Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
2015 schedule question
Author Message
greyowl72 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,656
Joined: Apr 2008
Reputation: 60
I Root For: Rice
Location: Permanent Basement
Post: #101
RE: 2015 schedule question
(01-29-2015 11:52 PM)Afflicted Wrote:  Fan Appreciation Day. All general admission tickets are$5. Get people inside the gates to storm concessions. Invite some high school bands to play with the MOB. Fireworks are a must. Flyover? Topless strippers? Whatever it takes. Good luck Marketing Dept.

Monkeys riding dogs is always popular.
Seriously, we have to but our best efforts forward with marketing for this game. Plenty of time to work up a big plan
01-30-2015 11:23 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
At Ease Offline
Banned

Posts: 17,134
Joined: Jun 2005
I Root For: The Rice Owls
Location:
Post: #102
RE: 2015 schedule question
(01-30-2015 07:47 AM)MemOwl Wrote:  Wagner??

Makes me long for New Mexico State.

Remind me again what happened to bring us to this unfortunate circumstance. Does it somehow tie back to a piece of Greenspan incompetence?

I don't want to believe this is a deliberate action by Karlgaard.

And not as if we need any fuel, but if we win by less than 21 the Bailiff discussions will get off to an early start next year.

We needed a home game. A full slate is important for building embarrassing season ticket numbers. Despite some of ths disjointed speculation of how we could just bring any X or Y team to want to open their season at Rice, this was the likely only feasible option at this point.

And it's a far better course than the idiotic NMSU series. Both are terrible no-name opponents, but at least with FCS schools here is no return game (and of course with NMSU we never got the home game).
01-30-2015 11:29 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WIowl Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,657
Joined: Aug 2005
Reputation: 17
I Root For:
Location:

New Orleans Bowl
Post: #103
RE: 2015 schedule question
(01-30-2015 11:29 AM)At Ease Wrote:  
(01-30-2015 07:47 AM)MemOwl Wrote:  Wagner??

Makes me long for New Mexico State.

Remind me again what happened to bring us to this unfortunate circumstance. Does it somehow tie back to a piece of Greenspan incompetence?

I don't want to believe this is a deliberate action by Karlgaard.

And not as if we need any fuel, but if we win by less than 21 the Bailiff discussions will get off to an early start next year.

We needed a home game. A full slate is important for building embarrassing season ticket numbers. Despite some of ths disjointed speculation of how we could just bring any X or Y team to want to open their season at Rice, this was the likely only feasible option at this point.

And it's a far better course than the idiotic NMSU series. Both are terrible no-name opponents, but at least with FCS schools here is no return game (and of course with NMSU we never got the home game).

Yet we were able to string together a home and home with Hawaii at the last second in 2014. I would like to know why Rice was forced/settled to settle with Wagner, rather than the other available FBS teams listed by FBSchedules.com.

Wagner is not going to build season tickets sales, and will not be impressive to fans/media whether Rice blows them out or not. BYU/P5 can play Wagner because they have other significant/high interest home games, Rice's home schedule will have UNT, LaTech....
01-30-2015 11:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WIowl Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,657
Joined: Aug 2005
Reputation: 17
I Root For:
Location:

New Orleans Bowl
Post: #104
RE: 2015 schedule question
(01-30-2015 11:29 AM)At Ease Wrote:  
(01-30-2015 07:47 AM)MemOwl Wrote:  Wagner??

Makes me long for New Mexico State.

Remind me again what happened to bring us to this unfortunate circumstance. Does it somehow tie back to a piece of Greenspan incompetence?

I don't want to believe this is a deliberate action by Karlgaard.

And not as if we need any fuel, but if we win by less than 21 the Bailiff discussions will get off to an early start next year.

We needed a home game. A full slate is important for building embarrassing season ticket numbers. Despite some of ths disjointed speculation of how we could just bring any X or Y team to want to open their season at Rice, this was the likely only feasible option at this point.

And it's a far better course than the idiotic NMSU series. Both are terrible no-name opponents, but at least with FCS schools here is no return game (and of course with NMSU we never got the home game).

