Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
OT - Stanford's take on the future of D1 sports
Author Message
temchugh Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,396
Joined: Apr 2008
Reputation: 17
I Root For: Rice
Location:
Post: #1
OT - Stanford's take on the future of D1 sports
An interesting article in the current issue of the Stanford alumni magazine on current issues in D1 sports:

http://alumni.stanford.edu/get/page/maga...e_id=72888

The article says that Stanford is very uncomfortable with the current balance between athletics and academics for student athletes and is pushing for reforms that would help restore the balance (e.g., restrictions on organized "voluntary" practices that are widely used to circumvent the current 20 hr/week limit on mandatory practices).

The article also says that the NLRB ruling in the Northwestern case that student athletes are employees, if upheld, would likely force Stanford out of Division 1 because Stanford simply would not agree to pay athletes more than the full cost of attendance.
09-11-2014 06:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


75src Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,591
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation: 25
I Root For: Rice
Location:
Post: #2
RE: OT - Stanford's take on the future of D1 sports
Good article. I like one possibility that was thrown out if Stanford needs to leave the PAC12, which was a conference of
Stanford
Rice (note we are mentioned right after Stanford)
Vanderbilt
Duke
Norte Dame (hard to believe they would ever cut back)
Northwestern

I am surprised they did not mention Tulane. Maybe the conference could be non-scholarship D1 FCS, because I do not think they would want to drop all the way to D3. I would be happy if Rice joins Stanford if they do something.

(09-11-2014 06:02 PM)temchugh Wrote:  An interesting article in the current issue of the Stanford alumni magazine on current issues in D1 sports:

http://alumni.stanford.edu/get/page/maga...e_id=72888

The article says that Stanford is very uncomfortable with the current balance between athletics and academics for student athletes and is pushing for reforms that would help restore the balance (e.g., restrictions on organized "voluntary" practices that are widely used to circumvent the current 20 hr/week limit on mandatory practices).

The article also says that the NLRB ruling in the Northwestern case that student athletes are employees, if upheld, would likely force Stanford out of Division 1 because Stanford simply would not agree to pay athletes more than the full cost of attendance.
09-11-2014 06:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.