(05-30-2014 01:12 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(05-30-2014 01:04 PM)AngryAphid Wrote:  I used to think the only difference between political ideologies is simply where we
draw the line on certain issues, but recently the left seems to have no such limitations.

I just want to know what the Liberals endgame is?

Equality.

Yeah, but you guys don’t want equal opportunity, you want equal results.

And apparently at any means necessary.

(05-30-2014 01:13 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(05-30-2014 12:14 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  I guarantee that when the tourist trade tapers off because normal people from other parts of Houston don't want to deal with this perversion they'll regret passing this stupid law. I hope it hurts Houston where it hurts them the most, the pocketbook.

When I make travel plans, public restroom accommodations rarely play a role in them.

I wonder, do the unisex facilities apply to city held property such as
ball parks, airports, fairgrounds and other municipal owned venues?

In fact, Council Member Mike Laster had just previously been allowed the same courtesy to be extended to move up four pro-GLBT speakers in the order to speak before eight members plus Mayor Parker voted against Boykin’s request. One of the black pastors called it the equivalent of being “sent to the back of the bus.” After the public snubbing of the two black pastors by council, the 150 plus pastors present walked out of the meeting in protest. Immediately after this the council allowed another pro-GLBT speaker to be moved up. Council Member Bradford was the member who voiced the objection to Boykins’ request and called for the vote. Standard protocol is usually to allow the courtesy by unanimous consent. (From the article on this law)


It seems that the Lefties only vouch for the black men when it suits their agenda. But in reality they are just as racists as those they say are. Lefties are RACISTS, should have been part of the story.

(05-30-2014 01:15 PM)AngryAphid Wrote:  

(05-30-2014 01:12 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(05-30-2014 01:04 PM)AngryAphid Wrote:  I used to think the only difference between political ideologies is simply where we
draw the line on certain issues, but recently the left seems to have no such limitations.

I just want to know what the Liberals endgame is?

Equality.

Yeah, but you guys don’t want equal opportunity, you want equal results.

And apparently at any means necessary.

First they need to comprehend the physical difference between a male and a female.

(05-30-2014 01:24 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  In fact, Council Member Mike Laster had just previously been allowed the same courtesy to be extended to move up four pro-GLBT speakers in the order to speak before eight members plus Mayor Parker voted against Boykin’s request. One of the black pastors called it the equivalent of being “sent to the back of the bus.” After the public snubbing of the two black pastors by council, the 150 plus pastors present walked out of the meeting in protest. Immediately after this the council allowed another pro-GLBT speaker to be moved up. Council Member Bradford was the member who voiced the objection to Boykins’ request and called for the vote. Standard protocol is usually to allow the courtesy by unanimous consent. (From the article on this law)


It seems that the Lefties only vouch for the black men when it suits their agenda. But in reality they are just as racists as those they say are. Lefties are RACISTS, should have been part of the story.

The left is extremely racist. But they know they can get away with it.

This is more Gay Agenda stuff. Forcing everyone to accommodate their chosen lifestyle even where it is beyond the bounds of societal norms. A Time Magazine article warned the Tranny train is coming.

I think Gaystapo next move is to get all churches that teach Biblical truth (Homosexuality is a sin) declared as hate groups to get their tax exempt status removed. The Gay Mafia is already hitting businesses that don't conform to what their moral standard is.

People are idiots for succumbing to these tactics. PC has gone too far.

(05-30-2014 01:24 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  In fact, Council Member Mike Laster had just previously been allowed the same courtesy to be extended to move up four pro-GLBT speakers in the order to speak before eight members plus Mayor Parker voted against Boykin’s request. One of the black pastors called it the equivalent of being “sent to the back of the bus.” After the public snubbing of the two black pastors by council, the 150 plus pastors present walked out of the meeting in protest. Immediately after this the council allowed another pro-GLBT speaker to be moved up. Council Member Bradford was the member who voiced the objection to Boykins’ request and called for the vote. Standard protocol is usually to allow the courtesy by unanimous consent. (From the article on this law)


It seems that the Lefties only vouch for the black men when it suits their agenda. But in reality they are just as racists as those they say are. Lefties are RACISTS, should have been part of the story.

