Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
ND to ACC worth $1 million/school
Author Message
nzmorange Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,000
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 279
I Root For: UAB
Location:
Post: #61
RE: ND to ACC worth $1 million/school
(04-15-2013 08:04 AM)Rich52c Wrote:  
(04-15-2013 06:53 AM)nzmorange Wrote:  
(04-15-2013 06:21 AM)Rich52c Wrote:  
(04-14-2013 09:24 PM)Chris02M Wrote:  
(04-14-2013 09:18 PM)Rich52c Wrote:  I would agree that WVU would rather be in the ACC than the B12.
However,the idea that PSU wanted Pitt in the b10 is incorrect.
Also the b10 wants AAU schools and syracuse is not an aau member.

Nebraska isn't aau and they got in so there are exceptions but Syracuse is much happier in acc then bigten anyday
Nebraska lost its AAU membership after entering the B10
I am glad syracuse likes the ACC It likes to be where a large part of the ACC schools are none publics(BC,ND,Syracuse,Miami,Duke,Wake Forest)Its league where the direct path to the national championship does not pay as much as the top 4 leagues (SEC,B12,B10 and SEC).

You do realize that the ACC, SEC, B1G, Big XII, and Pac-12 all get the same payout for winning a NC, right?

The lower Orange Bowl payout, which I think is what you're trying to reference, doesn't affect the ACC's payout when the ACC sends a team to the "Football Four" and beyond.

"The BCS recently signed a 12-year contract with ESPN. The deal averages $470 million annually, sources said. Of that amount, about $125 million is expected to go toward expenses, including an academic reward component, game participation, team expenses, allotment to Football Championship Subdivision conferences and other items.

It leaves an average of $345 million annually, which the commissioners have decided to split in two ways: 75 percent ($258.75 million) divided equally among the SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and ACC, and the remaining 25 percent ($86.25 million) divided among the Big East, MWC, MAC, C-USA and Sun Belt.
"
http://espn.go.com/college-football/stor...ources-say

"In addition to the annual revenue split, conferences will receive $6 million per team participating in the semifinals, and $4 million per team participating in the so-called "host" bowls, the person said. Notre Dame will receive the same amount if it reaches the playoffs or plays in a "host" bowl. There's no additional payout for advancing to the championship game."
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nca...s/1762709/

*As for PSU not wanting SU, I can't find the exact article, but these two give the general idea:
http://www.pennlive.com/pennstatefootbal...was_d.html
http://www.pennlive.com/pennstatefootbal...e_ora.html

*As for the B1G being the AAU club, you do know that Michigan and Wisconsin (?) lead the charge against revoking Nebraska's membership. If the B1G cared THAT much, why would multiple B1G schools voted to strip Nebraska of its membership after Nebraska joined the B1G? Anyway, this entire AAU-only talk is stupid. There is a standing invitation for Notre Dame and ND isn't AAU.

I get that you're a UCONN fan and hate Syracuse and the ACC, but there isn't a shortage of honest ways to trash the ACC and/or Syracuse. Use one of them. There's no need to continually make things up and spread rumors that originated with "the dude." It isn't making you look good, and it isn't making UCONN look good.
Being an AAU school is hardly stupid.
ND does its own thing and its likelihood of joining the B10 is small.
It is not made up that the magnitude of the payoff for the national championship of the ACC is smaller than the payoff for the big 12,B10,SEC or PAC12.Also it also true that 6 out of 15 schools in the ACC are non public.
*Nobody said that being AAU was stupid, and before your last post, you never said it wasn't. In otherwords, you statement that "[b]eing an AAU school is hardly stupid" is out of left field.
*It is completely made up that "the magnitude of the payoff for the national championship [sic] of [sic] the ACC is smaller than the payoff for the big 12,[sic]B10,[sic]SEC [sic] or PAC12." Revnue will be split equally and the teams that appear in the "Football Four" games will earn the say payout for their conference, regardless of their conference affiliation. The ACC won't even split it more ways than the SEC or the B1G, because ND will not participate in the ACC's distribution of that money.
*I do not see the relevance to your statement that "...it also true that 6 out of 15 schools in the ACC are non public." However, that depends on your definition of "public." By some definitions of "public," Pitt is public, but Pitt is merely state-related by other definitions.
04-15-2013 11:34 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rich52c Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 848
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 8
I Root For: Uconn
Location:
Post: #62
RE: ND to ACC worth $1 million/school
(04-15-2013 11:34 AM)nzmorange Wrote:  
(04-15-2013 08:04 AM)Rich52c Wrote:  
(04-15-2013 06:53 AM)nzmorange Wrote:  
(04-15-2013 06:21 AM)Rich52c Wrote:  
(04-14-2013 09:24 PM)Chris02M Wrote:  Nebraska isn't aau and they got in so there are exceptions but Syracuse is much happier in acc then bigten anyday
Nebraska lost its AAU membership after entering the B10
I am glad syracuse likes the ACC It likes to be where a large part of the ACC schools are none publics(BC,ND,Syracuse,Miami,Duke,Wake Forest)Its league where the direct path to the national championship does not pay as much as the top 4 leagues (SEC,B12,B10 and SEC).

