(10-13-2013 12:00 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  Any win is better than a loss...ANY but USA has another good win also. Tulane is 5-2

But if we must compare scores then we must...

Navy beat IU @Indiana and DESTROYED them on the ground with 444 rushing yards. The same Indiana that almost doubled up the score (44-24) on the Penn St team that just beat Mich....

see how that works?

....you do realize you started the score comparing thing...Really...just wow. You made my brain hurt.

national rankings:

total offense
western 29
cajuns 35

total defense
western 30
cajuns 55
troy 115

rushing offense
western 27
cajuns 24

rushing defense
western 74
cajuns 73

passing offense
western 46
cajuns 63

passing defense
western 17
cajuns 51

source: stats for days

looks like setup for hella game.

There's worse defensive teams than Troy (crybaby) freaking st....

didn't think it was possible

(10-13-2013 12:16 PM)dahbeed Wrote:  national rankings:

total defense
western 30
cajuns 55
troy 115

(10-13-2013 12:28 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  There's worse defensive teams than Troy (crybaby) freaking st....

didn't think it was possible

Troy Fans: Know that if you ever disagree or share an opposing opinion of a WKU fan, a few sensitive butthurt WKU fans will get offended an act accordingly.

Have a nice day guys! :)

(10-13-2013 11:44 AM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 11:18 AM)TroyFootball05 Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 11:09 AM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 10:56 AM)TroyFootball05 Wrote:  Louisiana 42
Western Kentucky 21

The Cajuns seem a little more solid so far. Both teams have played poorly at times, but maybe the Cajuns have done less of that. My prediction is not based on any kind of "perceived" hatred of WKU. I know its coming so can you guys hold on to that jealously card for one more post? Louisiana, in my opinion is simply the better team at this juncture.

One question when did this "solid play" for ULL happen?

was it against the worse team in the SEC, Arkansas?
was it against the K-State team that only has one other win 1-5 Massachusetts?
Must have been against the FCS Nicholls
I got it it was the 30-35 score against the 1-5 Akron team that impressed you
ULL did look solid beating TXST....other than that when?

No jealously card just a honest question

Western has no quality wins. Scheduling is part of that. You could make an argument for Kentucky and ULM, but Kentucky is terrible, and you beat a Browning-less ULM who hasn't been good offensively even with Browning this year.

Louisiana, much of the same story, but their win over Texas State was impressive. A solid win. That's why they are "a little more solid" at this juncture. Not by much.

I'm not ready to dismiss the uk win as "not solid" just yet. Yes they are 1-5 but it's not like they played cupcakes and loss nor have they just flat out got stomped other than Bama.

5 losses
WKU
#7 UL by 14
#20 Florida by 17
#13 South Carolina by 7
#1 Bama by 35

Now lets look at Ark
loss to Rutgers by 4
loss to #10 by 12
loss to #20 by 20
loss to #13 by 45

So by anyone's definition
beating a SEC school by 9 and losing to a SEC that dominated the game from the get go and that team played worse or just as bad so far this season...

the more solid playing team would be the one that won..would you not agree?

We both beat the dog crap out of our FCS opponent...both solid

So that leaves us with Akron and TXST for ULL and ULM and Navy for Western.

I'm sorry but in no one's world outside of this board is a win over a school playing it's first full year in the SBC a more solid win than beating and holding a Navy team by 12 and 107 yards on the ground. There's a reason Navy isn't playing well right now...WKU knocked their QB out.

So that leaves us with Akron vs ULM a game ULL was losing mid way through the 4th quarter and a game where we shut out ULM in the 2nd half on their home field.

Yes WKU loss to USA on 2 fourth qt INT's but USA is a team who also took Troy to the very last play before giving up the win. Who also beat Tulane and took a SEC team to with in a TD..

So let get this correct you base your more solid on comparing beating TXST? Who loss at home to a team Western beat on the road.

OK got you

Like I said before WKU is not playing Arkansas and we are not playing Kentucky. The game will be won or loss on the field. The past schedules only count if we were both BCS busters which we are not. We have won the games we are suppose to win. WKU is good team one of the top in the conference so is the Cajuns. The main difference in this season is we have won the games we are suppose to and you didn't unforchantly for you it was a conference game. The better team on Tuesday night will win doesn't mean that team will win the conference until either team prove that they can beat ASU. Cajuns 27-21 no method to my prediction just a Cajun fan.

