(12-15-2022 10:30 AM)Gamenole Wrote:  

(12-15-2022 10:21 AM)TIGERCITY Wrote:  

(12-15-2022 10:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Could someone please clue us all in on which Democrat "prominent attorneys" are investigating this?

I think it's all b*******. Anybody can start a rumor that "prominent attorneys" are doing this or that.... When they could have easily given names if there are names.

Exactly. There is nothing actual "prominent attorneys" love more than attention, so it's rather suspicious that no names are included. Their ilk is more likely to hold press conferences before they have found anything, than they are likely to keep things quiet unless and until they have something substantive.

I guess you numbskulls don’t remember The Big Guy suggesting that Musk should be investigated?

So, one guy who hosts a show on Sirius = Democrat "prominent attorneys"

You’re squirming tom

(12-15-2022 11:23 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  You’re squirming tom

You're delusional, Bart.

(12-15-2022 09:33 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(12-14-2022 10:12 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(12-14-2022 09:52 PM)Chappy Wrote:  Is there any reason to suspect Musk lied, or is this just “hey, let’s check and see if he lied so we can deport him!”???

IF, again if he lied, does it matter how the lie is uncovered?

If he was donating millions to the D's I can guarantee you no one would be looking into any "lies", fabricated or true.

Could you miss the point any further?

(12-15-2022 11:28 AM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(12-15-2022 09:33 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(12-14-2022 10:12 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(12-14-2022 09:52 PM)Chappy Wrote:  Is there any reason to suspect Musk lied, or is this just “hey, let’s check and see if he lied so we can deport him!”???

IF, again if he lied, does it matter how the lie is uncovered?

If he was donating millions to the D's I can guarantee you no one would be looking into any "lies", fabricated or true.

Could you miss the point any further?

I learn from the best.......

(12-15-2022 11:29 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(12-15-2022 11:28 AM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(12-15-2022 09:33 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(12-14-2022 10:12 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(12-14-2022 09:52 PM)Chappy Wrote:  Is there any reason to suspect Musk lied, or is this just “hey, let’s check and see if he lied so we can deport him!”???

IF, again if he lied, does it matter how the lie is uncovered?

If he was donating millions to the D's I can guarantee you no one would be looking into any "lies", fabricated or true.

Could you miss the point any further?

I learn from the best.......

Yet you are still a moron with a lot to learn.

What a massive fail. Mr Xcuses calling someone else a moron. That's rich.

(12-15-2022 11:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  So, one guy who hosts a show on Sirius = Democrat "prominent attorneys"

I don't know whom or what you're describing here...

but yes... a guy 'meaningful' enough to host a show on Sirius is at least somewhat prominent. This isn't public access TV, but is paid content... probably worth millions to the guy. As to 'attorneys' (plural) IDK, nor do I know if the guy is even one because again, I don't know whom you are referring to...

But yes, Tom... you seem to be squirming here. If someone says 'prominent attorneys' and it is instead only one... or even if the guy isn't an attorney, that's certainly a correction, but not really a meaningful one.

I STRONGLY suspect (and feel free to correct me with facts) that the most important factor of this is the word 'prominent' because that denotes 'influential'. President Obama iirc could be described as a 'prominent attorney'... but his prominence and his law degree are only loosely related.

(12-15-2022 11:51 AM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(12-15-2022 11:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  So, one guy who hosts a show on Sirius = Democrat "prominent attorneys"

I don't know whom or what you're describing here...

but yes... a guy 'meaningful' enough to host a show on Sirius is at least somewhat prominent. This isn't public access TV, but is paid content... probably worth millions to the guy. As to 'attorneys' (plural) IDK, nor do I know if the guy is even one because again, I don't know whom you are referring to...

But yes, Tom... you seem to be squirming here. If someone says 'prominent attorneys' and it is instead only one... or even if the guy isn't an attorney, that's certainly a correction, but not really a meaningful one.

I STRONGLY suspect (and feel free to correct me with facts) that the most important factor of this is the word 'prominent' because that denotes 'influential'. President Obama iirc could be described as a 'prominent attorney'... but his prominence and his law degree are only loosely related.

(12-15-2022 11:36 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  What a massive fail. Mr Xcuses calling someone else a moron. That's rich.

