(01-26-2015 10:54 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 10:37 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(01-25-2015 07:05 PM)Claw Wrote:  People used to get married at 14.

You could also compare a 14 year old from that era, to a 25 year old from this era, and 9 times out of 10, the 14 year old would be more self sufficient and mature.

True, but more often the 14 year old getting married in that era was a daughter married off to a 25 year old man by the father in exchange for a couple of acres and 20 cows. The gays don't want that either. They simply want full access to our children and for them to have the legal ability to consent.

Absolutely.

So let's use some gay logic... Buck's hubby looks better than Tom's, so why does Buck get to screw the better looking guy while Tom doesn't? How fair is that? Sex equality... It's coming.

(01-25-2015 10:15 PM)CardFan1 Wrote:  I guess next You can legally marry a Brother or Sister or first Cousin. The true meaning of a Man and a Woman for marriage will fall away like everything else Normal people believe in as well as existing laws.

We straights have f***ed it up nicely without the help.

EDIT: Wow. Filter let me drop the f-bomb.

(01-26-2015 10:37 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(01-25-2015 07:05 PM)Claw Wrote:  People used to get married at 14.

You could also compare a 14 year old from that era, to a 25 year old from this era, and 9 times out of 10, the 14 year old would be more self sufficient and mature.

We have no one to blame but ourselves for extending their childhoods. The way many parents coddle their children, there is basically no incentive to EVER leave home. Even during college my dad told me I was a guest in his home when I came home. When I graduated my old room was a guest room and there was no evidence in it that I ever lived there.

(01-26-2015 12:56 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 10:37 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(01-25-2015 07:05 PM)Claw Wrote:  People used to get married at 14.

You could also compare a 14 year old from that era, to a 25 year old from this era, and 9 times out of 10, the 14 year old would be more self sufficient and mature.

We have no one to blame but ourselves for extending their childhoods. The way many parents coddle their children, there is basically no incentive to EVER leave home. Even during college my dad told me I was a guest in his home when I came home. When I graduated my old room was a guest room and there was no evidence in it that I ever lived there.

Your dad sounds like a real dick...

(01-26-2015 01:13 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 12:56 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 10:37 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(01-25-2015 07:05 PM)Claw Wrote:  People used to get married at 14.

You could also compare a 14 year old from that era, to a 25 year old from this era, and 9 times out of 10, the 14 year old would be more self sufficient and mature.

We have no one to blame but ourselves for extending their childhoods. The way many parents coddle their children, there is basically no incentive to EVER leave home. Even during college my dad told me I was a guest in his home when I came home. When I graduated my old room was a guest room and there was no evidence in it that I ever lived there.

Your dad sounds like a real dick...

I bet you don't find this post the slightest bit inflammatory.

How many kids do you have?

(01-26-2015 01:13 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 12:56 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 10:37 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(01-25-2015 07:05 PM)Claw Wrote:  People used to get married at 14.

You could also compare a 14 year old from that era, to a 25 year old from this era, and 9 times out of 10, the 14 year old would be more self sufficient and mature.

We have no one to blame but ourselves for extending their childhoods. The way many parents coddle their children, there is basically no incentive to EVER leave home. Even during college my dad told me I was a guest in his home when I came home. When I graduated my old room was a guest room and there was no evidence in it that I ever lived there.

Your dad sounds like a real dick...

Good lord man.

(01-26-2015 01:13 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 12:56 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 10:37 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(01-25-2015 07:05 PM)Claw Wrote:  People used to get married at 14.

You could also compare a 14 year old from that era, to a 25 year old from this era, and 9 times out of 10, the 14 year old would be more self sufficient and mature.

We have no one to blame but ourselves for extending their childhoods. The way many parents coddle their children, there is basically no incentive to EVER leave home. Even during college my dad told me I was a guest in his home when I came home. When I graduated my old room was a guest room and there was no evidence in it that I ever lived there.

Your dad sounds like a real dick...