(10-13-2013 12:10 PM)Tuffguy21 Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 12:00 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  Any win is better than a loss...ANY but USA has another good win also. Tulane is 5-2

But if we must compare scores then we must...

Navy beat IU @Indiana and DESTROYED them on the ground with 444 rushing yards. The same Indiana that almost doubled up the score (44-24) on the Penn St team that just beat Mich....

see how that works?

....you do realize you started the score comparing thing...Really...just wow. You made my brain hurt.

Big difference..

my first comparison was to show who was worse :)

But with that most schools playing the uk and Ark schedule wouldn't have did much if any better. I hate uk (except when I want to make them look good..but I still hate them) but that is a KILLER schedule they played. Ark is just a little bit easier so far

(10-13-2013 12:31 PM)TroyFootball05 Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 12:16 PM)dahbeed Wrote:  national rankings:

total defense
western 30
cajuns 55
troy 115

(10-13-2013 12:28 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  There's worse defensive teams than Troy (crybaby) freaking st....

didn't think it was possible

Troy Fans: Know that if you ever disagree or share an opposing opinion of a WKU fan, a few sensitive butthurt WKU fans will get offended an act accordingly.

Have a nice day guys! :)

I know this isn't a Troy thread but what's wrong with Troy there only conference loss is to the defending SBC champions. It doesn't matter how you win as long as you do and Troy found away to win yesterday. UL or WKU or both may lose to ASU also this year. Troy also have a win over S. Alabama neither one of us can claim that until we get ours the last game of the season.

(10-13-2013 11:37 AM)dahbeed Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 11:17 AM)CajunExpress Wrote:  I am absolutely sure that when the WKU team load the box to kill the run, our receivers will destroy the Topper one on one. Look for several huge plays to number 15, 87, and 12. When the Toppers double the wide outs, and drop into a cover two look for Harris, and McGuire to run amuck.

When the WKU BEAST runs the ball, UL will have zero trouble one on one with the WKU receivers, so we load the box a little. We will not stop the WKU run game but we will control it.

both run defenses are identical statistically. your defense had trouble stopping andrews last year when you knew it was coming every play from taggart.

western has the number 17 pass defense in the country. cajuns are number 51 so it may come down to who has a better passing game.

Same can be said for WKU last year. Y'all knew Harris and Broadway was going to run the ball. Broadway had 145 and Harris around 110 on 10 carries.

WKU is no chopped liver, but neither are the Cajuns. If we play our best and WKU plays their best the Cajuns win. We are just more explosive and harder to defend when firing on all cylinders.

(10-13-2013 12:32 PM)UL ROTC Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 11:44 AM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 11:18 AM)TroyFootball05 Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 11:09 AM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 10:56 AM)TroyFootball05 Wrote:  Louisiana 42
Western Kentucky 21

The Cajuns seem a little more solid so far. Both teams have played poorly at times, but maybe the Cajuns have done less of that. My prediction is not based on any kind of "perceived" hatred of WKU. I know its coming so can you guys hold on to that jealously card for one more post? Louisiana, in my opinion is simply the better team at this juncture.

One question when did this "solid play" for ULL happen?

was it against the worse team in the SEC, Arkansas?
was it against the K-State team that only has one other win 1-5 Massachusetts?
Must have been against the FCS Nicholls
I got it it was the 30-35 score against the 1-5 Akron team that impressed you
ULL did look solid beating TXST....other than that when?

No jealously card just a honest question

Western has no quality wins. Scheduling is part of that. You could make an argument for Kentucky and ULM, but Kentucky is terrible, and you beat a Browning-less ULM who hasn't been good offensively even with Browning this year.

Louisiana, much of the same story, but their win over Texas State was impressive. A solid win. That's why they are "a little more solid" at this juncture. Not by much.

I'm not ready to dismiss the uk win as "not solid" just yet. Yes they are 1-5 but it's not like they played cupcakes and loss nor have they just flat out got stomped other than Bama.