You do realize that the ACC, SEC, B1G, Big XII, and Pac-12 all get the same payout for winning a NC, right?

The lower Orange Bowl payout, which I think is what you're trying to reference, doesn't affect the ACC's payout when the ACC sends a team to the "Football Four" and beyond.

"The BCS recently signed a 12-year contract with ESPN. The deal averages $470 million annually, sources said. Of that amount, about $125 million is expected to go toward expenses, including an academic reward component, game participation, team expenses, allotment to Football Championship Subdivision conferences and other items.

It leaves an average of $345 million annually, which the commissioners have decided to split in two ways: 75 percent ($258.75 million) divided equally among the SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and ACC, and the remaining 25 percent ($86.25 million) divided among the Big East, MWC, MAC, C-USA and Sun Belt.
"
http://espn.go.com/college-football/stor...ources-say

"In addition to the annual revenue split, conferences will receive $6 million per team participating in the semifinals, and $4 million per team participating in the so-called "host" bowls, the person said. Notre Dame will receive the same amount if it reaches the playoffs or plays in a "host" bowl. There's no additional payout for advancing to the championship game."
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nca...s/1762709/

*As for PSU not wanting SU, I can't find the exact article, but these two give the general idea:
http://www.pennlive.com/pennstatefootbal...was_d.html
http://www.pennlive.com/pennstatefootbal...e_ora.html

*As for the B1G being the AAU club, you do know that Michigan and Wisconsin (?) lead the charge against revoking Nebraska's membership. If the B1G cared THAT much, why would multiple B1G schools voted to strip Nebraska of its membership after Nebraska joined the B1G? Anyway, this entire AAU-only talk is stupid. There is a standing invitation for Notre Dame and ND isn't AAU.

I get that you're a UCONN fan and hate Syracuse and the ACC, but there isn't a shortage of honest ways to trash the ACC and/or Syracuse. Use one of them. There's no need to continually make things up and spread rumors that originated with "the dude." It isn't making you look good, and it isn't making UCONN look good.
Being an AAU school is hardly stupid.
ND does its own thing and its likelihood of joining the B10 is small.
It is not made up that the magnitude of the payoff for the national championship of the ACC is smaller than the payoff for the big 12,B10,SEC or PAC12.Also it also true that 6 out of 15 schools in the ACC are non public.
*Nobody said that being AAU was stupid, and before your last post, you never said it wasn't. In otherwords, you statement that "[b]eing an AAU school is hardly stupid" is out of left field.
*It is completely made up that "the magnitude of the payoff for the national championship [sic] of [sic] the ACC is smaller than the payoff for the big 12,[sic]B10,[sic]SEC [sic] or PAC12." Revnue will be split equally and the teams that appear in the "Football Four" games will earn the say payout for their conference, regardless of their conference affiliation. The ACC won't even split it more ways than the SEC or the B1G, because ND will not participate in the ACC's distribution of that money.
*I do not see the relevance to your statement that "...it also true that 6 out of 15 schools in the ACC are non public." However, that depends on your definition of "public." By some definitions of "public," Pitt is public, but Pitt is merely state-related by other definitions.

The number of non-public schools in the PAC 12 is 2 out of 12
The number of non-public schools in the BIG 12 is 2 out of 10
The number of non-public schools in the BIG 10 is 1 out of 14
The number of non-public schools in the SEC is 1 out of 14
The number of non-public schools in the ACC is 6 out of 15

The number of non-public schools in all 5 National championship is 12
and 50% of them are inthe ACC.Thus the nature of the ACC in terms of public and non-public is very different.The size of the stadiums for 3 ACC schools is much smaller than the average of the 65 schools currently in the national playoff.

Also the playoff for the national championship has the B10 vs the PAC 10,champions facing each other.Also the SEC champion plays the B12 champion.The ACC plays a #2 school from one of the 4 leagues(SEC,PAC 12,B10,B12)I think it is set up to play the B12#2.

You also said AAU talk is stupid,I disagree.
(This post was last modified: 04-15-2013 12:20 PM by Rich52c.)
04-15-2013 12:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
nzmorange Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,000
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 279
I Root For: UAB
Location:
Post: #63
RE: ND to ACC worth $1 million/school
(04-15-2013 12:18 PM)Rich52c Wrote:  
(04-15-2013 11:34 AM)nzmorange Wrote:  *Nobody said that being AAU was stupid, and before your last post, you never said it wasn't. In otherwords, you statement that "[b]eing an AAU school is hardly stupid" is out of left field.
*It is completely made up that "the magnitude of the payoff for the national championship [sic] of [sic] the ACC is smaller than the payoff for the big 12,[sic]B10,[sic]SEC [sic] or PAC12." Revnue will be split equally and the teams that appear in the "Football Four" games will earn the say payout for their conference, regardless of their conference affiliation. The ACC won't even split it more ways than the SEC or the B1G, because ND will not participate in the ACC's distribution of that money.
*I do not see the relevance to your statement that "...it also true that 6 out of 15 schools in the ACC are non public." However, that depends on your definition of "public." By some definitions of "public," Pitt is public, but Pitt is merely state-related by other definitions.

The number of non-public schools in the PAC 12 is 2 out of 12
The number of non-public schools in the BIG 12 is 2 out of 10
The number of non-public schools in the BIG 10 is 1 out of 14
The number of non-public schools in the SEC is 1 out of 14
The number of non-public schools in the ACC is 6 out of 15

The number of non-public schools in all 5 National championship is 12
and 50% of them are inthe ACC.Thus the nature of the ACC in terms of public and non-public is very different.The size of the stadiums for 3 ACC schools is much smaller than the average of the 65 schools currently in the national playoff.

Also the playoff for the national championship has the B10 vs the PAC 10,champions facing each other.Also the SEC champion plays the B12 champion.The ACC plays a #2 school from one of the 4 leagues(SEC,PAC 12,B10,B12)I think it is set up to play the B12#2.

You also said AAU talk is stupid,I disagree.
* What did I say that caused you to feel the need to lecture me about the number of private universities who participate in G5 conferences? How was any of that relevant to anything that I said?

Anyway, to respond to what you wrote: you can cherry pick 3 schools from any conference that have substantially smaller than average stadiums. For example, look at the stadium sized of Vanderbilt, 'Ole Miss (guess), and Mississippi State. Heck, throw in UK while you're at it, and I bet that they all have below average stadiums, and they're in the SEC.

* And no, the playoff for the national championship does not involve any predesignated matchups based on conference affiliation. Four teams will be chosen and they will presumably be matched up based on their selection order. Each school will be awarded $6,000,000 for appearing in the playoff and that money will be surrenderred to that school's conference, provided that the school's football team is a member of a conference. A school's conference affiliation does not change the payout. The money leftover after administrative costs and team payouts will then be distributed amongst G5 conferences, g5 conferences, and indies. The G5 will split their cut equally. The ACC will get the same cut as the Big XII, the SEC, the Pac-12, and the BIG TEN. The ACC will then split the money equally amongst its members, excluding ND, just like every other conference. That means that the payout for each and every ACC school, excluding ND, will be the same as every SEC school and every B1G school.

When you talk about the ACC getting a reduced payout, you're thinking of the ACC's top bowl when compared to the top bowl of the other conferences. Although the bowls are slated to host a "Football Four" playoff game once every 3 years, and the owners of the bowl get to keep the TV rights to that game, the ACC's participation in the Orange Bowl is not part of the national championship playoff, unless an ACC team happens to get selected in as a Football Four team while the Orange Bowl is hosting, and the ACC team happens to get selected for that location. However, in such a situation, the ACC's payout for participating in that game will not be any different than the payout would have been for any other conference.

