Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Thread Closed 
Low Population & Footprint Gap Glaring Concerns for Big 12
Author Message
BamaScorpio69 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,602
Joined: Oct 2010
Reputation: 149
I Root For: Non-AQs
Location:
Post: #81
RE: Low Population & Footprint Gap Glaring Concerns for Big 12
(02-24-2016 05:18 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  
(02-24-2016 04:57 PM)Blazer85 Wrote:  
(02-24-2016 04:49 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  
(02-24-2016 04:39 PM)Blazer85 Wrote:  Size of a TV market is an important fact but the analysis does not stop there. You have to look at actual number of football fans and viewers in those markets to get a real sense about impact that certain geographical areas will add to a conference.

For example, Birmingham is the 45th largest TV market in the nation. When you look at it in terms of football viewers, however, Birmingham is 1st in collegiate sports TV markets. Based on one study, Birmingham is estimated to have the 6th most number of college football fans in the US with an estimated 1.7 million college football fans (behind NYC, Atlanta, LA, Dallas, and Chicago in that order).

In essence, TV markets matter but there are limits to the utility of them based on percentage of sports viewers and specifically those who follow college football.

What all do they include in that? They must include a lot more than simply Birmingham and its immediate surroundings.

The whole Birmingham statistical area doesn't have 1.7 million people in it period. It's about 1.3 million total.

Yes it was based on the Birmingham TV market area (includes around 20 counties in Central Alabama) which has a population of close to 2.1 million. Based on their research 85% of the Birmingham TV market regularly follows college football giving the 1.7 million college football fans number.


The fans in the area is not UAB fans, They tend to be the Crimson Tide's fans. UAB is too close to Alabama that they overlap each other.

He didn't say they were UAB fans Mr. Irrelevant Poster.
02-26-2016 04:00 AM
Find all posts by this user
mavblues Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 150
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 6
I Root For: UCONN
Location:
Post: #82
RE: Low Population & Footprint Gap Glaring Concerns for Big 12
(02-25-2016 04:26 PM)Rabonchild Wrote:  
(02-25-2016 12:09 PM)Hank Schrader Wrote:  
(02-25-2016 11:20 AM)ken d Wrote:  
(02-24-2016 05:30 PM)Rabonchild Wrote:  
(02-24-2016 06:23 AM)Hank Schrader Wrote:  Your math is wrong which isn't a shocker. There's 150,150 UConn football fans living in NYC based on silvers study's which the courant is citing.

http://thequad.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09...haos/?_r=0

It is not hard to stay informed about UCONN sports in the Northeast. Just look beneath the Bruins, Red Sox, Celtics,Patriots, Yankees, Mets, Islanders, Giants, Nets, & Rangers.

It's certainly a lot easier to find info about UConn sports than it was when I lived in NYC. I was a rabid sports fan when I lived in NYC, and I not only wasn't aware of UConn sports, I can't say I even realized that Connecticut had a state university. Rutgers was just as irrelevant in sports, but at least I had heard of them. It wasn't until after I left the area and the Big East invited them to play basketball that they started to become relevant. Before that, Providence was the dominant New England basketball power.

To the extent that UConn has fans in NYC, the level of interest there is purely based on how much they win. NYC has had a remarkable tolerance for mediocrity in its pro teams (at least in hoops and hockey), but in college sports it only cares about winners. Put UConn in the big 12 and watch them get their butts kicked every year and their NYC "fans" will disappear.

Wow. I hope when I am 37 years older I don't pretend to be an expert on anything based on an impression formed 37 years prior. I hate to break this to you, but since you left NYC in the 1970's things have changed a bit.

I left NYC three years ago and not only was UCONN sports irrelavent, but college sports as a whole was irrelavent unless Duke was in town.

Someone forgot to tell the NYC media:

SNY: UConn's home network.

NYT: http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/...index.html Covered as a local team.

NY Daily News: 3,330 articles covering UConn (local team coverage), including many covers like this: http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_f...ncover.jpg

NY Post: 2,977 articles covering UConn (local team coverage), including many covers like this: http://bloguin.com/soxanddawgs/wp-conten...nypost.png

Big East Tournament: This never included Duke, yet it was always the hottest ticket in town. Not only was MSG full, but bars throughout the city always did HUGE business during the tournament.

