03-21-2017 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ] (03-20-2017 10:27 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-20-2017 07:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]The saddest thing I saw. The cost of the entire meals on wheels program is the same as Melania spending 6 days in NY. Live in the WH for a month and save home bound senior meals.
I don't know where this idea came from, but if you do the math you will realize very quickly that it cannot possibly be true. Either that, or Meals on Wheels is such a tiny program that its impact cannot possibly be significant.
It is a tiny program when it comes to what the government funds. That's why it's just so utterly stupid to cut it. It just make you look like an uncaring fool for no real fiscal benefit.
so fund it yourselves. honestly this is something the feds don't need to be involved with in the first place.
Sent from my SM-J700T using
CSNbbs mobile app
(03-21-2017 09:15 AM)Hood-rich Wrote: [ -> ] (03-21-2017 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ] (03-20-2017 10:27 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-20-2017 07:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]The saddest thing I saw. The cost of the entire meals on wheels program is the same as Melania spending 6 days in NY. Live in the WH for a month and save home bound senior meals.
I don't know where this idea came from, but if you do the math you will realize very quickly that it cannot possibly be true. Either that, or Meals on Wheels is such a tiny program that its impact cannot possibly be significant.
It is a tiny program when it comes to what the government funds. That's why it's just so utterly stupid to cut it. It just make you look like an uncaring fool for no real fiscal benefit.
so fund it yourselves. honestly this is something the feds don't need to be involved with in the first place.
Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app
Aren't subsidies to big oil, etc. much bigger and equally unneeded? So why not start there?
(03-21-2017 05:08 AM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]He could shoot someone on Main Street and he wouldn't lose supporters and he has the balls to tell you that. That's when he has entered the messiah complex. This room bitched up and down about his golfing habits. Trump's is far worse and nary a peep. Hypocrits, no thy name.
And Obama could have done the same, he just had the tact not to say it. When kids start singing hymms to Obama you've entered messiah complex.
I did ***** about Obama golfing, it was a tit-for-tat after the left bitching about Bush golfing. Something that even David Axelrod wishes Democrats had not done because it opened up Obama.
(03-21-2017 09:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ] (03-21-2017 09:15 AM)Hood-rich Wrote: [ -> ] (03-21-2017 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ] (03-20-2017 10:27 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-20-2017 07:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]The saddest thing I saw. The cost of the entire meals on wheels program is the same as Melania spending 6 days in NY. Live in the WH for a month and save home bound senior meals.
I don't know where this idea came from, but if you do the math you will realize very quickly that it cannot possibly be true. Either that, or Meals on Wheels is such a tiny program that its impact cannot possibly be significant.
It is a tiny program when it comes to what the government funds. That's why it's just so utterly stupid to cut it. It just make you look like an uncaring fool for no real fiscal benefit.
so fund it yourselves. honestly this is something the feds don't need to be involved with in the first place.
Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app
Aren't subsidies to big oil, etc. much bigger and equally unneeded? So why not start there?
I dunno........maybe it's b/c those groups create jobs???
therefore, food is on the table b/c the monkeys were trained properly over time.....
sigh....
your crew created this mess....do you really think a path to recovery was going to be simple....
my bad.....your crew only understands the okra screen viewing.....
#crude
(03-21-2017 09:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ] (03-21-2017 09:15 AM)Hood-rich Wrote: [ -> ] (03-21-2017 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ] (03-20-2017 10:27 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-20-2017 07:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]The saddest thing I saw. The cost of the entire meals on wheels program is the same as Melania spending 6 days in NY. Live in the WH for a month and save home bound senior meals.
I don't know where this idea came from, but if you do the math you will realize very quickly that it cannot possibly be true. Either that, or Meals on Wheels is such a tiny program that its impact cannot possibly be significant.
It is a tiny program when it comes to what the government funds. That's why it's just so utterly stupid to cut it. It just make you look like an uncaring fool for no real fiscal benefit.
so fund it yourselves. honestly this is something the feds don't need to be involved with in the first place.
Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app
Aren't subsidies to big oil, etc. much bigger and equally unneeded? So why not start there?
sounds good to me.
Sent from my SM-J700T using
CSNbbs mobile app
(03-21-2017 09:42 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote: [ -> ] (03-21-2017 05:08 AM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]He could shoot someone on Main Street and he wouldn't lose supporters and he has the balls to tell you that. That's when he has entered the messiah complex. This room bitched up and down about his golfing habits. Trump's is far worse and nary a peep. Hypocrits, no thy name.
And Obama could have done the same, he just had the tact not to say it. When kids start singing hymms [sic] to Obama you've entered messiah complex.
This is a WILD exaggeration of events.
(03-21-2017 09:46 AM)Hood-rich Wrote: [ -> ] (03-21-2017 09:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ] (03-21-2017 09:15 AM)Hood-rich Wrote: [ -> ] (03-21-2017 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ] (03-20-2017 10:27 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: [ -> ]I don't know where this idea came from, but if you do the math you will realize very quickly that it cannot possibly be true. Either that, or Meals on Wheels is such a tiny program that its impact cannot possibly be significant.
It is a tiny program when it comes to what the government funds. That's why it's just so utterly stupid to cut it. It just make you look like an uncaring fool for no real fiscal benefit.
so fund it yourselves. honestly this is something the feds don't need to be involved with in the first place.
Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app
Aren't subsidies to big oil, etc. much bigger and equally unneeded? So why not start there?
sounds good to me.
Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app
sorry, not to me...(maybe I'm reading you wrong)
subsidization relative to all forms of energy is necessary to fuel the engine.....
(03-21-2017 09:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ] (03-21-2017 09:15 AM)Hood-rich Wrote: [ -> ] (03-21-2017 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ] (03-20-2017 10:27 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-20-2017 07:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]The saddest thing I saw. The cost of the entire meals on wheels program is the same as Melania spending 6 days in NY. Live in the WH for a month and save home bound senior meals.
I don't know where this idea came from, but if you do the math you will realize very quickly that it cannot possibly be true. Either that, or Meals on Wheels is such a tiny program that its impact cannot possibly be significant.
It is a tiny program when it comes to what the government funds. That's why it's just so utterly stupid to cut it. It just make you look like an uncaring fool for no real fiscal benefit.
so fund it yourselves. honestly this is something the feds don't need to be involved with in the first place.
Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app
Aren't subsidies to big oil, etc. much bigger and equally unneeded? So why not start there?
More Democrat fake news
Now let’s analyze what the oil & gas sector pays in taxes. In 2012 the top two corporations paying federal taxes in the US were ExxonMobil and Chevron paying a combined total of $45.2 billion. On average, the industry pays a 45% tax rate when all state, federal, and foreign taxes are totaled up. By comparison the Healthcare Industry pays a total rate of 35% and the Pharmaceuticals pay an estimated rate of 21%. Based upon these numbers it’s hard to believe which business sector is criticized the most for “subsidies”.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes....idies/amp/
Fail fail fail. Please tell us that democrats have a reason to vote for them not this same worn out absurdity
(03-21-2017 10:08 AM)shere khan Wrote: [ -> ] (03-21-2017 09:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ] (03-21-2017 09:15 AM)Hood-rich Wrote: [ -> ] (03-21-2017 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ] (03-20-2017 10:27 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: [ -> ]I don't know where this idea came from, but if you do the math you will realize very quickly that it cannot possibly be true. Either that, or Meals on Wheels is such a tiny program that its impact cannot possibly be significant.
It is a tiny program when it comes to what the government funds. That's why it's just so utterly stupid to cut it. It just make you look like an uncaring fool for no real fiscal benefit.
so fund it yourselves. honestly this is something the feds don't need to be involved with in the first place.
Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app
Aren't subsidies to big oil, etc. much bigger and equally unneeded? So why not start there?
