(04-11-2017 08:14 AM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  1. Wichita State------16-2----NCAA
1. Cincy---------------14-4----NCAA
3. SMU----------------14-4----NCAA
4. Houston------------12-6----NIT
5. Tulsa---------------10-8----NIT
6. UCF-----------------9-9
7. UCONN-------------8-10------------Ollie Fired
8. Temple-------------8-10-----------Dunphy fired
9. Tulane--------------5-13
10. Memphis----------5-13-----------Tubby fired
11. ECU---------------3-15 Lebo extended
12. USF----------------2-16

(04-12-2017 12:31 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(04-12-2017 12:08 PM)zfred12 Wrote:  

(04-12-2017 12:03 PM)pesik Wrote:  It's a fact we played 13 players?????
I find that odd since we only had 11 players on our roster total last season (4 of which didn't play 1 second, in game 2)
Are you insinuating Sampson himself played himself or that you don't understand the concept of facts

And don't understand the concept Of dominate either, it was a 3 point game with 50 secs left in the game, leading and dominating are different things, if you need to make freethrows to ensure a win with 30 secs left, Yiu didn't dominate

I never thought I'd see the day I'd meet blind homer UCF basketball fans..But I guess it's a good thing and your program is on the up and up

Houston played 12 people against ucf. Check the box score. Here's a link for ya. http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketb...=400916609
Please check your bolded statement above and then the link and get back to me.

Ucf played 3 walk ons that game. They played 12, 7 and 1 minute respectively. Houston had 3 people in for 1 minute. Still leaves 9 players registering 7 minutes or more.

I thought we were counting scholarship players... This whole debate was about scholarship players
Mateen is a walk-on...

Either way 13 is still not 12 like his "fact"

alternative facts just like all your troll posts in this thread

Fact is UCF made it much further in the NIT tournament, further in the AAC tournament, and we split the season series 1-1 all while we only had 7 scholarship.

Calling someone a troll becuase you don't like their opinion is dumb..
You and everyone in here with sense knows I'm not trolling even if you disagree with my opinion

Randomly throwing the word troll, makes it meaningless when actual trolls make posts and you try to call them out

I forgot how much UCF fans were the worst...

And deciding worth on winner take all tournaments with different matchups is also a weak argument for deciding who was better.. ie we played uconn who had a home court advantage in the toutney and you didn't play them...we have standings.. no need to make up pseudo value definers ...If UCF finished higher than Houston. You know you'd use standings as your final definer regardless of anything else

(04-12-2017 03:35 PM)pesik Wrote:  Calling someone a troll becuase you don't like their opinion is dumb..
You and everyone in here with sense knows I'm not trolling even if you disagree with my opinion

Randomly throwing the word troll, makes it meaningless when actual trolls make posts and you try to call them out

I forgot how much UCF fans were the worst...

And deciding worth on winner take all tournaments with different matchups is also a weak argument for deciding who was better.. ie we played uconn who had a home court advantage in the toutney and you didn't play them...we have standings.. no need to make up pseudo value definers ...If UCF finished higher than Houston. You know you'd use standings as your final definer regardless of anything else

lol yall finished 1 game ahead in the standings. I'd contend 1 game ahead there is offset by crappy showings in the AAC and NIT tournaments houston had.

Doesn't matter though, all this started with your outrage anyone had UCF ahead of houston in silly fan preseason rankings lol. Maybe your issue is with them and not "ucf fans"

It will sure be fun to watch the top teams battle it out. Obviously the top 3 will be very good and we can pretty much assume who those teams will be. Excited to have Witchita State added to the conference, sucks we are down at the moment, but we will be back in a year or two and make things interesting.

beautiful thing about the new addition: seeing everybody fall for Bearcats#1 for the first time

Uconn
Wichita
Smu
Ucf
Houston
Tulsa
Cinc
Temple
Memphis
Ecu
Tulane
Usf

The Huskies have to much talent, mark my words they'll be back


Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

Do we know how the 2017-18 conference schedules will be formulated?

Favorable schedules could definitely affect the standings this next year. For instance, if Wichita St. avoids playing UCF in Orlando or Temple in Philly or if Cincinnati gets each of USF, ECU, and Tulane twice and Wichita St. and SMU only once, etc.

man...can't we all just get along?

(04-12-2017 08:38 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  man...can't we all just get along?

You started it you big meanie

(04-11-2017 08:14 AM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  10. Memphis----------5-13-----------Tubby fired

Can Memphis afford to buy Tubby out of his last 3 years? Is that even an option?

(04-11-2017 07:20 PM)Huskypride Wrote:  

(04-11-2017 06:48 PM)cmullinsTU Wrote:  1. SMU
2. WSU
3. Cincinnati
4. Tulsa
5. Houston
6. UCF
7. Tulane
8. Temple
9. UCONN
10. ECU
11. Memphis
12. USF

UConn will not be that low i will bet money on that lol

I agree. 8th is achievable.

