Hopefully they tell us where the bodies are.

It's too bad. You guys are so invested in destroying your opponent. It's hard to win a campaign that way.

Yeah, Dems are so good at propping up their opponents.

(04-24-2015 06:51 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  It's too bad. You guys are so invested in destroying your opponent. It's hard to win a campaign that way.

If the situation was reversed, the Republican would have already had their citizenship revoked. They would have been sent to Elba by now.

May the best person win.

(04-24-2015 06:51 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  It's too bad. You guys are so invested in destroying your opponent. It's hard to win a campaign that way.

Meh, let them shovel lies to a viewership of already committed Hillary haters....

Meanwhile, Hillary will be working on messaging that reaches swing voters.

(04-24-2015 08:15 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(04-24-2015 06:51 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  It's too bad. You guys are so invested in destroying your opponent. It's hard to win a campaign that way.

Meh, let them shovel lies to a viewership of already committed Hillary haters....

Meanwhile, Hillary will be working on messaging that reaches swing voters.

Oh, yaaasssss indeed .

At worst, it's putting 2 and 2 together and speculating the extent it's criminal. And Hillary is working out the spin to fight this stuff. She wasn't messaging before and she definitely wont be now.

(04-24-2015 08:15 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(04-24-2015 06:51 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  It's too bad. You guys are so invested in destroying your opponent. It's hard to win a campaign that way.

Meh, let them shovel lies to a viewership of already committed Hillary haters....

Meanwhile, Hillary will be working on messaging that reaches swing voters.

Lies? I think Harry Reid proved when it comes to lying, you Dems are the best.
It just isn't the right coming after Pantsuits, the NYTimes, Washington Post and other lib media is after her. You go ahead and call them liars also. I love this more than you know.

(04-24-2015 08:15 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(04-24-2015 06:51 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  It's too bad. You guys are so invested in destroying your opponent. It's hard to win a campaign that way.

Meh, let them shovel lies to a viewership of already committed Hillary haters....

Meanwhile, Hillary will be working on messaging that reaches swing voters.

Hillary doesn't give a rat's ass about swing voters. If elected, she'll grow government and make her fat cat Wall Street friends even fatter. The middle class will be left with crumbs, with more of us on government assistance.

(04-24-2015 09:36 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(04-24-2015 08:15 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(04-24-2015 06:51 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  It's too bad. You guys are so invested in destroying your opponent. It's hard to win a campaign that way.

Meh, let them shovel lies to a viewership of already committed Hillary haters....
Meanwhile, Hillary will be working on messaging that reaches swing voters.

Hillary doesn't give a rat's ass about swing voters. If elected, she'll grow government and make her fat cat Wall Street friends even fatter. The middle class will be left with crumbs, with more of us on government assistance.

Of course. Those on government assistance are the most reliable democrat voters.

NBC’s Chuck Todd Slams The Clintons: ‘Just Dumb And Inept’



"Host of NBC’s “Meet the Press” Chuck Todd tore into Bill and Hillary Clinton on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” for giving the appearance of corruption by taking donations from foreign governments while Hillary was secretary of state, calling the move “just dumb and inept” politically."

Quote:TODD: Look, for the life of me — and this is just political judgment — the Obama administration when they offered her the job looked at the foundation and said, boy, there will be the appearance of influence. we better be careful here. [Former Indiana Senator] Dick Lugar, at the time ranking member on Foreign Relations, even said very publicly, ‘You know, it’s going to look like foreign governments can buy access to you by foundation.’ How many more warnings did the Clintons need to have, and yet they ended up doing these things.

I hear what David [Axelrod] is saying and he’s right, there is not proof, it’s sort of circumstantial scandal. But the question I have is, it’s politically though just dumb and inept. Somebody I read the other day — I can’t remember who — said there is something about the way President Clinton has operated in his post-presidency that has simply been sloppy. What is he doing hanging out with the questionable president of Kazakhstan and taking money to do things like that? I understand he may rationalize it and say, ‘Yeah, you know what? We’re going to use this money for good, they’re not buying influence from me, I don’t care.’ But, boy, the appearance of it is terrible.

I’m surprised someone hasn’t said, you know what, no foreign governments for any presidential libraries. Bush libraries have been built by foreign money, Clinton Library and Foundation have been built by foreign money; the appearance is just too awful.

http://dailycaller.com/2015/04/24/nbcs-c...ept-video/