jhn31
Bench Warmer
Posts: 120
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 24
I Root For: Mississippi St.
Location:
|
Why not allow extra bowls to made created on the fly?
Rather than have 8 teams that finished 6-6 or better sitting at home because of the whims of bowl directors (or because of silly rules that prevent 9-3 conference champions who play a full FBS schedule from going to a bowl because they're new), why not just have the 38 official bowls, and then set a few more up ad hoc once we know how many eligible teams there are?
For example, CUSA and the Sun Belt could set up a game in Atlanta between Georgia Southern and Middle Tennessee, either at the Georgia Dome (surely they could find a day), or if necessary, at Georgia Tech's stadium.
You could also set up these matchups:
Ohio vs. Temple in Pittsburgh
UAB vs. Texas State in Jackson, MS
Appalachian State vs. Old Dominion at one of the stadiums in North Carolina
Granted, none of these games would be setting attendance records, but they should sell enough tickets and generate TV dollars to at least break even for the conferences who set them up, and this way bowl eligible teams wouldn't be locked out of bowls. Give the new "bowls" a snazzy names, and the casual fans wouldn't even realize these bowls were created on the fly a couple weeks beforehand.
There would still be the issue of what to do with an odd number of eligible teams -- either we'd still leave 1 team out or take one 5-7 team, but either of those is preferable to leaving out 8 teams over circumstances beyond their control.
|
|
12-09-2014 08:25 AM |
|
arkstfan
Sorry folks
Posts: 25,918
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 1003
I Root For: Fresh Starts
Location:
|
RE: Why not allow extra bowls to made created on the fly?
Because the SEC, Big XII, ACC, and Pac-10 would kill their lower paying bowl contracts and camp out at home or a nearby friendly stadium and make it a quasi or actual home game.
|
|
12-09-2014 10:16 AM |
|
Wedge
Hall of Famer
Posts: 19,862
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 964
I Root For: California
Location: IV, V, VI, IX
|
RE: Why not allow extra bowls to made created on the fly?
(12-09-2014 10:16 AM)arkstfan Wrote: Because the SEC, Big XII, ACC, and Pac-10 would kill their lower paying bowl contracts and camp out at home or a nearby friendly stadium and make it a quasi or actual home game.
Right, it's been suggested. One of the Big Ten ADs proposed a couple of years ago that bowls be set up for 6-6 teams on an ad hoc basis right after the end of the regular season, matching teams that are geographically close in a game at the stadium of one of the two teams. I think the example he used was that if Illinois and Missouri were both 6-6 they could play each other in Columbia instead of each spending a few hundred thousand bucks to send their entire contingents to a bowl game in Texas. And they wouldn't lose the TV exposure, because ESPN would be happy to televise it just like any other bowl game.
It would work just as well for any FBS teams, whether or not they're 6-6. This year Utah State is playing UTEP in the New Mexico Bowl in Albuquerque -- would be a lot less expensive for them to play each other a few hundred miles further south in El Paso and call it a bowl game.
(This post was last modified: 12-09-2014 11:33 AM by Wedge.)
|
|
12-09-2014 11:33 AM |
|