BlazeN'Bham
All American
Posts: 2,997
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation: 8
I Root For: UAB
Location:
|
RE: Champlin: Humphrey ineligible for 2013
(09-27-2013 08:35 PM)FNblazer Wrote: If we would run the FN ball and play to our strengths, we won't need any more than 2 or 3 WRs, as there won't be any room on the field for more than 3.
It's funny...I felt like we should have run the ball at least 10 more times than we did...and then noticed on the box score that our stat line was very balanced. If we build a power running team and can build one half of a defense we will compete for division titles.
I completely understand what Stache is trying to do strategically...and it will work. But we need to stop having one WTF per game. I'm expecting us to punt on 3rd and 7 tomorrow.
I was thinking vandy wins the coin toss defers to the 2nd half and we kickoff to start the game anyways.
|
|
09-27-2013 08:41 PM |
|
B'ham Blazer
All American
Posts: 3,093
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 6
I Root For: UAB
Location: Birmingham, Al
|
RE: Champlin: Humphrey ineligible for 2013
(09-27-2013 08:41 PM)BlazeNBham Wrote: (09-27-2013 08:35 PM)FNblazer Wrote: If we would run the FN ball and play to our strengths, we won't need any more than 2 or 3 WRs, as there won't be any room on the field for more than 3.
It's funny...I felt like we should have run the ball at least 10 more times than we did...and then noticed on the box score that our stat line was very balanced. If we build a power running team and can build one half of a defense we will compete for division titles.
I completely understand what Stache is trying to do strategically...and it will work. But we need to stop having one WTF per game. I'm expecting us to punt on 3rd and 7 tomorrow.
I was thinking vandy wins the coin toss defers to the 2nd half and we kickoff to start the game anyways.
LOL!...........hope our coaches don't get THAT confused.
|
|
09-27-2013 09:26 PM |
|