(12-12-2017 10:17 AM)pcm0103 Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 09:59 AM)BSUTOP25 Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 09:47 AM)pcm0103 Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 09:22 AM)BSUTOP25 Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 08:33 AM)pcm0103 Wrote:  Patient for what? If your admins wanted to join they would of join. Don't make excuses for your inept planning. Tell me what reason would be needed for the AAC to be patient with those schools from the west. What were you guys waiting on? What was holding you back prior to the AAC asking ECU, Tulane, and Tulsa?

1. I'm not Bob Kustra so it wasn't my "inept planning."
2. As I already mentioned, the Big East should have exercised patience because a few more MWC schools probably would have joined and the eventual AAC would have a much better portfolio than it does today.
3. I have no clue what you're talking about with "what were you guys waiting on?" and "what was holding you back prior to .." as those questions have zero relevance to what I posted above.

1. The "inept planning was referring to your admins. I assumed you would of known that but I guess I was wrong on that.

2. You can't assume (see #1) a few more MWC probably would of join. Especially now that the AAC is in a much better position than the MWC. You see the end result of what you missed out on so you want to blame the hastiness of the Big East on your short comings.

3. Yes it has a lot of relevance. You said that the AAC should of had patience. My question is why? You made up some Appalachian Rocky divisions but can't answer why the Big should of been patient? What should they have been waiting on?

sigh ... I'm obviously not dealing with a rocket scientist here.

Anyway, there was no urgency to add ECU, Tulane, or Tulsa at that time. I don't believe there is a strong argument that those schools helped the TV negotiations. The conference should have waited to see how the chips would eventually fall and would have been fine with 9 football members for a few seasons. Had the Big East have waited, Boise State and SDSU probably wouldn't have left and some of the top profile schools from the MWC and BYU likely would have joined.

No not a rocket scientist but smart enough to recognize the fallacy in your posts. But hey your happy in the MWC so I guess thats a good thing right? Next time Aresco offers an invite you might want to jump on it.

Nope, not a rocket scientist. But anyway, I don't think we're going to agree so I'll move on. LOL

(12-12-2017 10:16 AM)BSUTOP25 Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 10:09 AM)pesik Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 05:01 AM)BSUTOP25 Wrote:  Had the AAC just been patient and waited a bit before adding Tulane, Tulsa, and ECU, I believe Air Force, BYU, Colorado State, and Fresno State or UNLV would have joined Boise State and SDSU in what could have been a true all sports western division and Army would have probably been compelled to join the east as well. The AAC could have looked something like this:

Appalachian Swamp Division
Army
Central Florida
Cincinnati
Connecticut
Memphis
Navy
South Florida
Temple

Rocky Sierra Division
Air Force
Boise State
Brigham Young
Colorado State
Houston
San Diego State
Southern Methodist
Either Fresno State or UNLV

Now that would have been a very strong BOR conference with some leverage to negotiate a comparatively lucrative tv contract and much better bowl options. But with ECU, Tulane, and Tulsa in the mix, that ship sailed and the opportunity is unlikely to happen again.

please stop i cant stand why all the bsu fans and mwc change history

1) we offered fresno and unlv to join the aac. but bsu was already in talks to join the mwc bac back, they rejected because bsu sabotaged it
https://www.cbssports.com/college-footba...-football/

2) stop his ridiculous narrative that boise only left becuase this team was added...bsu left becuase they pinned both conferencea against each other and the mwc caved...boise with tulane already in said if the aac matched the deal the mwc had they would stay...we said no..boise and sdsu arent in the mwc becuase boise wanted more money than everyone else (damaging whatever league it joined)

3) ecu does 48k in football when they are atleast decent (.500 bowl team)...when they are somewhat good they are capable of doing 60k-70k, 8win+(and before they started sucking they were in talks to expand their stadium to 60k) ecu also has historic rivalries with vtech, ncstate, wvu, and south carolina, by far the biggeest local fanbase in the G5. ecu over half those teams you named

4) what ship has sailed, we are getting a way better tv deal and bowl games in 2020 when we renegotiate, our position has drastically improved..the ship has sailed for boise to be a part of it for greed...

blame the boise administration for playing a short sighted game for only self benefit..