More Democrat fake news
Now let’s analyze what the oil & gas sector pays in taxes. In 2012 the top two corporations paying federal taxes in the US were ExxonMobil and Chevron paying a combined total of $45.2 billion. On average, the industry pays a 45% tax rate when all state, federal, and foreign taxes are totaled up. By comparison the Healthcare Industry pays a total rate of 35% and the Pharmaceuticals pay an estimated rate of 21%. Based upon these numbers it’s hard to believe which business sector is criticized the most for “subsidies”.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes....idies/amp/
Fail fail fail. Please tell us that democrats have a reason to vote for them not this same worn out absurdity
I pay taxes...I don't get a subsidy. They don't need them. I don't give a **** what their taxes are.
(03-21-2017 10:44 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ] (03-21-2017 10:08 AM)shere khan Wrote: [ -> ] (03-21-2017 09:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ] (03-21-2017 09:15 AM)Hood-rich Wrote: [ -> ] (03-21-2017 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]It is a tiny program when it comes to what the government funds. That's why it's just so utterly stupid to cut it. It just make you look like an uncaring fool for no real fiscal benefit.
so fund it yourselves. honestly this is something the feds don't need to be involved with in the first place.
Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app
Aren't subsidies to big oil, etc. much bigger and equally unneeded? So why not start there?
More Democrat fake news
Now let’s analyze what the oil & gas sector pays in taxes. In 2012 the top two corporations paying federal taxes in the US were ExxonMobil and Chevron paying a combined total of $45.2 billion. On average, the industry pays a 45% tax rate when all state, federal, and foreign taxes are totaled up. By comparison the Healthcare Industry pays a total rate of 35% and the Pharmaceuticals pay an estimated rate of 21%. Based upon these numbers it’s hard to believe which business sector is criticized the most for “subsidies”.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes....idies/amp/
Fail fail fail. Please tell us that democrats have a reason to vote for them not this same worn out absurdity
I pay taxes...I don't get a subsidy. They don't need them. I don't give a **** what their taxes are.
therein lies the rub a dub dub....
what's really funny is I'm in your camp in relative terms....however, you choose to lean so far left that it becomes absurd to align....
you really don't understand how things work en macro.....
I never had a problem with Presidents playing golf and I don't have a problem with this one either.
It's amazing however the hypocrisy of those who criticized Obama for playing golf and now suddenly have become silent on the issue.
(03-21-2017 10:44 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ] (03-21-2017 10:08 AM)shere khan Wrote: [ -> ] (03-21-2017 09:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ] (03-21-2017 09:15 AM)Hood-rich Wrote: [ -> ] (03-21-2017 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: [ -> ]It is a tiny program when it comes to what the government funds. That's why it's just so utterly stupid to cut it. It just make you look like an uncaring fool for no real fiscal benefit.
so fund it yourselves. honestly this is something the feds don't need to be involved with in the first place.
Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app
Aren't subsidies to big oil, etc. much bigger and equally unneeded? So why not start there?
More Democrat fake news
Now let’s analyze what the oil & gas sector pays in taxes. In 2012 the top two corporations paying federal taxes in the US were ExxonMobil and Chevron paying a combined total of $45.2 billion. On average, the industry pays a 45% tax rate when all state, federal, and foreign taxes are totaled up. By comparison the Healthcare Industry pays a total rate of 35% and the Pharmaceuticals pay an estimated rate of 21%. Based upon these numbers it’s hard to believe which business sector is criticized the most for “subsidies”.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes....idies/amp/
Fail fail fail. Please tell us that democrats have a reason to vote for them not this same worn out absurdity
I pay taxes...I don't get a subsidy. They don't need them. I don't give a **** what their taxes are.
Get back to me you employ thousands, provide access to a vital resource and pay 40 billion in taxes. Read the article also, that might help
Fail. Lose
![[Image: Billy.GIF]](http://www.rustycans.com/Graphics/A-B/Billy.GIF)