But we did get $300k from NMSU's cancellation fee that could be used by the program.
01-30-2015 11:54 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JustAnotherAustinOwl Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,441
Joined: Nov 2005
Reputation: 56
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location:
Post: #105
RE: 2015 schedule question
(01-30-2015 11:52 AM)WIowl Wrote:  
(01-30-2015 11:29 AM)At Ease Wrote:  
(01-30-2015 07:47 AM)MemOwl Wrote:  Wagner??

Makes me long for New Mexico State.

Remind me again what happened to bring us to this unfortunate circumstance. Does it somehow tie back to a piece of Greenspan incompetence?

I don't want to believe this is a deliberate action by Karlgaard.

And not as if we need any fuel, but if we win by less than 21 the Bailiff discussions will get off to an early start next year.

We needed a home game. A full slate is important for building embarrassing season ticket numbers. Despite some of ths disjointed speculation of how we could just bring any X or Y team to want to open their season at Rice, this was the likely only feasible option at this point.

And it's a far better course than the idiotic NMSU series. Both are terrible no-name opponents, but at least with FCS schools here is no return game (and of course with NMSU we never got the home game).

Yet we were able to string together a home and home with Hawaii at the last second in 2014. I would like to know why Rice was forced/settled to settle with Wagner, rather than the other available FBS teams listed by FBSchedules.com.

Wagner is not going to build season tickets sales, and will not be impressive to fans/media whether Rice blows them out or not. BYU/P5 can play Wagner because they have other significant/high interest home games, Rice's home schedule will have UNT, LaTech....

We have Stanford, Baylor, and Army coming in 2016/17 to HRS, so that's pretty good IMHO. Hopefully we won't need to go the FCS route for the final home OOC game next year. Maybe UH? Really, if doing a one-off with Wagner is part of keeping our options open to restart the Bayou Bucket, I 100% support it.
01-30-2015 12:04 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Caelligh Offline
La Asesina
*

Posts: 5,950
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation: 87
I Root For: Rice U
Location: Not FL

New Orleans BowlDonators
Post: #106
RE: 2015 schedule question
Is the pool of options larger if we give up the home game?
01-30-2015 12:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ExcitedOwl18 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,345
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 68
I Root For: Rice
Location: Northern NJ
Post: #107
RE: 2015 schedule question
In a season with only one bye week(as 2015 is), it is CRITICAL to have six home games. IMO, seven away games this year, with four of them requiring significant travel, was way too tough on the team.
01-30-2015 12:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JustAnotherAustinOwl Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,441
Joined: Nov 2005
Reputation: 56
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location:
Post: #108
RE: 2015 schedule question
(01-30-2015 12:11 PM)Caelligh Wrote:  Is the pool of options larger if we give up the home game?

Based on mrbig's posts, possibly AF or SDSU. I like the idea of an AF series, but don't like losing a home game, especially in a season where we are @UT and @Baylor.

And, while it's purely speculation, I do wonder if reviving the Bayou Bucket is related to this decision. (And lack of official announcement...)
01-30-2015 12:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
temchugh Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,396
Joined: Apr 2008
Reputation: 17
I Root For: Rice
Location:
Post: #109
RE: 2015 schedule question
Every time we agree to play a P5 team on the road without a return home visit (A&M, Notre Dame, Baylor), we need to find another team that will play us at home without a return game. Otherwise, we play 3 OOC games on the road (like last year). So we really were limited to teams that would play us at home without a return game. Not many teams to choose from.

Even if you start now with a new policy of not scheduling P5 road $$$ games, we had (before Wagner) two more road OOC games scheduled than home OOC games from 2015 to 2018 (with four OOC slots open). If we filled those four slots with home & home commitments, we would have 3 OOC road games in one of those years.

In theory, I guess, we could keep things balanced in the short term by scheduling teams that will give us a home game now in exchange for a return game several years later. But that type of home & home is hard to find, too, and just pushes the problem off into the future.
01-30-2015 12:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
At Ease Offline
Banned

Posts: 17,134
Joined: Jun 2005
I Root For: The Rice Owls
Location:
Post: #110
RE: 2015 schedule question
(01-30-2015 11:52 AM)WIowl Wrote:  ñ

Yet we were able to string together a home and home with Hawaii at the last second in 2014. I would like to know why Rice was forced/settled to settle with Wagner, rather than the other available FBS teams listed by FBSchedules.com.