LOL ... Boise State left because the writing was on the wall that no true western division would ever take place and the Big East that they joined was not the same as the one they left and it was for damn sure the tv contract wasn't going to be as lucrative as advertised. There's no way the fanbase would have wanted to stay in the league as it's is currently configured. There was a lot of outcry about there not being a true western division. The Big East should have stayed put rather than inviting those three schools so quickly.

Anyway, please do keep us updated on your billions of dollars contract and P6 status. :)

thats a lie!!!

there are released emails from the ENTIRE situation (from cincys old AD)
the timeline
1) Boise asked the aac for a separate deal with nbc, we said no but to provide details. that Aresco wanted to look into it and see if he could make it work for the league. Boise never provided anything

2) Boise hints that the mwc is considering it. we hold our ground saying no special deal

3) boise gets special deal from the MWC, but says if the AAC matched the deal, on all terms theyd stay..we said no

this is documented...

the only reason the true western division didn't work was because Boise sabotaged it...we started talking to fresno and unlv (confirmed), but rumors about boise leaving came days after, they rejected (likely knew boise was coming back) ...if boise had just been loyal, and not greedy, fresno and unlv come

ps Tulsa was added AFTER you left...you changed the history to fit your narrative

and the boise fanbase wouldn't have wanted to stay in the league as configured??
your league/division games would be sdsu, houston, memphis, smu, fresno, unlv ....boise fans love Wyoming games that much?..ps your AD public said your fanbase is declining at a fast rate

and who sad anything about a billion dollar tv deal...we will get 4-8mill per team on the next tv deal and will secure 3 very good bowl on top of what we have ..it isnt on the level of the other p5 but it will definitely separate us from the g4

(12-12-2017 10:29 AM)BSUTOP25 Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 10:17 AM)pcm0103 Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 09:59 AM)BSUTOP25 Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 09:47 AM)pcm0103 Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 09:22 AM)BSUTOP25 Wrote:  1. I'm not Bob Kustra so it wasn't my "inept planning."
2. As I already mentioned, the Big East should have exercised patience because a few more MWC schools probably would have joined and the eventual AAC would have a much better portfolio than it does today.
3. I have no clue what you're talking about with "what were you guys waiting on?" and "what was holding you back prior to .." as those questions have zero relevance to what I posted above.

1. The "inept planning was referring to your admins. I assumed you would of known that but I guess I was wrong on that.

2. You can't assume (see #1) a few more MWC probably would of join. Especially now that the AAC is in a much better position than the MWC. You see the end result of what you missed out on so you want to blame the hastiness of the Big East on your short comings.

3. Yes it has a lot of relevance. You said that the AAC should of had patience. My question is why? You made up some Appalachian Rocky divisions but can't answer why the Big should of been patient? What should they have been waiting on?

sigh ... I'm obviously not dealing with a rocket scientist here.

Anyway, there was no urgency to add ECU, Tulane, or Tulsa at that time. I don't believe there is a strong argument that those schools helped the TV negotiations. The conference should have waited to see how the chips would eventually fall and would have been fine with 9 football members for a few seasons. Had the Big East have waited, Boise State and SDSU probably wouldn't have left and some of the top profile schools from the MWC and BYU likely would have joined.

No not a rocket scientist but smart enough to recognize the fallacy in your posts. But hey your happy in the MWC so I guess thats a good thing right? Next time Aresco offers an invite you might want to jump on it.

Nope, not a rocket scientist. But anyway, I don't think we're going to agree so I'll move on. LOL

You need a red pen to go with that butt hurt?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Did Boise play football this year? I never saw them on TV.

(12-12-2017 11:50 AM)HuskyU Wrote:  Did Boise play football this year? I never saw them on TV.

They won the PBR title I believe. Will be playing Akron in a bowl in Wyoming on Fox1 next Tuesday at noon.

When this was the big east I was vocally against adding them unless they ditched the blue field. That's as small time as it gets.

(12-12-2017 06:10 PM)BullsBEAST Wrote:  When this was the big east I was vocally against adding them unless they ditched the blue field. That's as small time as it gets.

Right on. Fields that match your school's colors are a joke...

(12-12-2017 06:23 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 06:10 PM)BullsBEAST Wrote:  When this was the big east I was vocally against adding them unless they ditched the blue field. That's as small time as it gets.

