RE: Coaches Luncheon Today 9/10 @ 12 noon
Obviously we are beating a dead horse here, but hey its EMU Football and we've been the dead horse for 20 years. For those who continue to defend Creighton and his decision making, I have only one question. What have you seen out of the first two games that leads you to believe he will be able to turn this program around. Here is what I've seen.
1. Musical chairs with the quarterbacks, so much so that none of them have any confidence and they are not being given the chance to lead, mature or gain any sense of how to overcome mistakes.
2. A Defense that regardless of talent (or lack of) still gives up far too many big plays, It is rare to find a defense that routinely gives up 30 yard plus plays, EMU has been doing it for 15 years.
3. An inability to make in game changes, the same thing we knocked English for by the way. If your defense is in a cover 2 or cover 3 the soft spot is supposed to be in the middle of the field underneath the secondary and beyond the front 7, somehow this defense continually gets beat down the field because secondary personnel out of position. It is one thing to get beat because a player is too slow or not physical enough, it is a coaching problem when players don't know their assignment. If they are incapable of learning than replace them.
4. Extremely Poor Clock management in the Morgan State Game. Specifically 4th Quarter after the turn over, he continued to run tempo and gave the ball back to Morgan State with enough time for a final drive. Roback was snapping the ball with 20 seconds left on the play clock. That is poor clock management, all of the plays were run plays, there was no surprise at this point and tempo didn't matter.
5. An offensive line that should be better than they are. While the offensive line played pretty well on running plays against Morgan State, they still allowed the pass rush to disrupt the the passing game. Against Florida, well lets face it, they did nothing correctly, including snapping the ball in shotgun.
6. Any ability to "coach up" the wide receivers he does have.
7. Total lack of a game plan to get Tyreese Russell involved in the offense. Russell is an All-MAC caliber player and Creighton has disrupted his senior year with this quarterback fiasco.
8. Corny "The Factory" and Breaking down the Wall embarrassment. Heather Lyke might be responsible for the Gray Turf, but Creighton is the face of the program and it has some how managed to make us more of a joke (who would have thought that was possible).
And So, I could go on and on but my point is this; I still am optimistic. I hold out hope that Creighton will get his act together. For no other reason than I have spoken to nobody that has a bad thing to say about the guy. I truly believe he is a honorable and moral man who wants to run a clean successful program. I have no reason to hope EMU plays poorly, I certainly don't enjoy watching our football program and the University dragged through the mud (figuratively and literally). However, until Creighton shows that he has the slightest football savvy, I will question his decisions. Specifically those that defy common sense, first and foremost this quarterback disaster. I don't care what Bell's completion percentage is, sounds to me like he's pretty adept at completing passes to the defense in practice. Roback is and should be the quarterback of the future, if Creighton doesn't see that, well it shows a complete disregard for what it will take to turn this program around. And like many others on the board, the idea of another 5 years of terrible teams is frustrating.
|