Seems he and his squeeze may have been leaking info to the press. Farkers.

Quote:In one exchange, FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok and bureau lawyer Lisa Page engaged in a series of texts shortly before Election Day 2016 suggesting they knew in advance about an article in The Wall Street Journal and would need to feign stumbling onto the story so it could be shared with colleagues.

“Article is out, but hidden behind paywall so can’t read it,” Page texted Strzok on Oct. 24, 2016.

“Wsj? Boy that was fast,” Strzok texted back, using the initials of the famed financial newspaper. “Should I ‘find’ it and tell the team?”

The text messages, which were reviewed by The Hill, show the two FBI agents discussed how they might make it appear they innocently discovered the article, such as through Google News alerts.

“I can get it like I do every other article that hits any Google News alerts, seriously,” Strzok wrote, adding he didn’t want his team hearing about the article “from someone else.”

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/368003...news-leaks

Looks like the source of collusion to affect the outcome of the election is being uncovered..........but taint got nothing to do with the Ruskis.

now ze journos are finally diggin' with shovels......

fokkk those stupid P'OS...

I'm sick and tired of dum-bum land....

bahahahaha, excellent.

At what point does the alt-left allege a new conspiracy theory that strzok is actually a Trump operative? Because he couldn't discredit this investigation more if he tried.

Sedition. Put them in jail

The odds that Strojk hand delivered a FISA application to a judge with info using the fake dossier now sits at 99.999999999999999999998%

More selective leaks by Nunes. This is disgusting.

Banana Republic

(01-09-2018 12:15 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  More selective leaks by Nunes. This is disgusting.

More selective outrage by Mach.

(01-09-2018 12:18 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 12:15 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  More selective leaks by Nunes. This is disgusting.

More selective outrage by Mach.

No one is paying a lick of attention to the House investigation.

That dude is going to lose his license at the end of all of this.

Just look at ALL Peter Pages did for Rodham and she didn’t even know about it.
No one on her team knew about it. Liability for Wapo?

(01-09-2018 12:15 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  More selective leaks by Nunes. This is disgusting.

Please say you're kidding...just lie and say you're joking...

(01-09-2018 12:15 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  More selective leaks by Nunes. This is disgusting.

(01-09-2018 12:18 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 12:15 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  More selective leaks by Nunes. This is disgusting.

More selective outrage by Mach.

Really!!! He loves all those fake news leaks by Schiff and the Obama FBI and DOJ holdovers.

You guys are weaponizing the subpoena. Why can’t you see that? These selective leaks have to stop. This has Nunes’ hands all over it. These texts also had texts of others. It’s a selective look into a selected window. It just is.

(01-09-2018 12:18 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 12:15 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  More selective leaks by Nunes. This is disgusting.

More selective outrage by Mach.

he's gone bananas

(01-09-2018 11:42 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  You guys are weaponizing the subpoena. Why can’t you see that? These selective leaks have to stop. This has Nunes’ hands all over it. These texts also had texts of others. It’s a selective look into a selected window. It just is.

Do you enjoy this? If you don't, you really should reassess your life man.

(01-09-2018 11:42 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  You guys are weaponizing the subpoena. Why can’t you see that? These selective leaks have to stop. This has Nunes’ hands all over it. These texts also had texts of others. It’s a selective look into a selected window. It just is.

First time leaks have ever been used for partisan political gain. Outraged, I'm outraged I tell ya!

Leaking classified information to Press against the law?

(01-09-2018 11:42 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  These selective leaks have to stop.

Integrity test Mach.

Were you repulsed by Comey's leak to a buddy of the details of the private conversation he (the FBI director) had with a newly-elected sitting president.........so that the buddy could then leak the details to the press with the hopes (Comey's hopes) that a special prosecutor would be appointed to investigate Trump?

If not, please explain the difference. Again, I'll hang up and listen.