"The video, which was just released earlier this week and made by conservative activist James O'Keefe of Project Veritas, was paid $10,000 by the Trump Foundation in May of 2015"

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-ele...fe-n670381

Same deal as the emails...is the info false or not? (crickets chirping...)

Rhetorical question, I suppose, kiddo.

Given the history of O'Keefe there is no doubt he doctored the videos he just released.

True or false.

You know...sane as the emails. Deflect away, kiddo.

So what's the problem? Is it that people were paid to incite violence at Trump rallies or that Trumps foundation hands out monies?

(10-20-2016 11:29 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Given the history of O'Keefe there is no doubt he doctored the videos he just released.

Doctored? Based upon what? I'm not aware of any evidence that he has doctored videos, What evidence do you have that he has?

He's that unique mix of hyper-partisan and excited youthful exuberance that comes off as mentally unstable.

(10-20-2016 11:32 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(10-20-2016 11:29 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Given the history of O'Keefe there is no doubt he doctored the videos he just released.

Doctored? Based upon what? I'm not aware of any evidence that he has doctored videos, What evidence do you have that he has?

based on the fact that the video pretty much proves what everyone thought was Donald Trump's absolutely nutty notion that the dems are rigging the election in ways no one imaged before.

given all of that, the videos have to be either fake, or otherwise doctored, or his universe begins to crumble.

(10-20-2016 11:32 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(10-20-2016 11:29 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Given the history of O'Keefe there is no doubt he doctored the videos he just released.

Doctored? Based upon what? I'm not aware of any evidence that he has doctored videos, What evidence do you have that he has?

Google is your friend. Seriously to not know his past history is a basic rejection of reality. He has triggered two major national scandals that needed congress and state AGs to get to the bottom of only to find absolutely no wrong doing due to the videos being heavily edited. He has been successfully sued because he misrepresents people in his videos.

(10-21-2016 12:24 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(10-20-2016 11:32 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(10-20-2016 11:29 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Given the history of O'Keefe there is no doubt he doctored the videos he just released.

Doctored? Based upon what? I'm not aware of any evidence that he has doctored videos, What evidence do you have that he has?

Google is your friend. Seriously to not know his past history is a basic rejection of reality. He has triggered two major national scandals that needed congress and state AGs to get to the bottom of only to find absolutely no wrong doing due to the videos being heavily edited. He has been successfully sued because he misrepresents people in his videos.

in other words, based on absolutely no evidence at all.

check.

In other words you refuse to acknowledge facts. Were you not around during the PP fetal tissue fiasco? Remember how that ended?

Comparison of the raw video with the released one revealed editing that was characterized as "selective" and "deceptive" by Michael Gerson, opinion writer in the Washington Post, who wrote, "O'Keefe did not merely leave a false impression; he manufactured an elaborate, alluring lie."[66] Time Magazine wrote that the video "transposed remarks from a different part of the meeting", was "manipulative" and "a partisan hit-job."[67]

That's in regards to his videos in the past.

The dude has a notorious track record. He dressed as a telephone repairman to gain access to a congresswomen's office probably because he wanted to buy her phone. He was arrested by the FBI and convicted for that stunt.

Quote:Breitbart is the platform where O'Keefe's videos are posted. The former head of Breitbart, Steve Bannon, is the CEO of Trump's campaign.

bahahaha wut

What a ridiculous, Huffpo/Salon-caliber reach. They're posted on Youtube and every other social media and alternative media site as well, because they all aren't so incredibly crooked and in the tank for Hillary that they refuse to cover the #1 story in the country, which shows her campaign participating in illegal activity and proving everything we already knew.

(10-21-2016 12:46 AM)john01992 Wrote:  Comparison of the raw video with the released one revealed editing that was characterized as "selective" and "deceptive" by Michael Gerson, opinion writer in the Washington Post, who wrote, "O'Keefe did not merely leave a false impression; he manufactured an elaborate, alluring lie."[66] Time Magazine wrote that the video "transposed remarks from a different part of the meeting", was "manipulative" and "a partisan hit-job."[67]

That's in regards to his videos in the past.

The dude has a notorious track record. He dressed as a telephone repairman to gain access to a congresswomen's office probably because he wanted to buy her phone. He was arrested by the FBI and convicted for that stunt.

Much like the Hillary record of truthfulness.

(10-20-2016 11:29 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Given the history of O'Keefe there is no doubt he doctored the videos he just released.

Source?

And by doctored, do you suggest what was said, wasn't said?!?

10 grand?

We're talking HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS here.

10 ******* grand?!? That's a years worth of lawn service. Big whoop.

However, For that peanut sum, he does damn fine work.

(10-21-2016 12:46 AM)john01992 Wrote:  Comparison of the raw video with the released one revealed editing that was characterized as "selective" and "deceptive" by Michael Gerson, opinion writer in the Washington Post, who wrote, "O'Keefe did not merely leave a false impression; he manufactured an elaborate, alluring lie."[66] Time Magazine wrote that the video "transposed remarks from a different part of the meeting", was "manipulative" and "a partisan hit-job."[67]

That's in regards to his videos in the past.

The dude has a notorious track record. He dressed as a telephone repairman to gain access to a congresswomen's office probably because he wanted to buy her phone. He was arrested by the FBI and convicted for that stunt.

Opinion writer for the W Compost, left wing rag since the early 70's, at least. Time magazine...

woof. even worse. Used to have a subscription, actually for about 25 years including school. Unreadable. Shame, really.

And, JZ? We've been over that "conviction", you really wanna troll those waters again?

Way to go Zero, Just like all of Your DNC counter parts "Kill the Messenger, Fu@k the Message " You guys just deflect the underlying problem and Over talk anyone You don't agree with . Hopefully the DNC will Be Shocked come election day when REAL VOTERS SHOW UP !

(10-21-2016 01:46 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(10-20-2016 11:29 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Given the history of O'Keefe there is no doubt he doctored the videos he just released.

Source?

And by doctored, do you suggest what was said, wasn't said?!?

10 grand?

We're talking HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS here.

10 ******* grand?!? That's a years worth of lawn service. Big whoop.

However, For that peanut sum, he does damn fine work.

That's a pretty good return on investment. We could use more of that in DC.

(10-21-2016 01:46 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(10-20-2016 11:29 PM)john01992 Wrote:  Given the history of O'Keefe there is no doubt he doctored the videos he just released.

Source?

And by doctored, do you suggest what was said, wasn't said?!?

10 grand?

We're talking HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS here.

10 ******* grand?!? That's a years worth of lawn service. Big whoop.

However, For that peanut sum, he does damn fine work.

I was thinking the same thing. A $10k check to the Clinton foundation won't even get you a letter of acknowledgement from the Clintons with a wet signature. 6 figures for a wet signature, 7 figures for a meeting, 8 figures and you can write foreign policy.

Nearly the entire left offers their opinions that his past videos have been heavily edited. You give them the links to the entire videos and they continue the editing talking point. Ask where. About all you get is that cameras were turned off during bathroom breaks. EDITED!!!

But john goes to new lows. "Investigations have taken place and no wrongdoing has been found." Yeah, just pay no attention to all those people who went to jail.

Peoples own words, ON VIDEO even, don't mean jack if it's criminality you yourself are fine with.