(10-02-2015 07:11 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I believe her actual quote was "WE have to pass the bill so that YOU can find out what's in it."

Arrogant, spiteful *itch.

(10-03-2015 06:13 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  HB, you're mixing issues here, which sadly you nearly always do when commenting on anything even remotely related to the ACA. She wasn't commenting on the effect or impact of the bill some several years down the road...she was commenting on the specific provisions in the bill.

And you're 'attacking the poster', which sadly you nearly always do when commenting on anything I ever post... especially when you know I'm right. FTR, my comments really have nothing to do with the ACA, but about Politics and the English Language.

Your pedantic correction doesn't change my comment.

If she was commenting on specific provisions of the bill, that's even worse. Those provisions are written down, right? Why would 'she' have to pass it in order for 'us' to be able to read it? That doesn't even make sense... unless you're telling me that she was refusing to let 'us' read the actual bill until she passed it. If so, that's probably grounds for impeachment.