Also, unless the current contracts are modified, the ACC will never face a Big XII team in the Orange Bowl, unless it during the Football Four playoff. Football Four playoff games aside, the ACC will always face a B1G team, a SEC team, or Notre Dame.

*Now you're changing what you wrote. You wrote "[b]eing an AAU school is hardly stupid." There is a substantial difference between a school's membership in an academic organization, and a fan thinking that membership in said organization is a prereq for admission to an athletic conference. However, in a previous post, I did say something to the effect that "AAU talk is stupid [when it involves advocating a belief that AAU membership is a prereq to joining an athletic conference]," and I stand by my statement. There is no real evidence to the contrary, and there is a substantial amount of evidence supporting my claim. I do think that, all other factors being equal, the B1G would rather admit a school with AAU membership, but it is clearly not a prereq.

EDIT:

Anyway, this conversation is becoming silly. I think I'm going to end it here. You're on your own after this message.
(This post was last modified: 04-15-2013 01:03 PM by nzmorange.)
04-15-2013 12:54 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Chris02M Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,017
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 15
I Root For: syracuse
Location:
Post: #64
RE: ND to ACC worth $1 million/school
(04-15-2013 06:21 AM)Rich52c Wrote:  
(04-14-2013 09:24 PM)Chris02M Wrote:  
(04-14-2013 09:18 PM)Rich52c Wrote:  
(04-14-2013 08:33 PM)JMUDuke25 Wrote:  
(04-14-2013 11:08 AM)Rich52c Wrote:  Is FSU,Clemson and Ga Tech thrilled by the arrival of ND in the ACC?
I think not.

Right. They were all begging to go in Storrs in front of 6,000 people. Who would want to be associated with Notre Dame when they could have UConn?

I would agree that WVU would rather be in the ACC than the B12.
However,the idea that PSU wanted Pitt in the b10 is incorrect.
Also the b10 wants AAU schools and syracuse is not an aau member.

Nebraska isn't aau and they got in so there are exceptions but Syracuse is much happier in acc then bigten anyday
Nebraska lost its AAU membership after entering the B10
I am glad syracuse likes the ACC It likes to be where a large part of the ACC schools are none publics(BC,ND,Syracuse,Miami,Duke,Wake Forest)Its league where the direct path to the national championship does not pay as much as the top 4 leagues (SEC,B12,B10 and SEC).

sec is so good its listed twice? and the acc is right in the same ballpark as pac 12 and big 12
04-15-2013 01:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
XLance Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,436
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation: 794
I Root For: Carolina
Location: Greensboro, NC
Post: #65
RE: ND to ACC worth $1 million/school
(04-14-2013 11:08 AM)Rich52c Wrote:  
(04-14-2013 09:11 AM)TerryD Wrote:  
(04-14-2013 06:06 AM)Vewb1 Wrote:  Guys, it's a done deal. Notre Dame will most likely get the top bowl slot for the ACC every year. At that point, any revenue Notre Dame makes on that top bowl, is their money. Cincinnati also made 2 million in BCS bowl appearences in the Big East in 2009 because it had to share the other 15 million with the football league. That was not the top bowl either, but one of the five BCS games. That's why Notre Dame only made 2 million this year. They would have made 23 million on that game if they had been a member of the ACC. Other ACC schools will get nothing. I agree that having Notre Dame and appearing with Notre Dame on TV and with Notre Dame at ones stadium will help the cause for all ACC teams, but Notre Dame joined the ACC to get the most bang out of their situation and to help Notre Dame. Notre Dame is not in the ACC to help the ACC and it's membership. Period. That's also why Notre Dame is not in the BIG. BIG would not give them a nickel more than other teams and they would be playing on an even field with everyone else. Most likely the schedule also was not what Notre Dame wanted. Notre Dame wanted more possibilities with non conference teams and rivals. That was the second reason Notre Dame did not go with BIG.


You are seriously misinfomed.


http://csnbbs.com/showthread.php?tid=628863&page=8

Is FSU,Clemson and Ga Tech thrilled by the arrival of ND in the ACC?
I think not.