(04-12-2017 12:21 PM)robertfoshizzle Wrote:  Houston and UCF will both be better next season as long as Tacko returns.

If Tacko can make TWO teams better he'll definitely be conference POY.

ECU beating memphis next year at least once, regardless of how bad they are, will save Lebos job. We basically will have to finish 0-16 and dead last before Lebo Lovers will be ready to move on

First off: congrats and welcome Shockers and Shockettes. We're thrilled to have you here.

Here's how Spudweiser sees it at this early date:

1-3: No doubt WSU, Cincy and SMU should all be considered contenders. Winning on the road at Moody and 5/3 rarely happens and I'm guessing WSU will be the same. Six great must see games next season although I think 5/3 is being renovated? Where Are the Beercoozies calling home for now?

4-7: UCF, Temple,Houston, Tulsa: the second division although I do think UCF IS A SOLID 4.... maybe better if Semi boogies or WSU has stage fright. I think people here are selling Temple short. They will be pretty good and tough at home once again.

8-worse than 8:

Tulane: my surprise team newly inspired by the misfortunes of Memphis and UCONN. They will flirt with .500

UCONN: make or break year for Ollie. No excuses this year.

Memphis: Tubby will find 5 or six warm bodies.

USF

ECU

Jon Rothstein‏Verified account @JonRothstein 9h9 hours ago
More
If Semi Ojeleye returns to SMU, the American Conference will have three legit Top 25 teams with the Ponies, Cincinnati, and Wichita State.

(04-13-2017 08:02 PM)SadderBudweiser Wrote:  

(04-11-2017 07:20 PM)Huskypride Wrote:  

(04-11-2017 06:48 PM)cmullinsTU Wrote:  1. SMU
2. WSU
3. Cincinnati
4. Tulsa
5. Houston
6. UCF
7. Tulane
8. Temple
9. UCONN
10. ECU
11. Memphis
12. USF

UConn will not be that low i will bet money on that lol

I agree. 8th is achievable.

UConn still has a lot of a talent on their team. We have a nasty back court and they will most likly bring in a solid class. They will make the NIT if not more. they have more talent then all of you guys think lol

(04-13-2017 11:07 PM)Huskypride Wrote:  

(04-13-2017 08:02 PM)SadderBudweiser Wrote:  

(04-11-2017 07:20 PM)Huskypride Wrote:  [quote='cmullinsTU' pid='14257549' dateline='1491954501']
1. SMU
2. WSU
3. Cincinnati
4. Tulsa
5. Houston
6. UCF
7. Tulane
8. Temple
9. UCONN
10. ECU
11. Memphis
12. USF

UConn will not be that low i will bet money on that lol

I agree. 8th is achievable.

UConn still has a lot of a talent on their team. We have a nasty back court and they will most likly bring in a solid class. They will make the NIT if not more. they have more talent then all of you guys think lol

Recruiting talent has never been a problem for Ollie. Making them better, keeping them and keeping them healthy seem to be where the train leaves the tracks.

(04-14-2017 12:19 AM)SadderBudweiser Wrote:  

(04-13-2017 11:07 PM)Huskypride Wrote:  

(04-13-2017 08:02 PM)SadderBudweiser Wrote:  

(04-11-2017 07:20 PM)Huskypride Wrote:  [quote='cmullinsTU' pid='14257549' dateline='1491954501']
1. SMU
2. WSU
3. Cincinnati
4. Tulsa
5. Houston
6. UCF
7. Tulane
8. Temple
9. UCONN
10. ECU
11. Memphis
12. USF

UConn will not be that low i will bet money on that lol

I agree. 8th is achievable.

UConn still has a lot of a talent on their team. We have a nasty back court and they will most likly bring in a solid class. They will make the NIT if not more. they have more talent then all of you guys think lol

Recruiting talent has never been a problem for Ollie. Making them better, keeping them and keeping them healthy seem to be where the train leaves the tracks.

i do agree but acting like we are gonna be are gonna be horrible is not logical in my opinion. Ollie is coaching for his job this year and we will have a nit year most likely. but we have the talent make the tourney its ollie's job to get them there and he has trouble with that. but i have faith in him.

1. East Carolina- NCAA, Final Four. Jeff Lebo earns another extension
2. Wichita State- NCAA, Greg Marshall can't pull a championship his first year
3. Cincinnati- NCAA
4. Houston- NCAA
5. SMU- NCAA
6. Connecticut, NIT
7. UCF, NIT
8. Temple, NIT
9. Memphis
10. Tulsa
11. Tulane
12. South Florida