(06-02-2017 02:57 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(06-02-2017 10:43 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-02-2017 10:22 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(06-02-2017 10:22 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-02-2017 09:18 AM)Crebman Wrote:  No, we said that when the liberals would tout the phony unemployment percentage......that's the number affected by folks stopping looking for work.

Actual more folks getting a job is different and you know it.

While the number certainly appears to be good and any increase of jobs is good. I temper any good feelings by wondering if the number will get revised down and not knowing what type/pay these new jobs are. If it's 250K more fast food workers it's not as impressive than 250K good paying jobs.

I'm sure a more detailed breakdown will come up later.....

Let's not forget that we have had 80 straight months of job growth. Job growth that conservatives dismissed for 8 years until now.

The hypocrisy continues.

Where did obamas job growth come from?

He didn't create one single job remember?

We learned over the last 8 years that the President cannot create jobs.

At least that is what the conservatives said.

Has that suddenly changed?

You're really struggling more than usual today.

The numbers speak for themselves,

Quote:Top Ex-White House Economist Admits 94% Of All New Jobs Under Obama Were Part-Time

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-23...-part-time

Wrong...I debunked this yesterday when it was brought up. The study was from 2005 to 2015, so it included Bush years, and it was 94% of the net job growth. Not on the total jobs created during the Obama administration, which was around 11 million per most estimates I've seen.

Also, the nature of these jobs changing is due more to business and industry changes than anything any president can do.