(11-01-2016 12:54 PM)KNIGHTTIME Wrote:  

(11-01-2016 07:45 AM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  There is going to be a lot of disappointment on this board based on some of the comments I read here.

Everyone has been getting a raise, so I doubt it. Even the c-usa got a 100% raise or more. The conference is essentially the former Sunbelt and FCS which got $100k and $0.

I'll be the realistic one though. $3.5-$4 million with same exposure agreement.

CUSA got a raise? Their money got chopped to next to nothing. At this point if you're not a P5 conference, if you think ESPN is about to increase payouts some of you are going to be quite disappointed.

(11-01-2016 08:47 PM)AlwaysSunny Wrote:  

(11-01-2016 12:54 PM)KNIGHTTIME Wrote:  

(11-01-2016 07:45 AM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  There is going to be a lot of disappointment on this board based on some of the comments I read here.

Everyone has been getting a raise, so I doubt it. Even the c-usa got a 100% raise or more. The conference is essentially the former Sunbelt and FCS which got $100k and $0.

I'll be the realistic one though. $3.5-$4 million with same exposure agreement.

CUSA got a raise? Their money got chopped to next to nothing. At this point if you're not a P5 conference, if you think ESPN is about to increase payouts some of you are going to be quite disappointed.

Yes they did. They all moved up from fcs ($0 tv contract) and Sunbelt that gets $100k. This isn't the old c-usa for comparison. If you think the AAC will go down, you're naive.

Has anybody ever seen a study, or thought about what we should get based on ratings alone vs the other conferences? That would be a good number to start with..........I would have to imagine it would be higher than what we get now. I have no idea how the math works in regard to rating numbers. I also assume which markets the ratings were higher, or lower in would matter as well.

Any TV folks out there?

(11-01-2016 09:35 PM)Bacca Buc Wrote:  Has anybody ever seen a study, or thought about what we should get based on ratings alone vs the other conferences? That would be a good number to start with..........I would have to imagine it would be higher than what we get now. I have no idea how the math works in regard to rating numbers. I also assume which markets the ratings were higher, or lower in would matter as well.

Any TV folks out there?

You can't really. We rarely ever play in the Saturday night primetime game on espn. My guess on ESPN2 with non elite ACC teams we can match up ok.

(11-01-2016 04:08 PM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  

(11-01-2016 12:38 PM)Tigersmoke3 Wrote:  

(11-01-2016 07:45 AM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  There is going to be a lot of disappointment on this board based on some of the comments I read here.

Why does it matter to you?

Entertainment value from Tiger High supporters.

Hmm k: