(04-20-2014 04:01 PM)David Krysakowski Wrote:  How about this 9 schools for football and 12 for basketball? How about adding a non football playing school to the eastern division? Would you consider adding Florida Gulf Coast or North Florida?

First time I saw this suggestion; it's actually a pretty good idea. Eight-game round-robin FB schedule, better travel for Olympic sports. I could support this (especially if NMSU never moves all sports to the SBC).

Football:

Appalachian State
Arkansas State
Georgia Southern
Georgia State
Louisiana-Lafayette
Louisiana-Monroe
South Alabama
Texas State
Troy

Basketball:

Eastern Division
Appalachian State
Georgia Southern
Georgia State
Jacksonville?
South Alabama
Troy

Western Division
Arkansas-Little Rock
Arkansas State
Louisiana-Lafayette
Louisiana-Monroe
Texas-Arlington
Texas State

9 football teams is really good in the fact of being able to play 4 home and 4 away games.
No questions then because of teams not being able to play each other in conference.

(06-14-2014 02:09 PM)GoApps70 Wrote:  9 football teams is really good in the fact of being able to play 4 home and 4 away games.
No questions then because of teams not being able to play each other in conference.

Just using this thread to get a Liberty thread off the front page. Sorry for the interruption.

Still carrying that much angst about us? Let it go, bro.

(07-22-2014 10:42 AM)SlyFox Wrote:  Still carrying that much angst about us? Let it go, bro.

No angst at all. Just old news. I would have done the same for UMASS.

(01-13-2014 12:49 AM)Check Yosef Wrote:  

(01-12-2014 04:50 AM)David Krysakowski Wrote:  I think UAB deserves a demotion from Conference USA and join the Sun Belt, but that's not going to happen.

^
Troll.
Coosa is a demotion from sun belt in FB at this point. Sorry you haven't figured that our yet.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Right because .141 (2-14) vs. P5 > .181 (4-22)???

Or is it because 2-0 (2 total) in bowl games > than 3-3 (6 total)?

Oh wait.. It must be your advantage in head to head play.. Well... congratulations on beating Tulane twice, UAB, and USM...

(07-29-2014 12:51 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(01-13-2014 12:49 AM)Check Yosef Wrote:  

(01-12-2014 04:50 AM)David Krysakowski Wrote:  I think UAB deserves a demotion from Conference USA and join the Sun Belt, but that's not going to happen.

^
Troll.
Coosa is a demotion from sun belt in FB at this point. Sorry you haven't figured that our yet.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Right because .141 (2-14) vs. P5 > .181 (4-22)???

Or is it because 2-0 (2 total) in bowl games > than 3-3 (6 total)?

Oh wait.. It must be your advantage in head to head play.. Well... congratulations on beating Tulane twice, UAB, and USM...

Current SBC is 42-28 against current CUSA teams in the past 4 years.

(07-29-2014 12:56 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(07-29-2014 12:51 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(01-13-2014 12:49 AM)Check Yosef Wrote:  

(01-12-2014 04:50 AM)David Krysakowski Wrote:  I think UAB deserves a demotion from Conference USA and join the Sun Belt, but that's not going to happen.

^
Troll.
Coosa is a demotion from sun belt in FB at this point. Sorry you haven't figured that our yet.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Right because .141 (2-14) vs. P5 > .181 (4-22)???

Or is it because 2-0 (2 total) in bowl games > than 3-3 (6 total)?

Oh wait.. It must be your advantage in head to head play.. Well... congratulations on beating Tulane twice, UAB, and USM...

Current SBC is 42-28 against current CUSA teams in the past 4 years.

And I would venture to say without looking it up that many of them are against the cellar dwellers. How many of those 42 had winning records?

(07-29-2014 03:06 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(07-29-2014 12:56 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(07-29-2014 12:51 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(01-13-2014 12:49 AM)Check Yosef Wrote:  

(01-12-2014 04:50 AM)David Krysakowski Wrote:  I think UAB deserves a demotion from Conference USA and join the Sun Belt, but that's not going to happen.

^
Troll.
Coosa is a demotion from sun belt in FB at this point. Sorry you haven't figured that our yet.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Right because .141 (2-14) vs. P5 > .181 (4-22)???

Or is it because 2-0 (2 total) in bowl games > than 3-3 (6 total)?

Oh wait.. It must be your advantage in head to head play.. Well... congratulations on beating Tulane twice, UAB, and USM...

