CSNbbs

(02-08-2017 12:38 PM)DexterDevil Wrote: [ -> ]The only explanation I have seen for it is that they had to send in their questions for approval and she just printed off the response.

Yeah I don't buy it.

She was a plant. The questions were scripted. Water is wet.

(02-08-2017 12:38 PM)DexterDevil Wrote: [ -> ]The only explanation I have seen for it is that they had to send in their questions for approval and she just printed off the response.

I think that is most likely what went down. I guess CNN could have drafted a question that fit this lady's problem/medical condition. But even so if the question fit the true facts...fact easily proven (is she a teacher was she not teaching because she was not getting treatment. Then started treatment and got a Sub-teacher job) then it was a good question.

But these things are staged anyways. If you have to summit your question before hand all CNN needs to do is select the people's question that fits the agenda they want to push. So in that regard most town hall meetings are scripted

(02-08-2017 12:42 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]She was a plant. The questions were scripted. Water is wet.

She probably already has the stunt included on her IMDB page like the "random little girl in a bow" at the Clinton rally.

Allen West? Please.

(02-08-2017 01:02 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]Damn. CNN got busted doing this again. Well, I guess that means we need to attack the source to deflect from the shameful actions of CNN.

(02-08-2017 01:07 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-08-2017 01:02 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]Damn. CNN got busted doing this again. Well, I guess that means we need to attack the source to deflect from the shameful actions of CNN.

I object to you putting words in my mouth. If you'd like to change a word and say FIFY, fine. If you'd like to respond, fine. But simply changing an entire post under someone else's name without comment is cheap.

(02-08-2017 01:10 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-08-2017 01:07 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-08-2017 01:02 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]Damn. CNN got busted doing this again. Well, I guess that means we need to attack the source to deflect from the shameful actions of CNN.

I object to you putting words in my mouth. If you'd like to change a word and say FIFY, fine. If you'd like to respond, fine. But simply changing an entire post under someone else's name without comment is cheap.

sorry, but truth in advertising laws require us to post what you are actually saying.

(02-08-2017 01:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-08-2017 01:10 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-08-2017 01:07 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-08-2017 01:02 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]Damn. CNN got busted doing this again. Well, I guess that means we need to attack the source to deflect from the shameful actions of CNN.

I object to you putting words in my mouth. If you'd like to change a word and say FIFY, fine. If you'd like to respond, fine. But simply changing an entire post under someone else's name without comment is cheap.

sorry, but truth in advertising laws require us to post what you are actually saying.

Sh*t posting at its finest, why even post dude?

(02-08-2017 01:14 PM)DexterDevil Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-08-2017 01:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-08-2017 01:10 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-08-2017 01:07 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-08-2017 01:02 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]Damn. CNN got busted doing this again. Well, I guess that means we need to attack the source to deflect from the shameful actions of CNN.

I object to you putting words in my mouth. If you'd like to change a word and say FIFY, fine. If you'd like to respond, fine. But simply changing an entire post under someone else's name without comment is cheap.

sorry, but truth in advertising laws require us to post what you are actually saying.

Sh*t posting at its finest, why even post dude?

I agree. Deflecting from the subject and attacking a source is sh*t posting.

(02-08-2017 01:58 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-08-2017 01:14 PM)DexterDevil Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-08-2017 01:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-08-2017 01:10 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-08-2017 01:07 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ]

I object to you putting words in my mouth. If you'd like to change a word and say FIFY, fine. If you'd like to respond, fine. But simply changing an entire post under someone else's name without comment is cheap.

sorry, but truth in advertising laws require us to post what you are actually saying.

Sh*t posting at its finest, why even post dude?

I agree. Deflecting from the subject and attacking a source is sh*t posting.

But why stoop to his level?

(02-08-2017 12:38 PM)DexterDevil Wrote: [ -> ]had to send in their questions for approval

Yeah, that would also be scripting.

(02-08-2017 01:02 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]Allen West? Please.

so you're saying the video was doctored?

(02-08-2017 02:03 PM)Hood-rich Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-08-2017 12:38 PM)DexterDevil Wrote: [ -> ]had to send in their questions for approval

Yeah, that would also be scripting.

Or screening, to prevent some stupid non relevant question.

CNN is #1, congrats!

(02-08-2017 02:27 PM)Kronke Wrote: [ -> ]CNN is #1, congrats!

Yup that is what comes up!

CNN is for old lefties. Other than that, opposition research. Fox actually needs CNN to have something to rage against.

(02-08-2017 01:02 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: [ -> ]Allen West? Please.

Yeah, I know. How dare he serve his country with distinction to allow you to be an a$$ 24/7.

Trump is a fake President.