(08-24-2014 11:40 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(08-24-2014 11:35 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-24-2014 11:31 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(08-24-2014 11:30 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-24-2014 11:27 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  Just want to make sure we're clear on this because you have a very liberal way of saying if I like my plan I can keep my plan. Doctor, too.

can you stay on topic? I don't think you can but please try.

And FYI I have never been a big Obamacare supporter. You really are a clueless douchebag who doesn't have a clue.

Where did you say HOW Mr deflector?

Fo: You will catch them if it is done correctly. The way Tenn. did this is a fcking joke.

Me: Do yourself a favor and look up the word constitutionality...

doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that one out. and besides even conservatives were addressing this earlier in the thread.

You've reached epic fail. Epic.

nope this one's on you. you clearly don't know much about this topic, I actually do. you got caught talking out of your a.ss and ended up getting bi.tch slapped for it.

how come I always debate with reason and you debate with pictures?

How come I keep making references to talking points that are not limited to the OP (which is fu.cken thinkprogress a terrible link to reference) whereas that is all you seem to refer to?

sorry but I don't slow down to make way for a dummy. either keep up, make it appear as if you are keeping up, or give up.

I am spending pages trying to explain a BASIC concept of this issue for you.

(08-24-2014 11:44 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(08-24-2014 11:30 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-24-2014 11:27 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(08-24-2014 11:08 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-24-2014 11:02 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  And you ignore the fact that states ARE drug testing. What a loser.

again you are 100% making sh.it up to account for your own failure to accurately read what I said.

I have said it plenty of times now. The constitutional issue is not whether or not states can test but how they can test.

comprende???? or am I not clear enough despite the large font, color & bold????

Just want to make sure we're clear on this because you have a very liberal way of saying if I like my plan I can keep my plan. Doctor, too.

can you stay on topic? I don't think you can but please try.

And FYI I have never been a big Obamacare supporter. You really are a clueless douchebag who doesn't have a clue.

Super witty comment. that's almost as good as, "a big fat fatty who's fat."

it is relevant to bring up. first he tried to reference gun control, now obamacare, then resorts to off topic images SMH. the dude argues like a three year old and he even worse he has admitted not once, but twice that he doesn't know much about the topic.

(08-24-2014 11:37 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-24-2014 11:35 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  If I were you, right about now I'd bang on the ceiling and see if mom and dad would come down and bail me out.

let's see.

called me out for living with my parents not once but twice But in Obama's economy millions of people have moved back with their parents. If you think that's an insult then you don't think much of the people who Obama has screwed.

called me a druggie In Colorado and Washington it's legal. Why do you think it's an insult unless you think druggies are on a lower level than yourelf?

called me a welfare queen But there's nothing wrong with that, right? You're defending them. So if you think calling you a WF queen is an insult then you must not think much of WF queens.

and yet you are the one who complains about me resorting to personal insults???

(08-24-2014 11:46 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-24-2014 11:44 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(08-24-2014 11:30 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-24-2014 11:27 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(08-24-2014 11:08 PM)john01992 Wrote:  again you are 100% making sh.it up to account for your own failure to accurately read what I said.

I have said it plenty of times now. The constitutional issue is not whether or not states can test but how they can test.

comprende???? or am I not clear enough despite the large font, color & bold????

Just want to make sure we're clear on this because you have a very liberal way of saying if I like my plan I can keep my plan. Doctor, too.

can you stay on topic? I don't think you can but please try.

And FYI I have never been a big Obamacare supporter. You really are a clueless douchebag who doesn't have a clue.

Super witty comment. that's almost as good as, "a big fat fatty who's fat."

it is relevant to bring up. first he tried to reference gun control, now obamacare, then resorts to off topic images SMH. the dude argues like a three year old and he even worse he has admitted not once, but twice that he doesn't know much about the topic.

you're getting obliterated. stop now, while there is something left.

John boy, you have to get up pretty early in the morning if you expect to have any chance to beat a conservative in a debate.....so you'd better go to bed now.

(08-24-2014 11:44 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-24-2014 11:40 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(08-24-2014 11:35 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-24-2014 11:31 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(08-24-2014 11:30 PM)john01992 Wrote:  can you stay on topic? I don't think you can but please try.

And FYI I have never been a big Obamacare supporter. You really are a clueless douchebag who doesn't have a clue.

Where did you say HOW Mr deflector?

