CSNbbs

Full Version: Is this collusion?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Donald Trump jr meets with Russian lawyer when promised damaging info on Clinton. Opinions? That's about as close as you are going to get.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/?referer=http...thevictors
Conflict on interest that is playing out in policy.
(07-09-2017 05:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]Donald Trump jr meets with Russian lawyer when promised damaging info on Clinton. Opinions? That's about as close as you are going to get.

That about nails it. That's about as close as anyone will ever get.

But for arguments sake, isn't it at least a possibility that someone from the Hillary camp was behind this in an attempt to discredit Trump? Sounds just as plausible as a Trump/Russian conspiracy.

And how many anonymous sources does the New York Times have?
No
Russians.
[Image: LorettaLynchBillClinton_590.jpg]
Stupid
Fake news
(07-09-2017 06:03 PM)cb4029 Wrote: [ -> ]Russians.

Repubrussians
(07-09-2017 06:41 PM)Kronke Wrote: [ -> ]Fake news

Give me your credibility.

Don Jr just admitted to it.
(07-09-2017 06:42 PM)swagsurfer11 Wrote: [ -> ]
(07-09-2017 06:03 PM)cb4029 Wrote: [ -> ]Russians.

Repubrussians

Demviets
Are we buckling again?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
(07-09-2017 06:13 PM)wahoowa Wrote: [ -> ][Image: LorettaLynchBillClinton_590.jpg]

Those two. Just sayin'
Should take a day or two for this to unravel for fake news.
They said they have damaging info on Clinton and he met with her. If that is not collusion what would be collusion in your eyes? This is the text book definition of collusion. What am I missing? No tit for tat. Just honest dialogue. What would be collusion in your eyes who are defending Trump?
(07-09-2017 05:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]Donald Trump jr meets with Russian lawyer when promised damaging info on Clinton. Opinions? That's about as close as you are going to get.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/?referer=http...thevictors

You are such a sucker for this junk.
Impeachment is a political process at the end of the day and you guys aren't there it doesn't seem. We know they hacked the DNC and mettelled with the election. Trumps team met with them during the campaign in numerous ways. Little Dondal admitted he met with the lawyer AFTER she said she had damaging info. How else can you spell it out?
Do any of you? Any of you worry about being able to blackmail Trump? Think about that? He's compromised any way you stretch it? We have enough on him right now that Putin could blackmail him. Think a little bit.
(07-09-2017 08:09 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]Do any of you? Any of you worry about being able to blackmail Trump? Think about that? He's compromised any way you stretch it? We have enough on him right now that Putin could blackmail him. Think a little bit.

Clinton Family Foundation. Pay for play.
(07-09-2017 08:05 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: [ -> ]Impeachment is a political process at the end of the day and you guys aren't there it doesn't seem. We know they hacked the DNC and mettelled with the election. Trumps team met with them during the campaign in numerous ways. Little Dondal admitted he met with the lawyer AFTER she said she had damaging info. How else can you spell it out?
So that means the fake dossier was collusion? I wonder who paid for that and if any other foreign agency was involved?

SIZZLE LIKE BACON

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Reference URL's