Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
2016 NCAA Athletic Department Revenue for the P5 and the next 15 Highest G5
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 13,288
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 662
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #1
2016 NCAA Athletic Department Revenue for the P5 and the next 15 Highest G5
The number by the school is it's national position. But I have broken them out by P conference / independents / and hopefuls.

ACC
17. Florida State-123,344,314
20. Louisville-112,146,501
27. Virginia-100,632,895
30. Clemson-95,800,326
37. Duke-91,971,836
40. North Carolina-90,969,518
43. Miami-85,615,972
46. Virginia Tech-84,064,779
47. Syracuse-82,676,841
49. N.C. State-80,255,029
60. Pittsburgh-71,314,082
62. Boston College-71,314,082 P5 schools earning below 65th position
66. Georgia Tech-62,260,693
67. Wake Forest-62053,971

ACC Conference Mean: $87,034,205


Big 10
02. Ohio State-169,904,847
05. Michigan-146,219,589
11. Penn State-132,306,528
13. Wisconsin-130,045,544
19. Iowa-117,002,340
22. Nebraska-109,967,175
23. Minnesota-107,705,479
26. Michigan State-100,914,623
32. Maryland-94,101,697
33. Indiana-93,938,599
51. Rutgers-78,845,894
53. Purdue-78,517,673
54. Illinois-78,395,389
57. Northwestern-77,906,464

Big 10 Conference Mean: $108,269,417


Big 12
01. Texas-182,104,126
04. Oklahoma-150,371,578
31. Kansas-94,697,418
34. T.C.U.-93,259,382
39. West Virginia-91,412,352
41. Baylor-90,769,041
42. Oklahoma State-90,049,297
55. Iowa State-78,355,500
56. Kansas State-77,936,660
61. Texas Tech-72,750,020

Big 12 Conference Mean: $102,170,537


PAC
21. Stanford-112,036,255
24. Washington-107,154,560
25. U.S.C.-106,195,078
28. U.C.L.A.-98,913,023
35. Oregon-92,375,046
36. Arizona State-92,146,148
45. California-84,200,594
48. Arizona-81,279,425
58. Oregon State-77,667,685
59. Colorado-77,276,890
63. Washington State-71,285,725
64. Utah-70,346,405

PAC Conference Mean: $89,239,736


SEC
03. Alabama-164,005,589
06. L.S.U.-141,456,764
07. Auburn-140,070,592
08. Tennessee-135,949,847
10. Florida-134,033,664
12. Texas A&M-131,045,544
14. Arkansas-127,316,374
15. Kentucky-124,006,908
16. Georgia-123,841,268
18. South Carolina-122,331,092
29. Mississippi-98,377,760
38. Missouri-91,573,174
44. Mississippi State-84,564,899
52. Vanderbilt-78,793,574

SEC Conference Mean: $121,240,504

Independents and G5 schools in the top 65:

09. Notre Dame-134,211,095
50. Connecticut-79,267,924
65. Brigham Young-62,563279

Best of the G5:
68. Southern Methodist-56,909,280
69. Tulane-53,141,211
70. Central Florida-52,317,442
71. Houston-50,886,777
72. Temple-50,886,490
73. Memphis-49,849,343
74. South Florida-48,405,192
75. San Diego St.-46,683,110
76. Cincinnati-43,367,493
77. East Carolina-43,045,337
78. Hawaii-41,997,257
79. Freson State-41,892,171
80. Tulsa-40,465,787

Everyone else earns below $40,000,000.

Conference Mean Earning Rankings:
1. SEC: $121,240,504
2. Big 10: $108,269,417
3. Big 12: $102,170,537
4. PAC: $89,239,736
5. ACC: $87,034,205

Conference breakdown by School Revenue
100,000,000 plus: SEC-10, Big 10-8, ACC-3, PAC-3, Big 12-2
90,000,000 plus: Big 12-5, ACC-3, PAC-3, SEC-2, Big 10-2
80,000,000 plus: ACC-4, PAC-2, SEC-1, Big 10-0, Big 12-0
70,000,000 plus: PAC-4, Big 10-4, Big 12-3, ACC-2, SEC-1
60,000,000 plus: ACC-2
(This post was last modified: 03-18-2017 01:59 PM by JRsec.)
03-18-2017 12:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

AllTideUp Online
1st String
*

Posts: 1,613
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 68
I Root For: Alabama
Location:
Post: #2
RE: 2016 NCAA Athletic Department Revenue for the P5 and the next 15 Highest G5
The Big 12 really does bring down some good revenue overall. Now obviously UT and OU up the averages, but the top 7 are in a strong position.
03-18-2017 03:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 13,288
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 662
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #3
RE: 2016 NCAA Athletic Department Revenue for the P5 and the next 15 Highest G5
(03-18-2017 03:32 PM)AllTideUp Wrote:  The Big 12 really does bring down some good revenue overall. Now obviously UT and OU up the averages, but the top 7 are in a strong position.

