Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
1 Out Of 6
Author Message
DaSaintFan Offline
Dum' Sutherner in Midwest!
*

Posts: 14,188
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 258
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location: Stuck in St. Louis
Post: #21
RE: 1 Out Of 6
(03-20-2017 05:05 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I don't really have a problem with Trump's playing golf, just as I didn't have a problem when Obama did it.

It wasn't the fact that he did it.. It was a question of WHEN he did it that was my issue.

Kind of like when anti-Bush people railed about Bush going to his ranch so often.
03-21-2017 08:40 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Proud traitor.
*

Posts: 30,552
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 515
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Post: #22
RE: 1 Out Of 6
(03-20-2017 06:26 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  
(03-20-2017 04:04 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
Quote:“I’m going to be working for you. I’m not going to have time to go play golf,” he said in Virginia last August.

Quote:Trump has on 10 different occasions traveled to golf clubs that bear his name in Florida — one out of every six days he’s been in office.

But rest easy. Sean Spicer explains...

Quote:“One is I think you saw him utilize this as an opportunity with Prime Minister Abe to help foster deeper relationships in Southeast Asia — in Asia, rather, and have a growing relationship that’s going to help U.S. interests. How you use the game of golf is something that he’s talked about.
Sean Spicer wants you to know that Trump’s golfing is strategic and/or not happening

03-rotfl

Whats funny is that the left savaged Bush for playing golf...

Ummmm....no...not really. We savaged him for that video when he was acting all serious then bragged "Now watch me his this drive!"

And then when he said he gave up golf but hadn't really yet.

But you'll remember, we were in a pretty big war at that time...so it wasn't really good optics for him to be golfing anyway.
03-21-2017 09:04 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Proud traitor.
*

Posts: 30,552
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 515
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Post: #23
RE: 1 Out Of 6
(03-20-2017 10:27 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(03-20-2017 07:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  The saddest thing I saw. The cost of the entire meals on wheels program is the same as Melania spending 6 days in NY. Live in the WH for a month and save home bound senior meals.

I don't know where this idea came from, but if you do the math you will realize very quickly that it cannot possibly be true. Either that, or Meals on Wheels is such a tiny program that its impact cannot possibly be significant.

It is a tiny program when it comes to what the government funds. That's why it's just so utterly stupid to cut it. It just make you look like an uncaring fool for no real fiscal benefit.
(This post was last modified: 03-21-2017 09:07 AM by Redwingtom.)
03-21-2017 09:06 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
stinkfist Online
laughing at MSM meltdown
*

Posts: 35,248
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 1416
I Root For: StL Cards & USM
Location: who knows?
Post: #24
RE: 1 Out Of 6
(03-21-2017 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-20-2017 10:27 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(03-20-2017 07:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  The saddest thing I saw. The cost of the entire meals on wheels program is the same as Melania spending 6 days in NY. Live in the WH for a month and save home bound senior meals.

I don't know where this idea came from, but if you do the math you will realize very quickly that it cannot possibly be true. Either that, or Meals on Wheels is such a tiny program that its impact cannot possibly be significant.

It is a tiny program when it comes to what the government funds. That's why it's just so utterly stupid to cut it. It just make you look like an uncaring fool for no real fiscal benefit.

b/c a penny saved is never a penny earned....

your math is solid like a limp one....

dippos have no clue that 'enabling policy' is vastly different than 'creation policy'......

#fuelinglazy
(This post was last modified: 03-21-2017 09:15 AM by stinkfist.)
03-21-2017 09:13 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hood-rich Offline
Smarter Than the Average Lib

Posts: 9,321
Joined: May 2016
I Root For: ECU & CSU
Location: The Hood
Post: #25
RE: 1 Out Of 6
(03-21-2017 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-20-2017 10:27 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(03-20-2017 07:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  The saddest thing I saw. The cost of the entire meals on wheels program is the same as Melania spending 6 days in NY. Live in the WH for a month and save home bound senior meals.

I don't know where this idea came from, but if you do the math you will realize very quickly that it cannot possibly be true. Either that, or Meals on Wheels is such a tiny program that its impact cannot possibly be significant.

