Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Hard To Think of Baylor As Part Of The Rich Get (Or Try To Get) Richer
Author Message
Tiki Owl Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,129
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 119
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location: Tiki Island

The Parliament AwardsCrappiesNew Orleans BowlDonatorsThe Parliament Awards
Post: #1
Hard To Think of Baylor As Part Of The Rich Get (Or Try To Get) Richer
Baylor hires PR firm to lobby for playoff spot.

http://awfulannouncing.com/the-locker/ba...-spot.html
(This post was last modified: 12-01-2014 07:41 PM by Tiki Owl.)
12-01-2014 07:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


WRCisforgotten79 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,611
Joined: May 2007
Reputation: 50
I Root For: Rice
Location: Houston
Post: #2
RE: Hard To Think of Baylor As Part Of The Rich Get (Or Try To Get) Richer
Point 1: #39 West Virginia 41, #7 Baylor 27

Point 2: Baylor's non-conference schedule

@Baylor 45, #121 SMU 0
@Baylor 70, FCS Northwestern St. 6
@Baylor 63, #115 Buffalo 21

Point 3: Baylor's 3-point victory over TCU was @Baylor

Point 4: TCU's non-conference schedule

@TCU 48, FCS Samford 14
@TCU 30, #31 Minnesota 7
TCU 56, @#121 SMU 0

Advantage to TCU. The FCS schools and SMU cancel out. The tie-breaker on the schedule is #31 Minnesota versus #115 Buffalo. Not even close. Plus, TCU at least had ONE of their 3 non-conference games on the road (albeit a short road).
12-01-2014 07:53 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WRCisforgotten79 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,611
Joined: May 2007
Reputation: 50
I Root For: Rice
Location: Houston
Post: #3
RE: Hard To Think of Baylor As Part Of The Rich Get (Or Try To Get) Richer
Also, on Massey's College Football Ranking Composite, TCU is ranked #3, while Baylor is #8. THAT is a significant difference.
12-01-2014 07:55 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
gsloth Offline
perpetually tired
*

Posts: 6,654
Joined: Aug 2007
Reputation: 54
I Root For: Rice&underdogs
Location: Central VA

Donators
Post: #4
RE: Hard To Think of Baylor As Part Of The Rich Get (Or Try To Get) Richer
(12-01-2014 07:55 PM)WRCisforgotten79 Wrote:  Also, on Massey's College Football Ranking Composite, TCU is ranked #3, while Baylor is #8. THAT is a significant difference.

I've been looking for someone doing a BCS-like calculation for this year, just to see. And it's not really close between TCU and Ohio State for 4 and 5.

http://www.colleyrankings.com/curBcsLike.html

Not an exact comparison, as some substitutions have to be made. But a 4 or 8 team playoff based on the "BCS" calcs would be:

1. Alabama
2. Florida St
3. Oregon
4. TCU

5. Ohio St
6. Baylor
7. Arizona
8. Mississippi St

Michigan State barely misses the cut for #8, with Kansas State at #10 about the same distance from Mississippi State as Ohio State from TCU (which I said wasn't that close). There's still 1 more week to go, with this weekend's game sure to adjust some of this.
12-01-2014 08:06 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WRCisforgotten79 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,611
Joined: May 2007
Reputation: 50
I Root For: Rice
Location: Houston
Post: #5
RE: Hard To Think of Baylor As Part Of The Rich Get (Or Try To Get) Richer
(12-01-2014 08:06 PM)gsloth Wrote:  
(12-01-2014 07:55 PM)WRCisforgotten79 Wrote:  Also, on Massey's College Football Ranking Composite, TCU is ranked #3, while Baylor is #8. THAT is a significant difference.

I've been looking for someone doing a BCS-like calculation for this year, just to see. And it's not really close between TCU and Ohio State for 4 and 5.

http://www.colleyrankings.com/curBcsLike.html

Not an exact comparison, as some substitutions have to be made. But a 4 or 8 team playoff based on the "BCS" calcs would be:

1. Alabama
2. Florida St
3. Oregon
4. TCU

5. Ohio St
6. Baylor
7. Arizona
8. Mississippi St

Michigan State barely misses the cut for #8, with Kansas State at #10 about the same distance from Mississippi State as Ohio State from TCU (which I said wasn't that close). There's still 1 more week to go, with this weekend's game sure to adjust some of this.