As a Carolina fan, I am thrilled that Notre Dame is joining the ACC. I can not understand why you think that fans of FSU, Clemson, or Georgia Tech wouldn't be excited too.
04-15-2013 04:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WakeForestRanger Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,740
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 92
I Root For: Wake Forest
Location:
Post: #66
RE: ND to ACC worth $1 million/school
The president of Clemson along with Wake's president were the ones responsible for putting the deal together that added Notre Dame to the ACC.
04-15-2013 11:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rich52c Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 848
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 8
I Root For: Uconn
Location:
Post: #67
RE: ND to ACC worth $1 million/school
(04-15-2013 11:33 PM)WakeForestRanger Wrote:  The president of Clemson along with Wake's president were the ones responsible for putting the deal together that added Notre Dame to the ACC.

The B10 ,SEC,B12 may offer better choices for many of the ACC schools.

Hoping this will go away is certainly one set of solutions.

ACC AAU schools such as UNC,UVA and GA Tech have places to go other than stay in the ACC.The UNC AD is now speaking of gaining a 40% increase in revenue.

FSU,Clemson,Miami,NC St and VA TECH have other places to go to increase their revenue stream.FSU was not in favor of the ACC having a 50 million buyout for leaving.
FSU seems to be talking with the B10 about membership in the B10.The B12 could moving to take in 2 Florida schools at the the suggestion of fox.The ACC increased their membership by taking BE schools such VA TECH,Miami,bc,Syracuse,Pitt and ND,it should be no sprise that other conferences are trying the same to the ACC.
04-16-2013 06:36 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
XLance Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,436
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation: 794
I Root For: Carolina
Location: Greensboro, NC
Post: #68
RE: ND to ACC worth $1 million/school
(04-16-2013 06:36 AM)Rich52c Wrote:  
(04-15-2013 11:33 PM)WakeForestRanger Wrote:  The president of Clemson along with Wake's president were the ones responsible for putting the deal together that added Notre Dame to the ACC.

The B10 ,SEC,B12 may offer better choices for many of the ACC schools.

Hoping this will go away is certainly one set of solutions.

ACC AAU schools such as UNC,UVA and GA Tech have places to go other than stay in the ACC.The UNC AD is now speaking of gaining a 40% increase in revenue.

FSU,Clemson,Miami,NC St and VA TECH have other places to go to increase their revenue stream.FSU was not in favor of the ACC having a 50 million buyout for leaving.
FSU seems to be talking with the B10 about membership in the B10.The B12 could moving to take in 2 Florida schools at the the suggestion of fox.The ACC increased their membership by taking BE schools such VA TECH,Miami,bc,Syracuse,Pitt and ND,it should be no sprise that other conferences are trying the same to the ACC.

03-lmfao03-lmfao03-lmfao03-lmfao03-lmfao
04-16-2013 07:51 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TexanMark Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 25,725
Joined: Jul 2003
Reputation: 1334
I Root For: Syracuse
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Post: #69
RE: ND to ACC worth $1 million/school
(04-15-2013 04:25 PM)XLance Wrote:  
(04-14-2013 11:08 AM)Rich52c Wrote:  
(04-14-2013 09:11 AM)TerryD Wrote:  
(04-14-2013 06:06 AM)Vewb1 Wrote:  Guys, it's a done deal. Notre Dame will most likely get the top bowl slot for the ACC every year. At that point, any revenue Notre Dame makes on that top bowl, is their money. Cincinnati also made 2 million in BCS bowl appearences in the Big East in 2009 because it had to share the other 15 million with the football league. That was not the top bowl either, but one of the five BCS games. That's why Notre Dame only made 2 million this year. They would have made 23 million on that game if they had been a member of the ACC. Other ACC schools will get nothing. I agree that having Notre Dame and appearing with Notre Dame on TV and with Notre Dame at ones stadium will help the cause for all ACC teams, but Notre Dame joined the ACC to get the most bang out of their situation and to help Notre Dame. Notre Dame is not in the ACC to help the ACC and it's membership. Period. That's also why Notre Dame is not in the BIG. BIG would not give them a nickel more than other teams and they would be playing on an even field with everyone else. Most likely the schedule also was not what Notre Dame wanted. Notre Dame wanted more possibilities with non conference teams and rivals. That was the second reason Notre Dame did not go with BIG.


You are seriously misinfomed.


http://csnbbs.com/showthread.php?tid=628863&page=8

Is FSU,Clemson and Ga Tech thrilled by the arrival of ND in the ACC?
I think not.

