(06-24-2015 09:54 AM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(06-24-2015 09:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-23-2015 06:20 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  China can hack into any U.S. government or defense computer system at any time and Obama doesn't give a sh-t.

And you keep on making idiotic sweeping generalizations and don't give a **** how moronic you look.

Or I suppose you have some evidence that Obama embraces China hacking into our governmental computer systems.

Yeah...I thought so.

I'm sure he cares. And I bet he's going to make a commitment to get to the bottom of it. Just like he did for the IRS, Veterans Admin, Benghazi, Ft Hood, etc.

Cool.

We know what happened with the IRS, the VA, Benghazi and Ft. Hood.

(06-24-2015 10:59 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-24-2015 09:54 AM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(06-24-2015 09:47 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-23-2015 06:20 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  China can hack into any U.S. government or defense computer system at any time and Obama doesn't give a sh-t.

And you keep on making idiotic sweeping generalizations and don't give a **** how moronic you look.

Or I suppose you have some evidence that Obama embraces China hacking into our governmental computer systems.

Yeah...I thought so.

I'm sure he cares. And I bet he's going to make a commitment to get to the bottom of it. Just like he did for the IRS, Veterans Admin, Benghazi, Ft Hood, etc.

Cool.

We know what happened with the IRS, the VA, Benghazi and Ft. Hood.

Apparently your satisfied with "getting to the bottom" as just knowing what happened. Others would set the bar a bit higher to include correcting the problems, and at least removing the folks responsible for the screw ups. But then, that's just what someone not versed in snark might expect.

Oh yeah, and Ft Hood was workplace violence.

(06-23-2015 03:32 PM)NCeagle Wrote:  while I usually enjoy any chance to make fun of Obama, when it comes to hacking, it's pretty tough to hold someone accountable for "allowing" this to happen.

When you are going up against city states, and 7 story tall buildings filled with hackers and networking equipment, they can hack anything they want, as long as they want to put forth the time and effort. It's really hard to say that one person was responsible for the hack. It isn't like this information was accidentally leaked to the outside.

If you use RSA-2048 encryption, it would take many, many years to crack the private key. Based on the current trend of increasing computer power, it would be around the year 2048 before those keys could be defeated in a reasonable amount of time.

Of course by then, virus authors will be using 262,144-bit keys, so you have no hope of defeating the future versions of CryptoLocker and CryptoWall.

(06-24-2015 11:55 AM)chargeradio Wrote:  

(06-23-2015 03:32 PM)NCeagle Wrote:  while I usually enjoy any chance to make fun of Obama, when it comes to hacking, it's pretty tough to hold someone accountable for "allowing" this to happen.

When you are going up against city states, and 7 story tall buildings filled with hackers and networking equipment, they can hack anything they want, as long as they want to put forth the time and effort. It's really hard to say that one person was responsible for the hack. It isn't like this information was accidentally leaked to the outside.

If you use RSA-2048 encryption, it would take many, many years to crack the private key. Based on the current trend of increasing computer power, it would be around the year 2048 before those keys could be defeated in a reasonable amount of time.

Of course by then, virus authors will be using 262,144-bit keys, so you have no hope of defeating the future versions of CryptoLocker and CryptoWall.

true, I forgot RSA has never been hacked