Really? I bet he looks back and appreciates it. My parents threw me out of the house in September after graduating in May and still not having a job. I had enough money for a security deposit, got a job selling clothes at Dillard's within 2 days, and that was the best thing that could have happened to me (lit a fire under my arse). Touchy feely parenting has proven ineffective. Me thinks you are portraying your own daddy issues on others.

I did all my best parenting before I had kids, too.

(01-26-2015 12:56 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 10:37 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(01-25-2015 07:05 PM)Claw Wrote:  People used to get married at 14.

You could also compare a 14 year old from that era, to a 25 year old from this era, and 9 times out of 10, the 14 year old would be more self sufficient and mature.

We have no one to blame but ourselves for extending their childhoods. The way many parents coddle their children, there is basically no incentive to EVER leave home. Even during college my dad told me I was a guest in his home when I came home. When I graduated my old room was a guest room and there was no evidence in it that I ever lived there.

That's right. It seems like kids these days run their parents. It's pathetic.

(01-26-2015 01:19 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 01:13 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 12:56 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 10:37 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(01-25-2015 07:05 PM)Claw Wrote:  People used to get married at 14.

You could also compare a 14 year old from that era, to a 25 year old from this era, and 9 times out of 10, the 14 year old would be more self sufficient and mature.

We have no one to blame but ourselves for extending their childhoods. The way many parents coddle their children, there is basically no incentive to EVER leave home. Even during college my dad told me I was a guest in his home when I came home. When I graduated my old room was a guest room and there was no evidence in it that I ever lived there.

Your dad sounds like a real dick...

I bet you don't find this post the slightest bit inflammatory.

How many kids do you have?

None. His potentials face the same fate every time.

(01-26-2015 01:13 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 12:56 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 10:37 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(01-25-2015 07:05 PM)Claw Wrote:  People used to get married at 14.

You could also compare a 14 year old from that era, to a 25 year old from this era, and 9 times out of 10, the 14 year old would be more self sufficient and mature.

We have no one to blame but ourselves for extending their childhoods. The way many parents coddle their children, there is basically no incentive to EVER leave home. Even during college my dad told me I was a guest in his home when I came home. When I graduated my old room was a guest room and there was no evidence in it that I ever lived there.

Your dad sounds like a real dick...

Yeah and so am I... I followed in his footsteps. My offspring was ushered the door also.

(01-26-2015 01:19 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 01:13 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 12:56 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 10:37 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(01-25-2015 07:05 PM)Claw Wrote:  People used to get married at 14.

You could also compare a 14 year old from that era, to a 25 year old from this era, and 9 times out of 10, the 14 year old would be more self sufficient and mature.

We have no one to blame but ourselves for extending their childhoods. The way many parents coddle their children, there is basically no incentive to EVER leave home. Even during college my dad told me I was a guest in his home when I came home. When I graduated my old room was a guest room and there was no evidence in it that I ever lived there.

Your dad sounds like a real dick...

I bet you don't find this post the slightest bit inflammatory.

How many kids do you have?

Its fine. I embrace my upbringing. I consider that comment a compliment.

(01-25-2015 01:38 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  it's almost impossible to override the Supreme Court (unless you alter the constitution)...

Not if you're Abraham Lincoln, it isn't. You do know Lincoln was actually considering having the Chief Justice arrested and imprisoned, at one point, don't you?

(01-26-2015 09:14 PM)G-Man Wrote:  

(01-25-2015 01:38 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  it's almost impossible to override the Supreme Court (unless you alter the constitution)...

Not if you're Abraham Lincoln, it isn't. You do know Lincoln was actually considering having the Chief Justice arrested and imprisoned, at one point, don't you?

I know Taney issued that ruling as a Circuit Court judge rather than the Supreme Court Chief Justice...moreover, I don't think you can just arrest a sitting judge at the Supreme Court...maybe back then.

But yeah, Ex parte Merryman is a pretty crazy case.

(01-26-2015 11:41 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 09:14 PM)G-Man Wrote:  

(01-25-2015 01:38 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  it's almost impossible to override the Supreme Court (unless you alter the constitution)...

Not if you're Abraham Lincoln, it isn't. You do know Lincoln was actually considering having the Chief Justice arrested and imprisoned, at one point, don't you?