Wagner is not going to build season tickets sales, and will not be impressive to fans/media whether Rice blows them out or not. BYU/P5 can play Wagner because they have other significant/high interest home games, Rice's home schedule will have UNT, LaTech....

We have 3 opponents already committed through 2018. And we are, I assume, holding a spot each of these years for a renewed Bayou Bucket.

So filling our schedule with an FBS home opponent would require a team that a) has matching open dates; b) wants to play us; c) is willing to play at Rice first and on short notice; d) is willing to wait for a return game until 2019 or later. ((Personally, I would add e) makes sense for us to play at 1;1 (a la why I thought USA and NMSU made little sense for us), but I don't know if that was a factor or not.))

It's not hard to see how difficult/impossible that scenario is.

$300K for NMSU? So we took home a fraction of an FCS school's going rate. Par for Greenspan.
01-30-2015 12:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WIowl Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,657
Joined: Aug 2005
Reputation: 17
I Root For:
Location:

New Orleans Bowl
Post: #111
RE: 2015 schedule question
(01-30-2015 12:28 PM)temchugh Wrote:  Every time we agree to play a P5 team on the road without a return home visit (A&M, Notre Dame, Baylor), we need to find another team that will play us at home without a return game. Otherwise, we play 3 OOC games on the road (like last year). So we really were limited to teams that would play us at home without a return game. Not many teams to choose from.

Even if you start now with a new policy of not scheduling P5 road $$$ games, we had (before Wagner) two more road OOC games scheduled than home OOC games from 2015 to 2018 (with four OOC slots open). If we filled those four slots with home & home commitments, we would have 3 OOC road games in one of those years.

In theory, I guess, we could keep things balanced in the short term by scheduling teams that will give us a home game now in exchange for a return game several years later. But that type of home & home is hard to find, too, and just pushes the problem off into the future.

Just a clarification,:

The A&M series is a home and home: @A&M 2014, @Rice 2019.

The Baylor series is a 6 game, home and home series: @Baylor 2007, @Rice 2010, @Baylor 2011, @Baylor 2015; @Rice 2016, @Rice 2019.
01-30-2015 01:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WIowl Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,657
Joined: Aug 2005
Reputation: 17
I Root For:
Location:

New Orleans Bowl
Post: #112
RE: 2015 schedule question
(01-30-2015 12:44 PM)At Ease Wrote:  $300K for NMSU? So we took home a fraction of an FCS school's going rate. Par for Greenspan.

NMSU was a home and home, but set up with a $300k cacnellation fee by either school. This is typical, but unfortunately NMSU canceled.
01-30-2015 01:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WIowl Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,657
Joined: Aug 2005
Reputation: 17
I Root For:
Location:

New Orleans Bowl
Post: #113
RE: 2015 schedule question
(01-30-2015 12:44 PM)At Ease Wrote:  
(01-30-2015 11:52 AM)WIowl Wrote:  ñ

Yet we were able to string together a home and home with Hawaii at the last second in 2014. I would like to know why Rice was forced/settled to settle with Wagner, rather than the other available FBS teams listed by FBSchedules.com.

Wagner is not going to build season tickets sales, and will not be impressive to fans/media whether Rice blows them out or not. BYU/P5 can play Wagner because they have other significant/high interest home games, Rice's home schedule will have UNT, LaTech....

We have 3 opponents already committed through 2018. And we are, I assume, holding a spot each of these years for a renewed Bayou Bucket.

So filling our schedule with an FBS home opponent would require a team that a) has matching open dates; b) wants to play us; c) is willing to play at Rice first and on short notice; d) is willing to wait for a return game until 2019 or later. ((Personally, I would add e) makes sense for us to play at 1;1 (a la why I thought USA and NMSU made little sense for us), but I don't know if that was a factor or not.))

If that is the case, that makes sense. But it would nice to hear an explanation from the AD that stipulates this is a one time thing, UH is being added back on the schedule, etc.

