1. ECU p5 win against a spirited in-state rival.
2. Cincinnati. p5 win against overmatched basketball school.
3. USF. Dominant win over good FBS team.
4. Navy. American win.
5. (tie) Tulane, Houston, Temple. Took care of FCS business.
8. (tie) SMU, Tulsa. Played better than expected against ranked teams.
10. UCF. Smackdown loss.
11. Memphis, MIA.
12. UConn. 'nuff said.
(09-10-2016 09:52 PM)vick mike Wrote: 1. ECU p5 win against a spirited in-state rival.
2. Cincinnati. p5 win against overmatched basketball school.
3. USF. Dominant win over good FBS team.
4. Navy. American win.
5. (tie) Tulane, Houston, Temple. Took care of FCS business.
8. (tie) SMU, Tulsa. Played better than expected against ranked teams.
10. UCF. Smackdown loss.
11. Memphis, MIA.
12. UConn. 'nuff said.
Tulsa lost 48-3 ...played better than expected? What was expected? 70-0?
(09-10-2016 09:52 PM)vick mike Wrote: 1. ECU p5 win against a spirited in-state rival.
2. Cincinnati. p5 win against overmatched basketball school.
3. USF. Dominant win over good FBS team.
4. Navy. American win.
5. (tie) Tulane, Houston, Temple. Took care of FCS business.
8. (tie) SMU, Tulsa. Played better than expected against ranked teams.
10. UCF. Smackdown loss.
11. Memphis, MIA.
12. UConn. 'nuff said.
Why do you include schools eliminated from the audition?
this entire concept is stupid...the B12 isn't going to base additions on what they are doing from a game to game standpoint this season. They are looking at total body of work. Presidents make the call, not the coaches/ad's. They are looking at academics, research dollars, location, endowments, athletic commitments, etc. Winning is great but it would be a small portion of what counts and even then it wouldn't be a game by game analysis lol, they would look at winning or not winning over a long period of time.
(09-10-2016 09:52 PM)vick mike Wrote: 1. ECU p5 win against a spirited in-state rival.
2. Cincinnati. p5 win against overmatched basketball school.
3. USF. Dominant win over good FBS team.
4. Navy. American win.
5. (tie) Tulane, Houston, Temple. Took care of FCS business.
8. (tie) SMU, Tulsa. Played better than expected against ranked teams.
10. UCF. Smackdown loss.
11. Memphis, MIA.
12. UConn. 'nuff said.
Tulsa lost 48-3 ...played better than expected? What was expected? 70-0?
(09-10-2016 09:52 PM)vick mike Wrote: 1. ECU p5 win against a spirited in-state rival.
2. Cincinnati. p5 win against overmatched basketball school.
3. USF. Dominant win over good FBS team.
4. Navy. American win.
5. (tie) Tulane, Houston, Temple. Took care of FCS business.
8. (tie) SMU, Tulsa. Played better than expected against ranked teams.
10. UCF. Smackdown loss.
11. Memphis, MIA.
12. UConn. 'nuff said.
Why do you include schools eliminated from the audition?
(09-11-2016 06:44 AM)Bearcats#1 Wrote: this entire concept is stupid...the B12 isn't going to base additions on what they are doing from a game to game standpoint this season. They are looking at total body of work. Presidents make the call, not the coaches/ad's. They are looking at academics, research dollars, location, endowments, athletic commitments, etc. Winning is great but it would be a small portion of what counts and even then it wouldn't be a game by game analysis lol, they would look at winning or not winning over a long period of time.
(09-11-2016 06:44 AM)Bearcats#1 Wrote: this entire concept is stupid...the B12 isn't going to base additions on what they are doing from a game to game standpoint this season. They are looking at total body of work. Presidents make the call, not the coaches/ad's. They are looking at academics, research dollars, location, endowments, athletic commitments, etc. Winning is great but it would be a small portion of what counts and even then it wouldn't be a game by game analysis lol, they would look at winning or not winning over a long period of time.
You're stupid!
Sorry, didn't mean that, you're the best.
haha that was Billy Madison-esq....
(This post was last modified: 09-11-2016 07:03 AM by Bearcats#1.)