5 losses
WKU
#7 UL by 14
#20 Florida by 17
#13 South Carolina by 7
#1 Bama by 35

Now lets look at Ark
loss to Rutgers by 4
loss to #10 by 12
loss to #20 by 20
loss to #13 by 45

So by anyone's definition
beating a SEC school by 9 and losing to a SEC that dominated the game from the get go and that team played worse or just as bad so far this season...

the more solid playing team would be the one that won..would you not agree?

We both beat the dog crap out of our FCS opponent...both solid

So that leaves us with Akron and TXST for ULL and ULM and Navy for Western.

I'm sorry but in no one's world outside of this board is a win over a school playing it's first full year in the SBC a more solid win than beating and holding a Navy team by 12 and 107 yards on the ground. There's a reason Navy isn't playing well right now...WKU knocked their QB out.

So that leaves us with Akron vs ULM a game ULL was losing mid way through the 4th quarter and a game where we shut out ULM in the 2nd half on their home field.

Yes WKU loss to USA on 2 fourth qt INT's but USA is a team who also took Troy to the very last play before giving up the win. Who also beat Tulane and took a SEC team to with in a TD..

So let get this correct you base your more solid on comparing beating TXST? Who loss at home to a team Western beat on the road.

OK got you

Like I said before WKU is not playing Arkansas and we are not playing Kentucky. The game will be won or loss on the field. The past schedules only count if we were both BCS busters which we are not. We have won the games we are suppose to win. WKU is good team one of the top in the conference so is the Cajuns. The main difference in this season is we have won the games we are suppose to and you didn't unforchantly for you it was a conference game. The better team on Tuesday night will win doesn't mean that team will win the conference until either team prove that they can beat ASU. Cajuns 27-21 no method to my prediction just a Cajun fan.

Who playing who this week was not the point...

I wanted to find out why he thought ULL played more solid so far this season.

My pick of 14 point win is based more on odds. Not Vegas odds but the more likelihood that if ULL loses it will be by more than a TD.

Since I think WKU wins and more than 50% of the time ULL loses it's not a close lose...14 points

(10-13-2013 12:39 PM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 11:37 AM)dahbeed Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 11:17 AM)CajunExpress Wrote:  I am absolutely sure that when the WKU team load the box to kill the run, our receivers will destroy the Topper one on one. Look for several huge plays to number 15, 87, and 12. When the Toppers double the wide outs, and drop into a cover two look for Harris, and McGuire to run amuck.

When the WKU BEAST runs the ball, UL will have zero trouble one on one with the WKU receivers, so we load the box a little. We will not stop the WKU run game but we will control it.

both run defenses are identical statistically. your defense had trouble stopping andrews last year when you knew it was coming every play from taggart.

western has the number 17 pass defense in the country. cajuns are number 51 so it may come down to who has a better passing game.

Same can be said for WKU last year. Y'all knew Harris and Broadway was going to run the ball. Broadway had 145 and Harris around 110 on 10 carries.

WKU is no chopped liver, but neither are the Cajuns. If we play our best and WKU plays their best the Cajuns win. We are just more explosive and harder to defend when firing on all cylinders.

the statistics don't bear out you being more explosive.

i posted them above. you may have overlooked that post.

YOUR boy is the one stating ZERO trouble....not me. i was just contesting his statements with facts.....not feelings....or imaginary explosive style points.

(10-13-2013 11:44 AM)Franko Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 09:50 AM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 09:34 AM)Rik Flair Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 09:17 AM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 08:36 AM)zeebart21 Wrote:  Our guys (UL) can respond here if you so choose. ULL is not who we are.

Z

Haters Zee, don't you know we will get killed by that vastly superior team we are gonna face on Tuesday? Lord knows the the WKU RBs are getting the Tony Mitchell hype. There is no doubt this will be a war, and we may not come out on top, but we will not be overmatched by the menstral clots.

Fine, I'll play along. Just copied and pasted my comment from the other thread. Please notice I called you UL. I don't think people are intentionally slighting you, it just takes a while to get used to dropping an L. Also, I have thought about it and it would be better for stAte if you lost. If we ever want to get to the NOLA bowl, we can't be tied with you in conference. Also hoping that WKU gets "Bensoned" if we have a lot of teams bowl eligible.