As a Carolina fan, I am thrilled that Notre Dame is joining the ACC. I can not understand why you think that fans of FSU, Clemson, or Georgia Tech wouldn't be excited too.

I'd rather have Notre Dame for 5 ACC games a year than 0. Pretty sure all 14 schools feel the same way.

Are UConn fans cousins to WV fans? They seem to have it all figured out.
(This post was last modified: 04-16-2013 08:00 AM by TexanMark.)
04-16-2013 07:58 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rich52c Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 848
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 8
I Root For: Uconn
Location:
Post: #70
RE: ND to ACC worth $1 million/school
(04-16-2013 07:58 AM)TexanMark Wrote:  
(04-15-2013 04:25 PM)XLance Wrote:  
(04-14-2013 11:08 AM)Rich52c Wrote:  
(04-14-2013 09:11 AM)TerryD Wrote:  
(04-14-2013 06:06 AM)Vewb1 Wrote:  Guys, it's a done deal. Notre Dame will most likely get the top bowl slot for the ACC every year. At that point, any revenue Notre Dame makes on that top bowl, is their money. Cincinnati also made 2 million in BCS bowl appearences in the Big East in 2009 because it had to share the other 15 million with the football league. That was not the top bowl either, but one of the five BCS games. That's why Notre Dame only made 2 million this year. They would have made 23 million on that game if they had been a member of the ACC. Other ACC schools will get nothing. I agree that having Notre Dame and appearing with Notre Dame on TV and with Notre Dame at ones stadium will help the cause for all ACC teams, but Notre Dame joined the ACC to get the most bang out of their situation and to help Notre Dame. Notre Dame is not in the ACC to help the ACC and it's membership. Period. That's also why Notre Dame is not in the BIG. BIG would not give them a nickel more than other teams and they would be playing on an even field with everyone else. Most likely the schedule also was not what Notre Dame wanted. Notre Dame wanted more possibilities with non conference teams and rivals. That was the second reason Notre Dame did not go with BIG.


You are seriously misinfomed.


http://csnbbs.com/showthread.php?tid=628863&page=8

Is FSU,Clemson and Ga Tech thrilled by the arrival of ND in the ACC?
I think not.

As a Carolina fan, I am thrilled that Notre Dame is joining the ACC. I can not understand why you think that fans of FSU, Clemson, or Georgia Tech wouldn't be excited too.

I'd rather have Notre Dame for 5 ACC games a year than 0. Pretty sure all 14 schools feel the same way.

Are UConn fans cousins to WV fans? They seem to have it all figured out.

Texas study this article:

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball...ans-primer
04-16-2013 10:24 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TexanMark Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 25,725
Joined: Jul 2003
Reputation: 1334
I Root For: Syracuse
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Post: #71
RE: ND to ACC worth $1 million/school
(04-16-2013 10:24 AM)Rich52c Wrote:  
(04-16-2013 07:58 AM)TexanMark Wrote:  
(04-15-2013 04:25 PM)XLance Wrote:  
(04-14-2013 11:08 AM)Rich52c Wrote:  
(04-14-2013 09:11 AM)TerryD Wrote:  You are seriously misinfomed.


http://csnbbs.com/showthread.php?tid=628863&page=8

Is FSU,Clemson and Ga Tech thrilled by the arrival of ND in the ACC?
I think not.

As a Carolina fan, I am thrilled that Notre Dame is joining the ACC. I can not understand why you think that fans of FSU, Clemson, or Georgia Tech wouldn't be excited too.

I'd rather have Notre Dame for 5 ACC games a year than 0. Pretty sure all 14 schools feel the same way.

Are UConn fans cousins to WV fans? They seem to have it all figured out.

Texas study this article:

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball...ans-primer

Thanks for the link...what I expected. The ACC is still working their network.
04-16-2013 10:43 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ecuacc4ever Offline
Resident Geek Musician
*

Posts: 7,492
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 239
I Root For: ACC
Location:

SkunkworksDonatorsPWNER of Scout/Rivals
Post: #72
RE: ND to ACC worth $1 million/school
(04-16-2013 06:36 AM)Rich52c Wrote:  
(04-15-2013 11:33 PM)WakeForestRanger Wrote:  The president of Clemson along with Wake's president were the ones responsible for putting the deal together that added Notre Dame to the ACC.

