(10-27-2017 03:05 PM)WRCisforgotten79 Wrote: For those skeptical of Neely's Ghost, I leave a couple of Bailiff quotes regarding Glaesmann, courtesy of Glynn Hill's Twitter:
"With Sam missing all those games, you're missing 3 games of development. There's going to be growing pains ... we're going through it now."
"He's a young QB, and he's made some really great decisions and he's made some poor decisions."
Of course. He is covering his a**. Do you think he is intentionally losing?
(10-27-2017 03:05 PM)WRCisforgotten79 Wrote: For those skeptical of Neely's Ghost, I leave a couple of Bailiff quotes regarding Glaesmann, courtesy of Glynn Hill's Twitter:
"With Sam missing all those games, you're missing 3 games of development. There's going to be growing pains ... we're going through it now."
"He's a young QB, and he's made some really great decisions and he's made some poor decisions."
Of course. He is covering his a**. Do you think he is intentionally losing?
No. But, this "we're young so that's my excuse" is tiresome.
(10-27-2017 03:05 PM)WRCisforgotten79 Wrote: For those skeptical of Neely's Ghost, I leave a couple of Bailiff quotes regarding Glaesmann, courtesy of Glynn Hill's Twitter:
"With Sam missing all those games, you're missing 3 games of development. There's going to be growing pains ... we're going through it now."
"He's a young QB, and he's made some really great decisions and he's made some poor decisions."
Of course. He is covering his a**. Do you think he is intentionally losing?
No. But, this "we're young so that's my excuse" is tiresome.
I truly love an entree to use my favorite movie line of all time, but its not my fault:
(This post was last modified: 10-27-2017 06:24 PM by tanqtonic.)
(10-24-2017 09:27 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote: If it has no purpose, would we be better off just lining up and running the play, a la Jess Neely before he was a ghost?
Same question was posed to the fake FG attempt. Wouldn't we just be better off lining up and running a play?
I had similar thoughts. Would we have been better off at 20-10? We would still need two scores. 20-14 makes it a one score game.
I remember a few years back when one of the complaints about Bailiff was that he always took the "safe' play. Well, in this game he didn't, and maybe the results show why many coaches take the safe play.
Personally, I am glad he tried to win the game, rather than just close the gap. The questions I have are about the play that was chosen and the execution of it. I am not sure why it didn't work, but like most "double or nothing" choices, sometimes you get nothing. This time, we got nothing.
(10-27-2017 06:16 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:
(10-27-2017 04:36 PM)WRCisforgotten79 Wrote:
(10-27-2017 03:14 PM)Middle Ages Wrote:
(10-27-2017 03:05 PM)WRCisforgotten79 Wrote: For those skeptical of Neely's Ghost, I leave a couple of Bailiff quotes regarding Glaesmann, courtesy of Glynn Hill's Twitter:
"With Sam missing all those games, you're missing 3 games of development. There's going to be growing pains ... we're going through it now."
"He's a young QB, and he's made some really great decisions and he's made some poor decisions."
Of course. He is covering his a**. Do you think he is intentionally losing?
No. But, this "we're young so that's my excuse" is tiresome.
I truly love an entree to use my favorite movie line of all time, but its not my fault:
