(10-01-2015 04:54 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  This isn't about the president.

No. What you mean is that you don't want to talk about the President in comparison, but obviously you brought him up as #3, and we're talking about #1. If you didn't want to talk about #2 or 1, you shouldn't have called him #3.

You brought up the topic of 'unintelligent' comments. You called him #3. We are showing unintelligent comments by #1.

Whether you like it or not, it is absolutely 'on' the very point you want to make.

(10-01-2015 09:53 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  This guys is a complete idiot.

On Iran

" It defies belief that the President would allow the ban on Iranian oil exports to be lifted............all the while keeping in place of the band on America."

This is the best we've got on complaints about the guy?

See: Biden, Joe...

Quote:" Those who return home are being disrespected by the VA that can't keep the simple promise to all of our heroes to the need when they need it most. "

Uhm... so he's not the most well-spoken? See: Biden, Joe.

Quote:On Terrorism

" We must engage this war of radical Islam if our life depended on it. Because it does. "

Of/with.. Let's talk about 57 states again, shall we?

Quote:On Foreign Policy

"This safe zone would create a stem a flow of refugees"

"Unlike during the surge in Iraq when Patreus and Crocker had an effective politically strategy to match the military strategy"

Really, this is what we're beefing on this guy about...? AGAIN, go see Biden, Joe; Clinton, Hillary; Boehner, John; Reid, Harry; Quayle, Dan; Kerry, Johnn..

If this is what Maddow and company are using to attack the guy, they're showing desperation..

And btw.. For what it's worth, I've heard Mark Levin rip on the guy.. he's basically called him "John Boehner with 10 less IQ points".

(10-02-2015 08:02 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  

(10-01-2015 09:53 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  This guys is a complete idiot.

On Iran

" It defies belief that the President would allow the ban on Iranian oil exports to be lifted............all the while keeping in place of the band on America."

This is the best we've got on complaints about the guy?

See: Biden, Joe...

Quote:" Those who return home are being disrespected by the VA that can't keep the simple promise to all of our heroes to the need when they need it most. "

Uhm... so he's not the most well-spoken? See: Biden, Joe.

Quote:On Terrorism

" We must engage this war of radical Islam if our life depended on it. Because it does. "

Of/with.. Let's talk about 57 states again, shall we?

Quote:On Foreign Policy

"This safe zone would create a stem a flow of refugees"

"Unlike during the surge in Iraq when Patreus and Crocker had an effective politically strategy to match the military strategy"

Really, this is what we're beefing on this guy about...? AGAIN, go see Biden, Joe; Clinton, Hillary; Boehner, John; Reid, Harry; Quayle, Dan; Kerry, Johnn..

If this is what Maddow and company are using to attack the guy, they're showing desperation..

And btw.. For what it's worth, I've heard Mark Levin rip on the guy.. he's basically called him "John Boehner with 10 less IQ points".

Might be the Left Coast version of Lindsey Graham from the video

(10-02-2015 08:19 AM)CardFan1 Wrote:  Might be the Left Coast version of Lindsey Graham from the video

I still think Webster's gonna get a lot of attention over anyone else in regards to the Speakership position, at least on the Republican side of the aisle.

(10-02-2015 08:24 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  

(10-02-2015 08:19 AM)CardFan1 Wrote:  Might be the Left Coast version of Lindsey Graham from the video

I still think Webster's gonna get a lot of attention over anyone else in regards to the Speakership position, at least on the Republican side of the aisle.

Ha! a Remake of "the Devil and Daniel Webster" in the making ? wonder whom the Devil will be ? 7 Years of prosperity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Devil_...el_Webster

(10-02-2015 08:02 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  

(10-01-2015 09:53 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  This guys is a complete idiot.

On Iran

" It defies belief that the President would allow the ban on Iranian oil exports to be lifted............all the while keeping in place of the band on America."

This is the best we've got on complaints about the guy?

See: Biden, Joe...

Quote:" Those who return home are being disrespected by the VA that can't keep the simple promise to all of our heroes to the need when they need it most. "

Uhm... so he's not the most well-spoken? See: Biden, Joe.

Quote:On Terrorism

" We must engage this war of radical Islam if our life depended on it. Because it does. "

Of/with.. Let's talk about 57 states again, shall we?