More importantly, how is the AD going to increase season tickets with this type of schedule?
01-30-2015 01:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Frizzy Owl Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 9,383
Joined: Nov 2012
Reputation: 54
I Root For: Rice
Location:
Post: #114
RE: 2015 schedule question
"This type of schedule" is common in D1, including schools that have no difficulty with season ticket sales.
01-30-2015 01:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Owl 69/70/75 Offline
Just an old rugby coach
*

Posts: 80,850
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3214
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

DonatorsNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #115
RE: 2015 schedule question
There are a bunch of people posting here who don't understand how things work. We are playing Wagner because we couldn't get a better deal with anyone else. All the talk about how this or that would be better ignores one thing--Wagner was on the table, this or that wasn't.
(This post was last modified: 01-30-2015 01:21 PM by Owl 69/70/75.)
01-30-2015 01:20 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Frizzy Owl Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 9,383
Joined: Nov 2012
Reputation: 54
I Root For: Rice
Location:
Post: #116
RE: 2015 schedule question
Another thing that people fail to appreciate is that Karlgaard's bargaining position is weak. He can't offer large payouts, so even amongst FCS schools he was limited to those that are scrambling last-minute to fill a hole in their schedule.
01-30-2015 01:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Gravy Owl Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,394
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 104
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location:
Post: #117
RE: 2015 schedule question
(01-30-2015 01:20 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  There are a bunch of people posting here who don't understand how things work.

You could probably add that to your signature.
01-30-2015 02:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SaintsOwl Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 455
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation: 4
I Root For: Rice
Location:
Post: #118
2015 schedule question
(01-30-2015 07:47 AM)MemOwl Wrote:  Wagner??

Makes me long for New Mexico State.

Remind me again what happened to bring us to this unfortunate circumstance. Does it somehow tie back to a piece of Greenspan incompetence?

I don't want to believe this is a deliberate action by Karlgaard.

And not as if we need any fuel, but if we win by less than 21 the Bailiff discussions will get off to an early start next year.

Wagner Seahawks. Seriously. Not a great way to become relevant. To top it off, watching Sportscenter last night Cris Carter referred to Luke Willson as the 5 round TE from Villanova. What a freaking insult.

Our AD has to step up and start trying to make this program relevant. Playing Wagner is not the route unless our goal is to once again win 6 or 7 games and play another average team in a bowl.

Will be sending Cris a tweet to let him know Luke graduated from Rice.
01-30-2015 07:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
dragon2owl Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,189
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation: 37
I Root For: RICE
Location: Houston
Post: #119
RE: 2015 schedule question
(01-30-2015 07:56 PM)SaintsOwl Wrote:  Will be sending Cris a tweet to let him know Luke graduated from Rice.

Quote:RiceFootball @RiceFootball1 · 13h 13 hours ago
Thanks for the words about @LWillson_82, @criscarter80, but he's a proud Rice Owl!

Cris Carter @criscarter80 · 11h 11 hours ago
@RiceFootball1 @LWillson_82 I know, but I made a mistake !!!! #Rice
(This post was last modified: 01-30-2015 08:20 PM by dragon2owl.)
01-30-2015 08:20 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RiceLad15 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 16,690
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation: 111
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location: H-town
Post: #120
RE: 2015 schedule question
(01-30-2015 07:56 PM)SaintsOwl Wrote:  
(01-30-2015 07:47 AM)MemOwl Wrote:  Wagner??

Makes me long for New Mexico State.

Remind me again what happened to bring us to this unfortunate circumstance. Does it somehow tie back to a piece of Greenspan incompetence?

I don't want to believe this is a deliberate action by Karlgaard.

And not as if we need any fuel, but if we win by less than 21 the Bailiff discussions will get off to an early start next year.

Wagner Seahawks. Seriously. Not a great way to become relevant. To top it off, watching Sportscenter last night Cris Carter referred to Luke Willson as the 5 round TE from Villanova. What a freaking insult.

Our AD has to step up and start trying to make this program relevant. Playing Wagner is not the route unless our goal is to once again win 6 or 7 games and play another average team in a bowl.

Will be sending Cris a tweet to let him know Luke graduated from Rice.

Plenty of help with that already.

https://twitter.com/criscarter80/status/...7403206656
01-30-2015 08:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.