(01-02-2014 03:09 PM)idroot4russia Wrote:  

(01-02-2014 03:07 PM)Stammers Wrote:  

(01-02-2014 10:45 AM)idroot4russia Wrote:  Is this the freshman pile-on thread?

If so, anyone ever notice Austin sets the weakest screen in D1 ball? He starts his roll to the basket before the defender even has a chance to be screened, it's like he is in a hurry to get out of the defender's way.

Tell us again why we should have recruited Nino Johnson instead of Demarcus Cousins. That was awesome.

Tell us again where Demarcus Cousins stands among our all time leading scorers and rebounders, I cant seem to find him listed in any of our archives.

You fell asleep a few years ago and just woke up now. You're dizzy; you're confused. We get it.

(01-02-2014 03:05 PM)Stammers Wrote:  

(01-02-2014 11:53 AM)Brother Bluto Wrote:  

(01-02-2014 10:45 AM)idroot4russia Wrote:  Is this the freshman pile-on thread?

If so, anyone ever notice Austin sets the weakest screen in D1 ball? He starts his roll to the basket before the defender even has a chance to be screened, it's like he is in a hurry to get out of the defender's way.

The ironic thing is if ANYONE else had started this thread, the OP would be calling that person stupid, a moron, a troll and an alias. It's amazing how some people are given more rope than others.



#freesaluki

It's amazing how 5 people with 15 aliases are allowed to try and wreck the board. You didn't even have the brains to cover up your alias by thinking of anything original for him to say...just like every single post you make on this board.

- snicker
- #freeoneofmymoronfriends
- so now we like so and so
- so now we hate so and so
- doe
- smh

Amazing how someone can go months without saying anything insightful, intelligent or worthwhile.

Why should that amaze you? You've been doing it for years..

.

(01-02-2014 03:40 PM)Stammers Wrote:  

(01-02-2014 03:09 PM)idroot4russia Wrote:  

(01-02-2014 03:07 PM)Stammers Wrote:  

(01-02-2014 10:45 AM)idroot4russia Wrote:  Is this the freshman pile-on thread?

If so, anyone ever notice Austin sets the weakest screen in D1 ball? He starts his roll to the basket before the defender even has a chance to be screened, it's like he is in a hurry to get out of the defender's way.

Tell us again why we should have recruited Nino Johnson instead of Demarcus Cousins. That was awesome.

Tell us again where Demarcus Cousins stands among our all time leading scorers and rebounders, I cant seem to find him listed in any of our archives.

You fell asleep a few years ago and just woke up now. You're dizzy; you're confused. We get it.

what do you guys say?

#snicker

(01-02-2014 11:53 AM)Brother Bluto Wrote:  

(01-02-2014 10:45 AM)idroot4russia Wrote:  Is this the freshman pile-on thread?

If so, anyone ever notice Austin sets the weakest screen in D1 ball? He starts his roll to the basket before the defender even has a chance to be screened, it's like he is in a hurry to get out of the defender's way.

The ironic thing is if ANYONE else had started this thread, the OP would be calling that person stupid, a moron, a troll and an alias. It's amazing how some people are given more rope than others.



#freesaluki

I believe that's called a double standard. Not sure when it became a bannable offense to disagree with the mainstream.

I agree, #freesaluki

Someone, please foul this thread away for future use.

(01-02-2014 10:13 AM)Brother Bluto Wrote:  

(01-01-2014 08:46 PM)TigersRuleAll Wrote:  

(01-01-2014 04:27 PM)Brother Bluto Wrote:  This thread is a perfect example of our miserable defeatist self loathing fan base.





#believeindatrueth

Your act is beyond old.

Opinions vary there Chico. Tom Bowen, Tyler Marriucci and Ryan Alpert seem to love my act, especially at donation time.

If you took a survey of all AD's, they would unanimously agree that the most distasteful part of job, is dealing with idiotic boosters; so take that for what it's worth.

(01-02-2014 10:15 PM)callemasIsee-em Wrote:  

(01-02-2014 03:05 PM)Stammers Wrote:  

(01-02-2014 11:53 AM)Brother Bluto Wrote:  

(01-02-2014 10:45 AM)idroot4russia Wrote:  Is this the freshman pile-on thread?

If so, anyone ever notice Austin sets the weakest screen in D1 ball? He starts his roll to the basket before the defender even has a chance to be screened, it's like he is in a hurry to get out of the defender's way.

The ironic thing is if ANYONE else had started this thread, the OP would be calling that person stupid, a moron, a troll and an alias. It's amazing how some people are given more rope than others.