Coming from a one trick pony like you…….I am insu……….nah I am

(12-15-2022 11:32 AM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(12-15-2022 11:29 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(12-15-2022 11:28 AM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(12-15-2022 09:33 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(12-14-2022 10:12 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  IF, again if he lied, does it matter how the lie is uncovered?

If he was donating millions to the D's I can guarantee you no one would be looking into any "lies", fabricated or true.

Could you miss the point any further?

I learn from the best.......

Yet you are still a moron with a lot to learn.

If he’s learning to be a moron, then there is no doubt you are the one to teach him.

(12-15-2022 11:59 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-15-2022 11:51 AM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(12-15-2022 11:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  So, one guy who hosts a show on Sirius = Democrat "prominent attorneys"

I don't know whom or what you're describing here...

but yes... a guy 'meaningful' enough to host a show on Sirius is at least somewhat prominent. This isn't public access TV, but is paid content... probably worth millions to the guy. As to 'attorneys' (plural) IDK, nor do I know if the guy is even one because again, I don't know whom you are referring to...

But yes, Tom... you seem to be squirming here. If someone says 'prominent attorneys' and it is instead only one... or even if the guy isn't an attorney, that's certainly a correction, but not really a meaningful one.

I STRONGLY suspect (and feel free to correct me with facts) that the most important factor of this is the word 'prominent' because that denotes 'influential'. President Obama iirc could be described as a 'prominent attorney'... but his prominence and his law degree are only loosely related.

WHich is just Tom code for, 'I've got nothing to respond to here because you're 100% correct, but I don't like it so I'm going to pretend that what you've suggested here is somehow funny'.

Yo litburds. The day is young. You dont have to use up all of your daily "lets make myself look like the most clueless assclown" posts prior to noon.

(12-15-2022 12:17 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(12-15-2022 11:59 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-15-2022 11:51 AM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(12-15-2022 11:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  So, one guy who hosts a show on Sirius = Democrat "prominent attorneys"

I don't know whom or what you're describing here...

but yes... a guy 'meaningful' enough to host a show on Sirius is at least somewhat prominent. This isn't public access TV, but is paid content... probably worth millions to the guy. As to 'attorneys' (plural) IDK, nor do I know if the guy is even one because again, I don't know whom you are referring to...

But yes, Tom... you seem to be squirming here. If someone says 'prominent attorneys' and it is instead only one... or even if the guy isn't an attorney, that's certainly a correction, but not really a meaningful one.

I STRONGLY suspect (and feel free to correct me with facts) that the most important factor of this is the word 'prominent' because that denotes 'influential'. President Obama iirc could be described as a 'prominent attorney'... but his prominence and his law degree are only loosely related.

WHich is just Tom code for, 'I've got nothing to respond to here because you're 100% correct, but I don't like it so I'm going to pretend that what you've suggested here is somehow funny'.

Sure, whatever you need to tell yourself to stroke your massive ego.

(12-15-2022 02:08 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-15-2022 12:17 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(12-15-2022 11:59 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-15-2022 11:51 AM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(12-15-2022 11:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  So, one guy who hosts a show on Sirius = Democrat "prominent attorneys"

I don't know whom or what you're describing here...

but yes... a guy 'meaningful' enough to host a show on Sirius is at least somewhat prominent. This isn't public access TV, but is paid content... probably worth millions to the guy. As to 'attorneys' (plural) IDK, nor do I know if the guy is even one because again, I don't know whom you are referring to...

But yes, Tom... you seem to be squirming here. If someone says 'prominent attorneys' and it is instead only one... or even if the guy isn't an attorney, that's certainly a correction, but not really a meaningful one.

I STRONGLY suspect (and feel free to correct me with facts) that the most important factor of this is the word 'prominent' because that denotes 'influential'. President Obama iirc could be described as a 'prominent attorney'... but his prominence and his law degree are only loosely related.

WHich is just Tom code for, 'I've got nothing to respond to here because you're 100% correct, but I don't like it so I'm going to pretend that what you've suggested here is somehow funny'.

Sure, whatever you need to tell yourself to stroke your massive ego.

So you HAVE no facts. Thanks. MY massive ego?? lmfao.... from the guy in his basement telling dozens of other people how wrong they are every day, all day...

I pretty much only routinely tell YOU how wrong you are.