Right on. Fields that match your school's colors are a joke...

Yeah... YOU LISTENING, TULANE????

(12-12-2017 09:59 AM)BSUTOP25 Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 09:47 AM)pcm0103 Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 09:22 AM)BSUTOP25 Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 08:33 AM)pcm0103 Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 05:01 AM)BSUTOP25 Wrote:  Had the AAC just been patient and waited a bit before adding Tulane, Tulsa, and ECU, I believe Air Force, BYU, Colorado State, and Fresno State or UNLV would have joined Boise State and SDSU in what could have been a true all sports western division and Army would have probably been compelled to join the east as well. The AAC could have looked something like this:

Appalachian Swamp Division
Army
Central Florida
Cincinnati
Connecticut
Memphis
Navy
South Florida
Temple

Rocky Sierra Division
Air Force
Boise State
Brigham Young
Colorado State
Houston
San Diego State
Southern Methodist
Either Fresno State or UNLV

Now that would have been a very strong BOR conference with some leverage to negotiate a comparatively lucrative tv contract and much better bowl options. But with ECU, Tulane, and Tulsa in the mix, that ship sailed and the opportunity is unlikely to happen again.

Patient for what? If your admins wanted to join they would of join. Don't make excuses for your inept planning. Tell me what reason would be needed for the AAC to be patient with those schools from the west. What were you guys waiting on? What was holding you back prior to the AAC asking ECU, Tulane, and Tulsa?

1. I'm not Bob Kustra so it wasn't my "inept planning."
2. As I already mentioned, the Big East should have exercised patience because a few more MWC schools probably would have joined and the eventual AAC would have a much better portfolio than it does today.
3. I have no clue what you're talking about with "what were you guys waiting on?" and "what was holding you back prior to .." as those questions have zero relevance to what I posted above.

1. The "inept planning was referring to your admins. I assumed you would of known that but I guess I was wrong on that.

2. You can't assume (see #1) a few more MWC probably would of join. Especially now that the AAC is in a much better position than the MWC. You see the end result of what you missed out on so you want to blame the hastiness of the Big East on your short comings.

3. Yes it has a lot of relevance. You said that the AAC should of had patience. My question is why? You made up some Appalachian Rocky divisions but can't answer why the Big should of been patient? What should they have been waiting on?

sigh ... I'm obviously not dealing with a rocket scientist here.

Anyway, there was no urgency to add ECU, Tulane, or Tulsa at that time. I don't believe there is a strong argument that those schools helped the TV negotiations. The conference should have waited to see how the chips would eventually fall and would have been fine with 9 football members for a few seasons. Had the Big East have waited, Boise State and SDSU probably wouldn't have left and some of the top profile schools from the MWC and BYU likely would have joined.

They could have waited a bit, but the truth is they had to add at least one within a few months. They certainly could not wait multiple seasons. They only had 7 all sports members. You need 8 all sports members to sponsor FBS football. That said, l largly agree that the AAC should have waited until the C7 situation completely shook out before replacing teams. I mean, without knowing who was in the conference for the long haul—how do you know who makes sense to add?

(12-12-2017 10:32 AM)pesik Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 10:16 AM)BSUTOP25 Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 10:09 AM)pesik Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 05:01 AM)BSUTOP25 Wrote:  Had the AAC just been patient and waited a bit before adding Tulane, Tulsa, and ECU, I believe Air Force, BYU, Colorado State, and Fresno State or UNLV would have joined Boise State and SDSU in what could have been a true all sports western division and Army would have probably been compelled to join the east as well. The AAC could have looked something like this:

Appalachian Swamp Division
Army
Central Florida
Cincinnati
Connecticut
Memphis
Navy
South Florida
Temple

Rocky Sierra Division
Air Force
Boise State
Brigham Young
Colorado State
Houston
San Diego State
Southern Methodist
Either Fresno State or UNLV

Now that would have been a very strong BOR conference with some leverage to negotiate a comparatively lucrative tv contract and much better bowl options. But with ECU, Tulane, and Tulsa in the mix, that ship sailed and the opportunity is unlikely to happen again.