I attended UConn, and I was born and raised in NY. Your comments are patently false, particularly for the last 25 years. If UConn doesn't have any interest in NYC, why the articles? Why put them on the cover?

Nobody is claiming UConn is the #1 draw in NYC. But for people to mindlessly spout that UConn has absolutely no traction in NYC, that's completely untrue. Further, it's already been proven historically. All you have to do is research what happened to SNY's carriage once it signed the Huskies.

By any metric, UConn is clearly a P5 worthy school, trapped in G5 hell.

For those keeping score, I've now posted 3 times with extensive links and data. So far, not one of the knuckleheads has come back with anything to support their claims.
02-26-2016 12:48 PM
Find all posts by this user
ken d Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 17,453
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 1226
I Root For: college sports
Location: Raleigh
Post: #83
RE: Low Population & Footprint Gap Glaring Concerns for Big 12
(02-26-2016 12:48 PM)mavblues Wrote:  
(02-25-2016 04:26 PM)Rabonchild Wrote:  
(02-25-2016 12:09 PM)Hank Schrader Wrote:  
(02-25-2016 11:20 AM)ken d Wrote:  
(02-24-2016 05:30 PM)Rabonchild Wrote:  It is not hard to stay informed about UCONN sports in the Northeast. Just look beneath the Bruins, Red Sox, Celtics,Patriots, Yankees, Mets, Islanders, Giants, Nets, & Rangers.

It's certainly a lot easier to find info about UConn sports than it was when I lived in NYC. I was a rabid sports fan when I lived in NYC, and I not only wasn't aware of UConn sports, I can't say I even realized that Connecticut had a state university. Rutgers was just as irrelevant in sports, but at least I had heard of them. It wasn't until after I left the area and the Big East invited them to play basketball that they started to become relevant. Before that, Providence was the dominant New England basketball power.

To the extent that UConn has fans in NYC, the level of interest there is purely based on how much they win. NYC has had a remarkable tolerance for mediocrity in its pro teams (at least in hoops and hockey), but in college sports it only cares about winners. Put UConn in the big 12 and watch them get their butts kicked every year and their NYC "fans" will disappear.

Wow. I hope when I am 37 years older I don't pretend to be an expert on anything based on an impression formed 37 years prior. I hate to break this to you, but since you left NYC in the 1970's things have changed a bit.

I left NYC three years ago and not only was UCONN sports irrelavent, but college sports as a whole was irrelavent unless Duke was in town.

Someone forgot to tell the NYC media:

SNY: UConn's home network.

NYT: http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/...index.html Covered as a local team.

NY Daily News: 3,330 articles covering UConn (local team coverage), including many covers like this: http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_f...ncover.jpg

NY Post: 2,977 articles covering UConn (local team coverage), including many covers like this: http://bloguin.com/soxanddawgs/wp-conten...nypost.png

Big East Tournament: This never included Duke, yet it was always the hottest ticket in town. Not only was MSG full, but bars throughout the city always did HUGE business during the tournament.

I attended UConn, and I was born and raised in NY. Your comments are patently false, particularly for the last 25 years. If UConn doesn't have any interest in NYC, why the articles? Why put them on the cover?

Nobody is claiming UConn is the #1 draw in NYC. But for people to mindlessly spout that UConn has absolutely no traction in NYC, that's completely untrue. Further, it's already been proven historically. All you have to do is research what happened to SNY's carriage once it signed the Huskies.

By any metric, UConn is clearly a P5 worthy school, trapped in G5 hell.

For those keeping score, I've now posted 3 times with extensive links and data. So far, not one of the knuckleheads has come back with anything to support their claims.

Good statistics. How many of those articles were about UConn football? Because for the Big 12, that's all that matters for realignment.
02-26-2016 01:19 PM
Find all posts by this user
mavblues Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 150
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 6
I Root For: UCONN
Location:
Post: #84
RE: Low Population & Footprint Gap Glaring Concerns for Big 12
(02-26-2016 01:19 PM)ken d Wrote:  
(02-26-2016 12:48 PM)mavblues Wrote:  
(02-25-2016 04:26 PM)Rabonchild Wrote:  
(02-25-2016 12:09 PM)Hank Schrader Wrote:  
(02-25-2016 11:20 AM)ken d Wrote:  It's certainly a lot easier to find info about UConn sports than it was when I lived in NYC. I was a rabid sports fan when I lived in NYC, and I not only wasn't aware of UConn sports, I can't say I even realized that Connecticut had a state university. Rutgers was just as irrelevant in sports, but at least I had heard of them. It wasn't until after I left the area and the Big East invited them to play basketball that they started to become relevant. Before that, Providence was the dominant New England basketball power.

To the extent that UConn has fans in NYC, the level of interest there is purely based on how much they win. NYC has had a remarkable tolerance for mediocrity in its pro teams (at least in hoops and hockey), but in college sports it only cares about winners. Put UConn in the big 12 and watch them get their butts kicked every year and their NYC "fans" will disappear.

Wow. I hope when I am 37 years older I don't pretend to be an expert on anything based on an impression formed 37 years prior. I hate to break this to you, but since you left NYC in the 1970's things have changed a bit.

I left NYC three years ago and not only was UCONN sports irrelavent, but college sports as a whole was irrelavent unless Duke was in town.

Someone forgot to tell the NYC media:

SNY: UConn's home network.

NYT: http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/...index.html Covered as a local team.

NY Daily News: 3,330 articles covering UConn (local team coverage), including many covers like this: http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_f...ncover.jpg

NY Post: 2,977 articles covering UConn (local team coverage), including many covers like this: http://bloguin.com/soxanddawgs/wp-conten...nypost.png

Big East Tournament: This never included Duke, yet it was always the hottest ticket in town. Not only was MSG full, but bars throughout the city always did HUGE business during the tournament.

I attended UConn, and I was born and raised in NY. Your comments are patently false, particularly for the last 25 years. If UConn doesn't have any interest in NYC, why the articles? Why put them on the cover?

Nobody is claiming UConn is the #1 draw in NYC. But for people to mindlessly spout that UConn has absolutely no traction in NYC, that's completely untrue. Further, it's already been proven historically. All you have to do is research what happened to SNY's carriage once it signed the Huskies.

By any metric, UConn is clearly a P5 worthy school, trapped in G5 hell.

For those keeping score, I've now posted 3 times with extensive links and data. So far, not one of the knuckleheads has come back with anything to support their claims.

Good statistics. How many of those articles were about UConn football? Because for the Big 12, that's all that matters for realignment.

Way to change the argument (again).

Your comments were: 1) UConn Sports were irrelevant (in NYC), and 2) College sports as a whole were irrelevant (in NYC), unless Duke was involved.

Both statements have been proven false.

And if you think football is the only thing that matters, you're even more ignorant than I thought.

The only thing that matters in realignment is MONEY. Period. End of story.

To get money, you need to have your own conference network, so you also need year 'round content to justify carriage rates. You also need to have some of your teams in large media markets.

The only way for B12 to make more money and close the gap with B10 and SEC is to have a CCG and create a conference network. One without the other doesn't sufficiently close the $$ gap, and thus doesn't stabilize the conference.

If B12 can create a conference network before the ACC does, it stands a very good chance of stealing 4 ACC programs down the road (to get to 16). Then the B12's $$ explodes even more, and P5 becomes P4.

The only way to get a B12 network going now is to add the largest media markets available. UConn is the clear #1. The choice is either BYU or Cincy to join them. To me, it's Cincy because the LDS church membership is too spread out to warrant "in market" rates for B12N anywhere (except Utah). Cincy also brings good recruiting and another eastern program for Fox.

Having said all that, B12 has shown a high level of dysfunction and politics so who knows what they will actually do (if anything).

All of that, of course, is not what we were discussing. You were claiming that UConn sports were irrelevant in NYC, as were college sports in general (unless Duke was involved).

