Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Is this collusion?
Author Message
Machiavelli Offline
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity
*

Posts: 19,948
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation: 465
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
Post: #31
RE: Is this collusion?
But Putin said they didn't meddle. Donnie Jr said the lawyer rambled. Nothing to see here.
07-09-2017 10:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Machiavelli Offline
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity
*

Posts: 19,948
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation: 465
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
Post: #32
RE: Is this collusion?
Kronke has 3 credible sources........... New FBI director Ted Nugent is going to get to the bottom of all of this.
07-09-2017 10:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Claw Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 16,212
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 270
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Orangeville HELP!
Post: #33
RE: Is this collusion?
It doesn't matter if it is real. It isn't illegal. It isn't even unethical.

Taking information about your opponent from someone is a normal election process. Just because you don't like who they were doesn't make it wrong.

This definition of "collusion" as somehow criminal would fit a number of news organizations guilty of "colluding" with felons who leaked secret government information in attempts to damage Trump. Those people actually broke the law to "collude" against Trump.

Listening to what the Russians have to say is in no way, shape, or form illegal.

Trying to win an election is not illegal.

Trying to discredit your opponent is not illegal.

There is nothing here that is a problem.

Nothing.
07-09-2017 10:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Paul M Offline
American-American
*

Posts: 19,161
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 475
I Root For: OU
Location: Next to Boomer
Post: #34
RE: Is this collusion?
Nailed it.
07-09-2017 10:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Machiavelli Offline
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity
*

Posts: 19,948
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation: 465
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
Post: #35
RE: Is this collusion?
Wow. How fast we go from no evidence of collusion to even if they did it's not illegal.
07-09-2017 10:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Claw Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 16,212
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 270
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Orangeville HELP!
Post: #36
RE: Is this collusion?
(07-09-2017 10:24 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Wow. How fast we go from no evidence of collusion to even if they did it's not illegal.

Rigging vote totals would be illegal. Tampering with registration would be too.

But getting information?

Why would that be different than the Trump pee-pee dossier? Didn't that come from a foreign intelligence agency as well? What would be the difference?
07-09-2017 10:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UofMstateU Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 17,969
Joined: Dec 2009
Reputation: 1033
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #37
RE: Is this collusion?
(07-09-2017 10:24 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Wow. How fast we go from no evidence of collusion to even if they did it's not illegal.

[Image: giphy.gif]
07-09-2017 10:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Paul M Offline
American-American
*

Posts: 19,161
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 475
I Root For: OU
Location: Next to Boomer
Post: #38
RE: Is this collusion?
THIS wouldn't be illegal. This wasn't collusion.

Hillary would do this as any Dem or Rep would. It's just listening to what someone claims to have. If it's good and you can use it, you do. Sometimes it's bad info and a campaign chooses to use it any way. Like the Steele Dossier. This is what campaigns and parties do.
(This post was last modified: 07-09-2017 10:34 PM by Paul M.)
07-09-2017 10:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HCJag Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,263
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 16
I Root For: South Alabama
Location: Mobile, AL
Post: #39
RE: Is this collusion?
(07-09-2017 10:28 PM)Claw Wrote:  
(07-09-2017 10:24 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Wow. How fast we go from no evidence of collusion to even if they did it's not illegal.

Rigging vote totals would be illegal. Tampering with registration would be too.

But getting information?

Why would that be different than the Trump pee-pee dossier? Didn't that come from a foreign intelligence agency as well? What would be the difference?

Swish. 3 points. Well, 2 points is all I got.
(This post was last modified: 07-09-2017 11:15 PM by HCJag.)
07-09-2017 11:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
usmbacker Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,768
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 538
I Root For: Beer
Location:
Post: #40
RE: Is this collusion?
(07-09-2017 09:23 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  
(07-09-2017 07:50 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  They said they have damaging info on Clinton and he met with her. If that is not collusion what would be collusion in your eyes? This is the text book definition of collusion. What am I missing? No tit for tat. Just honest dialogue. What would be collusion in your eyes who are defending Trump?

So the lawyer had nothing, gave nothing, got nothing in return, in a meeting that lasted 20 minutes. This is a scandal?

In Mach's world, any Trump, any day, doing anything, is a scandal. Maybe one day, he can accept the fact he lost an election. It is to the point of being a sick obsession with him, so just let him rant and rave.
07-09-2017 11:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2017 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2017 MyBB Group.