The B10 ,SEC,B12 may offer better choices for many of the ACC schools.

Hoping this will go away is certainly one set of solutions.

ACC AAU schools such as UNC,UVA and GA Tech have places to go other than stay in the ACC.The UNC AD is now speaking of gaining a 40% increase in revenue.

FSU,Clemson,Miami,NC St and VA TECH have other places to go to increase their revenue stream.FSU was not in favor of the ACC having a 50 million buyout for leaving.
FSU seems to be talking with the B10 about membership in the B10.The B12 could moving to take in 2 Florida schools at the the suggestion of fox.The ACC increased their membership by taking BE schools such VA TECH,Miami,bc,Syracuse,Pitt and ND,it should be no sprise that other conferences are trying the same to the ACC.

Where to start...?

Sounds like a plea by a UConn fan to have one of the ACC members leave in hopes that the ACC would, by some magical force, invite UConn as a replacement.

UNC's "40% revenue increase" sabre-rattling could also be a means to ensure it is one of the schools who gets to host ND in 2014 -- that, coupled with jacked-up ticket prices (demand), would easily cover most of that 40%.

Carolina isn't leaving the ACC. Neither is Virginia. Neither is Duke. GT very likely looked at a B1G proposition and said, "Thanks, but no thanks."

With Carolina, Virginia and Duke in place, NC State and VT are too. Wake has no where to go, so it HAS to work with schools like Clemson to secure ND's membership. Clemson, unlike Maryland, is a founding member with no red-ink.

Maryland's over-ambitious president pimp the school's athletic department out to the B1G -- plain and simple.

If there is any conversation with the B1G and FSU, it's one-sided, FSU talking to the B1G. FSU, despite not wanting the increased exit fee, is not leaving the ACC -- not without buddies, and Clemson's not leaving.
04-16-2013 01:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ecuacc4ever Offline
Resident Geek Musician
*

Posts: 7,492
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 239
I Root For: ACC
Location:

SkunkworksDonatorsPWNER of Scout/Rivals
Post: #73
RE: ND to ACC worth $1 million/school
(04-14-2013 02:14 PM)Rich52c Wrote:  FSU has been constantly seeking a new home in either the SEC or B10.
FSU fans have been looking. FSU administration and brass have not.

Quote:Ga Tech looks like a candidate for the B10.They constantly complain about how they are treated in the ACC.

And yet...

Quote:Also UMD took off from the ACC even with ND joining the ACC.

Maryland (and Rutgers) was the best the B1G could come up with. The poster fails to understand 1) the amount of red-ink Maryland athletics was swimming in, and 2) the level of animosity with other ACC members over a long period of time.

Maryland would have joined the "League of Distinguished Gentlemen" if they offered the same thing the B1G offered, just to get a quick fix to their "red ink" problem.

UConn is stuck.
04-16-2013 01:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Chris02M Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,017
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 15
I Root For: syracuse
Location:
Post: #74
RE: ND to ACC worth $1 million/school
unc is n't hosting nd in 2014 as nd is getting 3 home 2 away the first year and florida state and Syracuse are hosting notre dame, with Virginia tech,nc state and someone else going to south bend
04-16-2013 01:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Chris02M Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,017
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 15
I Root For: syracuse
Location:
Post: #75
RE: ND to ACC worth $1 million/school
(04-16-2013 01:23 PM)ecuacc4ever Wrote:  
(04-14-2013 02:14 PM)Rich52c Wrote:  FSU has been constantly seeking a new home in either the SEC or B10.
FSU fans have been looking. FSU administration and brass have not.

Quote:Ga Tech looks like a candidate for the B10.They constantly complain about how they are treated in the ACC.

And yet...

Quote:Also UMD took off from the ACC even with ND joining the ACC.

Maryland (and Rutgers) was the best the B1G could come up with. The poster fails to understand 1) the amount of red-ink Maryland athletics was swimming in, and 2) the level of animosity with other ACC members over a long period of time.

Maryland would have joined the "League of Distinguished Gentlemen" if they offered the same thing the B1G offered, just to get a quick fix to their "red ink" problem.

UConn is stuck.

I don't even think UConn is 1st up if someone leaves
04-16-2013 01:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ecuacc4ever Offline
Resident Geek Musician
*

Posts: 7,492
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 239
I Root For: ACC
Location:

SkunkworksDonatorsPWNER of Scout/Rivals
Post: #76
RE: ND to ACC worth $1 million/school
Noone is leaving.

JRSEC's last few posts have been pretty much on the mark about the future.
04-16-2013 01:39 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JMUDuke25 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,506
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 26
I Root For: JMU
Location:
Post: #77
RE: ND to ACC worth $1 million/school
(04-16-2013 06:36 AM)Rich52c Wrote:  
(04-15-2013 11:33 PM)WakeForestRanger Wrote:  The president of Clemson along with Wake's president were the ones responsible for putting the deal together that added Notre Dame to the ACC.

The B10 ,SEC,B12 may offer better choices for many of the ACC schools.

Hoping this will go away is certainly one set of solutions.

ACC AAU schools such as UNC,UVA and GA Tech have places to go other than stay in the ACC.The UNC AD is now speaking of gaining a 40% increase in revenue.

FSU,Clemson,Miami,NC St and VA TECH have other places to go to increase their revenue stream.FSU was not in favor of the ACC having a 50 million buyout for leaving.
FSU seems to be talking with the B10 about membership in the B10.The B12 could moving to take in 2 Florida schools at the the suggestion of fox.The ACC increased their membership by taking BE schools such VA TECH,Miami,bc,Syracuse,Pitt and ND,it should be no sprise that other conferences are trying the same to the ACC.
I know it's the dream of any UConn fan to see the ACC implode but UNC, UVA, and GT do not want to go anywhere. All the rumors surrounding them start with someone that hates the ACC as a conference.
04-16-2013 01:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rich52c Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 848
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 8
I Root For: Uconn
Location:
Post: #78
RE: ND to ACC worth $1 million/school
(04-16-2013 01:43 PM)JMUDuke25 Wrote:  
(04-16-2013 06:36 AM)Rich52c Wrote:  
(04-15-2013 11:33 PM)WakeForestRanger Wrote:  The president of Clemson along with Wake's president were the ones responsible for putting the deal together that added Notre Dame to the ACC.

The B10 ,SEC,B12 may offer better choices for many of the ACC schools.

Hoping this will go away is certainly one set of solutions.

ACC AAU schools such as UNC,UVA and GA Tech have places to go other than stay in the ACC.The UNC AD is now speaking of gaining a 40% increase in revenue.

FSU,Clemson,Miami,NC St and VA TECH have other places to go to increase their revenue stream.FSU was not in favor of the ACC having a 50 million buyout for leaving.
FSU seems to be talking with the B10 about membership in the B10.The B12 could moving to take in 2 Florida schools at the the suggestion of fox.The ACC increased their membership by taking BE schools such VA TECH,Miami,bc,Syracuse,Pitt and ND,it should be no sprise that other conferences are trying the same to the ACC.
I know it's the dream of any UConn fan to see the ACC implode but UNC, UVA, and GT do not want to go anywhere. All the rumors surrounding them start with someone that hates the ACC as a conference.
Listen to the broadcaster of GaTECH talk about getting out of the ACC .The obvious GA TECH is the B10 and their great tv package.Ga Tech is quite proud oftheir AAU status.Only UVA,Duke and UNC currently have that status.The ACC is not going to implode it will become old BE with Duke and Wake Forest,Maybe UConn ,UC ,USF and UCF.
04-16-2013 04:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
esayem Offline
Hark The Sound!
*

Posts: 16,769
Joined: Feb 2007
Reputation: 1271
I Root For: Olde Ironclad
Location: Tobacco Road
Post: #79
RE: ND to ACC worth $1 million/school
Well if AAU is of such great importance, Swoff get Tulane and Rice on the horn quickly!!
04-16-2013 04:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Marge Schott Offline
Banned

Posts: 5,989
Joined: Dec 2012
I Root For: YouAreButtHurt
Location: OnTopOfDwarfMountain
Post: #80
RE: ND to ACC worth $1 million/school
(04-16-2013 01:23 PM)ecuacc4ever Wrote:  
(04-14-2013 02:14 PM)Rich52c Wrote:  FSU has been constantly seeking a new home in either the SEC or B10.
FSU fans have been looking. FSU administration and brass have not.

You shouldn't be presenting your wishful opinion as fact.
04-16-2013 07:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.