It is a tiny program when it comes to what the government funds. That's why it's just so utterly stupid to cut it. It just make you look like an uncaring fool for no real fiscal benefit.
so fund it yourselves. honestly this is something the feds don't need to be involved with in the first place.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app
03-21-2017 09:15 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Proud traitor.
*

Posts: 30,552
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 515
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Post: #26
RE: 1 Out Of 6
(03-21-2017 09:15 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  
(03-21-2017 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-20-2017 10:27 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(03-20-2017 07:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  The saddest thing I saw. The cost of the entire meals on wheels program is the same as Melania spending 6 days in NY. Live in the WH for a month and save home bound senior meals.

I don't know where this idea came from, but if you do the math you will realize very quickly that it cannot possibly be true. Either that, or Meals on Wheels is such a tiny program that its impact cannot possibly be significant.

It is a tiny program when it comes to what the government funds. That's why it's just so utterly stupid to cut it. It just make you look like an uncaring fool for no real fiscal benefit.
so fund it yourselves. honestly this is something the feds don't need to be involved with in the first place.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Aren't subsidies to big oil, etc. much bigger and equally unneeded? So why not start there?
03-21-2017 09:25 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bull_Is_Back Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,056
Joined: Oct 2016
Reputation: 541
I Root For: Buffalo
Location:
Post: #27
RE: 1 Out Of 6
(03-21-2017 05:08 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  He could shoot someone on Main Street and he wouldn't lose supporters and he has the balls to tell you that. That's when he has entered the messiah complex. This room bitched up and down about his golfing habits. Trump's is far worse and nary a peep. Hypocrits, no thy name.

And Obama could have done the same, he just had the tact not to say it. When kids start singing hymms to Obama you've entered messiah complex.

I did ***** about Obama golfing, it was a tit-for-tat after the left bitching about Bush golfing. Something that even David Axelrod wishes Democrats had not done because it opened up Obama.
03-21-2017 09:42 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
stinkfist Online
laughing at MSM meltdown
*

Posts: 35,248
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 1416
I Root For: StL Cards & USM
Location: who knows?
Post: #28
RE: 1 Out Of 6
(03-21-2017 09:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-21-2017 09:15 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  
(03-21-2017 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-20-2017 10:27 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(03-20-2017 07:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  The saddest thing I saw. The cost of the entire meals on wheels program is the same as Melania spending 6 days in NY. Live in the WH for a month and save home bound senior meals.

I don't know where this idea came from, but if you do the math you will realize very quickly that it cannot possibly be true. Either that, or Meals on Wheels is such a tiny program that its impact cannot possibly be significant.

It is a tiny program when it comes to what the government funds. That's why it's just so utterly stupid to cut it. It just make you look like an uncaring fool for no real fiscal benefit.
so fund it yourselves. honestly this is something the feds don't need to be involved with in the first place.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Aren't subsidies to big oil, etc. much bigger and equally unneeded? So why not start there?

I dunno........maybe it's b/c those groups create jobs???

therefore, food is on the table b/c the monkeys were trained properly over time.....

sigh....

your crew created this mess....do you really think a path to recovery was going to be simple....

my bad.....your crew only understands the okra screen viewing.....

#crude
03-21-2017 09:46 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hood-rich Offline
Smarter Than the Average Lib

Posts: 9,321
Joined: May 2016
I Root For: ECU & CSU
Location: The Hood
Post: #29
RE: 1 Out Of 6
(03-21-2017 09:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-21-2017 09:15 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  
(03-21-2017 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-20-2017 10:27 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(03-20-2017 07:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  The saddest thing I saw. The cost of the entire meals on wheels program is the same as Melania spending 6 days in NY. Live in the WH for a month and save home bound senior meals.

I don't know where this idea came from, but if you do the math you will realize very quickly that it cannot possibly be true. Either that, or Meals on Wheels is such a tiny program that its impact cannot possibly be significant.

It is a tiny program when it comes to what the government funds. That's why it's just so utterly stupid to cut it. It just make you look like an uncaring fool for no real fiscal benefit.
so fund it yourselves. honestly this is something the feds don't need to be involved with in the first place.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Aren't subsidies to big oil, etc. much bigger and equally unneeded? So why not start there?

sounds good to me.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app
03-21-2017 09:46 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Proud traitor.
*

Posts: 30,552
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 515
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Post: #30
RE: 1 Out Of 6
(03-21-2017 09:42 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  
(03-21-2017 05:08 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  He could shoot someone on Main Street and he wouldn't lose supporters and he has the balls to tell you that. That's when he has entered the messiah complex. This room bitched up and down about his golfing habits. Trump's is far worse and nary a peep. Hypocrits, no thy name.

