The unofficial online home for fans of the Western Michigan University Broncos. Part of Collegiate Sports Nation (CSN).

(09-05-2015 03:09 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  

(09-05-2015 02:54 PM)gobaseline Wrote:  

(09-05-2015 02:24 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  

(09-05-2015 02:19 PM)gobaseline Wrote:  

(09-05-2015 02:11 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  You are so weird.

What! You don't speak football either?

Sitting in your lounge chair critiquing these kids because they aren't inflating your ego. I'm flabbergasted!

We aren't allowed to critique "kids'" performances now. I always love when that trope comes out. Shut down the message boards, I guess.

I'm half tempted to find any time you said something remotely negative about a bball player, but I really just don't care enough.

First and foremost always feel free to weigh in. Never implied other wise.

Second, I don't say one thing and then imply otherwise. Don't be disingenuous.

Third, I don't have personal faves and secretly root for someone else. I critique and then cover up my intent with euphemism.

Fourth, I'll assume you'll retort they are public figures and public figures are open to "criticism". I'll remind you this is a public forum and the same applies to you.

You don't even make sense, dude. You're the one all over the map saying I shouldn't sit in my lounge chair criticizing players while you do the same thing. And you're the one that decided I have some weird bias for Chance Stewart because I said terrell might not be the answer back in 2012.

I don't give a rats ass if you criticize me, but I'll answer to it. Why is that everyone's favorite thing here, saying that because people express an opinion they're trying to "control the conversation"?

Critiquing is evaluation. Being critical is mean spirited. Worse when camo'd. But maybe you disagree.

Capiche?

So it's "critiquing" and "evaluation" when you are critical of our student athletes, but "mean spirited" when someone else does it. LOL, got it.

(09-05-2015 03:17 PM)gobaseline Wrote:  

(09-05-2015 03:09 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  

(09-05-2015 02:54 PM)gobaseline Wrote:  

(09-05-2015 02:24 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  

(09-05-2015 02:19 PM)gobaseline Wrote:  What! You don't speak football either?

Sitting in your lounge chair critiquing these kids because they aren't inflating your ego. I'm flabbergasted!

We aren't allowed to critique "kids'" performances now. I always love when that trope comes out. Shut down the message boards, I guess.

I'm half tempted to find any time you said something remotely negative about a bball player, but I really just don't care enough.

First and foremost always feel free to weigh in. Never implied other wise.

Second, I don't say one thing and then imply otherwise. Don't be disingenuous.

Third, I don't have personal faves and secretly root for someone else. I critique and then cover up my intent with euphemism.

Fourth, I'll assume you'll retort they are public figures and public figures are open to "criticism". I'll remind you this is a public forum and the same applies to you.

You don't even make sense, dude. You're the one all over the map saying I shouldn't sit in my lounge chair criticizing players while you do the same thing. And you're the one that decided I have some weird bias for Chance Stewart because I said terrell might not be the answer back in 2012.

I don't give a rats ass if you criticize me, but I'll answer to it. Why is that everyone's favorite thing here, saying that because people express an opinion they're trying to "control the conversation"?

Critiquing is evaluation. Being critical is mean spirited. Worse when camo'd. But maybe you disagree.

Capiche?

Again.. YOU decided it was coming from some mean spirited place, presumably because it came from someone you dislike.

On top of that I already said I was wrong. Apparently that's not "black and white" enough for you to drop this ridiculous subject.

Looks like "Pete and repeat" have a new poster to try and tag team.

They're no match.

(09-05-2015 03:46 PM)rtletterman Wrote:  Looks like "Pete and repeat" have a new poster to try and tag team.

They're no match.

Don't you have a ball state game to watch?

(09-05-2015 03:47 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  

(09-05-2015 03:46 PM)rtletterman Wrote:  Looks like "Pete and repeat" have a new poster to try and tag team.

They're no match.

Don't you have a ball state game to watch?

Wow that's good! Did you go research that?!

That's the hilarious part. Hey are you two skirts posting from the same apartment again today?

Yes, clicking a link to look at how pathetic you are is some hard core research.

You embarrass yourself so regularly here I'm not sure anyone even pays attention anymore except dip.

(09-05-2015 03:52 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  Yes, clicking a link to look at how pathetic you are is some hard core research.

You embarrass yourself so regularly here I'm not sure anyone even pays attention anymore except dip.

Awwwww. Still mad about being fooled I see. Go back to tag teaming gbl, he actually cares.

(09-05-2015 03:56 PM)rtletterman Wrote:  

(09-05-2015 03:52 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  Yes, clicking a link to look at how pathetic you are is some hard core research.

