(01-27-2016 10:12 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  I think Cruz is going to win Iowa. Trump is losing it and Cruz is now beating him at his own game there.

.@realDonaldTrump: debate #TedCruz one-on-one in Iowa before the caucuses and we will donate $1.5M to vet charities

#iacaucus #greatdeal

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

dude....you won't let go of the religious right aspect will ya? you poor soul...

Iowa ain't gonna git her done this dime <sic?> IMO.....

just remember this post and so many others....

the only thing I see, "is trump really serious?"

if he is, the dems should/are (be) worried.....

this is an entire other level of 'pissed the fk off' that is being played out right now.....and cruz may end up as the end game result....

this game is just getting started.....

hell, when was the last time you saw the border crossing on this board....she'll return once it gets closer....these boys are the purest of manipulators...it's how 'they' do business....you should know that by now....

people.....they crack me the fk up.....

(01-27-2016 10:12 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  I think Cruz is going to win Iowa. Trump is losing it and Cruz is now beating him at his own game there.

.@realDonaldTrump: debate #TedCruz one-on-one in Iowa before the caucuses and we will donate $1.5M to vet charities

#iacaucus #greatdeal

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

Trump isn't going to debate Cruz. If Trump wins Iowa, he's NEVER debating again.

(01-27-2016 02:57 PM)gsu95 Wrote:  Those concerns about Sanders are certainly valid. I sometimes wonder about my investments (such as they are) and whether a win by Sanders will bite me in the ass. But then, I'm old, I don't need much. It's time for a change in the way we do business and put people first and profit motive second.

Maybe Sanders is it. Maybe he isn't. I just have a feeling he might be a damn good president. He certainly seems genuine.

BY FAR his best qualities. I like Bernie. I'm not a huge fan of his policies... though actually I'm not a fan of his policies being adopted by the status-quo which means we'll get all the power and money grabs, but little of the actual benefits of his policies.

Democratic socialism (not socialism, but DS) is not something that can be done 'halfway'. Doing it half-way simply leads to bloated government. Bernie would be OUTSTANDING if we had a multi-party coalition type 'proportional representation' system like most of Europe.

We think Obama can't reach across the aisle and work with "the other side"?

Just consider how it would be with Comrade Sanders in office.

(01-28-2016 12:49 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(01-27-2016 02:57 PM)gsu95 Wrote:  Those concerns about Sanders are certainly valid. I sometimes wonder about my investments (such as they are) and whether a win by Sanders will bite me in the ass. But then, I'm old, I don't need much. It's time for a change in the way we do business and put people first and profit motive second.

Maybe Sanders is it. Maybe he isn't. I just have a feeling he might be a damn good president. He certainly seems genuine.

BY FAR his best qualities. I like Bernie. I'm not a huge fan of his policies... though actually I'm not a fan of his policies being adopted by the status-quo which means we'll get all the power and money grabs, but little of the actual benefits of his policies.

Democratic socialism (not socialism, but DS) is not something that can be done 'halfway'. Doing it half-way simply leads to bloated government. Bernie would be OUTSTANDING if we had a multi-party coalition type 'proportional representation' system like most of Europe.

but that's blasphemy.....

that's exactly what needs to happen....

it's amazingly simple until the knee jerk media fags get involved....

change is never easy....unfortunately, I don't see it as being plausible at this point....

all I see are people stepping over and eating each other as they destroy based on the unwillingness to compromise and revise a system that is outdated

it sickens me that some diptard fk'r getting shot causes riots and the untrained create political stir that means nothing in scope for the whole.....

people have to suffer....that's just life....that's what this country once thought of as being a proud American....

I'm embarrassed to call myself one these days.....

(01-28-2016 01:32 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(01-27-2016 10:12 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  I think Cruz is going to win Iowa. Trump is losing it and Cruz is now beating him at his own game there.

.@realDonaldTrump: debate #TedCruz one-on-one in Iowa before the caucuses and we will donate $1.5M to vet charities

#iacaucus #greatdeal

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

dude....you won't let go of the religious right aspect will ya? you poor soul...

Iowa ain't gonna git her done this dime <sic?> IMO.....

just remember this post and so many others....

the only thing I see, "is trump really serious?"

if he is, the dems should/are (be) worried.....

this is an entire other level of 'pissed the fk off' that is being played out right now.....and cruz may end up as the end game result....

this game is just getting started.....

hell, when was the last time you saw the border crossing on this board....she'll return once it gets closer....these boys are the purest of manipulators...it's how 'they' do business....you should know that by now....

people.....they crack me the fk up.....

What have I said has anything to do with religious right?

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

(01-28-2016 03:04 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 01:32 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(01-27-2016 10:12 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  I think Cruz is going to win Iowa. Trump is losing it and Cruz is now beating him at his own game there.

.@realDonaldTrump: debate #TedCruz one-on-one in Iowa before the caucuses and we will donate $1.5M to vet charities

#iacaucus #greatdeal

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

dude....you won't let go of the religious right aspect will ya? you poor soul...

Iowa ain't gonna git her done this dime <sic?> IMO.....

just remember this post and so many others....

the only thing I see, "is trump really serious?"

if he is, the dems should/are (be) worried.....

this is an entire other level of 'pissed the fk off' that is being played out right now.....and cruz may end up as the end game result....

this game is just getting started.....

hell, when was the last time you saw the border crossing on this board....she'll return once it gets closer....these boys are the purest of manipulators...it's how 'they' do business....you should know that by now....

people.....they crack me the fk up.....

What have I said has anything to do with religious right?

