(01-09-2018 12:39 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 11:42 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  These selective leaks have to stop.

Integrity test Mach.

Were you repulsed by Comey's leak to a buddy of the details of the private conversation he (the FBI director) had with a newly-elected sitting president.........so that the buddy could then leak the details to the press with the hopes (Comey's hopes) that a special prosecutor would be appointed to investigate Trump?

If not, please explain the difference. Again, I'll hang up and listen.

And some of those were classified documents he leaked.

marie barf is absolutely shameless. She just suggested that there was nothing nefarious about strzok's texts, because the WSJ may have already had the story prepared, and they were just asking him for comment.

(01-09-2018 11:42 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  You guys are weaponizing the subpoena. Why can’t you see that? These selective leaks have to stop. This has Nunes’ hands all over it. These texts also had texts of others. It’s a selective look into a selected window. It just is.

You weaponized the fake Dossier.

(01-09-2018 12:39 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 11:42 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  These selective leaks have to stop.

Integrity test Mach.

Were you repulsed by Comey's leak to a buddy of the details of the private conversation he (the FBI director) had with a newly-elected sitting president.........so that the buddy could then leak the details to the press with the hopes (Comey's hopes) that a special prosecutor would be appointed to investigate Trump?

If not, please explain the difference. Again, I'll hang up and listen.

That whole admission regarding leaking to get Special Prosecutor needs more focus.
That was essentially Comey saying “lock him up” because he knew that would be the mission of whoever the Special Prosecutor was.
As Comey is a sophisticated actor, intent should not be disputed.

Strjok and Page are now known as the "leaking lovers". And its sad that TaintBoy was so incompetent or unethical that he hired BOTH of them to be on TEAM TAINT.

BWAHAHAHAH! The Gang That Couldn't Shoot Straight strikes again.

These idiots couldn't have cratered this investigation more if they tried to. What kind of idiot in the business thinks texts are not discoverable?

A friend who does criminal defense work jokes that 75% of the cases he handles starts with the following text among co-defendants the night of the alleged offense...."sup"

(01-09-2018 12:45 PM)Kronke Wrote:  marie barf is absolutely shameless. She just suggested that there was nothing nefarious about strzok's texts, because the WSJ may have already had the story prepared, and they were just asking him for comment.

Yeah, let's call a random FBI agent and ask him for comment.

(01-09-2018 12:59 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 12:45 PM)Kronke Wrote:  marie barf is absolutely shameless. She just suggested that there was nothing nefarious about strzok's texts, because the WSJ may have already had the story prepared, and they were just asking him for comment.

Yeah, let's call a random FBI agent and ask him for comment.

Coming from the same airhead that said that ISIS just needs jobs programs.

Just like George P just happens to run into a high ranking diplomat from Australia and spills his guts over drinks about what he was doing

(01-09-2018 01:04 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 12:59 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 12:45 PM)Kronke Wrote:  marie barf is absolutely shameless. She just suggested that there was nothing nefarious about strzok's texts, because the WSJ may have already had the story prepared, and they were just asking him for comment.

Yeah, let's call a random FBI agent and ask him for comment.

Coming from the same airhead that said that ISIS just needs jobs programs.

an AI bot or mannequin would be more effective in debate.....

(01-09-2018 12:39 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 11:42 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  These selective leaks have to stop.

Integrity test Mach.

Were you repulsed by Comey's leak to a buddy of the details of the private conversation he (the FBI director) had with a newly-elected sitting president.........so that the buddy could then leak the details to the press with the hopes (Comey's hopes) that a special prosecutor would be appointed to investigate Trump?

If not, please explain the difference. Again, I'll hang up and listen.

this is the part where the thread goes cold

(01-09-2018 04:31 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 12:39 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 11:42 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  These selective leaks have to stop.

Integrity test Mach.

Were you repulsed by Comey's leak to a buddy of the details of the private conversation he (the FBI director) had with a newly-elected sitting president.........so that the buddy could then leak the details to the press with the hopes (Comey's hopes) that a special prosecutor would be appointed to investigate Trump?

If not, please explain the difference. Again, I'll hang up and listen.

this is the part where the thread goes cold

(01-09-2018 04:31 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 12:39 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 11:42 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  These selective leaks have to stop.

Integrity test Mach.

Were you repulsed by Comey's leak to a buddy of the details of the private conversation he (the FBI director) had with a newly-elected sitting president.........so that the buddy could then leak the details to the press with the hopes (Comey's hopes) that a special prosecutor would be appointed to investigate Trump?

If not, please explain the difference. Again, I'll hang up and listen.

this is the part where the thread goes cold

So you see the pattern too.

(01-09-2018 07:25 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 04:31 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 12:39 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 11:42 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  These selective leaks have to stop.

Integrity test Mach.

Were you repulsed by Comey's leak to a buddy of the details of the private conversation he (the FBI director) had with a newly-elected sitting president.........so that the buddy could then leak the details to the press with the hopes (Comey's hopes) that a special prosecutor would be appointed to investigate Trump?

If not, please explain the difference. Again, I'll hang up and listen.

this is the part where the thread goes cold

So you see the pattern too.

The fusion thread went cold as well. Basic logical questions tend to do that

(01-09-2018 07:40 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 07:25 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 04:31 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 12:39 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 11:42 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  These selective leaks have to stop.

Integrity test Mach.

Were you repulsed by Comey's leak to a buddy of the details of the private conversation he (the FBI director) had with a newly-elected sitting president.........so that the buddy could then leak the details to the press with the hopes (Comey's hopes) that a special prosecutor would be appointed to investigate Trump?

If not, please explain the difference. Again, I'll hang up and listen.

this is the part where the thread goes cold

So you see the pattern too.

The fusion thread went cold as well. Basic logical questions tend to do that

It was just like the Trump tax returns. We were told that there was damning info in there. Then they got their hands on it, built it up, and it was a giant nothing burger.

This has gone the same way. Democrats have been screaming to release the transcripts. Then they celebrated when Feistein released them. And they are a giant nothing burger.