You embarrass yourself so regularly here I'm not sure anyone even pays attention anymore except dip.

Awwwww. Still mad about being fooled I see. Go back to tag teaming gbl, he actually cares.

Yes. You couldn't stay away from trolling a message board that banned you and pretended to be a Ball State fan to do it (after you got sued for being a complete prick) and I am the "mad" one.

Read that again and reevaluate your life.

(09-05-2015 03:59 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  

(09-05-2015 03:56 PM)rtletterman Wrote:  

(09-05-2015 03:52 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  Yes, clicking a link to look at how pathetic you are is some hard core research.

You embarrass yourself so regularly here I'm not sure anyone even pays attention anymore except dip.

Awwwww. Still mad about being fooled I see. Go back to tag teaming gbl, he actually cares.

Yes. You couldn't stay away from trolling a message board that banned you and pretended to be a Ball State fan to do it (after you got sued for being a complete prick) and I am the "mad" one.

Read that again and reevaluate your life.

Here you go again, angry boy. What's this "sued" thing you speak? Please educate me.

Oh. The lawsuit was unsuccessful. I'm sorry, that makes it totally normal and ok to get sued for being a caustic prick.

(09-05-2015 04:09 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  Oh. The lawsuit was unsuccessful. I'm sorry, that makes it totally normal and ok to get sued for being a caustic prick.

What lawsuit was unsuccessful?

And to that note, how would you know anything about a lawsuit?

(09-05-2015 04:11 PM)rtletterman Wrote:  

(09-05-2015 04:09 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  Oh. The lawsuit was unsuccessful. I'm sorry, that makes it totally normal and ok to get sued for being a caustic prick.

What lawsuit was unsuccessful?

And to that note, how would you know anything about a lawsuit?

I dunno. By the way, anything you want to claim I did to you as part of that? Seems like everyone was out to get you, must suck.

(09-05-2015 04:16 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  

(09-05-2015 04:11 PM)rtletterman Wrote:  

(09-05-2015 04:09 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  Oh. The lawsuit was unsuccessful. I'm sorry, that makes it totally normal and ok to get sued for being a caustic prick.

What lawsuit was unsuccessful?

And to that note, how would you know anything about a lawsuit?

I dunno. By the way, anything you want to claim I did to you as part of that? Seems like everyone was out to get you, must suck.

You don't know is the most accurate thing you've said here.

(09-05-2015 04:17 PM)rtletterman Wrote:  

(09-05-2015 04:16 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  

(09-05-2015 04:11 PM)rtletterman Wrote:  

(09-05-2015 04:09 PM)wmubroncopilot Wrote:  Oh. The lawsuit was unsuccessful. I'm sorry, that makes it totally normal and ok to get sued for being a caustic prick.

What lawsuit was unsuccessful?

And to that note, how would you know anything about a lawsuit?

I dunno. By the way, anything you want to claim I did to you as part of that? Seems like everyone was out to get you, must suck.

You don't know is the most accurate thing you've said here.

How about growing up and talking football. These high school pissing contests were old months ago. Why don;t those who continue to waste others time just meet up and have it out boy to boy.

Calm down Mr.B, that's not an elite attitude. Try this, it always helps when I'm frustrated. Stop rowing for a second, put the oars down, and put on your Prefontain face. Now clear your mind and start stroking........those oars.

Don't you feel better?

Terrell is a special breed. Although he took some sacks, he was able throughout the game to stay cool in a very tight pocket, smelling the breath of those MSU linemen, and made reads, then executed at a high level under fire. Most qb's would not have the same courage or composure. The guy has it in spades.

He was a tremendous catch by cubit, who just has a great eye for qb talent. But Terrell is also a great leader. He really has bought into what fleck and his coaches are trying g to do, and has led the way in circling the wagon. I just love everything I see about him.

(09-06-2015 10:02 AM)brovol Wrote:  Terrell is a special breed. Although he took some sacks, he was able throughout the game to stay cool in a very tight pocket, smelling the breath of those MSU linemen, and made reads, then executed at a high level under fire. Most qb's would not have the same courage or composure. The guy has it in spades.

He was a tremendous catch by cubit, who just has a great eye for qb talent. But Terrell is also a great leader. He really has bought into what fleck and his coaches are trying g to do, and has led the way in circling the wagon. I just love everything I see about him.

Well put.

If I have one concern about Fleck its that he is a junior coxswain when it comes to recruiting QBs. He's missed the boat on a few

God, this board is money.