I have Mississippi State at #15, in great part because of their pathetic non-conference schedule:

@Miss. St. 49, #117 So. Miss. 0
@Miss. St. 47, #82 UAB 34
@Miss. St. 35, #99 South Alabama 3
@Miss. St. 46, FCS Tenn-Martin 15
(This post was last modified: 12-01-2014 08:14 PM by WRCisforgotten79.)
12-01-2014 08:12 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Volente Beach Owl Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,047
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 35
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #6
RE: Hard To Think of Baylor As Part Of The Rich Get (Or Try To Get) Richer
TCU had a 21 point lead in the 4th quarter in the game against Baylor in Waco. That was truly a miraculous comeback by the Bears, but in watching the complete game, I thought TCU was the better team. If that game were in Fort Worth, I would say that TCU would have won by a minimum of 10 points.

I also think last year's Fiesta Bowl game in which Baylor lost to UCF is impacting the pollsters. A stronger non-conference schedule could have alleviated those concerns, but instead they chose to play weak opponents.
12-01-2014 08:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WRCisforgotten79 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,611
Joined: May 2007
Reputation: 50
I Root For: Rice
Location: Houston
Post: #7
RE: Hard To Think of Baylor As Part Of The Rich Get (Or Try To Get) Richer
(12-01-2014 08:25 PM)Volente Beach Owl Wrote:  TCU had a 21 point lead in the 4th quarter in the game against Baylor in Waco. That was truly a miraculous comeback by the Bears, but in watching the complete game, I thought TCU was the better team. If that game were in Fort Worth, I would say that TCU would have won by a minimum of 10 points.

I also think last year's Fiesta Bowl game in which Baylor lost to UCF is impacting the pollsters. A stronger non-conference schedule could have alleviated those concerns, but instead they chose to play weak opponents.

And, it won't be getting any better ...

Future Non-conference opponents for Baylor:

2015 - @SMU, Lamar, RICE

2016 - Northwestern State, SMU, @RICE

2017 - Liberty, UTSA, @Duke

2018 - @UTSA, Duke, n/a

2019 - Incarnate Word, UTSA, @RICE

Future TCU schedules include @Minnesota, as well as home-and-home against Arkansas, Ohio State and Cal-Berkeley
(This post was last modified: 12-01-2014 10:29 PM by WRCisforgotten79.)
12-01-2014 10:26 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rick Gerlach Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,529
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 70
I Root For:
Location:

The Parliament AwardsCrappiesNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #8
RE: Hard To Think of Baylor As Part Of The Rich Get (Or Try To Get) Richer
(12-01-2014 10:26 PM)WRCisforgotten79 Wrote:  
(12-01-2014 08:25 PM)Volente Beach Owl Wrote:  TCU had a 21 point lead in the 4th quarter in the game against Baylor in Waco. That was truly a miraculous comeback by the Bears, but in watching the complete game, I thought TCU was the better team. If that game were in Fort Worth, I would say that TCU would have won by a minimum of 10 points.

I also think last year's Fiesta Bowl game in which Baylor lost to UCF is impacting the pollsters. A stronger non-conference schedule could have alleviated those concerns, but instead they chose to play weak opponents.

And, it won't be getting any better ...

Future Non-conference opponents for Baylor:

2015 - @SMU, Lamar, RICE

2016 - Northwestern State, SMU, @RICE

2017 - Liberty, UTSA, @Duke

2018 - @UTSA, Duke, n/a

2019 - Incarnate Word, UTSA, @RICE

Future TCU schedules include @Minnesota, as well as home-and-home against Arkansas, Ohio State and Cal-Berkeley

Agree that TCU should be ranked above Baylor this year.

But the argument about SOS, including a look at Baylor's future schedule seems to argue that any P5 team worth their salt should avoid the vast majority of G5 schools, including Rice, like the plague.

Not sure how that helps us get the wins the Board is wanting.
(This post was last modified: 12-01-2014 10:40 PM by Rick Gerlach.)
12-01-2014 10:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WeatherfordOwl Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,168
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 10
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #9
RE: Hard To Think of Baylor As Part Of The Rich Get (Or Try To Get) Richer
This looks more like that old sandwich board we talk about.
12-01-2014 10:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.