Can't wait to watch this battle. I would give WKU the edge just because they are the home team. WKU win over ULM on the road is the best win between the two teams. I don't know which would be better for stAte. We play UL next week so would it be better them coming in confident after a win or a little nervous after a loss.

WKU 38 - UL - 31

Actually out of all of the teams in the Belt, Texas St and y'all are the two programs who have been respectful towards the Cajuns and I know I have a ton of respect for stAte.

With all of that being said, WKU is not God's gift to the Sun Belt. My position by position breakdown was accurate and got destroyed because I stated that WKU has flaws and Allen is not as good as Harris or McGuire. Hell I'm not sure Andrews is better than Harris, he has double the carries but nearly identical stats.

Defensively WKU is better at the LB and FS/SS positions, that's it. With WKU being at home it will be a hell of a game and the Cajuns will have to play very well like they did last week to win, but this is no gimme game for WKU like some toppers fans think.

.
If Harris is as good as Andrews why doesn't Hudspeth utilize him like Petrino uses Andrews? Andrews is currently 2nd in the nation in rushing yards while Harris is 127th. Also Andrews is 1st in the nation in all purpose yards and Harris is 249th. I mean stats don't always tell the whole story but I think the assertion is way off base.
The Cajuns have the advantage at receiver position but everywhere else is either even or the Toppers have the edge. Should be another great game though and I think the Toppers win unless we have problems with Broadway making big plays on 3rd down then the Cajuns could very well come out with the W.

If Harris had the same number of carries he would have 743 yds, not too bad if you ask me. If Elijah MCGuire had the same number of carries he would have 943 yds, so because HUD uses our backs differently than Pitrino doesn't mean they are not talented.

The Cajuns are more talented at QB, WR, interior OL, DL and CB. WKU is more talented at RB, OT, LB and Safety so this game is a toss up.

(10-13-2013 11:18 AM)TroyFootball05 Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 11:09 AM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 10:56 AM)TroyFootball05 Wrote:  Louisiana 42
Western Kentucky 21

The Cajuns seem a little more solid so far. Both teams have played poorly at times, but maybe the Cajuns have done less of that. My prediction is not based on any kind of "perceived" hatred of WKU. I know its coming so can you guys hold on to that jealously card for one more post? Louisiana, in my opinion is simply the better team at this juncture.

One question when did this "solid play" for ULL happen?

was it against the worse team in the SEC, Arkansas?
was it against the K-State team that only has one other win 1-5 Massachusetts?
Must have been against the FCS Nicholls
I got it it was the 30-35 score against the 1-5 Akron team that impressed you
ULL did look solid beating TXST....other than that when?

No jealously card just a honest question

Western has no quality wins. Scheduling is part of that. You could make an argument for Kentucky and ULM, but Kentucky is terrible, and you beat a Browning-less ULM who hasn't been good offensively even with Browning this year.

Louisiana, much of the same story, but their win over Texas State was impressive. A solid win. That's why they are "a little more solid" at this juncture. Not by much.

Don't argue with her, she swears the loss to USA doesn't matter. The Cajuns have no bad losses thus far and have won the games they were suppose to this season.

(10-13-2013 11:16 AM)LouisianaHawkFan Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 10:58 AM)TroyFootball05 Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 10:21 AM)mathenis89 Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 09:46 AM)Louisianafanrcajun90 Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 01:07 AM)TOPPERSonTOP Wrote:  Well the offensive unit thread went to pot, so here we go. I have no proof other than my gut and my gut tells me WKU wins by 10. 31-21. ULL will score an early TD, but WKU will also put up a few early. Once the two teams adjust, they will settle in with a 17-14 score. The horses will wear down ULL and find endzone 2 more times, ULL will get 1 more to make it respectable, but WKU runs out the clock. 31-21.

Did you use the ULL just to tick us off? You could have simply put Cajuns. It's going to be though to get out of Bowling Green with a win but I'm betting we do just that.

A little hypocritical of you to ask, considering most of your posts are attempts to insult or belittle other teams.

A little hypocritical of you Mathenis. You do a considerable amount of belittling yourself. So is it the pot calling the ketting calling the coffee beans black?

I am going with the home team.

Of course you are lol

(10-13-2013 12:38 PM)UL ROTC Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 12:31 PM)TroyFootball05 Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 12:16 PM)dahbeed Wrote:  national rankings:

total defense
western 30
cajuns 55
troy 115

(10-13-2013 12:28 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  There's worse defensive teams than Troy (crybaby) freaking st....

didn't think it was possible

Troy Fans: Know that if you ever disagree or share an opposing opinion of a WKU fan, a few sensitive butthurt WKU fans will get offended an act accordingly.

Have a nice day guys! :)

I know this isn't a Troy thread but what's wrong with Troy there only conference loss is to the defending SBC champions. It doesn't matter how you win as long as you do and Troy found away to win yesterday. UL or WKU or both may lose to ASU also this year. Troy also have a win over S. Alabama neither one of us can claim that until we get ours the last game of the season.

By the numbers you can't count Troy out. Only one loss. However, Troy has to shore up some defense before we have a hope of winning the remainder of SBC games. We're pretty good up front (Lead the SBC in total sacks and tackles for loss (per game), USA leads in sacks per game, Troy is 2nd in run defense), but our secondary and special teams return defense, as well as return blocking are among the worst I've ever seen.

Troy - 1st in Total Offense, 1st in Sacks, 1st in Tackles For Loss, 2nd in Rushing Defense, 2nd in Scoring Offense, 7th in Scoring Defense, 8th (last) in Passing Defense, 8th (last) in Defensive Interceptions, 8th (last) in Fumble Recoveries.

One side of the ball is worse than the other. Can you guess which? This is where I (and you should) get my stats from. Great site.

http://www.cfbstats.com/2013/conference/818/index.html

Yep. I used ull just to piss off you guys. Around here UL is Louisville. I am sorry if that upsets you, but believe it or not, nobody but you gives a rats *** about your name.

Cajuns by 3.

(10-13-2013 12:52 PM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 11:44 AM)Franko Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 09:50 AM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 09:34 AM)Rik Flair Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 09:17 AM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  Haters Zee, don't you know we will get killed by that vastly superior team we are gonna face on Tuesday? Lord knows the the WKU RBs are getting the Tony Mitchell hype. There is no doubt this will be a war, and we may not come out on top, but we will not be overmatched by the menstral clots.

Fine, I'll play along. Just copied and pasted my comment from the other thread. Please notice I called you UL. I don't think people are intentionally slighting you, it just takes a while to get used to dropping an L. Also, I have thought about it and it would be better for stAte if you lost. If we ever want to get to the NOLA bowl, we can't be tied with you in conference. Also hoping that WKU gets "Bensoned" if we have a lot of teams bowl eligible.


Can't wait to watch this battle. I would give WKU the edge just because they are the home team. WKU win over ULM on the road is the best win between the two teams. I don't know which would be better for stAte. We play UL next week so would it be better them coming in confident after a win or a little nervous after a loss.

WKU 38 - UL - 31

Actually out of all of the teams in the Belt, Texas St and y'all are the two programs who have been respectful towards the Cajuns and I know I have a ton of respect for stAte.

With all of that being said, WKU is not God's gift to the Sun Belt. My position by position breakdown was accurate and got destroyed because I stated that WKU has flaws and Allen is not as good as Harris or McGuire. Hell I'm not sure Andrews is better than Harris, he has double the carries but nearly identical stats.

Defensively WKU is better at the LB and FS/SS positions, that's it. With WKU being at home it will be a hell of a game and the Cajuns will have to play very well like they did last week to win, but this is no gimme game for WKU like some toppers fans think.

.
If Harris is as good as Andrews why doesn't Hudspeth utilize him like Petrino uses Andrews? Andrews is currently 2nd in the nation in rushing yards while Harris is 127th. Also Andrews is 1st in the nation in all purpose yards and Harris is 249th. I mean stats don't always tell the whole story but I think the assertion is way off base.
The Cajuns have the advantage at receiver position but everywhere else is either even or the Toppers have the edge. Should be another great game though and I think the Toppers win unless we have problems with Broadway making big plays on 3rd down then the Cajuns could very well come out with the W.