I'd be interested in seeing what research you've compiled to backup these ridiculous statements, because everything I've posted shows the exact opposite.
02-26-2016 01:44 PM
Find all posts by this user
ken d Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 17,453
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 1226
I Root For: college sports
Location: Raleigh
Post: #85
RE: Low Population & Footprint Gap Glaring Concerns for Big 12
(02-26-2016 01:44 PM)mavblues Wrote:  
(02-26-2016 01:19 PM)ken d Wrote:  
(02-26-2016 12:48 PM)mavblues Wrote:  
(02-25-2016 04:26 PM)Rabonchild Wrote:  
(02-25-2016 12:09 PM)Hank Schrader Wrote:  Wow. I hope when I am 37 years older I don't pretend to be an expert on anything based on an impression formed 37 years prior. I hate to break this to you, but since you left NYC in the 1970's things have changed a bit.

I left NYC three years ago and not only was UCONN sports irrelavent, but college sports as a whole was irrelavent unless Duke was in town.

Someone forgot to tell the NYC media:

SNY: UConn's home network.

NYT: http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/...index.html Covered as a local team.

NY Daily News: 3,330 articles covering UConn (local team coverage), including many covers like this: http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_f...ncover.jpg

NY Post: 2,977 articles covering UConn (local team coverage), including many covers like this: http://bloguin.com/soxanddawgs/wp-conten...nypost.png

Big East Tournament: This never included Duke, yet it was always the hottest ticket in town. Not only was MSG full, but bars throughout the city always did HUGE business during the tournament.

I attended UConn, and I was born and raised in NY. Your comments are patently false, particularly for the last 25 years. If UConn doesn't have any interest in NYC, why the articles? Why put them on the cover?

Nobody is claiming UConn is the #1 draw in NYC. But for people to mindlessly spout that UConn has absolutely no traction in NYC, that's completely untrue. Further, it's already been proven historically. All you have to do is research what happened to SNY's carriage once it signed the Huskies.

By any metric, UConn is clearly a P5 worthy school, trapped in G5 hell.

For those keeping score, I've now posted 3 times with extensive links and data. So far, not one of the knuckleheads has come back with anything to support their claims.

Good statistics. How many of those articles were about UConn football? Because for the Big 12, that's all that matters for realignment.

Way to change the argument (again).

Your comments were: 1) UConn Sports were irrelevant (in NYC), and 2) College sports as a whole were irrelevant (in NYC), unless Duke was involved.

Both statements have been proven false.

And if you think football is the only thing that matters, you're even more ignorant than I thought.

The only thing that matters in realignment is MONEY. Period. End of story.

To get money, you need to have your own conference network, so you also need year 'round content to justify carriage rates. You also need to have some of your teams in large media markets.

The only way for B12 to make more money and close the gap with B10 and SEC is to have a CCG and create a conference network. One without the other doesn't sufficiently close the $$ gap, and thus doesn't stabilize the conference.

If B12 can create a conference network before the ACC does, it stands a very good chance of stealing 4 ACC programs down the road (to get to 16). Then the B12's $$ explodes even more, and P5 becomes P4.

The only way to get a B12 network going now is to add the largest media markets available. UConn is the clear #1. The choice is either BYU or Cincy to join them. To me, it's Cincy because the LDS church membership is too spread out to warrant "in market" rates for B12N anywhere (except Utah). Cincy also brings good recruiting and another eastern program for Fox.

Having said all that, B12 has shown a high level of dysfunction and politics so who knows what they will actually do (if anything).

All of that, of course, is not what we were discussing. You were claiming that UConn sports were irrelevant in NYC, as were college sports in general (unless Duke was involved).

I'd be interested in seeing what research you've compiled to backup these ridiculous statements, because everything I've posted shows the exact opposite.

I haven't changed any argument. I'm not even arguing. But if you want to sling personal insults, you go right ahead. I'm not getting into the gutter with you. You aren't worth it.
02-26-2016 01:52 PM
Find all posts by this user
Huskies12 Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 369
Joined: Apr 2015
Reputation: 12
I Root For: UConn
Location:
Post: #86
RE: Low Population & Footprint Gap Glaring Concerns for Big 12
(02-26-2016 01:19 PM)ken d Wrote:  
(02-26-2016 12:48 PM)mavblues Wrote:  
(02-25-2016 04:26 PM)Rabonchild Wrote:  
(02-25-2016 12:09 PM)Hank Schrader Wrote:  
(02-25-2016 11:20 AM)ken d Wrote:  It's certainly a lot easier to find info about UConn sports than it was when I lived in NYC. I was a rabid sports fan when I lived in NYC, and I not only wasn't aware of UConn sports, I can't say I even realized that Connecticut had a state university. Rutgers was just as irrelevant in sports, but at least I had heard of them. It wasn't until after I left the area and the Big East invited them to play basketball that they started to become relevant. Before that, Providence was the dominant New England basketball power.