You will of course note that even if the Big 10 gets their 5 million dollar increase in TV revenue (more like 3.5) that they keep hollering about they will still be almost 8 million per school average lower than the SEC schools in total revenue.

It also means that should we expand out of the Big 12 we have to have either Texas or Oklahoma to make a second school from that group at 90 million work. Just some food for thought. It also means that Florida State is now the only prospect from the ACC that pays their way, although I'm sure we would make an exception for either of the Virginia Schools (UVA preferable) or for U.N.C. but both of those are doubtful unless the ACCN thing doesn't pan out.
03-18-2017 05:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
XLance Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,827
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation: 146
I Root For: Carolina
Location:
Post: #4
RE: 2016 NCAA Athletic Department Revenue for the P5 and the next 15 Highest G5
(03-18-2017 05:26 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(03-18-2017 03:32 PM)AllTideUp Wrote:  The Big 12 really does bring down some good revenue overall. Now obviously UT and OU up the averages, but the top 7 are in a strong position.

You will of course note that even if the Big 10 gets their 5 million dollar increase in TV revenue (more like 3.5) that they keep hollering about they will still be almost 8 million per school average lower than the SEC schools in total revenue.

It also means that should we expand out of the Big 12 we have to have either Texas or Oklahoma to make a second school from that group at 90 million work. Just some food for thought. It also means that Florida State is now the only prospect from the ACC that pays their way, although I'm sure we would make an exception for either of the Virginia Schools (UVA preferable) or for U.N.C. but both of those are doubtful unless the ACCN thing doesn't pan out.

Actually what it means is that the SEC is in the best position to add any school and still be making as much or more than any other conference.
Who is to say that the other schools in the SEC wouldn't give up a million or two to get other advantages for their conference.
I'm still looking for Texas to move to the ACC with either TCU or Baylor, or be traded to the PAC for "considerations".
(This post was last modified: 03-18-2017 06:06 PM by XLance.)
03-18-2017 06:01 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 13,288
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 662
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #5
RE: 2016 NCAA Athletic Department Revenue for the P5 and the next 15 Highest G5
(03-18-2017 06:01 PM)XLance Wrote:  
(03-18-2017 05:26 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(03-18-2017 03:32 PM)AllTideUp Wrote:  The Big 12 really does bring down some good revenue overall. Now obviously UT and OU up the averages, but the top 7 are in a strong position.

You will of course note that even if the Big 10 gets their 5 million dollar increase in TV revenue (more like 3.5) that they keep hollering about they will still be almost 8 million per school average lower than the SEC schools in total revenue.

It also means that should we expand out of the Big 12 we have to have either Texas or Oklahoma to make a second school from that group at 90 million work. Just some food for thought. It also means that Florida State is now the only prospect from the ACC that pays their way, although I'm sure we would make an exception for either of the Virginia Schools (UVA preferable) or for U.N.C. but both of those are doubtful unless the ACCN thing doesn't pan out.

Actually what it means is that the SEC is in the best position to add any school and still be making as much or more than any other conference.
Who is to say that the other schools in the SEC wouldn't give up a million or two to get other advantages for their conference.
I'm still looking for Texas to move to the ACC with either TCU or Baylor, or be traded to the PAC for "considerations".

It means that we can economically take Oklahoma and any one of the following: Kansas, Oklahoma State, or West Virginia. I don't think Baylor would get consideration at this point and we don't need T.C.U. if we get OU.
03-18-2017 07:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
XLance Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,827
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation: 146
I Root For: Carolina
Location:
Post: #6
RE: 2016 NCAA Athletic Department Revenue for the P5 and the next 15 Highest G5
(03-18-2017 07:25 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(03-18-2017 06:01 PM)XLance Wrote:  
(03-18-2017 05:26 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(03-18-2017 03:32 PM)AllTideUp Wrote:  The Big 12 really does bring down some good revenue overall. Now obviously UT and OU up the averages, but the top 7 are in a strong position.