I know Taney issued that ruling as a Circuit Court judge rather than the Supreme Court Chief Justice...moreover, I don't think you can just arrest a sitting judge at the Supreme Court...maybe back then.

But yeah, Ex parte Merryman is a pretty crazy case.

Nope, it wasn't for any ruling he made as a Circuit Court judge. It was because as Chief Justice of the SCOTUS he wasn't quietly sitting by as Lincoln continued to suspend Habeas Corpus. Lincoln ROUTINELY imprisoned people for not agreeing with him. A whole body of Maryland legislators, he had imprisoned for nothing more than talking about the possibility of secession. They had committed no crime whatsoever. Lincoln didn't like the heat that the Chief Justice was putting on him by not just winking at Lincoln's illegal actions, and wanted to take the law into his own hands to have the Chief Justice arrested.

(01-26-2015 08:28 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 01:19 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 01:13 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 12:56 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 10:37 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  You could also compare a 14 year old from that era, to a 25 year old from this era, and 9 times out of 10, the 14 year old would be more self sufficient and mature.

We have no one to blame but ourselves for extending their childhoods. The way many parents coddle their children, there is basically no incentive to EVER leave home. Even during college my dad told me I was a guest in his home when I came home. When I graduated my old room was a guest room and there was no evidence in it that I ever lived there.

Your dad sounds like a real dick...

I bet you don't find this post the slightest bit inflammatory.

How many kids do you have?

Its fine. I embrace my upbringing. I consider that comment a compliment.

Hey, I apologize for that...it was inappropriate thing to say, my bad.

(01-27-2015 12:15 AM)G-Man Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 11:41 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 09:14 PM)G-Man Wrote:  

(01-25-2015 01:38 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  it's almost impossible to override the Supreme Court (unless you alter the constitution)...

Not if you're Abraham Lincoln, it isn't. You do know Lincoln was actually considering having the Chief Justice arrested and imprisoned, at one point, don't you?

I know Taney issued that ruling as a Circuit Court judge rather than the Supreme Court Chief Justice...moreover, I don't think you can just arrest a sitting judge at the Supreme Court...maybe back then.

But yeah, Ex parte Merryman is a pretty crazy case.

Nope, it wasn't for any ruling he made as a Circuit Court judge. It was because as Chief Justice of the SCOTUS he wasn't quietly sitting by as Lincoln continued to suspend Habeas Corpus. Lincoln ROUTINELY imprisoned people for not agreeing with him. A whole body of Maryland legislators, he had imprisoned for nothing more than talking about the possibility of secession. They had committed no crime whatsoever. Lincoln didn't like the heat that the Chief Justice was putting on him by not just winking at Lincoln's illegal actions, and wanted to take the law into his own hands to have the Chief Justice arrested.

I had to look it up to make sure I didn't get confused...

Quote:At this time, Supreme Court Justices sat as circuit court judges, as well. Taney decided to issue the writ while sitting as the circuit court judge for the District of Maryland rather than as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_parte_Merryman

but yes, it's a crazy case.

(01-27-2015 12:35 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 08:28 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 01:19 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 01:13 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(01-26-2015 12:56 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  We have no one to blame but ourselves for extending their childhoods. The way many parents coddle their children, there is basically no incentive to EVER leave home. Even during college my dad told me I was a guest in his home when I came home. When I graduated my old room was a guest room and there was no evidence in it that I ever lived there.

Your dad sounds like a real dick...

I bet you don't find this post the slightest bit inflammatory.

How many kids do you have?

Its fine. I embrace my upbringing. I consider that comment a compliment.

Hey, I apologize for that...it was inappropriate thing to say, my bad.

No need...I thought it was funny actually.

(01-25-2015 01:38 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  it's almost impossible to override the Supreme Court (unless you alter the constitution)...so this will be all worked out in a few months.

The IMPORTANT thing here is to destroy states rights, while letting a handful of people decide that the state constitution is unconstitutional... kind of an oxymoron....

How many kids do you have?
[/quote]

None. His potentials face the same fate every time.


[/quote]

Memphis is a Catcher,... so this is so on target.