To the extent that UConn has fans in NYC, the level of interest there is purely based on how much they win. NYC has had a remarkable tolerance for mediocrity in its pro teams (at least in hoops and hockey), but in college sports it only cares about winners. Put UConn in the big 12 and watch them get their butts kicked every year and their NYC "fans" will disappear.

Wow. I hope when I am 37 years older I don't pretend to be an expert on anything based on an impression formed 37 years prior. I hate to break this to you, but since you left NYC in the 1970's things have changed a bit.

I left NYC three years ago and not only was UCONN sports irrelavent, but college sports as a whole was irrelavent unless Duke was in town.

Someone forgot to tell the NYC media:

SNY: UConn's home network.

NYT: http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/...index.html Covered as a local team.

NY Daily News: 3,330 articles covering UConn (local team coverage), including many covers like this: http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_f...ncover.jpg

NY Post: 2,977 articles covering UConn (local team coverage), including many covers like this: http://bloguin.com/soxanddawgs/wp-conten...nypost.png

Big East Tournament: This never included Duke, yet it was always the hottest ticket in town. Not only was MSG full, but bars throughout the city always did HUGE business during the tournament.

I attended UConn, and I was born and raised in NY. Your comments are patently false, particularly for the last 25 years. If UConn doesn't have any interest in NYC, why the articles? Why put them on the cover?

Nobody is claiming UConn is the #1 draw in NYC. But for people to mindlessly spout that UConn has absolutely no traction in NYC, that's completely untrue. Further, it's already been proven historically. All you have to do is research what happened to SNY's carriage once it signed the Huskies.

By any metric, UConn is clearly a P5 worthy school, trapped in G5 hell.

For those keeping score, I've now posted 3 times with extensive links and data. So far, not one of the knuckleheads has come back with anything to support their claims.

Good statistics. How many of those articles were about UConn football? Because for the Big 12, that's all that matters for realignment.

they covered a .500 team going to a bowl

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/27/sports...-envy.html
02-26-2016 03:56 PM
Find all posts by this user
mavblues Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 150
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 6
I Root For: UCONN
Location:
Post: #87
RE: Low Population & Footprint Gap Glaring Concerns for Big 12
(02-26-2016 01:52 PM)ken d Wrote:  
(02-26-2016 01:44 PM)mavblues Wrote:  
(02-26-2016 01:19 PM)ken d Wrote:  
(02-26-2016 12:48 PM)mavblues Wrote:  
(02-25-2016 04:26 PM)Rabonchild Wrote:  I left NYC three years ago and not only was UCONN sports irrelavent, but college sports as a whole was irrelavent unless Duke was in town.

Someone forgot to tell the NYC media:

SNY: UConn's home network.

NYT: http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/...index.html Covered as a local team.

NY Daily News: 3,330 articles covering UConn (local team coverage), including many covers like this: http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_f...ncover.jpg

NY Post: 2,977 articles covering UConn (local team coverage), including many covers like this: http://bloguin.com/soxanddawgs/wp-conten...nypost.png

Big East Tournament: This never included Duke, yet it was always the hottest ticket in town. Not only was MSG full, but bars throughout the city always did HUGE business during the tournament.

I attended UConn, and I was born and raised in NY. Your comments are patently false, particularly for the last 25 years. If UConn doesn't have any interest in NYC, why the articles? Why put them on the cover?

Nobody is claiming UConn is the #1 draw in NYC. But for people to mindlessly spout that UConn has absolutely no traction in NYC, that's completely untrue. Further, it's already been proven historically. All you have to do is research what happened to SNY's carriage once it signed the Huskies.