Current SBC is 42-28 against current CUSA teams in the past 4 years.

And I would venture to say without looking it up that many of them are against the cellar dwellers. How many of those 42 had winning records?

You forgot to look at the fact the sun belt mostly faces the SEC when you mentioned records vs P5 >.>

(07-29-2014 03:06 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(07-29-2014 12:56 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(07-29-2014 12:51 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(01-13-2014 12:49 AM)Check Yosef Wrote:  

(01-12-2014 04:50 AM)David Krysakowski Wrote:  I think UAB deserves a demotion from Conference USA and join the Sun Belt, but that's not going to happen.

^
Troll.
Coosa is a demotion from sun belt in FB at this point. Sorry you haven't figured that our yet.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Right because .141 (2-14) vs. P5 > .181 (4-22)???

Or is it because 2-0 (2 total) in bowl games > than 3-3 (6 total)?

Oh wait.. It must be your advantage in head to head play.. Well... congratulations on beating Tulane twice, UAB, and USM...

Current SBC is 42-28 against current CUSA teams in the past 4 years.

And I would venture to say without looking it up that many of them are against the cellar dwellers. How many of those 42 had winning records?

MTSU in 2012
WKU in 2011, 2012, and 2013
FIU in 2011

(07-29-2014 07:41 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(07-29-2014 03:06 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(07-29-2014 12:56 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(07-29-2014 12:51 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(01-13-2014 12:49 AM)Check Yosef Wrote:  ^
Troll.
Coosa is a demotion from sun belt in FB at this point. Sorry you haven't figured that our yet.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Right because .141 (2-14) vs. P5 > .181 (4-22)???

Or is it because 2-0 (2 total) in bowl games > than 3-3 (6 total)?

Oh wait.. It must be your advantage in head to head play.. Well... congratulations on beating Tulane twice, UAB, and USM...

Current SBC is 42-28 against current CUSA teams in the past 4 years.

And I would venture to say without looking it up that many of them are against the cellar dwellers. How many of those 42 had winning records?

MTSU in 2012
WKU in 2011, 2012, and 2013
FIU in 2011

All of which were in the sun belt at those times save FIU in 2013... So your answer is... 1...Just saying

(07-30-2014 02:47 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(07-29-2014 07:41 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(07-29-2014 03:06 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(07-29-2014 12:56 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(07-29-2014 12:51 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  Right because .141 (2-14) vs. P5 > .181 (4-22)???

Or is it because 2-0 (2 total) in bowl games > than 3-3 (6 total)?

Oh wait.. It must be your advantage in head to head play.. Well... congratulations on beating Tulane twice, UAB, and USM...

Current SBC is 42-28 against current CUSA teams in the past 4 years.

And I would venture to say without looking it up that many of them are against the cellar dwellers. How many of those 42 had winning records?

MTSU in 2012
WKU in 2011, 2012, and 2013
FIU in 2011

All of which were in the sun belt at those times save FIU in 2013... So your answer is... 1...Just saying

Doesn't matter where they were... That's recent history. Just because their conference name changed doesn't mean they magically got better friend.

(07-30-2014 02:47 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(07-29-2014 07:41 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(07-29-2014 03:06 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(07-29-2014 12:56 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(07-29-2014 12:51 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  Right because .141 (2-14) vs. P5 > .181 (4-22)???

Or is it because 2-0 (2 total) in bowl games > than 3-3 (6 total)?

Oh wait.. It must be your advantage in head to head play.. Well... congratulations on beating Tulane twice, UAB, and USM...

Current SBC is 42-28 against current CUSA teams in the past 4 years.

And I would venture to say without looking it up that many of them are against the cellar dwellers. How many of those 42 had winning records?

MTSU in 2012
WKU in 2011, 2012, and 2013
FIU in 2011

All of which were in the sun belt at those times save FIU in 2013... So your answer is... 1...Just saying

So...what you're saying is that MTSU, WKU, and FIU are not real CUSA teams, and we should be able to count them as part of our record against current CUSA?

(07-22-2014 10:42 AM)SlyFox Wrote:  Still carrying that much angst about us? Let it go, bro.

Playing stAte, with both teams @ the FBS level, could be a lot of fun!

(07-30-2014 10:31 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(07-30-2014 02:47 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(07-29-2014 07:41 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(07-29-2014 03:06 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(07-29-2014 12:56 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  Current SBC is 42-28 against current CUSA teams in the past 4 years.

