(12-05-2016 10:04 PM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  Johnny,

You get that Scott tried to disarm a police officer right? How does that set with you ?

Murder has to be premeditated,.. got that right?!

While He might have tried to disarm the officer, Scott was clearly shot multiple ties in the back a good distance away while running from the officer. A single shot to the leg would have stopped Him from running away. This trial isn't over at all.

(12-06-2016 06:17 AM)CardFan1 Wrote:  

(12-05-2016 10:04 PM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  Johnny,

You get that Scott tried to disarm a police officer right? How does that set with you ?

Murder has to be premeditated,.. got that right?!

While He might have tried to disarm the officer, Scott was clearly shot multiple ties in the back a good distance away while running from the officer. A single shot to the leg would have stopped Him from running away. This trial isn't over at all.

Except for the fact that shooting someone in the leg is nowhere close to established procedure and can be just as fatal as shooting someone center mass.

(12-05-2016 11:15 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  I've stated on here many times that I wouldn't be surprised if this trial went bad simply because the Solicitor, Scarlett Wilson, is renowned for being extremely incompetent. It's no shock she Moseby'ed this trial thus far.

Does she have a history of failing to get convictions.

(12-06-2016 12:05 AM)HCJag Wrote:  

(12-05-2016 10:13 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(12-05-2016 10:11 PM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  Johnny, that was the taser that the perp took off the the officer. Man you are a dolt!

Answer the question ,.. are you ok with a perp assaulting an officer ?

and he picked it up, carried it, and moved it closer to the body.

I don't see how anyone can look at that video and say it was anything other than murder. Even it you try to give the cop every benefit of the doubt there's nothing that can explain that away.

Probably because there was more evidence than just the video.

(12-06-2016 06:57 AM)fsquid Wrote:  

(12-05-2016 11:15 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  I've stated on here many times that I wouldn't be surprised if this trial went bad simply because the Solicitor, Scarlett Wilson, is renowned for being extremely incompetent. It's no shock she Moseby'ed this trial thus far.

Does she have a history of failing to get convictions.

Failing to get convictions, dropping charges for no reason, being criminal friendly.

There used to be a website called Charleston Thug Life that started out just to document the failings of her office in going easy on career criminals by using online available court documentation. The site owner was anonymous but speculation was that it was someone who either was or had been a law enforcement officer in the Charleston area. They eventually expanded to where they exposed inmates who were using contraband cellphones to create social media pages while in the custody of the SC Dept of Corrections. It was a thorn in the side of Wilson's office and the SCDC folks. Rumor is somebody finally figured out who was responsible for the site and got to them but that's just a rumor. One thing is for sure whoever ran it had great sources because they knew stuff that was going down before it became public knowledge.

(12-06-2016 06:17 AM)CardFan1 Wrote:  

(12-05-2016 10:04 PM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  Johnny,

You get that Scott tried to disarm a police officer right? How does that set with you ?

Murder has to be premeditated,.. got that right?!

While He might have tried to disarm the officer, Scott was clearly shot multiple ties in the back a good distance away while running from the officer. A single shot to the leg would have stopped Him from running away. This trial isn't over at all.

So the perp was merely trying to "disarm" the official on the scene? Wow! Scott had no ill intentions against the officer he just wanted to disarm him if his firearm. ? Must have wanted to settle the issue with a round of "Rock ..Paper..Scissors " huh ?

This trial is 100 % over. Now therewill be at least Two more to follow but this ONE is over.

Are you familiar with the 21' rule? A perp can kill you with in his radius with a knife.

Also, Police and those with firearms training ( civilian types like myself) are not going to wound,.. I'm dropping center mass and one in the Melon.

As far as the " leg **** goes,.. read up on the femoral artery. You hit that, and the individual bleeds out in 3-7 minutes.

Until we have Robo-Cop patrolling , you will always have human emotions involved. I cannot imagine the fear that Officer Slager had when he was assaulted by this thug trash Walter Scott!