By any metric, UConn is clearly a P5 worthy school, trapped in G5 hell.

For those keeping score, I've now posted 3 times with extensive links and data. So far, not one of the knuckleheads has come back with anything to support their claims.

Good statistics. How many of those articles were about UConn football? Because for the Big 12, that's all that matters for realignment.

Way to change the argument (again).

Your comments were: 1) UConn Sports were irrelevant (in NYC), and 2) College sports as a whole were irrelevant (in NYC), unless Duke was involved.

Both statements have been proven false.

And if you think football is the only thing that matters, you're even more ignorant than I thought.

The only thing that matters in realignment is MONEY. Period. End of story.

To get money, you need to have your own conference network, so you also need year 'round content to justify carriage rates. You also need to have some of your teams in large media markets.

The only way for B12 to make more money and close the gap with B10 and SEC is to have a CCG and create a conference network. One without the other doesn't sufficiently close the $$ gap, and thus doesn't stabilize the conference.

If B12 can create a conference network before the ACC does, it stands a very good chance of stealing 4 ACC programs down the road (to get to 16). Then the B12's $$ explodes even more, and P5 becomes P4.

The only way to get a B12 network going now is to add the largest media markets available. UConn is the clear #1. The choice is either BYU or Cincy to join them. To me, it's Cincy because the LDS church membership is too spread out to warrant "in market" rates for B12N anywhere (except Utah). Cincy also brings good recruiting and another eastern program for Fox.

Having said all that, B12 has shown a high level of dysfunction and politics so who knows what they will actually do (if anything).

All of that, of course, is not what we were discussing. You were claiming that UConn sports were irrelevant in NYC, as were college sports in general (unless Duke was involved).

I'd be interested in seeing what research you've compiled to backup these ridiculous statements, because everything I've posted shows the exact opposite.

I haven't changed any argument. I'm not even arguing. But if you want to sling personal insults, you go right ahead. I'm not getting into the gutter with you. You aren't worth it.

So you have absolutely no data to back up your "definitive" statements.

Nothing.

Got it. Another internet expert on the northeast, UConn, and conference realignment, this one based out of Raleigh, NC. 01-wingedeagle

Typical.
02-26-2016 04:58 PM
Find all posts by this user
ken d Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 17,453
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 1226
I Root For: college sports
Location: Raleigh
Post: #88
RE: Low Population & Footprint Gap Glaring Concerns for Big 12
(02-26-2016 04:58 PM)mavblues Wrote:  
(02-26-2016 01:52 PM)ken d Wrote:  
(02-26-2016 01:44 PM)mavblues Wrote:  
(02-26-2016 01:19 PM)ken d Wrote:  
(02-26-2016 12:48 PM)mavblues Wrote:  Someone forgot to tell the NYC media:

SNY: UConn's home network.

NYT: http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/...index.html Covered as a local team.

NY Daily News: 3,330 articles covering UConn (local team coverage), including many covers like this: http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_f...ncover.jpg

NY Post: 2,977 articles covering UConn (local team coverage), including many covers like this: http://bloguin.com/soxanddawgs/wp-conten...nypost.png

Big East Tournament: This never included Duke, yet it was always the hottest ticket in town. Not only was MSG full, but bars throughout the city always did HUGE business during the tournament.

I attended UConn, and I was born and raised in NY. Your comments are patently false, particularly for the last 25 years. If UConn doesn't have any interest in NYC, why the articles? Why put them on the cover?

Nobody is claiming UConn is the #1 draw in NYC. But for people to mindlessly spout that UConn has absolutely no traction in NYC, that's completely untrue. Further, it's already been proven historically. All you have to do is research what happened to SNY's carriage once it signed the Huskies.

By any metric, UConn is clearly a P5 worthy school, trapped in G5 hell.

For those keeping score, I've now posted 3 times with extensive links and data. So far, not one of the knuckleheads has come back with anything to support their claims.

Good statistics. How many of those articles were about UConn football? Because for the Big 12, that's all that matters for realignment.

Way to change the argument (again).

Your comments were: 1) UConn Sports were irrelevant (in NYC), and 2) College sports as a whole were irrelevant (in NYC), unless Duke was involved.