Quote:On Foreign Policy

"This safe zone would create a stem a flow of refugees"

"Unlike during the surge in Iraq when Patreus and Crocker had an effective politically strategy to match the military strategy"

Really, this is what we're beefing on this guy about...? AGAIN, go see Biden, Joe; Clinton, Hillary; Boehner, John; Reid, Harry; Quayle, Dan; Kerry, Johnn..

If this is what Maddow and company are using to attack the guy, they're showing desperation..

And btw.. For what it's worth, I've heard Mark Levin rip on the guy.. he's basically called him "John Boehner with 10 less IQ points".

NO,NO,NO,NO,NO! Fit isn't concerned with the #1 and #2 men currently speaking like idiots, he's only concerned with the possible future #3 man.

(10-02-2015 08:52 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(10-02-2015 08:02 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  

(10-01-2015 09:53 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  This guys is a complete idiot.

On Iran

" It defies belief that the President would allow the ban on Iranian oil exports to be lifted............all the while keeping in place of the band on America."

This is the best we've got on complaints about the guy?

See: Biden, Joe...

Quote:" Those who return home are being disrespected by the VA that can't keep the simple promise to all of our heroes to the need when they need it most. "

Uhm... so he's not the most well-spoken? See: Biden, Joe.

Quote:On Terrorism

" We must engage this war of radical Islam if our life depended on it. Because it does. "

Of/with.. Let's talk about 57 states again, shall we?

Quote:On Foreign Policy

"This safe zone would create a stem a flow of refugees"

"Unlike during the surge in Iraq when Patreus and Crocker had an effective politically strategy to match the military strategy"

Really, this is what we're beefing on this guy about...? AGAIN, go see Biden, Joe; Clinton, Hillary; Boehner, John; Reid, Harry; Quayle, Dan; Kerry, Johnn..

If this is what Maddow and company are using to attack the guy, they're showing desperation..

And btw.. For what it's worth, I've heard Mark Levin rip on the guy.. he's basically called him "John Boehner with 10 less IQ points".

NO,NO,NO,NO,NO! Fit isn't concerned with the #1 and #2 men currently speaking like idiots, he's only concerned with the possible future #3 man.

Those are subjects for another thread. This thread is about the man that could become the new number three.

Care to comment on him?

(10-02-2015 09:01 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(10-02-2015 08:52 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(10-02-2015 08:02 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  

(10-01-2015 09:53 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  This guys is a complete idiot.

On Iran

" It defies belief that the President would allow the ban on Iranian oil exports to be lifted............all the while keeping in place of the band on America."

This is the best we've got on complaints about the guy?

See: Biden, Joe...

Quote:" Those who return home are being disrespected by the VA that can't keep the simple promise to all of our heroes to the need when they need it most. "

Uhm... so he's not the most well-spoken? See: Biden, Joe.

Quote:On Terrorism

" We must engage this war of radical Islam if our life depended on it. Because it does. "

Of/with.. Let's talk about 57 states again, shall we?

Quote:On Foreign Policy

"This safe zone would create a stem a flow of refugees"

"Unlike during the surge in Iraq when Patreus and Crocker had an effective politically strategy to match the military strategy"

Really, this is what we're beefing on this guy about...? AGAIN, go see Biden, Joe; Clinton, Hillary; Boehner, John; Reid, Harry; Quayle, Dan; Kerry, Johnn..

If this is what Maddow and company are using to attack the guy, they're showing desperation..

And btw.. For what it's worth, I've heard Mark Levin rip on the guy.. he's basically called him "John Boehner with 10 less IQ points".

NO,NO,NO,NO,NO! Fit isn't concerned with the #1 and #2 men currently speaking like idiots, he's only concerned with the possible future #3 man.

Those are subjects for another thread. This thread is about the man that could become the new number three.

Care to comment on him?

You have yet to provide a link to somewhere other than MSNBCLOL for me to see the actual quotes.

I'm not referring to the individual, Fit (I think it's a Boehner-Clone and would be a mitigated disaster for republicans). I'm referring to the fact that if this is the "best" they're going to attack him with, they need new attack dogs...

(10-02-2015 09:05 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(10-02-2015 09:01 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(10-02-2015 08:52 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(10-02-2015 08:02 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  

(10-01-2015 09:53 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  This guys is a complete idiot.