And I would venture to say without looking it up that many of them are against the cellar dwellers. How many of those 42 had winning records?

MTSU in 2012
WKU in 2011, 2012, and 2013
FIU in 2011

All of which were in the sun belt at those times save FIU in 2013... So your answer is... 1...Just saying

So...what you're saying is that MTSU, WKU, and FIU are not real CUSA teams, and we should be able to count them as part of our record against current CUSA?

It is debatable if FIU is a real program so he's got you there.

(07-31-2014 08:55 AM)Saint3333 Wrote:  

(07-30-2014 10:31 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(07-30-2014 02:47 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(07-29-2014 07:41 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(07-29-2014 03:06 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  And I would venture to say without looking it up that many of them are against the cellar dwellers. How many of those 42 had winning records?

MTSU in 2012
WKU in 2011, 2012, and 2013
FIU in 2011

All of which were in the sun belt at those times save FIU in 2013... So your answer is... 1...Just saying

So...what you're saying is that MTSU, WKU, and FIU are not real CUSA teams, and we should be able to count them as part of our record against current CUSA?

It is debatable if FIU is a real program so he's got you there.

And your opinion really doesn't matter coming from a fan of a school that has yet to play a down of FBS football, let alone a season...

And no, what I was saying is that you were using the CUSA vs. Sunbelt over the PAST FOUR YEARS. Only ONE of those schools was in CUSA... I get what you're trying to say...

What I am saying that you can crow on and on about how much better your conference is, and I will respectfully disagree. I think the gap has narrowed, but the reality is that you are not better against the P5 and still only sent two teams bowling whereas we sent 5...And you had teams passed over (Yeah, I know the WKU thing).

And, even though they are only predictions... 7 bowls vs 3...plus an access bowl bid. Again...only predictions, but that is the perception. We will soon see what the reality truly is

I love when people claim an opinion doesn't matter, what a joke. It's football, not quantum physics, FIU as a program isn't good. They are yet another program stinking up your weak schedule.

History lesson time, App has played 8 seasons at the highest level. The last time we played at the highest level we beat Marshall four our of the five times we played.

Time to renew the rivalry that we OWN.

(07-31-2014 12:33 PM)Saint3333 Wrote:  I love when people claim an opinion doesn't matter, what a joke. It's football, not quantum physics, FIU as a program isn't good. They are yet another program stinking up your weak schedule.

History lesson time, App has played 8 seasons at the highest level. The last time we played at the highest level we beat Marshall four our of the five times we played.

Time to renew the rivalry that we OWN.

Right...because that mattered so much way back in the 70's... Means NOTHING in modern era football... Columbia used to be a powerhouse too... Apples to oranges Pal...Since we're talking history...How have you fared against us lately? Last couple of times that anything really even mattered, you got handled...

But you're right, I was out of line stating that your opinion didn't matter...it does, my apologies... IMHO I think you all are doing a lot of chest thumping without really accomplishing anything in recent memory.

I think you and our other former SoCon counterparts are going to be in for a surprise...but good luck just the same. And about owning us..

(07-31-2014 10:38 AM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(07-31-2014 08:55 AM)Saint3333 Wrote:  

(07-30-2014 10:31 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(07-30-2014 02:47 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(07-29-2014 07:41 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  MTSU in 2012
WKU in 2011, 2012, and 2013
FIU in 2011

All of which were in the sun belt at those times save FIU in 2013... So your answer is... 1...Just saying

So...what you're saying is that MTSU, WKU, and FIU are not real CUSA teams, and we should be able to count them as part of our record against current CUSA?

It is debatable if FIU is a real program so he's got you there.

And your opinion really doesn't matter coming from a fan of a school that has yet to play a down of FBS football, let alone a season...

And no, what I was saying is that you were using the CUSA vs. Sunbelt over the PAST FOUR YEARS. Only ONE of those schools was in CUSA... I get what you're trying to say...

What I am saying that you can crow on and on about how much better your conference is, and I will respectfully disagree. I think the gap has narrowed, but the reality is that you are not better against the P5 and still only sent two teams bowling whereas we sent 5...And you had teams passed over (Yeah, I know the WKU thing).

And, even though they are only predictions... 7 bowls vs 3...plus an access bowl bid. Again...only predictions, but that is the perception. We will soon see what the reality truly is

When CUSA doesn't get 7 eligible teams this year, SBC teams will be the ones filling those slots.

And Access bowl bid? We share the same equal chance for that one.