Both statements have been proven false.

And if you think football is the only thing that matters, you're even more ignorant than I thought.

The only thing that matters in realignment is MONEY. Period. End of story.

To get money, you need to have your own conference network, so you also need year 'round content to justify carriage rates. You also need to have some of your teams in large media markets.

The only way for B12 to make more money and close the gap with B10 and SEC is to have a CCG and create a conference network. One without the other doesn't sufficiently close the $$ gap, and thus doesn't stabilize the conference.

If B12 can create a conference network before the ACC does, it stands a very good chance of stealing 4 ACC programs down the road (to get to 16). Then the B12's $$ explodes even more, and P5 becomes P4.

The only way to get a B12 network going now is to add the largest media markets available. UConn is the clear #1. The choice is either BYU or Cincy to join them. To me, it's Cincy because the LDS church membership is too spread out to warrant "in market" rates for B12N anywhere (except Utah). Cincy also brings good recruiting and another eastern program for Fox.

Having said all that, B12 has shown a high level of dysfunction and politics so who knows what they will actually do (if anything).

All of that, of course, is not what we were discussing. You were claiming that UConn sports were irrelevant in NYC, as were college sports in general (unless Duke was involved).

I'd be interested in seeing what research you've compiled to backup these ridiculous statements, because everything I've posted shows the exact opposite.

I haven't changed any argument. I'm not even arguing. But if you want to sling personal insults, you go right ahead. I'm not getting into the gutter with you. You aren't worth it.

So you have absolutely no data to back up your "definitive" statements.

Nothing.

Got it. Another internet expert on the northeast, UConn, and conference realignment, this one based out of Raleigh, NC. 01-wingedeagle

Typical.

I'll say this one more time. If you want to pick a fight, you are going to have to find somebody else. I expressed my opinion, you expressed yours. So, if it's important to you to believe that you have "won the internet", then congratulations.

Your next move should be to repeat your claim of victory, so you can have the last word. Collect your prize on your way out.
02-26-2016 05:24 PM
Find all posts by this user
Rabonchild Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,339
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 52
I Root For: Charlotte
Location: Lex KY
Post: #89
RE: Low Population & Footprint Gap Glaring Concerns for Big 12
(02-26-2016 05:24 PM)ken d Wrote:  
(02-26-2016 04:58 PM)mavblues Wrote:  
(02-26-2016 01:52 PM)ken d Wrote:  
(02-26-2016 01:44 PM)mavblues Wrote:  
(02-26-2016 01:19 PM)ken d Wrote:  Good statistics. How many of those articles were about UConn football? Because for the Big 12, that's all that matters for realignment.

Way to change the argument (again).

Your comments were: 1) UConn Sports were irrelevant (in NYC), and 2) College sports as a whole were irrelevant (in NYC), unless Duke was involved.

Both statements have been proven false.

And if you think football is the only thing that matters, you're even more ignorant than I thought.

The only thing that matters in realignment is MONEY. Period. End of story.

To get money, you need to have your own conference network, so you also need year 'round content to justify carriage rates. You also need to have some of your teams in large media markets.

The only way for B12 to make more money and close the gap with B10 and SEC is to have a CCG and create a conference network. One without the other doesn't sufficiently close the $$ gap, and thus doesn't stabilize the conference.

If B12 can create a conference network before the ACC does, it stands a very good chance of stealing 4 ACC programs down the road (to get to 16). Then the B12's $$ explodes even more, and P5 becomes P4.

The only way to get a B12 network going now is to add the largest media markets available. UConn is the clear #1. The choice is either BYU or Cincy to join them. To me, it's Cincy because the LDS church membership is too spread out to warrant "in market" rates for B12N anywhere (except Utah). Cincy also brings good recruiting and another eastern program for Fox.

Having said all that, B12 has shown a high level of dysfunction and politics so who knows what they will actually do (if anything).

All of that, of course, is not what we were discussing. You were claiming that UConn sports were irrelevant in NYC, as were college sports in general (unless Duke was involved).

I'd be interested in seeing what research you've compiled to backup these ridiculous statements, because everything I've posted shows the exact opposite.

