http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/08/...ource.html

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange implied in an interview that a murdered Democratic National Committee staffer was the source of a trove of damaging emails the rogue website posted just days before the party's convention.

Actually he explicitly said he wasn't making that claim.

#hisnamewassethrich

(08-10-2016 03:02 PM)Max Power Wrote:  Actually he explicitly said he wasn't making that claim.

From what I read he did not say Rich was not the Source he only mentioned Wikileaks does not reveal sources.

He is playing mind games.

The guy was killed 12 days before the stuff was leaked.

more bodies to add to the Clintoris....

Yea, Assaunge is just making stuff up. Maybe Trump and Putin/Assaunge are using Roger Stone as a go between communicate and coordinate.

https://newrepublic.com/minutes/135932/r...r-surprise

By the way, I didn't know until I looked it up that Roger Stone and Paul Manafort are business partners. Is there anyone on Team Trump that doesn't have financial ties to Putin?

Maybe I'll win the lottery if I play. Maybe, my friends doesn't cut it. Anyone who has an S-hole can guess according to their prejudices.

It got posted earlier, but Seth Rich was rumoured to have been a source to the FBI, not wikileaks, for ages about the Clinton Foundation's questionable money intake...

(08-10-2016 03:14 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  The guy was killed 12 days before the stuff was leaked.

Well that settles it.

(08-10-2016 04:27 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  It got posted earlier, but Seth Rich was rumoured to have been a source to the FBI, not wikileaks, for ages about the Clinton Foundation's questionable money intake...

The FBI? Meh. Look at what's happened so far with them involved. Talk to the wind, talk to the winddddddd.

(08-10-2016 04:29 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(08-10-2016 04:27 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  It got posted earlier, but Seth Rich was rumoured to have been a source to the FBI, not wikileaks, for ages about the Clinton Foundation's questionable money intake...

The FBI? Meh. Look at what's happened so far with them involved. Talk to the wind, talk to the winddddddd.

Dunno, Ollie, that's what I saw on a few snippets of articles, even before Assange's statement came out.

Again, this was an FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation, not the email server.

Her supporters do not care. They just don't.

Of course, Trump's don't care about his lunacy either.

Helluva mess, America.

(08-10-2016 06:00 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Her supporters do not care. They just don't.

Of course, Trump's don't care about his lunacy either.

Helluva mess, America.

So they should care about a unfounded conspiracy theory before it has one shred of proof?

C'mon man.

Clinton's inauguration theme.

Quote:Leavin' them bodies dumped off in the alley for dead,
I'm near, kill 'em all, mo' murda mo' murda
That's what Ouija said,
Gotta put one in ya head, Bang,
We coming to serve ya,
Mo murda, mo murda, mo murda
Mo murda, mo murda, mo murda

(08-11-2016 08:52 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-10-2016 06:00 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Her supporters do not care. They just don't.

Of course, Trump's don't care about his lunacy either.

Helluva mess, America.

So they should care about a unfounded conspiracy theory before it has one shred of proof?

C'mon man.

You mean like "Russia hacked us because Trump is a Kremlin agent!"? They picked that one up and sprinted with it.

(08-11-2016 09:01 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  

(08-11-2016 08:52 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-10-2016 06:00 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Her supporters do not care. They just don't.

Of course, Trump's don't care about his lunacy either.

Helluva mess, America.

So they should care about a unfounded conspiracy theory before it has one shred of proof?

C'mon man.

You mean like "Russia hacked us because Trump is a Kremlin agent!"? They picked that one up and sprinted with it.

Who is they? And do you have a link to anyone here saying "Trump is a Kremlin agent?" On the other hand, there is plenty of evidence that Russia was behind the hack.

Quote:News of the hack of the Democratic National Committee first broke in mid-June. That’s when Crowdstrike, a firm that analyzes threats to network security, revealed that the DNC had called it in to inspect the party’s servers, where it found “two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries present in the DNC network.” Crowdstrike released a comprehensive report of its findings on June 14, which accompanied a Washington Post article detailing the attacks. One of the hacking groups, Crowdstrike found, had access to the DNC servers for almost a year.

Here’s What We Know About Russia and the DNC Hack

(08-11-2016 09:01 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  

(08-11-2016 08:52 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-10-2016 06:00 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Her supporters do not care. They just don't.

Of course, Trump's don't care about his lunacy either.

Helluva mess, America.

So they should care about a unfounded conspiracy theory before it has one shred of proof?

C'mon man.

You mean like "Russia hacked us because Trump is a Kremlin agent!"? They picked that one up and sprinted with it.

When it comes to batshit nuts conspiracy theories, there is no comparison. GOP has the market cornered.

Obama is a secret Muslim Kenyan whose sealed college transcripts hide a terrible secret. Hillary is near death, suffering from constant seizures and strokes, but somehow still manages to run the Clinton Murder ring without anybody finding out.

It's sad.