#freesaluki

It's amazing how 5 people with 15 aliases are allowed to try and wreck the board. You didn't even have the brains to cover up your alias by thinking of anything original for him to say...just like every single post you make on this board.

- snicker
- #freeoneofmymoronfriends
- so now we like so and so
- so now we hate so and so
- doe
- smh

Amazing how someone can go months without saying anything insightful, intelligent or worthwhile.

Why should that amaze you? You've been doing it for years..

.

On cue. I'm sure someone will let you know if you say anything of any value. It sure hasn't happened yet.

(12-31-2013 11:57 PM)Stammers Wrote:  

(12-31-2013 11:54 PM)ItsDude Wrote:  

(12-31-2013 11:52 PM)Stammers Wrote:  He isn't a team player, doesn't hustle enough and doesn't have a clue how to play D1 basketball. When he has the ball he is singularly focused on scoring and has a complete disregard for all of his teammates. He will grudgingly pass the ball only when he is sure that he can't score and he will almost always pass the ball to a teammate without thinking about the pass putting a teammate in a position to score the ball.

Having said that; he has a ton of talent. When he figures it out, he is going to be a terrific player for us. I have no idea when that will be.

Worst post of 2013.....so many wrongs in that post....at least you were positive in the end?

I thought it was observant and positive overall.

Accuracy goes far



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

(01-02-2014 10:32 PM)AndyAnderson Wrote:  

(01-02-2014 03:40 PM)Stammers Wrote:  

(01-02-2014 03:09 PM)idroot4russia Wrote:  

(01-02-2014 03:07 PM)Stammers Wrote:  

(01-02-2014 10:45 AM)idroot4russia Wrote:  Is this the freshman pile-on thread?

If so, anyone ever notice Austin sets the weakest screen in D1 ball? He starts his roll to the basket before the defender even has a chance to be screened, it's like he is in a hurry to get out of the defender's way.

Tell us again why we should have recruited Nino Johnson instead of Demarcus Cousins. That was awesome.

Tell us again where Demarcus Cousins stands among our all time leading scorers and rebounders, I cant seem to find him listed in any of our archives.

You fell asleep a few years ago and just woke up now. You're dizzy; you're confused. We get it.

what do you guys say?

#snicker

No idea what this ID did to get banned. He's exactly the same as 20 other IDs being used by a dozen losers.

(01-02-2014 11:15 AM)eastcoastDave Wrote:  Iverson will be fine. Not many teams in American, Africa or Asia have 6 ft 10 inch guards. For him, problem is that the Tigers don't need to rely on him. Pastner was probably straight up with Iverson when he recruited him: "You'll be playing behind 4 senior guards, plus we have two forwards who will start ahead of you." He came anyway, and I'm glad he did. He needs to develop, get stronger and work on his shot. But, man, he's got a ton of potential.

I don't understand the referencs that imply he has great handles. Perhaps good for a 6 10 guy but for a guard they just aren't good. Finally, keep in mind that when most posters (like me) say he isn't this or that they aren't bashing him or implying he cannot be good. The way I interpret the comments he just isn't where he needs to be at this time to get significant minutes. Maybe everything will 'click' tomorrow or the next week. If and when it does I hope posters won't start junk about the haters, etc. (gets old ). what we do know now is that he isn't a complete player at this time.

(01-03-2014 11:39 PM)murphster Wrote:  

(01-02-2014 11:15 AM)eastcoastDave Wrote:  Iverson will be fine. Not many teams in American, Africa or Asia have 6 ft 10 inch guards. For him, problem is that the Tigers don't need to rely on him. Pastner was probably straight up with Iverson when he recruited him: "You'll be playing behind 4 senior guards, plus we have two forwards who will start ahead of you." He came anyway, and I'm glad he did. He needs to develop, get stronger and work on his shot. But, man, he's got a ton of potential.

I don't understand the referencs that imply he has great handles. Perhaps good for a 6 10 guy but for a guard they just aren't good. Finally, keep in mind that when most posters (like me) say he isn't this or that they aren't bashing him or implying he cannot be good. The way I interpret the comments he just isn't where he needs to be at this time to get significant minutes. Maybe everything will 'click' tomorrow or the next week. If and when it does I hope posters won't start junk about the haters, etc. (gets old ). what we do know now is that he isn't a complete player at this time.

The day he comes out with about 12 pts, 5 rbs, and 3 assists is going to be interesting...seems those numbers might be easy for him when Josh is able to give him enough minutes....it might be next year though?