And Obama could have done the same, he just had the tact not to say it. When kids start singing hymms [sic] to Obama you've entered messiah complex.

This is a WILD exaggeration of events.
03-21-2017 09:50 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
stinkfist Online
laughing at MSM meltdown
*

Posts: 35,248
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 1416
I Root For: StL Cards & USM
Location: who knows?
Post: #31
RE: 1 Out Of 6
(03-21-2017 09:46 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  
(03-21-2017 09:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-21-2017 09:15 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  
(03-21-2017 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-20-2017 10:27 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I don't know where this idea came from, but if you do the math you will realize very quickly that it cannot possibly be true. Either that, or Meals on Wheels is such a tiny program that its impact cannot possibly be significant.

It is a tiny program when it comes to what the government funds. That's why it's just so utterly stupid to cut it. It just make you look like an uncaring fool for no real fiscal benefit.
so fund it yourselves. honestly this is something the feds don't need to be involved with in the first place.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Aren't subsidies to big oil, etc. much bigger and equally unneeded? So why not start there?

sounds good to me.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

sorry, not to me...(maybe I'm reading you wrong)

subsidization relative to all forms of energy is necessary to fuel the engine.....
03-21-2017 09:51 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
shere khan Offline
AAC Troll Emeritus
*

Posts: 32,479
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 2294
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Reverie, Tenn
Post: #32
RE: 1 Out Of 6
(03-21-2017 09:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-21-2017 09:15 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  
(03-21-2017 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-20-2017 10:27 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(03-20-2017 07:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  The saddest thing I saw. The cost of the entire meals on wheels program is the same as Melania spending 6 days in NY. Live in the WH for a month and save home bound senior meals.

I don't know where this idea came from, but if you do the math you will realize very quickly that it cannot possibly be true. Either that, or Meals on Wheels is such a tiny program that its impact cannot possibly be significant.

It is a tiny program when it comes to what the government funds. That's why it's just so utterly stupid to cut it. It just make you look like an uncaring fool for no real fiscal benefit.
so fund it yourselves. honestly this is something the feds don't need to be involved with in the first place.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Aren't subsidies to big oil, etc. much bigger and equally unneeded? So why not start there?
More Democrat fake news

Now let’s analyze what the oil & gas sector pays in taxes. In 2012 the top two corporations paying federal taxes in the US were ExxonMobil and Chevron paying a combined total of $45.2 billion. On average, the industry pays a 45% tax rate when all state, federal, and foreign taxes are totaled up. By comparison the Healthcare Industry pays a total rate of 35% and the Pharmaceuticals pay an estimated rate of 21%. Based upon these numbers it’s hard to believe which business sector is criticized the most for “subsidies”.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes....idies/amp/

Fail fail fail. Please tell us that democrats have a reason to vote for them not this same worn out absurdity
03-21-2017 10:08 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Redwingtom Offline
Proud traitor.
*

Posts: 30,552
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 515
I Root For: B-G-S-U !!!!
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Post: #33
RE: 1 Out Of 6
(03-21-2017 10:08 AM)shere khan Wrote:  
(03-21-2017 09:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-21-2017 09:15 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  
(03-21-2017 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-20-2017 10:27 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I don't know where this idea came from, but if you do the math you will realize very quickly that it cannot possibly be true. Either that, or Meals on Wheels is such a tiny program that its impact cannot possibly be significant.

It is a tiny program when it comes to what the government funds. That's why it's just so utterly stupid to cut it. It just make you look like an uncaring fool for no real fiscal benefit.
so fund it yourselves. honestly this is something the feds don't need to be involved with in the first place.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Aren't subsidies to big oil, etc. much bigger and equally unneeded? So why not start there?
More Democrat fake news

Now let’s analyze what the oil & gas sector pays in taxes. In 2012 the top two corporations paying federal taxes in the US were ExxonMobil and Chevron paying a combined total of $45.2 billion. On average, the industry pays a 45% tax rate when all state, federal, and foreign taxes are totaled up. By comparison the Healthcare Industry pays a total rate of 35% and the Pharmaceuticals pay an estimated rate of 21%. Based upon these numbers it’s hard to believe which business sector is criticized the most for “subsidies”.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes....idies/amp/

Fail fail fail. Please tell us that democrats have a reason to vote for them not this same worn out absurdity