Fo: You will catch them if it is done correctly. The way Tenn. did this is a fcking joke.

Me: Do yourself a favor and look up the word constitutionality...

doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that one out. and besides even conservatives were addressing this earlier in the thread.

You've reached epic fail. Epic.

nope this one's on you. you clearly don't know much about this topic, I actually do. you got caught talking out of your a.ss and ended up getting bi.tch slapped for it.

how come I always debate with reason and you debate with pictures?

How come I keep making references to talking points that are not limited to the OP (which is fu.cken thinkprogress a terrible link to reference) whereas that is all you seem to refer to?

sorry but I don't slow down to make way for a dummy. either keep up, make it appear as if you are keeping up, or give up.

I am spending pages trying to explain a BASIC concept of this issue for you.

Dude, you lost. The quicker you accept it the less painful it will be.

They ought to test the WH and Congress before they test anyone else.

John boy, I'm going to bed. That you know more about collecting Welfare says more about you than me. You can keep referring to arguments that you said you made but never did but you still lost. You can refer to judges while states still require testing, but you still lost. And you can refer to the Constitution, something libs haven't really talked about since Obama took office, but you'll need to show me the page that says Welfare is an unequivocal right with no restrictions.

(08-24-2014 11:59 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  John boy, I'm going to bed. That you know more about collecting Welfare says more about you than me. You can keep referring to arguments that you said you made but never did but you still lost. You can refer to judges while states still require testing, but you still lost. And you can refer to the Constitution, something libs haven't really talked about since Obama took office, but you'll need to show me the page that says Welfare is an unequivocal right with no restrictions.

what a typical conservative piece of trash. You guys literally fear anything that disagrees with your ideology to the point where you think that anyone whose disagrees with your MUST be because they are personally affected by it hence the reason they have that stance. I said this once and I will say it again, sometimes people disagree with you because your political views are actually stupid. you can say what you want about who won and who lost but the fact is that you walked into this conversation with very limited knowledge about the topic at hand, admitted you didn't know much about it, personally attacked others for knowing something about the information at hand, and then had the balls to proclaim yourself right and that I was wrong. That displays just how big your ego is and just how stupid you are. seriously what right do you have to actually attack someone for knowing more about a subject than you do? what right do you have to openly admit that you know less about the subject at hand then the person you are debating, while continuing to profess that you are correct and he is wrong. and lastly I can not imagine how one could look down on another for going out and learning about current events and understanding these issues.

you were outed, I clearly debated certain points all over this thread and you pretend as if they never happened. Was it a mistake on your part?IMO most likely because you did walk into the arguement late and had very limited context on the subject material. Maybe it's a defensive tactic or you are just plain stupid. either way I am baffled by some of the statements and attitudes you have displayed tonight which have enlightened me to how cowardly and stupid a conservative can be, but also that you legitimately look down on people for knowing more about a topic than you do. can it be any more obvious that conservatives are low information voters?

You can read just three solid articles and know all you needed to know tonight. rather than do that you just assume that anyone who knows about this issue is a "welfare queen." That's pathetic dude, terribly pathetic and what worst it is evident that some GOPers are so locked up in their own little world that they don't even have a clue as to how people with opposing views think. "I'm so SOOOOO correct that anyone who disagrees with me must be a druggie who relies on govt assistance" that is essentially your attitude.

(08-24-2014 11:50 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(08-24-2014 11:46 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-24-2014 11:44 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(08-24-2014 11:30 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(08-24-2014 11:27 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  Just want to make sure we're clear on this because you have a very liberal way of saying if I like my plan I can keep my plan. Doctor, too.

can you stay on topic? I don't think you can but please try.

And FYI I have never been a big Obamacare supporter. You really are a clueless douchebag who doesn't have a clue.

Super witty comment. that's almost as good as, "a big fat fatty who's fat."

it is relevant to bring up. first he tried to reference gun control, now obamacare, then resorts to off topic images SMH. the dude argues like a three year old and he even worse he has admitted not once, but twice that he doesn't know much about the topic.

you're getting obliterated. stop now, while there is something left.

only in the eyes of a partisan hack would someone think that. seriously this guy keeps trying to change the subject, resorts to personal insults AND has openly admitted that he doesn't know a whole lot about the subject material.

idiots like you who follow the even bigger idiots like sheep are everything that's wrong with this country.