monarx
Hall of Famer
Posts: 14,562
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 280
I Root For: ODU
Location:
|
RE: Kah missing??
(12-01-2016 07:57 AM)Punk Wrote: Ed's article on the game mentioned that Kah will be back in uniform on Saturday, so it doesn't appear related to the Talley issue.
It also said it was "his decision". It wasn't clear to me if the "his" was Kah's or the coach's. Seems odd.
|
|
12-01-2016 09:12 AM |
|
Nukesquad
1st String
Posts: 1,550
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 24
I Root For: ODU
Location:
|
RE: Kah missing??
(12-01-2016 09:12 AM)monarx Wrote: (12-01-2016 07:57 AM)Punk Wrote: Ed's article on the game mentioned that Kah will be back in uniform on Saturday, so it doesn't appear related to the Talley issue.
It also said it was "his decision". It wasn't clear to me if the "his" was Kah's or the coach's. Seems odd.
I highly doubt "his" would refer to Kah. I would certainly hope that none of the roster would choose to not dress out for a game.
|
|
12-01-2016 09:19 AM |
|
mac
All American
Posts: 4,116
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 89
I Root For: Old Dominion
Location:
|
RE: Kah missing??
He wouldn't be on the team by the next game. Players don't "get" to choose.
|
|
12-01-2016 10:53 AM |
|
ETSUDB8-79
Coach
Posts: 2,259
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation: 50
I Root For: ODU-ETSU
Location:
|
RE: Kah missing??
(12-01-2016 09:12 AM)monarx Wrote: (12-01-2016 07:57 AM)Punk Wrote: Ed's article on the game mentioned that Kah will be back in uniform on Saturday, so it doesn't appear related to the Talley issue.
It also said it was "his decision". It wasn't clear to me if the "his" was Kah's or the coach's. Seems odd.
My guess would be that Coach Jones meant that it was not a decision dictated by university policy but one that was his to make.
|
|
12-01-2016 11:51 AM |
|