I pay taxes...I don't get a subsidy. They don't need them. I don't give a **** what their taxes are.
03-21-2017 10:44 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
stinkfist Online
laughing at MSM meltdown
*

Posts: 35,248
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 1416
I Root For: StL Cards & USM
Location: who knows?
Post: #34
RE: 1 Out Of 6
(03-21-2017 10:44 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-21-2017 10:08 AM)shere khan Wrote:  
(03-21-2017 09:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-21-2017 09:15 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  
(03-21-2017 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  It is a tiny program when it comes to what the government funds. That's why it's just so utterly stupid to cut it. It just make you look like an uncaring fool for no real fiscal benefit.
so fund it yourselves. honestly this is something the feds don't need to be involved with in the first place.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Aren't subsidies to big oil, etc. much bigger and equally unneeded? So why not start there?
More Democrat fake news

Now let’s analyze what the oil & gas sector pays in taxes. In 2012 the top two corporations paying federal taxes in the US were ExxonMobil and Chevron paying a combined total of $45.2 billion. On average, the industry pays a 45% tax rate when all state, federal, and foreign taxes are totaled up. By comparison the Healthcare Industry pays a total rate of 35% and the Pharmaceuticals pay an estimated rate of 21%. Based upon these numbers it’s hard to believe which business sector is criticized the most for “subsidies”.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes....idies/amp/

Fail fail fail. Please tell us that democrats have a reason to vote for them not this same worn out absurdity

I pay taxes...I don't get a subsidy. They don't need them. I don't give a **** what their taxes are.

therein lies the rub a dub dub....

what's really funny is I'm in your camp in relative terms....however, you choose to lean so far left that it becomes absurd to align....

you really don't understand how things work en macro.....
(This post was last modified: 03-21-2017 10:49 AM by stinkfist.)
03-21-2017 10:47 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fitbud Offline
Banned

Posts: 30,986
Joined: Dec 2011
I Root For: PAC 12
Location:
Post: #35
RE: 1 Out Of 6
I never had a problem with Presidents playing golf and I don't have a problem with this one either.

It's amazing however the hypocrisy of those who criticized Obama for playing golf and now suddenly have become silent on the issue.
03-21-2017 10:49 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
shere khan Offline
AAC Troll Emeritus
*

Posts: 32,479
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 2294
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Reverie, Tenn
Post: #36
RE: 1 Out Of 6
(03-21-2017 10:44 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-21-2017 10:08 AM)shere khan Wrote:  
(03-21-2017 09:25 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  
(03-21-2017 09:15 AM)Hood-rich Wrote:  
(03-21-2017 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  It is a tiny program when it comes to what the government funds. That's why it's just so utterly stupid to cut it. It just make you look like an uncaring fool for no real fiscal benefit.
so fund it yourselves. honestly this is something the feds don't need to be involved with in the first place.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Aren't subsidies to big oil, etc. much bigger and equally unneeded? So why not start there?
More Democrat fake news

Now let’s analyze what the oil & gas sector pays in taxes. In 2012 the top two corporations paying federal taxes in the US were ExxonMobil and Chevron paying a combined total of $45.2 billion. On average, the industry pays a 45% tax rate when all state, federal, and foreign taxes are totaled up. By comparison the Healthcare Industry pays a total rate of 35% and the Pharmaceuticals pay an estimated rate of 21%. Based upon these numbers it’s hard to believe which business sector is criticized the most for “subsidies”.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes....idies/amp/

Fail fail fail. Please tell us that democrats have a reason to vote for them not this same worn out absurdity

I pay taxes...I don't get a subsidy. They don't need them. I don't give a **** what their taxes are.

Get back to me you employ thousands, provide access to a vital resource and pay 40 billion in taxes. Read the article also, that might help

Fail. Lose
03-21-2017 10:50 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
stinkfist Online
laughing at MSM meltdown
*

Posts: 35,248
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 1416
I Root For: StL Cards & USM
Location: who knows?
Post: #37
RE: 1 Out Of 6
(03-21-2017 10:49 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  I never had a problem with Presidents playing golf and I don't have a problem with this one either.

It's amazing however the hypocrisy of those who criticized Obama for playing golf and now suddenly have become silent on the issue.

#wrongthread

[Image: Billy.GIF]
03-21-2017 10:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2018 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2018 MyBB Group.