(06-09-2016 12:20 PM)RealDeal Wrote: I feel about Marvin exactly how I feel about Dusty Baker. Mediocre game coach but his teams respect him and play really hard for him. That's why they win; motivating players is far more important than game day decision making.
There aren't many coaches who have made 5 straight playoffs without elite QB play.
Mediocre is a reasonable opinion. I think he's a better game coach than people getting credit for, but does somethings that people react very poorly to. A few examples of what I like about Marvin:
1. I think he has been really good with the challenge flag in recent years. Seems to throw it at the right time for the right plays.
2. He has been really good with timeouts in the second half. I think almost every game we had all our timeouts when we needed them in the second half. In first half it seems like he's basically decided not to worry about it calling timeouts if it means getting things right. I don't know if it's absolutely the right play, but it's interesting prioritizing that I actually do get the logic to.
3. He's aggressive on 4th down between the 30-40 yard line. This has probably been my favorite thing about Marvin's in game coaching (and an area where I think he wasn't good early in his career). The Bengals go for it a ton in these situations and not just on 4th and short. I've seen many 4th and 3-8 yards where Marvin doesn't settle for the FG. My favorite was I think they went on 4th and 15 and converted in the first half of a game from the 40 a couple seasons ago. Punting not a great idea there and Marvin has played these well.
4. He's mostly very aggressive on 4th and less than a yard, trusting in his offensive line (particularly inside the 5).
5. The defenses always seem to have a good gameplan for the best QBs in the league. It's amazing some of the performances they've put together against guys like Rapelsburger, Brady and Rodgers (certainly our DCs deserve credit too).
My biggest Marvin complaint is that I think his clock management is confusing at times and often bad late in the first half. It seems like Marvin is still more concerned with not screwing up in the first half and plays more to win in the second. I think they've left some points off the board late in the half of games.
His teams aren't flashy, but they are consistently efficient on both sides of the ball which seems good to me.