please stop i cant stand why all the bsu fans and mwc change history

1) we offered fresno and unlv to join the aac. but bsu was already in talks to join the mwc bac back, they rejected because bsu sabotaged it
https://www.cbssports.com/college-footba...-football/

2) stop his ridiculous narrative that boise only left becuase this team was added...bsu left becuase they pinned both conferencea against each other and the mwc caved...boise with tulane already in said if the aac matched the deal the mwc had they would stay...we said no..boise and sdsu arent in the mwc becuase boise wanted more money than everyone else (damaging whatever league it joined)

3) ecu does 48k in football when they are atleast decent (.500 bowl team)...when they are somewhat good they are capable of doing 60k-70k, 8win+(and before they started sucking they were in talks to expand their stadium to 60k) ecu also has historic rivalries with vtech, ncstate, wvu, and south carolina, by far the biggeest local fanbase in the G5. ecu over half those teams you named

4) what ship has sailed, we are getting a way better tv deal and bowl games in 2020 when we renegotiate, our position has drastically improved..the ship has sailed for boise to be a part of it for greed...

blame the boise administration for playing a short sighted game for only self benefit..

LOL ... Boise State left because the writing was on the wall that no true western division would ever take place and the Big East that they joined was not the same as the one they left and it was for damn sure the tv contract wasn't going to be as lucrative as advertised. There's no way the fanbase would have wanted to stay in the league as it's is currently configured. There was a lot of outcry about there not being a true western division. The Big East should have stayed put rather than inviting those three schools so quickly.

Anyway, please do keep us updated on your billions of dollars contract and P6 status. :)

thats a lie!!!

there are released emails from the ENTIRE situation (from cincys old AD)
the timeline
1) Boise asked the aac for a separate deal with nbc, we said no but to provide details. that Aresco wanted to look into it and see if he could make it work for the league. Boise never provided anything

2) Boise hints that the mwc is considering it. we hold our ground saying no special deal

3) boise gets special deal from the MWC, but says if the AAC matched the deal, on all terms theyd stay..we said no

this is documented...

the only reason the true western division didn't work was because Boise sabotaged it...we started talking to fresno and unlv (confirmed), but rumors about boise leaving came days after, they rejected (likely knew boise was coming back) ...if boise had just been loyal, and not greedy, fresno and unlv come

ps Tulsa was added AFTER you left...you changed the history to fit your narrative

and the boise fanbase wouldn't have wanted to stay in the league as configured??
your league/division games would be sdsu, houston, memphis, smu, fresno, unlv ....boise fans love Wyoming games that much?..ps your AD public said your fanbase is declining at a fast rate

and who sad anything about a billion dollar tv deal...we will get 4-8mill per team on the next tv deal and will secure 3 very good bowl on top of what we have ..it isnt on the level of the other p5 but it will definitely separate us from the g4

ESPN just announce more layoffs again...... Freeing up money for the AAC contract
http://www.sportingnews.com/other-sports...2iabhcqxe0

We'll be getting at least $20 Mil per team. Nice try.

And nice win by your Cajuns last night!

^^^$22-25M/team/yr

(12-13-2017 11:22 AM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 10:32 AM)pesik Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 10:16 AM)BSUTOP25 Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 10:09 AM)pesik Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 05:01 AM)BSUTOP25 Wrote:  Had the AAC just been patient and waited a bit before adding Tulane, Tulsa, and ECU, I believe Air Force, BYU, Colorado State, and Fresno State or UNLV would have joined Boise State and SDSU in what could have been a true all sports western division and Army would have probably been compelled to join the east as well. The AAC could have looked something like this:

Appalachian Swamp Division
Army
Central Florida
Cincinnati
Connecticut
Memphis
Navy
South Florida
Temple

Rocky Sierra Division
Air Force
Boise State
Brigham Young
Colorado State
Houston
San Diego State
Southern Methodist
Either Fresno State or UNLV

Now that would have been a very strong BOR conference with some leverage to negotiate a comparatively lucrative tv contract and much better bowl options. But with ECU, Tulane, and Tulsa in the mix, that ship sailed and the opportunity is unlikely to happen again.

please stop i cant stand why all the bsu fans and mwc change history

1) we offered fresno and unlv to join the aac. but bsu was already in talks to join the mwc bac back, they rejected because bsu sabotaged it
https://www.cbssports.com/college-footba...-football/