You will of course note that even if the Big 10 gets their 5 million dollar increase in TV revenue (more like 3.5) that they keep hollering about they will still be almost 8 million per school average lower than the SEC schools in total revenue.

It also means that should we expand out of the Big 12 we have to have either Texas or Oklahoma to make a second school from that group at 90 million work. Just some food for thought. It also means that Florida State is now the only prospect from the ACC that pays their way, although I'm sure we would make an exception for either of the Virginia Schools (UVA preferable) or for U.N.C. but both of those are doubtful unless the ACCN thing doesn't pan out.

Actually what it means is that the SEC is in the best position to add any school and still be making as much or more than any other conference.
Who is to say that the other schools in the SEC wouldn't give up a million or two to get other advantages for their conference.
I'm still looking for Texas to move to the ACC with either TCU or Baylor, or be traded to the PAC for "considerations".

It means that we can economically take Oklahoma and any one of the following: Kansas, Oklahoma State, or West Virginia. I don't think Baylor would get consideration at this point and we don't need T.C.U. if we get OU.

You won't be getting Tejas.
If Oklahoma goes brain dead and heads to the B1G................
The SEC needs another Texas school.
03-18-2017 08:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 13,288
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 662
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #7
RE: 2016 NCAA Athletic Department Revenue for the P5 and the next 15 Highest G5
(03-18-2017 08:17 PM)XLance Wrote:  
(03-18-2017 07:25 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(03-18-2017 06:01 PM)XLance Wrote:  
(03-18-2017 05:26 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(03-18-2017 03:32 PM)AllTideUp Wrote:  The Big 12 really does bring down some good revenue overall. Now obviously UT and OU up the averages, but the top 7 are in a strong position.

You will of course note that even if the Big 10 gets their 5 million dollar increase in TV revenue (more like 3.5) that they keep hollering about they will still be almost 8 million per school average lower than the SEC schools in total revenue.

It also means that should we expand out of the Big 12 we have to have either Texas or Oklahoma to make a second school from that group at 90 million work. Just some food for thought. It also means that Florida State is now the only prospect from the ACC that pays their way, although I'm sure we would make an exception for either of the Virginia Schools (UVA preferable) or for U.N.C. but both of those are doubtful unless the ACCN thing doesn't pan out.

Actually what it means is that the SEC is in the best position to add any school and still be making as much or more than any other conference.
Who is to say that the other schools in the SEC wouldn't give up a million or two to get other advantages for their conference.
I'm still looking for Texas to move to the ACC with either TCU or Baylor, or be traded to the PAC for "considerations".

It means that we can economically take Oklahoma and any one of the following: Kansas, Oklahoma State, or West Virginia. I don't think Baylor would get consideration at this point and we don't need T.C.U. if we get OU.

You won't be getting Tejas.
If Oklahoma goes brain dead and heads to the B1G................
The SEC needs another Texas school.

In that case it would be T.C.U. if we decided to expand. If Texas heads to the ACC Oklahoma will not go to the Big 10. They can't afford to go to the Big 10 unless Texas goes with them and ESPN isn't letting that happen.

If the PAC throws in with ESPN and Texas heads west then OU might go with them and take OSU with them.

Should that happen T.C.U. and either Kansas or West Virginia might get a look but there are no guarantees.
03-18-2017 08:49 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

AllTideUp Online
1st String
*

Posts: 1,613
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 68
I Root For: Alabama
Location:
Post: #8
RE: 2016 NCAA Athletic Department Revenue for the P5 and the next 15 Highest G5
(03-18-2017 06:01 PM)XLance Wrote:  
(03-18-2017 05:26 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(03-18-2017 03:32 PM)AllTideUp Wrote:  The Big 12 really does bring down some good revenue overall. Now obviously UT and OU up the averages, but the top 7 are in a strong position.

You will of course note that even if the Big 10 gets their 5 million dollar increase in TV revenue (more like 3.5) that they keep hollering about they will still be almost 8 million per school average lower than the SEC schools in total revenue.

It also means that should we expand out of the Big 12 we have to have either Texas or Oklahoma to make a second school from that group at 90 million work. Just some food for thought. It also means that Florida State is now the only prospect from the ACC that pays their way, although I'm sure we would make an exception for either of the Virginia Schools (UVA preferable) or for U.N.C. but both of those are doubtful unless the ACCN thing doesn't pan out.

