(09-18-2014 08:38 PM)jh Wrote:  

(09-18-2014 08:18 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-18-2014 07:51 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  

(09-18-2014 12:59 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  You are liberals. You can put lipstick on a pig by calling it "liberty" but the outcome always mirror what the progressives want.

You're an idjut. Libertarians are not liberals. YOU just think they are. Your assertions sway nobody and they make you look and sound silly. But carry on, this is great entertainment.

fraid they are, big timer. You cannot push social liberalism and call yourself conservative.

Isn't that why they call themselves libertarians, jefe?

Dont worry....Okie will make like a zombie and vote for Rand Paul if he is nominated. He has no principles.

(09-18-2014 10:14 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(09-18-2014 08:38 PM)jh Wrote:  

(09-18-2014 08:18 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-18-2014 07:51 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  

(09-18-2014 12:59 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  You are liberals. You can put lipstick on a pig by calling it "liberty" but the outcome always mirror what the progressives want.

You're an idjut. Libertarians are not liberals. YOU just think they are. Your assertions sway nobody and they make you look and sound silly. But carry on, this is great entertainment.

fraid they are, big timer. You cannot push social liberalism and call yourself conservative.

Isn't that why they call themselves libertarians, jefe?

Dont worry....Okie will make like a zombie and vote for Rand Paul if he is nominated. He has no principles.

Don't worry, Rand Paul won't be nominated.

(09-18-2014 09:13 PM)jh Wrote:  

(09-18-2014 08:59 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-18-2014 08:55 PM)jh Wrote:  

(09-18-2014 08:40 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-18-2014 08:38 PM)jh Wrote:  Isn't that why they call themselves libertarians, jefe?

Except when they call themselves Republicans.

What does that have to do with anything, carino? We were talking ideologies, not political parties.

A lot, Janet because they are not Republicans.

But you weren't talking about Republicans, querido, you were talking about conservatives.

Even in the alternate reality where what you say about libertarian-leaning Republicans is true, how sad is that for the Republican Party? Your party is so out of touch that it can't even field an actual Republican candidate in multiple high profile races. Instead, you have to ride the libertarians' coattails. The shame.

And who is Janet?

I think you have totally confused yourself.

Here's the bottom line: You really are in no position to criticize either party when you can't produce a formidable party of your own. The GOP is not a socially liberal party so don't expect libertarians running under a GOP ticket to garner much of the vote. If you want to push your independent candidates that's great, but you don't because they don't have the monetary backing that they would get running on the GOP ticket.

(09-19-2014 08:26 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-18-2014 09:13 PM)jh Wrote:  

(09-18-2014 08:59 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-18-2014 08:55 PM)jh Wrote:  

(09-18-2014 08:40 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-18-2014 08:55 PM)jh Wrote:  

(09-18-2014 08:40 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  fraid they are, big timer. You cannot push social liberalism and call yourself conservative.

Isn't that why they call themselves libertarians, jefe?

Except when they call themselves Republicans.

What does that have to do with anything, carino? We were talking ideologies, not political parties.

A lot, Janet because they are not Republicans.

But you weren't talking about Republicans, querido, you were talking about conservatives.
Even in the alternate reality where what you say about libertarian-leaning Republicans is true, how sad is that for the Republican Party? Your party is so out of touch that it can't even field an actual Republican candidate in multiple high profile races. Instead, you have to ride the libertarians' coattails. The shame.
And who is Janet?

I think you have totally confused yourself.

Neno, you have to be able to keep up with the conversation. But I believe in you. If you really try, you can maintain a coherent thought for more than a couple of seconds. You can do it!

Quote:Here's the bottom line: You really are in no position to criticize either party when you can't produce a formidable party of your own. The GOP is not a socially liberal party so don't expect libertarians running under a GOP ticket to garner much of the vote. If you want to push your independent candidates that's great, but you don't because they don't have the monetary backing that they would get running on the GOP ticket.

Oh, mi amor, you're so cute when you confuse yourself. What about Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Mike Lee, Thomas Massie, Mark Sanford, Trey Radel, Justin Amash, and Ted Cruz? Those "libertarians" running under the Republican ticket seem to be doing pretty well for themselves.

(09-18-2014 03:30 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  Hey, didn't [Rand Paul's] Dad also run as a Republican? What about Mike Lee or Thomas Massie? How about Mark Sanford and Trey Radel?

If the Republican Party is as socially conservative as you say, it has nothing to fear from libertarian candidates running under its banner. They simply would not make it through the primary. Yet, according to you, they do on a fairly regular basis. And then manage to get themselves elected in the general election to boot.

This is my last post in the thread, mi corazon, so I will just leave you with that to think about. As amusing as I find your constant flip flopping and revisionist posts are, eventually it just gets sad.

(09-19-2014 11:20 AM)jh Wrote:  

(09-19-2014 08:26 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-18-2014 09:13 PM)jh Wrote:  

(09-18-2014 08:59 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-18-2014 08:55 PM)jh Wrote:  What does that have to do with anything, carino? We were talking ideologies, not political parties.

A lot, Janet because they are not Republicans.

But you weren't talking about Republicans, querido, you were talking about conservatives.
Even in the alternate reality where what you say about libertarian-leaning Republicans is true, how sad is that for the Republican Party? Your party is so out of touch that it can't even field an actual Republican candidate in multiple high profile races. Instead, you have to ride the libertarians' coattails. The shame.
And who is Janet?

I think you have totally confused yourself.

Neno, you have to be able to keep up with the conversation. But I believe in you. If you really try, you can maintain a coherent thought for more than a couple of seconds. You can do it!

Quote:Here's the bottom line: You really are in no position to criticize either party when you can't produce a formidable party of your own. The GOP is not a socially liberal party so don't expect libertarians running under a GOP ticket to garner much of the vote. If you want to push your independent candidates that's great, but you don't because they don't have the monetary backing that they would get running on the GOP ticket.

Oh, mi amor, you're so cute when you confuse yourself. What about Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Mike Lee, Thomas Massie, Mark Sanford, Trey Radel, Justin Amash, and Ted Cruz? Those "libertarians" running under the Republican ticket seem to be doing pretty well for themselves.

(09-18-2014 03:30 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  Hey, didn't [Rand Paul's] Dad also run as a Republican? What about Mike Lee or Thomas Massie? How about Mark Sanford and Trey Radel?

If the Republican Party is as socially conservative as you say, it has nothing to fear from libertarian candidates running under its banner. They simply would not make it through the primary. Yet, according to you, they do on a fairly regular basis. And then manage to get themselves elected in the general election to boot.

This is my last post in the thread, mi corazon, so I will just leave you with that to think about. As amusing as I find your constant flip flopping and revisionist posts are, eventually it just gets sad.

I have completely kept up with the conversation. I have stated the rub multiple times. It is you that doesn't like the answer. I am not going to repeat the same information over and over.

Ann Coulter is an extremely smart woman and she doesn't just manufacture problems. I have told you the conflict with libertarians trying to leech off the GOP ticket. I have pointed out the problems with libertarians trying to change the GOP to fit their ideology.

You can be mad about it all you want...but the fact remains you need to work on building a relevant party before you criticize any other party.

are we clear? Ernie?