olliebaba
Legend
Posts: 28,273
Joined: Jul 2007
Reputation: 2181
I Root For: Christ
Location: El Paso
|
RE: Who is not voting for Trump?
You should change your user name to Sheldon Cooper. He's more like you.
|
|
08-09-2016 01:01 PM |
|
john01992
Former ESPNer still in recovery mode
Posts: 16,277
Joined: Jul 2013
I Root For: John0 out!!!!
Location: The Worst P5 Program
|
RE: Who is not voting for Trump?
|
|
08-09-2016 01:05 PM |
|
john01992
Former ESPNer still in recovery mode
Posts: 16,277
Joined: Jul 2013
I Root For: John0 out!!!!
Location: The Worst P5 Program
|
RE: Who is not voting for Trump?
you could have taken 5 seconds to google any of those but you choose not to. let's face it...you are lazy or too partisan to be taken seriously if you refuse to read the news and refuse to verify on your own what someone else says.
|
|
08-09-2016 01:06 PM |
|
UofMstateU
Legend
Posts: 39,274
Joined: Dec 2009
Reputation: 3586
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
|
RE: Who is not voting for Trump?
Typical libturds. They try to start a thread demonizing Trump, then get all butthurt when it blows up in their face.
|
|
08-09-2016 01:08 PM |
|
Fort Bend Owl
Legend
Posts: 28,454
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 454
I Root For: An easy win
Location:
|
RE: Who is not voting for Trump?
Susan Collins said she's voting Libertarian.
|
|
08-09-2016 01:08 PM |
|
UTSAMarineVet09
Corporal of the Board.
Posts: 16,361
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 1271
I Root For: UTSA
Location: West Michigan
|
RE: Who is not voting for Trump?
So now they are major news stories?
Ok, so if it would only take 5 seconds to google them, why didnt you google them and provided the links? You were the one that made the claim john, its your job to prove them. Not mine buddy.
|
|
08-09-2016 01:09 PM |
|
john01992
Former ESPNer still in recovery mode
Posts: 16,277
Joined: Jul 2013
I Root For: John0 out!!!!
Location: The Worst P5 Program
|
RE: Who is not voting for Trump?
(08-09-2016 01:08 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: Typical libturds. They try to start a thread demonizing Trump, then get all butthurt when it blows up in their face.
how annoyed would you be when the other side blatantly ignores facts because it goes against their political views?
oh yeah I forgot...according to you asking the cons to be fair, educated, and not be a prick is called being butthurt.
|
|
08-09-2016 01:11 PM |
|
green
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11,478
Joined: May 2014
Reputation: 391
I Root For: Miami
Location:
|
RE: Who is not voting for Trump?
(08-09-2016 01:08 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote: Susan Collins said she's voting Libertarian.
power to the people ...
WHO CARES
|
|
08-09-2016 01:11 PM |
|
Hood-rich
Smarter Than the Average Lib
Posts: 9,300
Joined: May 2016
I Root For: ECU & CSU
Location: The Hood
|
RE: Who is not voting for Trump?
|
|
08-09-2016 01:12 PM |
|
Hood-rich
Smarter Than the Average Lib
Posts: 9,300
Joined: May 2016
I Root For: ECU & CSU
Location: The Hood
|
RE: Who is not voting for Trump?
|
|
08-09-2016 01:13 PM |
|
john01992
Former ESPNer still in recovery mode
Posts: 16,277
Joined: Jul 2013
I Root For: John0 out!!!!
Location: The Worst P5 Program
|
RE: Who is not voting for Trump?
(08-09-2016 01:09 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote: So now they are major news stories?
Ok, so if it would only take 5 seconds to google them, why didnt you google them and provided the links? You were the one that made the claim john, its your job to prove them. Not mine buddy.
YES....THEY....ARE. The 50 GOP thing was the top story on NBC after the Olympics and was the frontpage headline on major media outlets such as CNN within the last 24 hours.
to your bold part ==> do I have to post a source just to prove gravity exists every time I engage with you? let's be reasonable here, there is absolutely no way you can say the reason you asked for a link was because it was unreasonable to know. you asked for a link purely to be a prick and to be difficult.
(This post was last modified: 08-09-2016 01:14 PM by john01992.)
|
|
08-09-2016 01:14 PM |
|
UTSAMarineVet09
Corporal of the Board.
Posts: 16,361
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 1271
I Root For: UTSA
Location: West Michigan
|
RE: Who is not voting for Trump?
|
|
08-09-2016 01:19 PM |
|
john01992
Former ESPNer still in recovery mode
Posts: 16,277
Joined: Jul 2013
I Root For: John0 out!!!!