On Iran

" It defies belief that the President would allow the ban on Iranian oil exports to be lifted............all the while keeping in place of the band on America."

This is the best we've got on complaints about the guy?

See: Biden, Joe...

Quote:" Those who return home are being disrespected by the VA that can't keep the simple promise to all of our heroes to the need when they need it most. "

Uhm... so he's not the most well-spoken? See: Biden, Joe.

Quote:On Terrorism

" We must engage this war of radical Islam if our life depended on it. Because it does. "

Of/with.. Let's talk about 57 states again, shall we?

Quote:On Foreign Policy

"This safe zone would create a stem a flow of refugees"

"Unlike during the surge in Iraq when Patreus and Crocker had an effective politically strategy to match the military strategy"

Really, this is what we're beefing on this guy about...? AGAIN, go see Biden, Joe; Clinton, Hillary; Boehner, John; Reid, Harry; Quayle, Dan; Kerry, Johnn..

If this is what Maddow and company are using to attack the guy, they're showing desperation..

And btw.. For what it's worth, I've heard Mark Levin rip on the guy.. he's basically called him "John Boehner with 10 less IQ points".

NO,NO,NO,NO,NO! Fit isn't concerned with the #1 and #2 men currently speaking like idiots, he's only concerned with the possible future #3 man.

Those are subjects for another thread. This thread is about the man that could become the new number three.

Care to comment on him?

You have yet to provide a link to somewhere other than MSNBCLOL for me to see the actual quotes.

Those are the actual quotes. The link I provided don't just quote him but show the video of him actually saying those things.

What more proof do you need besides him actually saying the things he is saying?

(10-02-2015 09:22 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(10-02-2015 09:05 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(10-02-2015 09:01 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(10-02-2015 08:52 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(10-02-2015 08:02 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  This is the best we've got on complaints about the guy?

See: Biden, Joe...


Uhm... so he's not the most well-spoken? See: Biden, Joe.


Of/with.. Let's talk about 57 states again, shall we?




Really, this is what we're beefing on this guy about...? AGAIN, go see Biden, Joe; Clinton, Hillary; Boehner, John; Reid, Harry; Quayle, Dan; Kerry, Johnn..

If this is what Maddow and company are using to attack the guy, they're showing desperation..

And btw.. For what it's worth, I've heard Mark Levin rip on the guy.. he's basically called him "John Boehner with 10 less IQ points".

NO,NO,NO,NO,NO! Fit isn't concerned with the #1 and #2 men currently speaking like idiots, he's only concerned with the possible future #3 man.

Those are subjects for another thread. This thread is about the man that could become the new number three.

Care to comment on him?

You have yet to provide a link to somewhere other than MSNBCLOL for me to see the actual quotes.

Those are the actual quotes. The link I provided don't just quote him but show the video of him actually saying those things.

What more proof do you need besides him actually saying the things he is saying?

A video that hasn't been edited by MSNBCLOL, or the unofficial propaganda arm of the DNC.

(10-02-2015 09:27 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(10-02-2015 09:22 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(10-02-2015 09:05 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(10-02-2015 09:01 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(10-02-2015 08:52 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  NO,NO,NO,NO,NO! Fit isn't concerned with the #1 and #2 men currently speaking like idiots, he's only concerned with the possible future #3 man.

Those are subjects for another thread. This thread is about the man that could become the new number three.

Care to comment on him?

You have yet to provide a link to somewhere other than MSNBCLOL for me to see the actual quotes.

Those are the actual quotes. The link I provided don't just quote him but show the video of him actually saying those things.

What more proof do you need besides him actually saying the things he is saying?

A video that hasn't been edited by MSNBCLOL, or the unofficial propaganda arm of the DNC.

So edited video means it didn't happen? Where have I heard that before?

(10-02-2015 08:02 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  And btw.. For what it's worth, I've heard Mark Levin rip on the guy.. he's basically called him "John Boehner with 10 less IQ points".

Fewer, not less. One of my pet peeves, especially among those (Levin) who seek to correct others for their grammar.

(10-02-2015 09:22 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(10-02-2015 09:05 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(10-02-2015 09:01 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Those are subjects for another thread. This thread is about the man that could become the new number three.

Care to comment on him?

You have yet to provide a link to somewhere other than MSNBCLOL for me to see the actual quotes.