The NAACP and every African American elected official in Houston other than Dwight Boykins supported this legislation. Mayor Parker, the parent of black children, is not a racist. Neither is Mike Laster.

350 speakers spoke in favor of the bill. 53 against. No one was prevented from speaking who signed up using the transparent process. The reason that there were so few opposing speakers is that the protesters outside aren't city residents.

(05-30-2014 05:53 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  People are idiots for succumbing to these tactics. PC has gone too far.

Welcome to social liberalism. Once you allow a little, it grows like a cancer. There is no balance with it.

(05-30-2014 05:48 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  This is more Gay Agenda stuff. Forcing everyone to accommodate their chosen lifestyle even where it is beyond the bounds of societal norms. A Time Magazine article warned the Tranny train is coming.

I think Gaystapo next move is to get all churches that teach Biblical truth (Homosexuality is a sin) declared as hate groups to get their tax exempt status removed. The Gay Mafia is already hitting businesses that don't conform to what their moral standard is.

I don't think Country Clubs, Polo Clubs, or Churches (Private Clubs) should enjoy tax free status. Neither should 401c3s

I defend their right to say whatever they wish, but they don't have a right to have the government provide a special benefit for that.

If Westboro/Tony Perkins/David Duke want to say all kinds of hateful things, they are welcome to do so. But they don't have a right to a tax deduction, nor do they get an exemption from criticisms from those exercising their freedoms as well.

Transgendered is the new Gay is the new Mexican is the new Black is the new Irish. There's always someone out there to demonize for some people.

(05-30-2014 06:14 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(05-30-2014 05:48 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  This is more Gay Agenda stuff. Forcing everyone to accommodate their chosen lifestyle even where it is beyond the bounds of societal norms. A Time Magazine article warned the Tranny train is coming.

I think Gaystapo next move is to get all churches that teach Biblical truth (Homosexuality is a sin) declared as hate groups to get their tax exempt status removed. The Gay Mafia is already hitting businesses that don't conform to what their moral standard is.

I don't think Country Clubs, Polo Clubs, or Churches (Private Clubs) should enjoy tax free status. Neither should 401c3s

I defend their right to say whatever they wish, but they don't have a right to have the government provide a special benefit for that.

Here's one conformation from a member of the gaystapo as to what the actual agenda is.

Will this be a crime?

(05-30-2014 07:49 AM)VA49er Wrote:  Can't wait for all the "peeping tom" and "hidden video camera" complaints/lawsuits that may come. Stupid decision by Houston mayor.

Transgendered individuals have had mandated bathroom rights for 30 years in some places. Problems....zero.

Why would Houston passing something that NYC, Boston, SF, Chicago, Fort Worth, Miami, Broward County, and many other places have already done, cause problems in Houston that have never appeared elsewhere?

(05-31-2014 09:27 AM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  Will this be a crime?

How long do you think it will take before some woman activist complains about urinals because women can't use them? And how long will it take after that for women to regret this when they find out that men tend to piss on toilet seats in public bathrooms?

What does the law actually say? I've heard everything from the end of the world to virtually no effect. I'm becoming less and less involved in Houston and quite frankly not missing it, so I don't really pay that much attention.

Annise is a friend, going back to her days as halfback for the Sharcs (although I don't think they were actually called the Sharcs until later). I'd like to believe she's not doing something as nutty as what I've seen alleged.

Ugh! Now the lines will be longer.

(05-31-2014 11:11 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  Ugh! Now the lines will be longer.

If you think about it only the women are getting screwed. A man can take a leak in every urinal/toilet that's available and woman can only use the toilets. The left's war on women continues.