I haven't changed any argument. I'm not even arguing. But if you want to sling personal insults, you go right ahead. I'm not getting into the gutter with you. You aren't worth it.

So you have absolutely no data to back up your "definitive" statements.

Nothing.

Got it. Another internet expert on the northeast, UConn, and conference realignment, this one based out of Raleigh, NC. 01-wingedeagle

Typical.

I'll say this one more time. If you want to pick a fight, you are going to have to find somebody else. I expressed my opinion, you expressed yours. So, if it's important to you to believe that you have "won the internet", then congratulations.

Your next move should be to repeat your claim of victory, so you can have the last word. Collect your prize on your way out.


Here's a statistic I'm pretty sure of. Of the last eight teams to move up to a P5 conference UCONN is not one of them.
02-26-2016 05:56 PM
Find all posts by this user
mavblues Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 150
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 6
I Root For: UCONN
Location:
Post: #90
RE: Low Population & Footprint Gap Glaring Concerns for Big 12
(02-26-2016 05:24 PM)ken d Wrote:  
(02-26-2016 04:58 PM)mavblues Wrote:  
(02-26-2016 01:52 PM)ken d Wrote:  
(02-26-2016 01:44 PM)mavblues Wrote:  
(02-26-2016 01:19 PM)ken d Wrote:  Good statistics. How many of those articles were about UConn football? Because for the Big 12, that's all that matters for realignment.

Way to change the argument (again).

Your comments were: 1) UConn Sports were irrelevant (in NYC), and 2) College sports as a whole were irrelevant (in NYC), unless Duke was involved.

Both statements have been proven false.

And if you think football is the only thing that matters, you're even more ignorant than I thought.

The only thing that matters in realignment is MONEY. Period. End of story.

To get money, you need to have your own conference network, so you also need year 'round content to justify carriage rates. You also need to have some of your teams in large media markets.

The only way for B12 to make more money and close the gap with B10 and SEC is to have a CCG and create a conference network. One without the other doesn't sufficiently close the $$ gap, and thus doesn't stabilize the conference.

If B12 can create a conference network before the ACC does, it stands a very good chance of stealing 4 ACC programs down the road (to get to 16). Then the B12's $$ explodes even more, and P5 becomes P4.

The only way to get a B12 network going now is to add the largest media markets available. UConn is the clear #1. The choice is either BYU or Cincy to join them. To me, it's Cincy because the LDS church membership is too spread out to warrant "in market" rates for B12N anywhere (except Utah). Cincy also brings good recruiting and another eastern program for Fox.

Having said all that, B12 has shown a high level of dysfunction and politics so who knows what they will actually do (if anything).

All of that, of course, is not what we were discussing. You were claiming that UConn sports were irrelevant in NYC, as were college sports in general (unless Duke was involved).

I'd be interested in seeing what research you've compiled to backup these ridiculous statements, because everything I've posted shows the exact opposite.

I haven't changed any argument. I'm not even arguing. But if you want to sling personal insults, you go right ahead. I'm not getting into the gutter with you. You aren't worth it.

So you have absolutely no data to back up your "definitive" statements.

Nothing.

Got it. Another internet expert on the northeast, UConn, and conference realignment, this one based out of Raleigh, NC. 01-wingedeagle

Typical.

I'll say this one more time. If you want to pick a fight, you are going to have to find somebody else. I expressed my opinion, you expressed yours. So, if it's important to you to believe that you have "won the internet", then congratulations.

Your next move should be to repeat your claim of victory, so you can have the last word. Collect your prize on your way out.

Except that you never stated it as your opinion, you stated it as fact - referencing the fact that you lived in NYC to back your claims.

Kind of a douche like move.

And just to be clear, my post are not my "opinion". They are backed up by easily verified facts.

It's easy to pick on UConn. I get it. Miko and BigEast4Evah have made great sport of it, and some of it is funny.

But when people like you spout utter BS and present it as fact, that's another story.

I'm not out to win the Internet. I'm out to expose fools like you and Knightsweat. (You'll notice he hasn't responded.)
02-26-2016 06:20 PM
Find all posts by this user
Thread Closed 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.