+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: AACbbs (/forum-460.html)
+---- Forum: AAC Conference Talk (/forum-409.html)
+---- Thread: BIG XII Auditions Week 2 (/thread-790368.html)
BIG XII Auditions Week 2 - vick mike - 09-10-2016 09:52 PM
1. ECU p5 win against a spirited in-state rival.
2. Cincinnati. p5 win against overmatched basketball school.
3. USF. Dominant win over good FBS team.
4. Navy. American win.
5. (tie) Tulane, Houston, Temple. Took care of FCS business.
8. (tie) SMU, Tulsa. Played better than expected against ranked teams.
10. UCF. Smackdown loss.
11. Memphis, MIA.
12. UConn. 'nuff said.
RE: BIG XII Auditions Week 2 - uchoops - 09-10-2016 10:04 PM
(09-10-2016 09:52 PM)vick mike Wrote: 1. ECU p5 win against a spirited in-state rival.
2. Cincinnati. p5 win against overmatched basketball school.
3. USF. Dominant win over good FBS team.
4. Navy. American win.
5. (tie) Tulane, Houston, Temple. Took care of FCS business.
8. (tie) SMU, Tulsa. Played better than expected against ranked teams.
10. UCF. Smackdown loss.
11. Memphis, MIA.
12. UConn. 'nuff said.
Tulsa lost 48-3 ...played better than expected? What was expected? 70-0?
RE: BIG XII Auditions Week 2 - jaredf29 - 09-10-2016 10:07 PM
Not all of the games listed are candidates. I'm guessing by the commentary you just wanted to be smug.
RE: BIG XII Auditions Week 2 - Enviro5609 - 09-11-2016 12:04 AM
ECU?
Oh sweetie, you must not have heard.
RE: BIG XII Auditions Week 2 - Indiana Bones - 09-11-2016 12:14 AM
(09-11-2016 12:04 AM)Enviro5609 Wrote: ECU?
Oh sweetie, you must not have heard.
We're gonna try to keep winning games till they reconsider.
RE: BIG XII Auditions Week 2 - quo vadis - 09-11-2016 06:41 AM
(09-10-2016 09:52 PM)vick mike Wrote: 1. ECU p5 win against a spirited in-state rival.Why do you include schools eliminated from the audition?
2. Cincinnati. p5 win against overmatched basketball school.
3. USF. Dominant win over good FBS team.
4. Navy. American win.
5. (tie) Tulane, Houston, Temple. Took care of FCS business.
8. (tie) SMU, Tulsa. Played better than expected against ranked teams.
10. UCF. Smackdown loss.
11. Memphis, MIA.
12. UConn. 'nuff said.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using CSNbbs mobile app
RE: BIG XII Auditions Week 2 - Bearcats#1 - 09-11-2016 06:44 AM
this entire concept is stupid...the B12 isn't going to base additions on what they are doing from a game to game standpoint this season. They are looking at total body of work. Presidents make the call, not the coaches/ad's. They are looking at academics, research dollars, location, endowments, athletic commitments, etc. Winning is great but it would be a small portion of what counts and even then it wouldn't be a game by game analysis lol, they would look at winning or not winning over a long period of time.
RE: BIG XII Auditions Week 2 - vick mike - 09-11-2016 06:53 AM
(09-10-2016 10:04 PM)uchoops Wrote:Should have said Tulsa played better for a while.(09-10-2016 09:52 PM)vick mike Wrote: 1. ECU p5 win against a spirited in-state rival.
2. Cincinnati. p5 win against overmatched basketball school.
3. USF. Dominant win over good FBS team.
4. Navy. American win.
5. (tie) Tulane, Houston, Temple. Took care of FCS business.
8. (tie) SMU, Tulsa. Played better than expected against ranked teams.
10. UCF. Smackdown loss.
11. Memphis, MIA.
12. UConn. 'nuff said.
Tulsa lost 48-3 ...played better than expected? What was expected? 70-0?
RE: BIG XII Auditions Week 2 - vick mike - 09-11-2016 06:53 AM
Smugness not intended.
RE: BIG XII Auditions Week 2 - vick mike - 09-11-2016 06:54 AM
(09-11-2016 12:04 AM)Enviro5609 Wrote: ECU?
Oh sweetie, you must not have heard.
See Indiana Bones reply.
RE: BIG XII Auditions Week 2 - vick mike - 09-11-2016 06:55 AM
(09-11-2016 06:41 AM)quo vadis Wrote:(09-10-2016 09:52 PM)vick mike Wrote: 1. ECU p5 win against a spirited in-state rival.Why do you include schools eliminated from the audition?
2. Cincinnati. p5 win against overmatched basketball school.
3. USF. Dominant win over good FBS team.
4. Navy. American win.
5. (tie) Tulane, Houston, Temple. Took care of FCS business.
8. (tie) SMU, Tulsa. Played better than expected against ranked teams.
10. UCF. Smackdown loss.
11. Memphis, MIA.
12. UConn. 'nuff said.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using CSNbbs mobile app
I don't believe anything anyone says about B12 expansion.
RE: BIG XII Auditions Week 2 - vick mike - 09-11-2016 06:56 AM
(09-11-2016 06:44 AM)Bearcats#1 Wrote: this entire concept is stupid...the B12 isn't going to base additions on what they are doing from a game to game standpoint this season. They are looking at total body of work. Presidents make the call, not the coaches/ad's. They are looking at academics, research dollars, location, endowments, athletic commitments, etc. Winning is great but it would be a small portion of what counts and even then it wouldn't be a game by game analysis lol, they would look at winning or not winning over a long period of time.You're stupid!
Sorry, didn't mean that, you're the best.
RE: BIG XII Auditions Week 2 - Bearcats#1 - 09-11-2016 07:01 AM
(09-11-2016 06:56 AM)vick mike Wrote:(09-11-2016 06:44 AM)Bearcats#1 Wrote: this entire concept is stupid...the B12 isn't going to base additions on what they are doing from a game to game standpoint this season. They are looking at total body of work. Presidents make the call, not the coaches/ad's. They are looking at academics, research dollars, location, endowments, athletic commitments, etc. Winning is great but it would be a small portion of what counts and even then it wouldn't be a game by game analysis lol, they would look at winning or not winning over a long period of time.You're stupid!
Sorry, didn't mean that, you're the best.
haha that was Billy Madison-esq....