If Harris had the same number of carries he would have 743 yds, not too bad if you ask me. If Elijah MCGuire had the same number of carries he would have 943 yds, so because HUD uses our backs differently than Pitrino doesn't mean they are not talented.

The Cajuns are more talented at QB, WR, interior OL, DL and CB. WKU is more talented at RB, OT, LB and Safety so this game is a toss up.

What makes you think ULL is more talented at the OL? If I'm not mistaken ULL has given up more sacks than Western in less games. Western is the top offensive team in the SBC and the top rushing team...

usually that tells the tale of the OL and one other question if you are so talented at CB ...why is Western the top defensive passing team in the conference?

"He called us ULL, better go make my own thread!" Lol whatever. Toppers win and I hope we blow it open early and bring these pathetic ULL fans to their knees. If we won by 70 it would be too close for me. Cry about getting left behind, cry about your name, cry about everything. Ragin Cajuns? More like the weeping crypuss trees. Screw them all. We may not win, but I hope we do, the wailing from ULL fans will be great! Screw em!

(10-13-2013 01:12 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 12:52 PM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 11:44 AM)Franko Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 09:50 AM)geauxcajuns Wrote:  

(10-13-2013 09:34 AM)Rik Flair Wrote:  Fine, I'll play along. Just copied and pasted my comment from the other thread. Please notice I called you UL. I don't think people are intentionally slighting you, it just takes a while to get used to dropping an L. Also, I have thought about it and it would be better for stAte if you lost. If we ever want to get to the NOLA bowl, we can't be tied with you in conference. Also hoping that WKU gets "Bensoned" if we have a lot of teams bowl eligible.


Can't wait to watch this battle. I would give WKU the edge just because they are the home team. WKU win over ULM on the road is the best win between the two teams. I don't know which would be better for stAte. We play UL next week so would it be better them coming in confident after a win or a little nervous after a loss.

WKU 38 - UL - 31

Actually out of all of the teams in the Belt, Texas St and y'all are the two programs who have been respectful towards the Cajuns and I know I have a ton of respect for stAte.

With all of that being said, WKU is not God's gift to the Sun Belt. My position by position breakdown was accurate and got destroyed because I stated that WKU has flaws and Allen is not as good as Harris or McGuire. Hell I'm not sure Andrews is better than Harris, he has double the carries but nearly identical stats.

Defensively WKU is better at the LB and FS/SS positions, that's it. With WKU being at home it will be a hell of a game and the Cajuns will have to play very well like they did last week to win, but this is no gimme game for WKU like some toppers fans think.

.
If Harris is as good as Andrews why doesn't Hudspeth utilize him like Petrino uses Andrews? Andrews is currently 2nd in the nation in rushing yards while Harris is 127th. Also Andrews is 1st in the nation in all purpose yards and Harris is 249th. I mean stats don't always tell the whole story but I think the assertion is way off base.
The Cajuns have the advantage at receiver position but everywhere else is either even or the Toppers have the edge. Should be another great game though and I think the Toppers win unless we have problems with Broadway making big plays on 3rd down then the Cajuns could very well come out with the W.

If Harris had the same number of carries he would have 743 yds, not too bad if you ask me. If Elijah MCGuire had the same number of carries he would have 943 yds, so because HUD uses our backs differently than Pitrino doesn't mean they are not talented.

The Cajuns are more talented at QB, WR, interior OL, DL and CB. WKU is more talented at RB, OT, LB and Safety so this game is a toss up.

What makes you think ULL is more talented at the OL? If I'm not mistaken ULL has given up more sacks than Western in less games. Western is the top offensive team in the SBC and the top rushing team...

usually that tells the tale of the OL and one other question if you are so talented at CB ...why is Western the top defensive passing team in the conference?

Well obviously because we haven't played or beaten any real teams...

Is that Randy Savage in the picture? To me it looks like him and if so it's great a ULL fan would use the picture of a man that was confused about his own name.