Location: The Worst P5 Program
|
RE: Who is not voting for Trump?
|
|
08-09-2016 01:25 PM |
|
firmbizzle
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20,447
Joined: Jul 2008
Reputation: 442
I Root For: UF, UCF
Location:
|
RE: Who is not voting for Trump?
Benghazi
|
|
08-09-2016 01:31 PM |
|
UTSAMarineVet09
Corporal of the Board.
Posts: 16,361
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 1271
I Root For: UTSA
Location: West Michigan
|
RE: Who is not voting for Trump?
(08-09-2016 01:25 PM)john01992 Wrote: (08-09-2016 01:19 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote: (08-09-2016 01:14 PM)john01992 Wrote: (08-09-2016 01:09 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote: So now they are major news stories?
Ok, so if it would only take 5 seconds to google them, why didnt you google them and provided the links? You were the one that made the claim john, its your job to prove them. Not mine buddy.
YES....THEY....ARE. The 50 GOP thing was the top story on NBC after the Olympics and was the frontpage headline on major media outlets such as CNN within the last 24 hours.
to your bold part ==> do I have to post a source just to prove gravity exists every time I engage with you? let's be reasonable here, there is absolutely no way you can say the reason you asked for a link was because it was unreasonable to know. you asked for a link purely to be a prick and to be difficult.
Are you saying that gravity was just discovered a couple of days ago???
and I am just returning the favor, you ask for sources and links too, dont get your panties in a bunch when people also ask you for sources. Not being a prick at all, but if you think I am, I am pretty sure you can find a safe space that you can go hide.
I ask for sources/links to something I can't find on my own or things that are rather obscure like a study or op ed. you are asking for major (and recent) high profile news stories and are too much of a hack to understand the difference.
not one of your fellow cons has denied these things happened, in fact the last con to post acknowledge that one of them did happen.
now I know you are both incredibly uneducated and incredibly lazy.
they might be major news to you, but they are not to me. Maybe your clinton news network tried to air those news, which I dont watch.
The poster might have acknowledge one of them, but you made 4 claims. So I am still waiting for those links. If you dont want to provide the links, just say so, dont get all pissy about it and start calling people names.
Funny though, a sign of an uneducated person is one that usually resorts to name calling after they lose a discussion.
|
|
08-09-2016 01:34 PM |
|
VA49er
Legend
Posts: 29,134
Joined: Dec 2004
Reputation: 985
I Root For: Charlotte
Location:
|
RE: Who is not voting for Trump?
(08-09-2016 01:11 PM)john01992 Wrote: (08-09-2016 01:08 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: Typical libturds. They try to start a thread demonizing Trump, then get all butthurt when it blows up in their face.
how annoyed would you be when the other side blatantly ignores facts because it goes against their political views?
Well, to be honest, BOTH sides do that. It's the primary reason nothing every gets done.
|
|
08-09-2016 01:35 PM |
|
Lord Stanley
L'Étoile du Nord
Posts: 19,103
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation: 994
I Root For: NIU
Location: Cold. So cold......
|
RE: Who is not voting for Trump?
(08-09-2016 12:51 PM)john01992 Wrote: when a candidate has held no political office and is running on his business record...then yes, billionaires saying he is a bad businessman is as relevant as it gets.
And I like to think of the pro-Hillary crowd as the “let's put a corrupt serial liar in the White House" faction.
(08-09-2016 12:51 PM)john01992 Wrote: same with GOP security officials and congressmen putting the country above partisan politics by openly calling out Trump is again pretty damn relevant.
How convenient that those " putting the country above partisan politics" are anti-Trump and have nothing to say about abandoning Iraq to ISIS and Afghanistan to the Taliban, about expanding drone usage, about unsecured emails almost certainly in the hands of foreign intelligence, about how a certain candidate personally profited from foreign contributions to her family foundation. That can’t possibly be relevant to foreign affairs, no way no sir no how.
As I’ve always said, without double standards, progressives would have NO standards.
|
|
08-09-2016 01:37 PM |
|
john01992
Former ESPNer still in recovery mode
Posts: 16,277
Joined: Jul 2013
I Root For: John0 out!!!!
Location: The Worst P5 Program
|
RE: Who is not voting for Trump?
(08-09-2016 01:34 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote: (08-09-2016 01:25 PM)john01992 Wrote: (08-09-2016 01:19 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote: (08-09-2016 01:14 PM)john01992 Wrote: (08-09-2016 01:09 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote: So now they are major news stories?