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

wow....another narcissist said that in the internutz pubic flossing....

ummmkay.....wtfe man....

the implied is easy to spit fire in any eye....

we can tango or 'wrastle' with it.....makes no difference to me....

ready to rumble? tell me how any of my post is incorrect in stature.....this is nothing but 'fonzie kill time' before I treat my daughter to sushi and another life lesson...

(01-28-2016 12:52 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  We think Obama can't reach across the aisle and work with "the other side"?

Just consider how it would be with Comrade Sanders in office.

Then we'd get to hear about "Republican obstructionism" for 4 more years, despite the fact that Congress will have been doing their job, preventing our country from being put out of business and further into a debt spiral.

(01-28-2016 03:15 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 12:52 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  We think Obama can't reach across the aisle and work with "the other side"?

Just consider how it would be with Comrade Sanders in office.

Then we'd get to hear about "Republican obstructionism" for 4 more years, despite the fact that Congress will have been doing their job, preventing our country from being put out of business and further into a debt spiral.

so if we take that number and divide into 14.5, I only have to deal with potentially two more of these diptard self serving morons....

I too think Cruz wins Iowa and Trump will have no one to blame but himself because I think skipping this debate will be the reason.

(01-27-2016 10:12 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  I think Cruz is going to win Iowa. Trump is losing it and Cruz is now beating him at his own game there.

.@realDonaldTrump: debate #TedCruz one-on-one in Iowa before the caucuses and we will donate $1.5M to vet charities

#iacaucus #greatdeal

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

If Cruz wins Iowa, which he actually should, it will be because he has an organization that can bus more people to caucuses than Trump supporters willing to drive themselves.

As to game winning, Cruz sounds like a whiny little brother just trying to get a place at the table. It's like he wants to go wherever Trump goes instead of standing on his own. If Cruz wanted to win at Trump's game, then he should hold a rally immediately after the debates and show people just how big his following is. The truth is that Cruz is horrible at playing this game. The guy still hasn't figured out a way to dismiss the Canada question. I respect his intelligence, but sometimes the man is a lot like Gingrich in his arrogance and foolhardy moves. But, that's just my opinion.

(01-28-2016 03:46 PM)pharaoh0 Wrote:  

(01-27-2016 10:12 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  I think Cruz is going to win Iowa. Trump is losing it and Cruz is now beating him at his own game there.

.@realDonaldTrump: debate #TedCruz one-on-one in Iowa before the caucuses and we will donate $1.5M to vet charities

#iacaucus #greatdeal

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

If Cruz wins Iowa, which he actually should, it will be because he has an organization that can bus more people to caucuses than Trump supporters willing to drive themselves.

As to game winning, Cruz sounds like a whiny little brother just trying to get a place at the table. It's like he wants to go wherever Trump goes instead of standing on his own. If Cruz wanted to win at Trump's game, then he should hold a rally immediately after the debates and show people just how big his following is. The truth is that Cruz is horrible at playing this game. The guy still hasn't figured out a way to dismiss the Canada question. I respect his intelligence, but sometimes the man is a lot like Gingrich in his arrogance and foolhardy moves. But, that's just my opinion.

cruz is easily just a simple wide open bend over vag that the wine bottle wont fill....

that's why some choose the 'eight extra muscles and 4 degrees warmer' option....

Cruz MUST win Iowa. No win Iowa, no chance.

(01-28-2016 04:08 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  Cruz MUST win Iowa. No win Iowa, no chance.

With someone as volatile as The Donald, I'd never say never. All it takes is 1 slip up, and the race could be turned on it's head.

(01-28-2016 04:16 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 04:08 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  Cruz MUST win Iowa. No win Iowa, no chance.

With someone as volatile as The Donald, I'd never say never. All it takes is 1 slip up, and the race could be turned on it's head.

agree....Iowa doesn't mean dick with this guy....

(01-28-2016 04:08 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  Cruz MUST win Iowa. No win Iowa, no chance.

I wouldn't say that necessarily. If he finished in 2nd in the 1st 3 states and the field shrinks, I think he can still pull it off. The path is much clearer if he wins, however.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

(01-28-2016 04:40 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 04:08 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  Cruz MUST win Iowa. No win Iowa, no chance.

I wouldn't say that necessarily. If he finished in 2nd in the 1st 3 states and the field shrinks, I think he can still pull it off. The path is much clearer if he wins, however.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

Doubtful because that would entail the Donald winning all three......because he is going to win NH and SC.

I don't think Iowa means much to anyone but Donald. He has a lot to lose and everybody else just has upside.

Paul, Huckabee and Santorum might need really good performances to avoid folding up. But the rest are fine.

(01-28-2016 04:16 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 04:08 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  Cruz MUST win Iowa. No win Iowa, no chance.

With someone as volatile as The Donald, I'd never say never. All it takes is 1 slip up, and the race could be turned on it's head.

Nobody is leaving Donald.

(01-28-2016 04:43 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 04:40 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(01-28-2016 04:08 PM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  Cruz MUST win Iowa. No win Iowa, no chance.

I wouldn't say that necessarily. If he finished in 2nd in the 1st 3 states and the field shrinks, I think he can still pull it off. The path is much clearer if he wins, however.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

Doubtful because that would entail the Donald winning all three......because he is going to win NH and SC.

Agree, but he has turned off a lot of people and has the highest negatives. Cruz beats him head to head now. The early state delegates are elected proportionally and Cruz has a 15 point lead in Texas. So, after the SEC, even if Trump wins all states except Texas, the delegate count will likely be pretty much tied. At that point, if everyone else drops out and Cruz has the money to stay in, it is a one on one battle where Cruz has the edge.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk