Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Nomenclature shift: Big 5, not Power 5
Author Message
lumberpack4 Offline
Banned

Posts: 4,336
Joined: Jun 2013
I Root For: ACC
Location:
Post: #21
RE: Nomenclature shift: Big 5, not Power 5
(07-28-2013 09:12 PM)Dr. Isaly von Yinzer Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 08:51 PM)lumberpack4 Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 07:33 PM)Theodoresdaddy Wrote:  actually it's Big 4 with the ACC tagging along

Do all WVa fans have ***** envy?

It's called psycho ex-girlfriend syndrome (PEGS). The ACC rejected them, then chose their arch rivals in their place, and - like all psycho ex-girlfriends - they lost their cotton-picking minds.

Don't be fooled. That's what all of this nonsense has always been about.

You are correct. West Va was a mistake first made in 1950. They destroyed the Southern Conference in just two years by supporting VT's then president on his anti-bowl game stance. MD, Clemson, South Carolina, NC State, Wake and UVa were all so disgusted by West Va, that when UNC's represenative nominated them for the 9th spot in the ACC, the motion died for lack of a second. Even VT got 4 votes despite pissing off MD, Clemson, and Duke.
07-28-2013 09:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
cleburneslim Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,551
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 25
I Root For: jax state
Location:
Post: #22
RE: Nomenclature shift: Big 5, not Power 5
All power is ascribed.

And subservience is chosen.
07-28-2013 09:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Theodoresdaddy Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,577
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 48
I Root For: WVU; Marshall
Location: WV
Post: #23
RE: Nomenclature shift: Big 5, not Power 5
(07-28-2013 08:40 PM)Dr. Isaly von Yinzer Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 07:33 PM)Theodoresdaddy Wrote:  actually it's Big 4 with the ACC tagging along

Actually, the more this whole thing unfurls, it is pretty obvious that there is a Big 2 with the B12, P12 and ACC just hanging around. The difference is the P12 and ACC have been proven more stable than the B12 has over the years.

the Big 10 is overrated and has been for a while

it's more like the SEC and everyone else and I'm pretty damn happy that WVU is part of that everyone else
07-28-2013 09:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
FreshPrinceOfDarkness Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 420
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 29
I Root For: Texas Tech
Location:
Post: #24
RE: Nomenclature shift: Big 5, not Power 5
(07-28-2013 08:30 PM)OrangeCrush22 Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 07:33 PM)Theodoresdaddy Wrote:  actually it's Big 4 with the ACC tagging along

The Big XII has four members ripped away by three separate conferences in a mere 19 years of existence. Fans still think they're bigger, better, and more stable than the ACC. 05-stirthepot

Syracuse fans think SU is relevant. 03-lmfao
07-28-2013 09:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Theodoresdaddy Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,577
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 48
I Root For: WVU; Marshall
Location: WV
Post: #25
RE: Nomenclature shift: Big 5, not Power 5
(07-28-2013 08:51 PM)lumberpack4 Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 07:33 PM)Theodoresdaddy Wrote:  actually it's Big 4 with the ACC tagging along

Do all WVa fans have ***** envy?

as I said, we're still going to be making more money than the ACC teams

03-cloud903-cloud903-cloud9
07-28-2013 09:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Theodoresdaddy Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,577
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 48
I Root For: WVU; Marshall
Location: WV
Post: #26
RE: Nomenclature shift: Big 5, not Power 5
(07-28-2013 09:26 PM)FreshPrinceOfDarkness Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 08:30 PM)OrangeCrush22 Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 07:33 PM)Theodoresdaddy Wrote:  actually it's Big 4 with the ACC tagging along

The Big XII has four members ripped away by three separate conferences in a mere 19 years of existence. Fans still think they're bigger, better, and more stable than the ACC. 05-stirthepot

Syracuse fans think SU is relevant. 03-lmfao

I think most Syracuse fans are smarter than that

04-cheers
07-28-2013 09:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
john01992 Offline
Former ESPNer still in recovery mode

Posts: 16,277
Joined: Jul 2013
I Root For: John0 out!!!!
Location: The Worst P5 Program
Post: #27
RE: Nomenclature shift: Big 5, not Power 5
(07-28-2013 09:25 PM)lumberpack4 Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 09:12 PM)Dr. Isaly von Yinzer Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 08:51 PM)lumberpack4 Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 07:33 PM)Theodoresdaddy Wrote:  actually it's Big 4 with the ACC tagging along

Do all WVa fans have ***** envy?

It's called psycho ex-girlfriend syndrome (PEGS). The ACC rejected them, then chose their arch rivals in their place, and - like all psycho ex-girlfriends - they lost their cotton-picking minds.

Don't be fooled. That's what all of this nonsense has always been about.

You are correct. West Va was a mistake first made in 1950. They destroyed the Southern Conference in just two years by supporting VT's then president on his anti-bowl game stance. MD, Clemson, South Carolina, NC State, Wake and UVa were all so disgusted by West Va, that when UNC's represenative nominated them for the 9th spot in the ACC, the motion died for lack of a second. Even VT got 4 votes despite pissing off MD, Clemson, and Duke.

ive never heard this story before but would like to hear more about it
07-28-2013 09:39 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Chris02M Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,017
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 15
I Root For: syracuse
Location:
Post: #28
RE: Nomenclature shift: Big 5, not Power 5
(07-28-2013 09:28 PM)Theodoresdaddy Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 09:26 PM)FreshPrinceOfDarkness Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 08:30 PM)OrangeCrush22 Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 07:33 PM)Theodoresdaddy Wrote:  actually it's Big 4 with the ACC tagging along

The Big XII has four members ripped away by three separate conferences in a mere 19 years of existence. Fans still think they're bigger, better, and more stable than the ACC. 05-stirthepot

Syracuse fans think SU is relevant. 03-lmfao

I think most Syracuse fans are smarter than that

04-cheers

we also have your number in football
07-28-2013 09:39 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
john01992 Offline
Former ESPNer still in recovery mode

Posts: 16,277
Joined: Jul 2013
I Root For: John0 out!!!!
Location: The Worst P5 Program
Post: #29
RE: Nomenclature shift: Big 5, not Power 5
(07-28-2013 09:28 PM)Theodoresdaddy Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 09:26 PM)FreshPrinceOfDarkness Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 08:30 PM)OrangeCrush22 Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 07:33 PM)Theodoresdaddy Wrote:  actually it's Big 4 with the ACC tagging along

The Big XII has four members ripped away by three separate conferences in a mere 19 years of existence. Fans still think they're bigger, better, and more stable than the ACC. 05-stirthepot

Syracuse fans think SU is relevant. 03-lmfao

I think most Syracuse fans are smarter than that

04-cheers

nothing funnier than a texas tech fan calling out cuse for not being relevant and a wvu fan chiming in.......
07-28-2013 09:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
nzmorange Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,000
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 279
I Root For: UAB
Location:
Post: #30
RE: Nomenclature shift: Big 5, not Power 5
(07-28-2013 09:39 PM)Chris02M Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 09:28 PM)Theodoresdaddy Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 09:26 PM)FreshPrinceOfDarkness Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 08:30 PM)OrangeCrush22 Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 07:33 PM)Theodoresdaddy Wrote:  actually it's Big 4 with the ACC tagging along

The Big XII has four members ripped away by three separate conferences in a mere 19 years of existence. Fans still think they're bigger, better, and more stable than the ACC. 05-stirthepot

Syracuse fans think SU is relevant. 03-lmfao

I think most Syracuse fans are smarter than that

04-cheers

we also have your number in football

I know. A team with a losing record against Syracuse that's lost the last 3x played (last 3 years) is talking smack [rolls eyes]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syracuse%E2...ll_rivalry

There's a lot of orange on that graph. If we're irrelevant I'd hate to think what the fine folks down in Morgantown are.

Smack coming from a TTech fan is also pretty rich. When's the last time they mattered, even in their own state?
07-28-2013 09:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
john01992 Offline
Former ESPNer still in recovery mode

Posts: 16,277
Joined: Jul 2013
I Root For: John0 out!!!!
Location: The Worst P5 Program
Post: #31
RE: Nomenclature shift: Big 5, not Power 5
(07-28-2013 09:46 PM)nzmorange Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 09:39 PM)Chris02M Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 09:28 PM)Theodoresdaddy Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 09:26 PM)FreshPrinceOfDarkness Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 08:30 PM)OrangeCrush22 Wrote:  The Big XII has four members ripped away by three separate conferences in a mere 19 years of existence. Fans still think they're bigger, better, and more stable than the ACC. 05-stirthepot

Syracuse fans think SU is relevant. 03-lmfao

I think most Syracuse fans are smarter than that

04-cheers

we also have your number in football

I know. A team with a losing record against Syracuse that's lost the last 3x played (last 3 years) is talking smack [rolls eyes]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syracuse%E2...ll_rivalry

There's a lot of orange on that graph. If we're irrelevant I'd hate to think what the fine folks down in Morgantown are.

Smack coming from a TTech fan is also pretty rich. When's the last time they mattered, even in their own state?

even after they leave the big east to escape us we still manage to beat them.......
07-28-2013 09:49 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
OrangeCrush22 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,426
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 267
I Root For: Syracuse
Location:
Post: #32
RE: Nomenclature shift: Big 5, not Power 5
(07-28-2013 09:39 PM)Chris02M Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 09:28 PM)Theodoresdaddy Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 09:26 PM)FreshPrinceOfDarkness Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 08:30 PM)OrangeCrush22 Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 07:33 PM)Theodoresdaddy Wrote:  actually it's Big 4 with the ACC tagging along

The Big XII has four members ripped away by three separate conferences in a mere 19 years of existence. Fans still think they're bigger, better, and more stable than the ACC. 05-stirthepot

Syracuse fans think SU is relevant. 03-lmfao

I think most Syracuse fans are smarter than that

04-cheers

we also have your number in football
Syracuse leads all time series 33-27.

Last three meetings.
2010 - 19-14
2011 - 49-23
2012 - 38-14

05-stirthepot
07-28-2013 10:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
lumberpack4 Offline
Banned

Posts: 4,336
Joined: Jun 2013
I Root For: ACC
Location:
Post: #33
RE: Nomenclature shift: Big 5, not Power 5
(07-28-2013 09:39 PM)john01992 Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 09:25 PM)lumberpack4 Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 09:12 PM)Dr. Isaly von Yinzer Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 08:51 PM)lumberpack4 Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 07:33 PM)Theodoresdaddy Wrote:  actually it's Big 4 with the ACC tagging along

Do all WVa fans have ***** envy?

It's called psycho ex-girlfriend syndrome (PEGS). The ACC rejected them, then chose their arch rivals in their place, and - like all psycho ex-girlfriends - they lost their cotton-picking minds.

Don't be fooled. That's what all of this nonsense has always been about.

You are correct. West Va was a mistake first made in 1950. They destroyed the Southern Conference in just two years by supporting VT's then president on his anti-bowl game stance. MD, Clemson, South Carolina, NC State, Wake and UVa were all so disgusted by West Va, that when UNC's represenative nominated them for the 9th spot in the ACC, the motion died for lack of a second. Even VT got 4 votes despite pissing off MD, Clemson, and Duke.

ive never heard this story before but would like to hear more about it

The ACC and SEC are both children of the mother conference the Southern Conference. It formed in 1921 and by 1933 had grown way too big (23 schools). Tulane, Bama, Georiga, Florida, GT, Sewanee, Tennessee, Ole Miss, Mississippii State, Kentucky, Auburn, Vandy and LSU pulled out in 1933, leaving NC State, UNC, Clemson, Duke, South Carolina, Maryland, UVa, VT, Washington and Lee and VMI. In 1937 the SoCon started up again with adding schools after UVa left - fed up with UNC's cheating (it's in their minutes), adding Wake Forest at the behest of NC State, UNC, and Duke (at the time WF was near Raleigh). Then William and Mary and a few others were added.

(Lots of folks forget that Tulane, Sewanee, and GT were SEC members and that the SEC had shrunk to ten by 1964)

Everything was fine in the SoCon - Duke, Clemson, Maryland and even UNC were regulars in the Rose, Sugar, Cotton, and Orange Bowls. The SoCon had a tie to the Orange Bowl and NC State had build the largest basketball arena in the South - Reynolds Colesium.

Then in 1950 someone got the bright idea to add West Va. and all hell broke loose. (It was VT's and VMI's idea)

VT's president was the defacto SoCon President at the time and wanted to ban post season bowls (remember this is at a time that MD is the number one team in the nation and Duke has been to 2 Rose, 2 Orange and 1 Cotton Bowls over prior dozen or so years).

It was West Virginia's addition that gave VT's president the mathematical majority to push through the change and West Virginia supported the change to stick it to MD.

Maryland responded by meeting with Duke, Clemson, and SC and they formed the ACC, bringing along NC State and UNC and bringing WF, at NC State and UNC's behest. It was already decided that UVa would be invited and they were the first "expansion". These 8 then meet in Greensboro in late 1953 regarding rules, etc.

UNC proposed forgiving VT since VT had been a conference mate of UNC and NC State since the 19th Century - the motion died 4-4 with UVa essentially casting the deciding vote against VT. Duke, MD, and Clemson were still mad at VT. UNC, Wake, NC State and South Carolina were willing to forgive.

Then UNC turned around and proposed West Va. The motion died for lack of a second and the rest of the represenatives were so mad that the session ended (Bill Brill a UVa grad and now dead sports writer has written all about this).

The league learned to live without VT and then in 1962 Duke had a change of heart about football, did not want to recruit a certain kind of kid and pushed through the 800 minimum SAT rule that kept most all blacks and as well as dumb white kids out of the ACC a decade.

It set ACC football back 20 years. In 1962 Duke went to the Cotton Bowl, and an ACC team would not go to a major bowl again for 15 years and the ACC would not be truly competitive at the national level again for 20 years (Clemson-1982).

This is the history of the SoCon/ACC. Almost all of the SoCon time is forgotten which is due primarily to UNC not wanting those record to count. The Big 12 and PAC 12 by contrast keep their old records even under different conference names.

The ACC is far older than the 1953 date indicates. For all practical purposes the ACC's formation date is really 1933 - when the SEC schools left the Southern Conference - as such when you wonder why the ACC does things a certain way - you need to go back to the SoCon and that will answer EVERY question.
(This post was last modified: 07-28-2013 10:10 PM by lumberpack4.)
07-28-2013 10:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
john01992 Offline
Former ESPNer still in recovery mode

Posts: 16,277
Joined: Jul 2013
I Root For: John0 out!!!!
Location: The Worst P5 Program
Post: #34
RE: Nomenclature shift: Big 5, not Power 5
ok but why did vtech/wvu want a post season bowl ban?
07-28-2013 10:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
lumberpack4 Offline
Banned

Posts: 4,336
Joined: Jun 2013
I Root For: ACC
Location:
Post: #35
RE: Nomenclature shift: Big 5, not Power 5
(07-28-2013 10:07 PM)john01992 Wrote:  ok but why did vtech/wvu want a post season bowl ban?

VT's president was an academic first and not a sports fan. He thought football was bull **** for a real university and that bowl games took advantage of the players and cheapened the Ivory Tower. He also had seen how William and Mary was willing to prostitute itself to win and it was a real issue within State of Virginia politics as at the time, VT, W&M and UVa were the only public, white institutions (remember Jim Crow lasts until the late 60's in Va).

He also was rumored to hate Jim Tatum - MD's football coach - and former coach at Oklahoma who was known to be crooked as hell. At least, that's what old hands at VT will reveal.

President Newman meant well. http://www.president.vt.edu/presidents/p...tml#newman
(This post was last modified: 07-28-2013 10:18 PM by lumberpack4.)
07-28-2013 10:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
john01992 Offline
Former ESPNer still in recovery mode

Posts: 16,277
Joined: Jul 2013
I Root For: John0 out!!!!
Location: The Worst P5 Program
Post: #36
RE: Nomenclature shift: Big 5, not Power 5
ok now things make sense
07-28-2013 11:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jml2010 Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,282
Joined: Jan 2011
I Root For: Tx Tech & UNT
Location: Oklahoma
Post: #37
RE: Nomenclature shift: Big 5, not Power 5
(07-28-2013 09:46 PM)nzmorange Wrote:  Smack coming from a TTech fan is also pretty rich. When's the last time they mattered, even in their own state?

Ask Texas in 2002 & 2008. Ask Texas A&M from 1960-2008. Ask Oklahoma in 2005, 2007,2009 & 2011.

The 29th largest football fan base in America will not be ignored or denied. The rest is pure jealously because you live in a state where no one cares about you. Have fun playing the AAC champ in the who cares bowl. Meanwhile the power 4 conferences will play in the Rose and Sugar and our champs will play for a MNC. Florida St and Clemson will come begging when they realize they were hung out to dry by the BBall schools.
07-28-2013 11:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Underdog Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,747
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation: 124
I Root For: The American
Location: Cloud Nine
Post: #38
RE: Nomenclature shift: Big 5, not Power 5
(07-28-2013 08:30 PM)OrangeCrush22 Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 07:33 PM)Theodoresdaddy Wrote:  actually it's Big 4 with the ACC tagging along

The Big XII has four members ripped away by three separate conferences in a mere 19 years of existence. Fans still think they're bigger, better, and more stable than the ACC. 05-stirthepot

It should have been six.... The PAC was foolish to turn down OU and OSU.
(This post was last modified: 07-29-2013 03:42 AM by Underdog.)
07-29-2013 03:40 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Maize Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,352
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 558
I Root For: Athletes First
Location:
Post: #39
RE: Nomenclature shift: Big 5, not Power 5
(07-28-2013 07:40 PM)nzmorange Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 07:33 PM)Theodoresdaddy Wrote:  actually it's Big 4 with the ACC tagging along

*Along with the rest of the Big XII not named "Texas" 05-stirthepot

Just "Some" in the Big XII overcompensating...03-shhhh03-lmfao03-shhhh
07-29-2013 08:17 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Maize Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,352
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 558
I Root For: Athletes First
Location:
Post: #40
RE: Nomenclature shift: Big 5, not Power 5
(07-29-2013 03:40 AM)Underdog Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 08:30 PM)OrangeCrush22 Wrote:  
(07-28-2013 07:33 PM)Theodoresdaddy Wrote:  actually it's Big 4 with the ACC tagging along

The Big XII has four members ripped away by three separate conferences in a mere 19 years of existence. Fans still think they're bigger, better, and more stable than the ACC. 05-stirthepot

It should have been six.... The PAC was foolish to turn down OU and OSU.

True...people forget that the Pac 12 turned those two down...nothing wrong with the Big XII just find it odd that some out of Morgantown have this "Thing" with the ACC...I thought they are/were happy in the Big XII...just saying...07-coffee3
07-29-2013 08:25 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.