(12-06-2016 06:17 AM)CardFan1 Wrote:  

(12-05-2016 10:04 PM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  Johnny,

You get that Scott tried to disarm a police officer right? How does that set with you ?

Murder has to be premeditated,.. got that right?!

While He might have tried to disarm the officer, Scott was clearly shot multiple ties in the back a good distance away while running from the officer. A single shot to the leg would have stopped Him from running away. This trial isn't over at all.

No no no! You shoot to kill so that Scott can't lie in court. It's obvious that Scott was a threat and reached for Slager's weapon 15 minutes prior. Let this be a lesson.

(12-06-2016 08:20 AM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  

(12-06-2016 06:17 AM)CardFan1 Wrote:  

(12-05-2016 10:04 PM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  Johnny,

You get that Scott tried to disarm a police officer right? How does that set with you ?

Murder has to be premeditated,.. got that right?!

While He might have tried to disarm the officer, Scott was clearly shot multiple ties in the back a good distance away while running from the officer. A single shot to the leg would have stopped Him from running away. This trial isn't over at all.

So the perp was merely trying to "disarm" the official on the scene? Wow! Scott had no ill intentions against the officer he just wanted to disarm him if his firearm. ? Must have wanted to settle the issue with a round of "Rock ..Paper..Scissors " huh ?

This trial is 100 % over. Now therewill be at least Two more to follow but this ONE is over.

Are you familiar with the 21' rule? A perp can kill you with in his radius with a knife.

Also, Police and those with firearms training ( civilian types like myself) are not going to wound,.. I'm dropping center mass and one in the Melon.

As far as the " leg **** goes,.. read up on the femoral artery. You hit that, and the individual bleeds out in 3-7 minutes.

Until we have Robo-Cop patrolling , you will always have human emotions involved. I cannot imagine the fear that Officer Slager had when he was assaulted by this thug trash Walter Scott!

I've seen ninja perps kill cops 21' away. True story.

(12-06-2016 12:05 AM)HCJag Wrote:  

(12-05-2016 10:13 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(12-05-2016 10:11 PM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  Johnny, that was the taser that the perp took off the the officer. Man you are a dolt!
Answer the question ,.. are you ok with a perp assaulting an officer ?

and he picked it up, carried it, and moved it closer to the body.

I don't see how anyone can look at that video and say it was anything other than murder. Even it you try to give the cop every benefit of the doubt there's nothing that can explain that away.

What in the video shows that it was intentional and not heat of the moment?

Nothing at all. Again, I can't imagine the fear in Slager's eyes when this trash attempted to take his life!

(12-05-2016 04:34 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(12-05-2016 04:29 PM)VA49er Wrote:  Mistrial does not equal not guilty.

But a little southern home cookin' does, right Duke. ;-)

Wut? The attorney will simply ask for another trial.

He's doing his race bait slow troll schtick.

(12-05-2016 04:02 PM)john01992 Wrote:  and the cons on here wonder why the BLM has grown into what it has become.

As a conservative I would say *this* is the time to take to the streets.... *this* is a miscarriage of justice.

The problem with BLM is that they spend their power on situations like Ferguson.

(12-05-2016 05:50 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(12-05-2016 05:04 PM)fsquid Wrote:  "Scott was shot five times in the back while running from Slager during a routine traffic stop."

That's tough

I've been involved with many traffic stops. Never once did I grab the officers weapon or taser him in the leg. Could explain why I've never been shot.

Neither did philando castile, how'd that work out for him?

(12-05-2016 09:58 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(12-05-2016 06:05 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(12-05-2016 05:18 PM)green Wrote:  

(12-05-2016 03:57 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:   We won again!


http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/05/us/michael...-mistrial/

who's this we ...

NO JUSTICE. NO PEACE.

Firmbizzle is a troll...liberal but pretending to be a TRUMPet on this forum. He is not a conservative. Just a troll.

