(01-09-2013 02:23 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(01-09-2013 01:33 PM)ShockerBob Wrote:  

(01-08-2013 08:29 AM)WeatherfordMeanGreen Wrote:  

(01-08-2013 08:17 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  I don't think anyone wants to play A&M right now, but they shouldn't be the national champs with 2 losses.

With an 8 or 16 team play-off they would have eliminated 'Bama.

Texas A & M: 2013 NCAA National Champions and you dont' think the 'Bama players don't really know that deep inside? Think again.

GMG!

Highly debatable. Give Saban a month to gameplan for A&M.

Also, you completely ignore the fact Lacy was injured in that game. If he was healthy, Bama scores from the 5 in 4 tries. Bama wins.

However, I still thought the two best teams were Georgia and Oregon. Georgia had that SEC title game right in their hands. Were the better team IMO. Bama just found a way to win. Still mad Stanford beat Oregon. The Ducks were a damn good team this year. That KState game was not even competitive.

If you had A&M-Oregon-Bama-Georgia in a final 4. I think that would have been some incredible games.

A win is a win.. No matter if you have the game in hand or find a way.. That's what seperates a good team from a great team.. A good team almost wins.. A great team finds a way to bring home the win.

It's what separates Georgia from Alabama.

I asked this earlier, but nobody responded, so let me ask it again.

If Ohio State U had been eligible this season, would the BCS championship have been OSU/ND? Does anyone know OSU's BCS rank?

(01-09-2013 03:19 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  I asked this earlier, but nobody responded, so let me ask it again.

If Ohio State U had been eligible this season, would the BCS championship have been OSU/ND? Does anyone know OSU's BCS rank?

If they won the B1G title game (and with how Nebraska played, they would have), yes.

They weren't ranked in the BCS or the coaches poll (3rd in AP) due to their ineligibility. But being unbeaten in an AQ, they definitely would have been in the title game.

/thread