Those are the actual quotes. The link I provided don't just quote him but show the video of him actually saying those things.

What more proof do you need besides him actually saying the things he is saying?

So is the subject him? Or what he is saying?

If it's what he is saying, comparing what he said to what others above him have said is perfectly legitimate.

If it's him, then comparing his intelligence based on grammar (what you did) to those above him is similarly legitimate.

That's the problem fit, you say this is about 'him', but you aren't taking issue with his policies... but his grammar.

If you want to talk about his policies... then list some of those.


I can correct people's grammar without thinking that they are somehow 'unworthy' as a result of it. Be honest, the biggest reason you don't like him is that he has an ® after his name. If he had a (D), you wouldn't care about his grammar.

(10-02-2015 10:27 AM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(10-02-2015 08:02 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  And btw.. For what it's worth, I've heard Mark Levin rip on the guy.. he's basically called him "John Boehner with 10 less IQ points".

Fewer, not less. One of my pet peeves, especially among those (Levin) who seek to correct others for their grammar.

(10-02-2015 09:22 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(10-02-2015 09:05 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(10-02-2015 09:01 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Those are subjects for another thread. This thread is about the man that could become the new number three.

Care to comment on him?

You have yet to provide a link to somewhere other than MSNBCLOL for me to see the actual quotes.

Those are the actual quotes. The link I provided don't just quote him but show the video of him actually saying those things.

What more proof do you need besides him actually saying the things he is saying?

So is the subject him? Or what he is saying?

If it's what he is saying, comparing what he said to what others above him have said is perfectly legitimate.

If it's him, then comparing his intelligence based on grammar (what you did) to those above him is similarly legitimate.

That's the problem fit, you say this is about 'him', but you aren't taking issue with his policies... but his grammar.

If you want to talk about his policies... then list some of those.


I can correct people's grammar without thinking that they are somehow 'unworthy' as a result of it. Be honest, the biggest reason you don't like him is that he has an ® after his name. If he had a (D), you wouldn't care about his grammar.

I don't have a problem with is policies. I'm talking about his lack of proof reading skills. Like I said, if you watch the videos, he isn't really paying attention to what he is reading but just reading it. I"m guessing that the mistakes are written into whatever he is reading.

This is one time I agree with this woman...but...only because I consider ALL of these people in Congress idiots. The entire lot on both sides of the aisle are useless as a football bat.

What, if anything, do these one-off quotes say about his competence or capability?

I could come up with more errors in a day by anyone who interacts with the public. So could any of us.

(10-02-2015 12:23 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  What, if anything, do these one-off quotes say about his competence or capability?

I could come up with more errors in a day by anyone who interacts with the public. So could any of us.

What is good for the goose is good for the gander.

I seem to recall much criticize of Obama for reading from teleprompters. Now you have a guy who can't even read properly from notes and it's nothing to see here?

(10-02-2015 09:28 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  So edited video means it didn't happen? Where have I heard that before?

RedWingTom

(10-02-2015 01:18 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(10-02-2015 12:23 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  What, if anything, do these one-off quotes say about his competence or capability?
I could come up with more errors in a day by anyone who interacts with the public. So could any of us.

What is good for the goose is good for the gander.
I seem to recall much criticize of Obama for reading from teleprompters. Now you have a guy who can't even read properly from notes and it's nothing to see here?

I recall just about every politician from both parties in forever being called out on this. I've always said, going both ways, that it's a stupid criticism.

(10-02-2015 01:18 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(10-02-2015 12:23 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  What, if anything, do these one-off quotes say about his competence or capability?

I could come up with more errors in a day by anyone who interacts with the public. So could any of us.

What is good for the goose is good for the gander.

I seem to recall much criticize of Obama for reading from teleprompters. Now you have a guy who can't even read properly from notes and it's nothing to see here?

No, we make fun of Obama when he DIDN'T read from teleprompters and tries off the cuff remarks.. at least we know that USUALLY the TOTUS has the correct words and verbiage on it all times :)

I have no problem with making fun of this guy when he makes goofy statements, but to say he's "incompetent", as the title of this thread implies (and I have no idea what Rachel Maddow says, cause I don't watch her even in on-line clips if i can avoid it) for the lack of a better word) because of that... hell, we might as well just mark everyone of us as incompetent for everyjob out there.