Actually what it means is that the SEC is in the best position to add any school and still be making as much or more than any other conference.
Who is to say that the other schools in the SEC wouldn't give up a million or two to get other advantages for their conference.
I'm still looking for Texas to move to the ACC with either TCU or Baylor, or be traded to the PAC for "considerations".

Or just add no one and make even more.

If we can't land the ones we want then we probably do nothing, but if we went crazy and said we have to do something then might as well go for projects in new markets. There's absolutely no need to take Big 12 schools that don't pad our bottom line.
03-18-2017 09:34 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
XLance Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,827
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation: 146
I Root For: Carolina
Location:
Post: #9
RE: 2016 NCAA Athletic Department Revenue for the P5 and the next 15 Highest G5
(03-18-2017 09:34 PM)AllTideUp Wrote:  
(03-18-2017 06:01 PM)XLance Wrote:  
(03-18-2017 05:26 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(03-18-2017 03:32 PM)AllTideUp Wrote:  The Big 12 really does bring down some good revenue overall. Now obviously UT and OU up the averages, but the top 7 are in a strong position.

You will of course note that even if the Big 10 gets their 5 million dollar increase in TV revenue (more like 3.5) that they keep hollering about they will still be almost 8 million per school average lower than the SEC schools in total revenue.

It also means that should we expand out of the Big 12 we have to have either Texas or Oklahoma to make a second school from that group at 90 million work. Just some food for thought. It also means that Florida State is now the only prospect from the ACC that pays their way, although I'm sure we would make an exception for either of the Virginia Schools (UVA preferable) or for U.N.C. but both of those are doubtful unless the ACCN thing doesn't pan out.

Actually what it means is that the SEC is in the best position to add any school and still be making as much or more than any other conference.
Who is to say that the other schools in the SEC wouldn't give up a million or two to get other advantages for their conference.
I'm still looking for Texas to move to the ACC with either TCU or Baylor, or be traded to the PAC for "considerations".

Or just add no one and make even more.

If we can't land the ones we want then we probably do nothing, but if we went crazy and said we have to do something then might as well go for projects in new markets. There's absolutely no need to take Big 12 schools that don't pad our bottom line.

In the long term, 14 is awkward for scheduling. 15 or 16 work much better, the only way the SEC or any conference stays at 14 is if the Big 12 survives past the GOR expiration.
03-18-2017 09:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
AllTideUp Online
1st String
*

Posts: 1,613
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 68
I Root For: Alabama
Location:
Post: #10
RE: 2016 NCAA Athletic Department Revenue for the P5 and the next 15 Highest G5
(03-18-2017 09:58 PM)XLance Wrote:  
(03-18-2017 09:34 PM)AllTideUp Wrote:  
(03-18-2017 06:01 PM)XLance Wrote:  
(03-18-2017 05:26 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(03-18-2017 03:32 PM)AllTideUp Wrote:  The Big 12 really does bring down some good revenue overall. Now obviously UT and OU up the averages, but the top 7 are in a strong position.

You will of course note that even if the Big 10 gets their 5 million dollar increase in TV revenue (more like 3.5) that they keep hollering about they will still be almost 8 million per school average lower than the SEC schools in total revenue.

It also means that should we expand out of the Big 12 we have to have either Texas or Oklahoma to make a second school from that group at 90 million work. Just some food for thought. It also means that Florida State is now the only prospect from the ACC that pays their way, although I'm sure we would make an exception for either of the Virginia Schools (UVA preferable) or for U.N.C. but both of those are doubtful unless the ACCN thing doesn't pan out.

Actually what it means is that the SEC is in the best position to add any school and still be making as much or more than any other conference.
Who is to say that the other schools in the SEC wouldn't give up a million or two to get other advantages for their conference.
I'm still looking for Texas to move to the ACC with either TCU or Baylor, or be traded to the PAC for "considerations".

Or just add no one and make even more.

If we can't land the ones we want then we probably do nothing, but if we went crazy and said we have to do something then might as well go for projects in new markets. There's absolutely no need to take Big 12 schools that don't pad our bottom line.

In the long term, 14 is awkward for scheduling. 15 or 16 work much better, the only way the SEC or any conference stays at 14 is if the Big 12 survives past the GOR expiration.

That in and of itself is not a reason to expand with schools that don't really help.

Anyway, I find it hard to believe that a league with the economic might of the SEC will have to pick over scraps.
03-18-2017 10:49 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2017 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2017 MyBB Group.