I'm sorry not sorry that Trump beat your candidate.

http://csnbbs.com/thread-796039-post-137...id13767683

Romney tops Trump's list for secretary of State
-- @thehill

I'm one of the few, the proud ...
to predict with precision trump's improbable win ...
also on record ...
I, like many other, will desert should the dreaded neocons' recommended emissary take the reins of U.S. foreign policy ...
dog & pony show notwithstanding ...
but what does all this have to do with a murderous pig nonchalantly gunning down an innocent in a fit of pique ...
unequal justice under law ...

YOU TALKING TO ME

(12-06-2016 08:39 AM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  Nothing at all. Again, I can't imagine the fear in Slager's eyes when this trash attempted to take his life!

His heart must have still been racing from 30 minutes prior when this happened. I can't imagine the fear he had while he fired those 5 shots into that thugs back.

(12-05-2016 05:04 PM)fsquid Wrote:  "Scott was shot five times in the back while running from Slager during a routine traffic stop."

That's tough

Agree. Insane

http://www.postandcourier.com/news/durin...2f525.html

Quote:The jury foreman who said he wanted to convict Michael Slager had a felony charge by North Charleston police that was dropped by prosecutors during the former officer's murder trial.

Dorsey Montgomery, 34, was picked for the jury despite his 2014 traffic stop and arrest by the North Charleston Police Department, the agency where Slager worked.

It’s not known if the breach-of-trust charge was discussed during the jury selection process, as the presiding judge on Slager’s case barred the public from attending those early proceedings.

After the trial in Walter Scott's shooting death ended with a hung jury, members of the public posed further questions about how a jury with only one black member, Montgomery, was chosen for a case with racial undertones. If Slager had been convicted, some with opposite views of the case likely would have raised more questions in light of Montgomery's past.

Quote:None of the lawyers involved in the case objected to Montgomery serving, though defense lawyer Andy Savage said the limited questioning of prospective jurors' histories would have been grounds for an appeal. Savage said, though, that he had known about Montgomery’s past, but he did not opt to exclude Montgomery from the panel.

Then, nearly three weeks into the trial, a prosecutor in 9th Circuit Solicitor Scarlett Wilson’s office dropped Montgomery’s charge without Wilson’s knowledge, she said. On the same day, the judge appointed Montgomery as foreman.

Quote:Montgomery appeared on NBC earlier in the day and said the jury had focused on a manslaughter charge after deciding Slager had done nothing "malicious" in Scott's shooting.

But before a mistrial was declared Monday, five of the 12 jurors remained undecided on any conviction while a holdout for an acquittal refused to rethink his decision, Montgomery told the "Today" show. He said he chose to speak out Thursday to set the record straight about the jury's discussions.

After seeing the bystander's video, he first thought Scott's killing was murder, he said. But after looking at other evidence, poring over the legal requirements and factoring in the judge's instructions, he said the jury resorted to the lesser charge of voluntary manslaughter.

"We had to come to find out that he didn’t do anything malicious," Montgomery said of Slager during the "Today" interview. "He had a brief disturbance in reason at that moment."

"Malice," or an evil intent, is a central component of murder, while manslaughter happens in the "heat of passion" after the killer is somehow provoked. While murder carries 30 years to life in prison, manslaughter carries between two and 30 years.

Quote:Like Scott, Montgomery had a pending arrest warrant when a North Charleston patrol officer stopped his car for a traffic violation.

The officer, who said in a report that Montgomery had been speeding in December 2014, learned about the warrant after checking Montgomery’s identity. Investigators alleged that Montgomery had given away or offered discounts on $5,500 worth of electronics at Best Buy, where he worked. An arrest affidavit said he later acknowledged poor judgment and promised to pay back the items' value.

(12-06-2016 02:49 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-05-2016 05:04 PM)fsquid Wrote:  "Scott was shot five times in the back while running from Slager during a routine traffic stop."

That's tough

Agree. Insane

Self defense

I'm certain that Scott acted without any "malice" towards Officer Slager when he was placing his DNA on the ifficer's weapon, and taser. Assault on an officer = No Malice

Also how crooked is the State Solicitor? Since when can convicted felons serve on a jury pool? The judge is even more corrupt or inept by influencing and bullying the jurors.