Ok, so if it would only take 5 seconds to google them, why didnt you google them and provided the links? You were the one that made the claim john, its your job to prove them. Not mine buddy.
YES....THEY....ARE. The 50 GOP thing was the top story on NBC after the Olympics and was the frontpage headline on major media outlets such as CNN within the last 24 hours.
to your bold part ==> do I have to post a source just to prove gravity exists every time I engage with you? let's be reasonable here, there is absolutely no way you can say the reason you asked for a link was because it was unreasonable to know. you asked for a link purely to be a prick and to be difficult.
Are you saying that gravity was just discovered a couple of days ago???
and I am just returning the favor, you ask for sources and links too, dont get your panties in a bunch when people also ask you for sources. Not being a prick at all, but if you think I am, I am pretty sure you can find a safe space that you can go hide.
I ask for sources/links to something I can't find on my own or things that are rather obscure like a study or op ed. you are asking for major (and recent) high profile news stories and are too much of a hack to understand the difference.
not one of your fellow cons has denied these things happened, in fact the last con to post acknowledge that one of them did happen.
now I know you are both incredibly uneducated and incredibly lazy.
they might be major news to you, but they are not to me. Maybe your clinton news network tried to air those news, which I dont watch.
The poster might have acknowledge one of them, but you made 4 claims. So I am still waiting for those links. If you dont want to provide the links, just say so, dont get all pissy about it and start calling people names.
Funny though, a sign of an uneducated person is one that usually resorts to name calling after they lose a discussion.
I just google it: here is who covered (names I recognized) it after clicking on five pages using two different keyterms:
CNN
NYT
NBC
CBS
ABC
washpo
US News
huffington
business insider
time
politico
WSJ
msn
msnba
military.com
dailymail
telegraph
yahoo
gawker
breibart (whose well known for their pro clinton bias)
fox news (whose well known for their pro clinton bias)
USA Today
the hill
boston globe
bloomberg
LA times
conservativetribune
rawstory
the week
syracuse.com
wral
nj.com
pitt gazatte
aol.com
thedailybeast
mediate
salon
guardian
BBC
UPI
gateway
inside edition
so yes...do tell how only cnn covered this. and FYI I only namecall when someone truly deserves it. you are lazy when you refused to educate yourself on something you didn't know. you are uneducated for being unaware of eight major news stories all of which received considerable coverage.
|
|
08-09-2016 01:47 PM |
|
boroeagle2
1st String
Posts: 2,109
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation: 85
I Root For: GA SOUTHERN
Location:
|
RE: Who is not voting for Trump?
(This post was last modified: 08-09-2016 01:51 PM by boroeagle2.)
|
|
08-09-2016 01:49 PM |
|
john01992
Former ESPNer still in recovery mode
Posts: 16,277
Joined: Jul 2013
I Root For: John0 out!!!!
Location: The Worst P5 Program
|
RE: Who is not voting for Trump?
(08-09-2016 01:37 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote: (08-09-2016 12:51 PM)john01992 Wrote: when a candidate has held no political office and is running on his business record...then yes, billionaires saying he is a bad businessman is as relevant as it gets.
And I like to think of the pro-Hillary crowd as the “let's put a corrupt serial liar in the White House" faction.
(08-09-2016 12:51 PM)john01992 Wrote: same with GOP security officials and congressmen putting the country above partisan politics by openly calling out Trump is again pretty damn relevant.
How convenient that those " putting the country above partisan politics" are anti-Trump and have nothing to say about abandoning Iraq to ISIS and Afghanistan to the Taliban, about expanding drone usage, about unsecured emails almost certainly in the hands of foreign intelligence, about how a certain candidate personally profited from foreign contributions to her family foundation. That can’t possibly be relevant to foreign affairs, no way no sir no how.
As I’ve always said, without double standards, progressives would have NO standards.
ISIS is losing ground and has been for some time. but that won't stop the fear mongering coming from the right.
the other stuff are IMO reach scandals. The idea that a former FL would engage in for profit corruption is ludicrous. they are set $$$ for life do to book deals and you really want to suggest that at the height of her political career she is going to engage in that sort of stuff? it concerns me more than the other stuff but it doesn't really add up.
the email stuff is again grasping for straws. yes I think she did something unethical. but no I don't think she is any different from Obama, bush, other clinton etc. with how many internal memos they make sure stays out of the hands of the public. let's face it. the cons were looking to nail her from day one and kept digging until they could find something with traction.
|
|
08-09-2016 01:53 PM |
|