randyfensfanclub1
All American
Posts: 4,942
Joined: Sep 2008
Reputation: 45
I Root For: NIU
Location:
|
RE: Who starts at QB vs. Northwestern?
(08-21-2014 07:36 AM)NIU8484 Wrote: (08-20-2014 11:52 PM)randyfensfanclub1 Wrote: Something just tells me there is a lack of confidence in McIntosh. Perhaps also not to shatter confidence of Hare.
You play MM, no questions, you are in a sense dedicated more to him being an upperclassman. He doesn't get the job done, it would be hard to ever have him come back again, namely if he sits. Not sure what you would get for next year. You start MM however, I believe they will also work in Hare from time to time. Seeing that he saw time last year, he would probably think he deserved time.
You start Hare, you will go to MM should he fail. No doubt. There would be a shorter leash than MM, especially if they are losing. But not sure if you make packages for him.
I don't see Maddie starting over 2 guys w/ experience. I think it also causes a little dissention. If Hare feels he has become 3, especially if MM gets packages backing Maddie, I don't think he is sticking around. Maddie I think would stick if he didn't play.
I think it's a lot more complicated than people think. This is 2 year planning. Sure, it's win now, go with your best shot, but I don't think that is an issue. My guess isn't much difference in talent. I think it's a spark the team factor as well as create something to build upon. But also as seen before in a guy like Grady, while different circumstances, his stock fell from 1 to basically 3 in a hurry. One final thought may be who recruited them and where they are from. McIntosh is an Evansville guy. Don't think NIU recruits much there. Hare is a Stl guy, more recent recruit. NIU has hit the area before and may continue. Maddie is the transfer, but local kid. Would starting a transfer be negative? Likely outweighed by local kid factor though.
We shall see, but I think it's MM with Hare right there, getting the opportunity part time.
You did some good analysis, but mother of god I hope "where they were recruited from" has absolutely no impact on who takes the reigns as QB....just get me the best arm, vision, awareness, and agility and put the ball in that bastards hands!
Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App
I think it could, especially when a race seems to be close, as this does. May also make a race close. I am by no means saying it is right, is a major factor here. I think in other regions it is no doubt. Donors like to win, but when you win with "ousiders" it's worse. But I think it may be down the list, and I think it's part of "making everyone happy" and building a program. If you look at UI, they used to get much better players from Chicago. Simply saying "they suck" isn't an answer why it happened. They had started to go juco route, transfers, out of state. Basketball may be a better example for them.They did, they won, could not sustain. But look at their qb situation. They brought in the kid from OSU to start, while they have played Bailey parts of 2 years. You think kids want to go to a school where you pay your dues for 2 years only to have a 1st year guy take your job? Call it win now, which is what a program like IL and coach like Beckman needs to keep his job. Without micro analyzing every team, the Ohio State's, Michigan's, Texas, Penn State (pre-scandal) OK's, Florida, Nebraska's of the world didn't get where they are recruiting out of state, transfers. Yes, you need them sometimes, they fill holes. But right now, this State is becoming ripe for NIU to get 3 star players. As NIU to B12 on FB posted, NIU IS the most popular college team in and from Illinois!!!
|
|