2) stop his ridiculous narrative that boise only left becuase this team was added...bsu left becuase they pinned both conferencea against each other and the mwc caved...boise with tulane already in said if the aac matched the deal the mwc had they would stay...we said no..boise and sdsu arent in the mwc becuase boise wanted more money than everyone else (damaging whatever league it joined)

3) ecu does 48k in football when they are atleast decent (.500 bowl team)...when they are somewhat good they are capable of doing 60k-70k, 8win+(and before they started sucking they were in talks to expand their stadium to 60k) ecu also has historic rivalries with vtech, ncstate, wvu, and south carolina, by far the biggeest local fanbase in the G5. ecu over half those teams you named

4) what ship has sailed, we are getting a way better tv deal and bowl games in 2020 when we renegotiate, our position has drastically improved..the ship has sailed for boise to be a part of it for greed...

blame the boise administration for playing a short sighted game for only self benefit..

LOL ... Boise State left because the writing was on the wall that no true western division would ever take place and the Big East that they joined was not the same as the one they left and it was for damn sure the tv contract wasn't going to be as lucrative as advertised. There's no way the fanbase would have wanted to stay in the league as it's is currently configured. There was a lot of outcry about there not being a true western division. The Big East should have stayed put rather than inviting those three schools so quickly.

Anyway, please do keep us updated on your billions of dollars contract and P6 status. :)

thats a lie!!!

there are released emails from the ENTIRE situation (from cincys old AD)
the timeline
1) Boise asked the aac for a separate deal with nbc, we said no but to provide details. that Aresco wanted to look into it and see if he could make it work for the league. Boise never provided anything

2) Boise hints that the mwc is considering it. we hold our ground saying no special deal

3) boise gets special deal from the MWC, but says if the AAC matched the deal, on all terms theyd stay..we said no

this is documented...

the only reason the true western division didn't work was because Boise sabotaged it...we started talking to fresno and unlv (confirmed), but rumors about boise leaving came days after, they rejected (likely knew boise was coming back) ...if boise had just been loyal, and not greedy, fresno and unlv come

ps Tulsa was added AFTER you left...you changed the history to fit your narrative

and the boise fanbase wouldn't have wanted to stay in the league as configured??
your league/division games would be sdsu, houston, memphis, smu, fresno, unlv ....boise fans love Wyoming games that much?..ps your AD public said your fanbase is declining at a fast rate

and who sad anything about a billion dollar tv deal...we will get 4-8mill per team on the next tv deal and will secure 3 very good bowl on top of what we have ..it isnt on the level of the other p5 but it will definitely separate us from the g4

ESPN just announce more layoffs again...... Freeing up money for the AAC contract
http://www.sportingnews.com/other-sports...2iabhcqxe0

that means absolutely nothing...espn keeps reducing oranges and you keep using that as justification for them losing apples

they have been very upfront, that they feel personalities are replaceable, so they feel they can cut anyone who they feel is overpriced

espn has 9000 employees everytime they fire 50 you think the world is imploding
they have hired numerous high priced replacements aswell

espn exec all said most of the layoff is them trying to hit a different demographic and most the firing werent in that demographic. they are transitioning to a new era and moving pieces they think will fit

espn in the mist of all these layoff tripled the big 10 contract...TRIPLED...and the big 10 was so confident they could get espn to do it again for more in a short time, they only agreed to 6 year contract

espn has made it clear they will invest in content.....they are launching a espn version of netflix in a few months and hulu live with espn just launched..