(01-03-2014 11:39 PM)murphster Wrote:  

(01-02-2014 11:15 AM)eastcoastDave Wrote:  Iverson will be fine. Not many teams in American, Africa or Asia have 6 ft 10 inch guards. For him, problem is that the Tigers don't need to rely on him. Pastner was probably straight up with Iverson when he recruited him: "You'll be playing behind 4 senior guards, plus we have two forwards who will start ahead of you." He came anyway, and I'm glad he did. He needs to develop, get stronger and work on his shot. But, man, he's got a ton of potential.

I don't understand the referencs that imply he has great handles. Perhaps good for a 6 10 guy but for a guard they just aren't good. Finally, keep in mind that when most posters (like me) say he isn't this or that they aren't bashing him or implying he cannot be good. The way I interpret the comments he just isn't where he needs to be at this time to get significant minutes. Maybe everything will 'click' tomorrow or the next week. If and when it does I hope posters won't start junk about the haters, etc. (gets old ). what we do know now is that he isn't a complete player at this time.

Good post.

(01-01-2014 06:19 PM)Stammers Wrote:  Time for this site to require a mandatory contribution of $20. That way whenever losers like Saluki, you,Jake Show, Hoopdreams, Bluebeard, etc decide to throw out a new alias; you need to ask your boyfriends/mothers for their credit card and explain that you need it to create multiple identities on a message board.

(12-27-2013 11:47 AM)Stammers Wrote:  I'm not an idiot.

(01-01-2014 07:10 PM)Stammers Wrote:  How many do you have besides Jake Show?

(12-27-2013 11:47 AM)Stammers Wrote:  I'm not an idiot.

(01-01-2014 10:58 PM)Stammers Wrote:  Him and all his idiot alias using buddies. There was a perfect place for them. It was called YMT. I wish they would bring it back.

(12-27-2013 11:47 AM)Stammers Wrote:  I'm not an idiot.

(12-31-2013 11:52 PM)Stammers Wrote:  He isn't a team player, doesn't hustle enough and doesn't have a clue how to play D1 basketball. When he has the ball he is singularly focused on scoring and has a complete disregard for all of his teammates. He will grudgingly pass the ball only when he is sure that he can't score and he will almost always pass the ball to a teammate without thinking about the pass putting a teammate in a position to score the ball.

Having said that; he has a ton of talent. When he figures it out, he is going to be a terrific player for us. I have no idea when that will be.

(12-27-2013 11:47 AM)Stammers Wrote:  I'm not an idiot.

oh snap

All this talk about "aliases" is really annoying. I have no clue, nor any interest in, whether or not Poster A has other user IDs that they use on the board. But some people are really obsessed by it.

And then they throw out blanket accusations and act like they know for sure that so and so is actually some other guy, when in actuality, they are completely speculating and have no proof whatsoever.

Just trying to understand why people care. Maybe someone can elighten me.

(01-04-2014 08:37 AM)NigelTufnel Wrote:  All this talk about "aliases" is really annoying. I have no clue, nor any interest in, whether or not Poster A has other user IDs that they use on the board. But some people are really obsessed by it.

And then they throw out blanket accusations and act like they know for sure that so and so is actually some other guy, when in actuality, they are completely speculating and have no proof whatsoever.

Just trying to understand why people care. Maybe someone can elighten me.

It's sort of like the "agenda" talk. A way to disregard someone without having to really address the message.

(01-04-2014 08:37 AM)NigelTufnel Wrote:  All this talk about "aliases" is really annoying. I have no clue, nor any interest in, whether or not Poster A has other user IDs that they use on the board. But some people are really obsessed by it.

And then they throw out blanket accusations and act like they know for sure that so and so is actually some other guy, when in actuality, they are completely speculating and have no proof whatsoever.

Just trying to understand why people care. Maybe someone can elighten me.

Just sometimes frustrating for some of us that have been here for 14+ years (before the alias thing). When YMT was shut down and some of those little wingerwanger guys were pizzed and/or bored, they came here under all different aliases just to rile folks up or stalk or just feed their insatiable egos. Some of those same "fans" became haters of other tiger fans and didn't care what they said or how they said it to cause trouble here. Many have been banned off and on but always come back under different screen names. It's funny that some actually think they are getting away with fooling us here. It normally doesn't take very long to figure out who they are. Personally, I don't care how many folks have aliases or how many aliases they have here, it's actually sad that they feel the need to do that to begin with, but to each their own. I guess all of us here have our own craziness in one way or another. Too bad we can't just all get along. Years ago, this place was actually an informative fun place to be. Most of the oldtimers are long gone to private message boards or rarely post and that's a shame. The alias thing does get old.