4-8 million isnt even alot..the big east gets 5mil a piece, with no football...if espn cant afford that ..(which i doubt)...nbcsports or cbssport...or some online platform will...aresco already confirmed numerous big time digital outlets have contacted and are interested but that he wants espn

despite your deep jealousy and denial of the AAC. anyone trying to get into live sports content can either spend 26mil per on a p5, or 4-8mil for the next best thing (4-5 bid basketball league,, that regularly put 3 top 25 in football)

4-8mil as a min is almost guaranteed because if not espn someone else will

(12-13-2017 12:13 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(12-13-2017 11:22 AM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 10:32 AM)pesik Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 10:16 AM)BSUTOP25 Wrote:  

(12-12-2017 10:09 AM)pesik Wrote:  please stop i cant stand why all the bsu fans and mwc change history

1) we offered fresno and unlv to join the aac. but bsu was already in talks to join the mwc bac back, they rejected because bsu sabotaged it
https://www.cbssports.com/college-footba...-football/

2) stop his ridiculous narrative that boise only left becuase this team was added...bsu left becuase they pinned both conferencea against each other and the mwc caved...boise with tulane already in said if the aac matched the deal the mwc had they would stay...we said no..boise and sdsu arent in the mwc becuase boise wanted more money than everyone else (damaging whatever league it joined)

3) ecu does 48k in football when they are atleast decent (.500 bowl team)...when they are somewhat good they are capable of doing 60k-70k, 8win+(and before they started sucking they were in talks to expand their stadium to 60k) ecu also has historic rivalries with vtech, ncstate, wvu, and south carolina, by far the biggeest local fanbase in the G5. ecu over half those teams you named

4) what ship has sailed, we are getting a way better tv deal and bowl games in 2020 when we renegotiate, our position has drastically improved..the ship has sailed for boise to be a part of it for greed...

blame the boise administration for playing a short sighted game for only self benefit..

LOL ... Boise State left because the writing was on the wall that no true western division would ever take place and the Big East that they joined was not the same as the one they left and it was for damn sure the tv contract wasn't going to be as lucrative as advertised. There's no way the fanbase would have wanted to stay in the league as it's is currently configured. There was a lot of outcry about there not being a true western division. The Big East should have stayed put rather than inviting those three schools so quickly.

Anyway, please do keep us updated on your billions of dollars contract and P6 status. :)

thats a lie!!!

there are released emails from the ENTIRE situation (from cincys old AD)
the timeline
1) Boise asked the aac for a separate deal with nbc, we said no but to provide details. that Aresco wanted to look into it and see if he could make it work for the league. Boise never provided anything

2) Boise hints that the mwc is considering it. we hold our ground saying no special deal

3) boise gets special deal from the MWC, but says if the AAC matched the deal, on all terms theyd stay..we said no

this is documented...

the only reason the true western division didn't work was because Boise sabotaged it...we started talking to fresno and unlv (confirmed), but rumors about boise leaving came days after, they rejected (likely knew boise was coming back) ...if boise had just been loyal, and not greedy, fresno and unlv come

ps Tulsa was added AFTER you left...you changed the history to fit your narrative

and the boise fanbase wouldn't have wanted to stay in the league as configured??
your league/division games would be sdsu, houston, memphis, smu, fresno, unlv ....boise fans love Wyoming games that much?..ps your AD public said your fanbase is declining at a fast rate

and who sad anything about a billion dollar tv deal...we will get 4-8mill per team on the next tv deal and will secure 3 very good bowl on top of what we have ..it isnt on the level of the other p5 but it will definitely separate us from the g4

ESPN just announce more layoffs again...... Freeing up money for the AAC contract
http://www.sportingnews.com/other-sports...2iabhcqxe0

that means absolutely nothing...espn keeps reducing oranges and you keep using that as justification for them losing apples

they have been very upfront, that they feel personalities are replaceable, so they feel they can cut anyone who they feel is overpriced

espn has 9000 employees everytime they fire 50 you think the world is imploding
they have hired numerous high priced replacements aswell

espn exec all said most of the layoff is them trying to hit a different demographic and most the firing werent in that demographic. they are transitioning to a new era and moving pieces they think will fit

espn in the mist of all these layoff tripled the big 10 contract...TRIPLED...and the big 10 was so confident they could get espn to do it again for more in a short time, they only agreed to 6 year contract

espn has made it clear they will invest in content.....they are launching a espn version of netflix in a few months and hulu live with espn just launched..

4-8 million isnt even alot..the big east gets 5mil a piece, with no football...if espn cant afford that ..(which i doubt)...nbcsports or cbssport...or some online platform will...aresco already confirmed numerous big time digital outlets have contacted and are interested but that he wants espn

despite your deep jealousy and denial of the AAC. anyone trying to get into live sports content can either spend 26mil per on a p5, or 4-8mil for the next best thing (4-5 bid basketball league,, that regularly put 3 top 25 in football)

4-8mil as a min is almost guaranteed because if not espn someone else will

Exactly. lol...this "broke" company desperately laying off people to stave off bankruptcy JUST BID FOR MORE CONTENT (Fox RSN's). They are realizing what we already know. People dont pay $7 amonth for ESPN because they cant live without Steven A Smith. They pay $7 a month for actual live games. Other than that--most never turn on ESPN. There is much more compelling content on other networks than ESPN talking heads.

ESPN will continue to do 2 things moving forward.

1) They will look to "lean down" using cheaper talking head talent laced with a few key "big names". Part of this "lean down" will be figuring out cheaper more efficient ways to produce live games--meaning continuing layoffs and streamlining on the production side.

2) They will continue to aggregate live sports content and monetize it via multiple platforms (including streaming).

Pesik is only 17 years old ?,well that explains it

(12-13-2017 07:38 PM)JHS55 Wrote:  Pesik is only 17 years old ?,well that explains it

i wish i was still 17...ive been on these message boards for like 5/6 years...i used to be on the espn message boards with vickmike before it shut down years ago..can you imagine if i was only 17, that would mean i was trash talking on here at like 8..lol thinking about that is kinda funny

(12-13-2017 08:57 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(12-13-2017 07:38 PM)JHS55 Wrote:  Pesik is only 17 years old ?,well that explains it

i wish i was still 17...ive been on these message boards for like 5/6 years...i used to be on the espn message boards with vickmike before it shut down years ago..can you imagine if i was only 17, that would mean i was trash talking on here at like 8..lol thinking about that is kinda funny

I think the assumption of you being a minor derives from your lack of capitalization, punctuation, and relatively bad syntax.

(12-13-2017 10:10 PM)fanhood Wrote:  

(12-13-2017 08:57 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(12-13-2017 07:38 PM)JHS55 Wrote:  Pesik is only 17 years old ?,well that explains it

i wish i was still 17...ive been on these message boards for like 5/6 years...i used to be on the espn message boards with vickmike before it shut down years ago..can you imagine if i was only 17, that would mean i was trash talking on here at like 8..lol thinking about that is kinda funny

I think the assumption of you being a minor derives from your lack of capitalization, punctuation, and relatively bad syntax.

What do you expect!?!?!? He went to duh coug u .... Todge Rodge says it the best

(12-14-2017 11:08 AM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(12-13-2017 10:10 PM)fanhood Wrote:  

(12-13-2017 08:57 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(12-13-2017 07:38 PM)JHS55 Wrote:  Pesik is only 17 years old ?,well that explains it

i wish i was still 17...ive been on these message boards for like 5/6 years...i used to be on the espn message boards with vickmike before it shut down years ago..can you imagine if i was only 17, that would mean i was trash talking on here at like 8..lol thinking about that is kinda funny

I think the assumption of you being a minor derives from your lack of capitalization, punctuation, and relatively bad syntax.

What do you expect!?!?!? He went to duh coug u .... Todge Rodge says it the best

we both know it wasn't that funny.. i don't get your overuse of the laughing smilies on every post

your school is bad this person agrees look at this

todge also trashes c-usa badly, so im guessing you agree with him on everything
am i right

(12-14-2017 11:21 AM)pesik Wrote:  

(12-14-2017 11:08 AM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(12-13-2017 10:10 PM)fanhood Wrote:  

(12-13-2017 08:57 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(12-13-2017 07:38 PM)JHS55 Wrote:  Pesik is only 17 years old ?,well that explains it

i wish i was still 17...ive been on these message boards for like 5/6 years...i used to be on the espn message boards with vickmike before it shut down years ago..can you imagine if i was only 17, that would mean i was trash talking on here at like 8..lol thinking about that is kinda funny

I think the assumption of you being a minor derives from your lack of capitalization, punctuation, and relatively bad syntax.

What do you expect!?!?!? He went to duh coug u .... Todge Rodge says it the best

we both know it wasn't that funny.. i don't get your overuse of the laughing smilies on every post

your school is bad this person agrees look at this

todge also trashes c-usa badly, so im guessing you agree with him on everything
am i right